Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSenate Dems: "confirming (Summers) would be a huge challenge and probably a pretty ugly process.”
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/07/senate-dem-leadership-summers-fed-confirmation-fight-would-be-ugly-perhaps-impossible.phpGiven the level of opposition to Larry Summers within our caucus, confirming him would be a huge challenge and probably a pretty ugly process, a Senate Democratic leadership aide tells TPM.
More:
But even if the White House comes to the conclusion that Summers is the superior choice to replace Bernanke, theyve now been apprised that liberal anger at Summers over his controversial statements about women, and his ties to Wall Street (and the concern that Obama will miss an opportunity to break a big economic and political glass ceiling) isnt a fringe or ephemeral phenomenon.
Instead, Senate Democratic leaders have concluded that a confirmation fight over Summers would be a long, wasteful, divisive slog, and might ultimately fail.
Instead, Senate Democratic leaders have concluded that a confirmation fight over Summers would be a long, wasteful, divisive slog, and might ultimately fail.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1236 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Dems: "confirming (Summers) would be a huge challenge and probably a pretty ugly process.” (Original Post)
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
OP
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)1. Two petitions at WhiteHouse.gov need some DU attention...
Nominate Janet Yellin as the next Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board and not Larry Summers -- NO MORE CRONIES !!!
The petition references a Facebook post by Robert Reich (search for 'Yellen'):
and Do not nominate Larry Summers to head the Federal Reserve.
Reich's take on Summers:
Easy to sign both.
The petition references a Facebook post by Robert Reich (search for 'Yellen'):
Janet Yellen has impeccable credentials. She's now vice-chairman of the Fed, after having been head of the San Francisco branch of the Fed, and before that, an economics professor at Berkeley. In 2007 she was one of the very few voices sounding the alarm about the sub-prime mortgage crisis. Not incidentally, she's also a delightful person. Those who have worked with her tell me she listens carefully to all views, and is respectful of her employees. If selected, she'd be the first woman to head the Fed.
and Do not nominate Larry Summers to head the Federal Reserve.
Reich's take on Summers:
I worked with Larry Summers in the Clinton administration, where he eventually became Treasury Secretary. Under Obama, he ran the National Economic Council. Personally, I like Larry. He's very bright, and able to see the nub of most policy problems very quickly. But he has the tact and personality of a bull in a China shop, and he's been notoriously wrong about a few big things. In the late 1990s, he urged Clinton to sign off on legislation killing off Glass-Steagall, and was also part of the Rubin-Greenspan cabal that rejected the arguments of Brooksley Born, then chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, for why the CFTC should regulate financial derivatives. Summers' subsequent tenure as president of Harvard came to an end after he suggested one reason women were not well-represented in the sciences is they don't have the mind for it. As chair of the National Economic Council under Obama, he and Tim Geithner, then Treasury Secretary, bailed out Wall Street while refusing to impose tough conditions on the banks.
Easy to sign both.
Igel
(35,309 posts)2. So he's saying a lot of Democrats would oppose the President's nomination, were it Summers.
Interesting.
So it is something that can be done without being accused of racism or obstructionism.
Wonder how the (R) feel about Summers.
burrowowl
(17,641 posts)3. I'm glad there are
DEMS that would oppose Summers nomination.
What the hell is Obama thinking?!