2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumpossible consequences of a US military strike on syria
. . . .
Colonel Timothy J. Geraghty, the commander of the U.S. 24th Marine Amphibious Unit (MAU) deployed as peacekeepers in Beirut, said that the American and the French headquarters were targeted primarily because of "who we were and what we represented
It is noteworthy that the United States provided direct naval gunfire support [which fired a total of 360 5-inch rounds between 10:04 A.M. and 3:00 PM.] -- which I strongly opposed for a week -- to the Lebanese Army at a mountain village called Suq-al-Garb on September 19 and that the French conducted an air strike on September 23 in the Bekaa Valley. American support removed any lingering doubts of our neutrality, and I stated to my staff at the time that we were going to pay in blood for this decision.
Some of the circumstances around the incidents in Lebanon in 1983 and now thirty years later in Syria are familiar. U.S. intelligence agencies were aware of potential trouble but did not report the problems in sufficient time for actions to be taken. President Obama said that the U.S. had intercepted signals indicating the Syrian government was moving equipment into place for an attack, but the U.S. did not warn the Syrian government that the U.S. knew what was happening and did not warn civilians that a chemical attack was imminent.
Thirty years before, on September 26, 1983, "the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted an Iranian diplomatic communications message from the Iranian intelligence agency, the Ministry of Information and Security (MOIS)," to its ambassador, Ali Akbar Mohtashemi, in Damascus. The message directed the ambassador to "take spectacular action against the American Marines. The intercepted message, dated September 26, was not passed to the Marines until a month later on October 26: three days after the bombing.
Geraghty wrote 20 years later, The coordinated dual suicide attacks, supported, planned, organized, and financed by Iran and Syria using Shiite proxies, achieved their strategic goal: the withdrawal of the multinational force from Lebanon and a dramatic change in U.S. national policy. The synchronized attacks that morning killed 299 U.S. and French peacekeepers and wounded scores more. The cost to the Iranian/Syrian-supported operation was two suicide bombers dead.
What is the political end state were trying to achieve? said a retired senior officer involved in Middle East operational planning who said his concerns are widely shared by active-duty military leaders. I dont know what it is. We say its not regime change. If its punishment, there are other ways to punish. The former senior officer said that those who are expressing alarm at the risks inherent in the plan are not being heard other than in a pro-forma manner
. . . .
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/08/31-3
gopiscrap
(23,674 posts)niyad
(112,434 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And there are still periodic clashes and outbreaks of violence.
The Syrian civil war has many similarities, and could very likely last as long.
Kablooie
(18,571 posts)But for the US to go in alone is simply stupid.
If the world turns on a leader for an attack then future leaders might think twice.
If it's just the US, they might just think, "Screw them, I'm going ahead anyway."