Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
2. That is awful. I bet this is syndicated advertising
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 03:02 PM
Oct 2013

I bet the signboard runs advertising feeds provided by a service that pays the strip mall owner nice rent check every month. If some tenants start suing their landlords for defamation, this will stop in a hurry. This very much appears like this is a position endorsed by CVS. If I were corporate counsel for CVS, I think I would be all over this landlord.

And in turn, if others in the same advertising package get complaints from their tenants, they will push this upstream to the publisher.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. A simple lesson in business I learned a long time ago:
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 03:15 PM
Oct 2013

It is never very clever to piss off half of your potential customers, even if it is "your right" to do so.

In my case, I was making a sales presentation at a division of a large company. This was a day when a smallish incident at a nuclear reactor was in the news. I mad a little joke about it -- actually it was a snarky comment about the safety of nukes. A colleague later pointed out to me that I happened to be presenting at General Electric, and they actually have a corporate fondness for nukes.

This was about 30 years ago, but I remember as if it were yesterday. My therapist says I should let it go.

There was a transmission repair company in my town that had been in business a long time, and had a pretty good reputation for their service, as a locally-owned alternative to Aamco. Then one day late in the 1990s, they started running ads that made fun of President Clinton and his sexual issues. It was their right. But those ads stuck with me. Before then, I would have been inclined to use them, but I never would after that. I would suggest that an ad that turns off half your potential customers is a really poor investment.

I don't know many businesses that can afford to miss out on half the market. That transmission business still has several offices open, but I never hear any ads anymore. I bet owner is sitting around grousing about how little ROI he got the last time he spent big bucks on advertising.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
10. FWIW, CVS was a victim of a greedy mall landlord.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 04:36 PM
Oct 2013

It just so happened that their signage is right below the billboard area.

CVS had nothing to do with the ads, it was the mall landlord who sold the advertising space. CVS complained and it has been removed. See downthread.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
11. Yes. I said as much upthread. But the point remains
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 04:48 PM
Oct 2013

that it is foolish for anybody to do this type of advertising. It is foolish for the landlord to allow that. it is foolish for the publisher to accept those ads. And CVS should threaten a lawsuit for defamation, just to make sure these assholes get the message.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. I think the landlord may have been a bit greedy.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 04:51 PM
Oct 2013

It's all about the money.

I do think CVS should sue--they can use their fb page as evidence, with all the statements from nitwits who thought CVS had something to do with it and who harrumph off to a "new" drugstore as proof that their business was impacted.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
14. The landlord just allowed a syndicator to erect the sign
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 05:04 PM
Oct 2013

That provides an income stream to the landlord. That helps him offer a competitive rent. He probably had no control at all over what was being displayed.

But get a few defamation lawsuits going and this will work its way upstream to the billboard company that accepted these horrible ads.

Nobody would excuse this if, for example, they had displayed hard core porn on the screen. And there is no excuse for the kind of garbage they did display.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. LaRouche-nuts. What assholes--the link is a slow loader but it works eventually.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 03:17 PM
Oct 2013

(1/4)A video billboard at the Cornerstone Plaza in Kendallville shows a picture of President Barack Obama with an Adolf Hitler mustache and the message "Impeach Obama."


KENDALLVILLE, Ind. (WANE) - A NewsChannel 15 crew drove to Kendallville on Tuesday and the sign portraying President Barack Obama with an Adolf Hitler mustache and the message "Impeach Obama" appeared to have been removed.

This story will be updated throughout the day as NewsChannel 15 speaks with Kendallville representatives and the LaRouchePac.


This is an update to the previously published story below.
--------------------

A video billboard in the Cornerstone Plaza sign in Kendallville shows a picture of President Barack Obama with an Adolf Hitler mustache and the message "Impeach Obama.".....The sign also includes one message linked to LaRouchePac and another that seeks to restore the Glass-Steagall act. That act was created to give banks more regulation after the Great Depression.

LaRouchePac is a political action committee created by Lyndon LaRouche. He has run for president multiple times but served jail time in 1988 for mail fraud.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. I agree--I don't blame CVS for getting pissed off one bit.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 04:34 PM
Oct 2013

It makes them look bad.

Some idiots are actually thinking that "CVS" has something to do with this, when they don't--it's the shopping plaza owners who are doing this bullshit. In fact, it was CVS complaining that got it taken down.

On the CVS fb page:

CVS Hi Carlette, CVS/pharmacy is not affiliated with the picture of President Obama that appears in the Cornerstone Plaza store signage, nor do we support the message. This is a paid advertisement and we have reached out to express our concerns to the landlord about the inappropriateness of this advertisement and it has since been taken down. We apologize for any inconvenience or disturbance that this may have caused our customers.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
12. How much you want to bet the next edition of CVS' retail leases
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 04:49 PM
Oct 2013

has some really stiff penalties for any landlords who let this happen?

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
16. In defense of CVS lawyers
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 05:19 PM
Oct 2013

Lawyers are people too.

This is a relatively new problem. There just wouldn't have been a lot of small billboards like this, controlled by 3rd party publishers in the past. The billboard companies had mostly huge stand-alone signs. A grotesque billboard in the same neighborhood as CVS wouldn't reflect on CVS in particular, as the public would know there is no association. Also, the costs to be on a traditional billboard were usually so high that it filtered out the scum like LaRousch.

These electronic signboards change both the economics and the guilt-by-association aspects. This is a lot more like Internet banner advertising. Most advertising syndicators give website owners rather tight control of the content categories that will display on their site. I suspect the electronic billboard industry has not evolved to that extent yet.

It will be successful litigation, or at least the threat of such, that forces these billboard companies to act responsibly.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
17. I agree completely. I posted a pic of the sign in this thread.
Tue Oct 15, 2013, 05:22 PM
Oct 2013

It does give a fast impression that CVS is somehow "sponsoring" the ad, to the point where customers went on their fb page and carped about it like it was CVS's fault!

IronLionZion

(45,442 posts)
18. The people who should be offended most by this are nazis
Wed Oct 16, 2013, 10:02 AM
Oct 2013

if you think about it.

Yup, never a good idea to alienate a significant portion of customers no matter what the issue.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CVS Pharmacy gets shoppin...