Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 11:08 AM Aug 2013

For Obama, World Looks far Different than Expected

By JULIE PACE — Aug. 25 9:07 AM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly five years into his presidency, Barack Obama confronts a world far different from what he envisioned when he first took office. U.S. influence is declining in the Middle East as violence and instability rock Arab countries. An ambitious attempt to reset U.S. relations with Russia faltered and failed. Even in Obama-friendly Europe, there's deep skepticism about Washington's government surveillance programs.

In some cases, the current climate has been driven by factors outside the White House's control. But missteps by the president also are to blame, say foreign policy analysts, including some who worked for the Obama administration. Among them: miscalculating the fallout from the Arab Spring uprisings, publicly setting unrealistic expectations for improved ties with Russia and a reactive decision-making process that can leave the White House appearing to veer from crisis to crisis without a broader strategy. Rosa Brooks, a former Defense Department official who left the administration in 2011, said that while the shrinking U.S. leverage overseas predates the current president, "Obama has sometimes equated 'we have no leverage' with 'there's no point to really doing anything'."

Obama, faced most urgently with escalating crises in Egypt and Syria, has defended his measured approach, saying America's ability to solve the world's problems on its own has been "overstated." "Sometimes what we've seen is that folks will call for immediate action, jumping into stuff, that does not turn out well, gets us mired in very difficult situations," he said. "We have to think through strategically what's going to be in our long-term national interests."

The strongest challenge to Obama's philosophy on intervention has come from the deepening tumult in the Middle East and North Africa. The president saw great promise in the region when he first took office and pledged "a new beginning" with the Arab world when he traveled to Cairo in 2009. But the democracy protests that spread across the region quickly scrambled Obama's efforts. While the U.S. has consistently backed the rights of people seeking democracy, the violence that followed has often left the Obama administration unsure of its next move or taking tentative steps that do little to change the situation on the ground. In Egypt, where the country's first democratically elected president was ousted last month, the U.S. has refused to call Mohammed Morsi's removal a coup. The ruling military, which the U.S. has financially backed for decades, has largely ignored Obama's calls to end assaults on Morsi supporters. And U.S. officials are internally at odds over whether to cut off aid to the military.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/obama-world-looks-far-different-expected

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Aristus

(66,316 posts)
1. If the result of W's astoundingly reckless habit of jumping in to armed conflict with
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 12:36 PM
Aug 2013

both cowboy-booted feet is an overcorrection by President Obama, I'm okay with that.

If winding down two prolonged, difficult, dangerous, and entirely unnecessary wars means not launching in to any more for a while, we'll just have to live with the disappointment of the defense-industry CEO's.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
9. Doing nothing isn't necessarily a strategy
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 04:26 PM
Aug 2013

Choosing to not act is one thing, it is a conscious strategy. If that's what he's doing, in essence that's fine. But doing nothing because you don't know what to do isn't so much a strategy as a reaction. What the article, and alot of the similar criticism of Obama on this topic is suggesting is that he isn't doing things because of a lack of ideas upon what to do. The things he has tried haven't panned out, and may actually have worsened the situation. And very little in the way of "new ideas" are coming out in a rapidly changing world.


FWIW, I think he is probably mostly guilty of not explicitly discussing that he has an actual strategy of "doing nothing". Waiting is some times the best thing to do. Arab spring wasn't his idea, and the collapse of that phenomenon isn't his fault (most likely). And in the end it was an event that interfered with his plans.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
2. Obama To AP's Julie Pace: 'Give Me An Example Of What I Might Do'
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 03:21 PM
Aug 2013

A notably jocular President Obama sparred with White House reporters during his press conference about the budget sequester on Friday.

Obama's most notably tense moment came with his first question, the AP's Julie Pace.

"It sounds like you're saying this is a Republican problem, not one that you bear any responsibility for," she said to him.


"Well, Julie, give me an example of what I might do," Obama shot back. "Just trying to clarify," Pace said.

"Well, I'm just trying to clarify your question," Obama said.

The Republicans, he said, didn't want to increase revenues in any deal. "So, what more do you think I should do?" he asked the room at large. When there was silence, he said, "I just wanted to clarify. Because if people have a suggestion — this is a room full of smart folks."

March 2013, Obama with White House reporters, press conference about the budget sequester

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
6. A proper answer from Ms. Pace might be,
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 10:46 AM
Aug 2013

"Well, I don't know, but I didn't run to be president."

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
8. She might be a journalist.
Mon Aug 26, 2013, 10:57 AM
Aug 2013

Sometimes you ask the question merely for the purpose of being a nasty jerk who wants to annoy people, like Chris Matthews. Sometimes you ask the question because you know the answer and want to show off how smart you are, like Tim Russert. But sometimes you are actually a journalist and you ask the question in order to find out what the answer is.

Her question was a little snarky, but given his track record of shuffling off the blame to Republicans, it was not unreasonable.

It may actually be the fault of the Republicans, but he is not improving his stature by making such a fetish of saying so. He is saying repeatedly that the Republicans have beaten him, and I'm not sure how he thinks that makes him look good.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. that our Presidents have to control the rest of the world
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 03:56 PM
Aug 2013

seems to be the assumption here. How Republican.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. I agree but I think the President should be more upfront about it.
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 11:45 PM
Aug 2013

I might talk about that next week.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»For Obama, World Looks fa...