Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

victoryparty

(441 posts)
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:14 PM May 2012

I really like Gary Johnson's positions on social issues...

The Libertarians are nominating Gary Johnson and Drug War foe Jim Gray, a former federal prosecutor, this weekend in Las Vegas. I voted for Obama in 2008, but I really wish he would adopt some of Johnson's social positions, such as:

"...Johnson is promising to make marijuana legalization a “front burner” issue in 2012, and by teaming up with Gray, he sends a strong message that he is fully committed to doing just that. The former governor, an accomplished triathlete who climbed Mount Everest in 2004, is also strongly pro-choice, supports marriage equality for gays and lesbians and pledges to make ending the war in Afghanistan a top issue as well."

Obama is obviously pro-choice, but what about full marriage equality and legalizing cannabis (or at least rescheduling it as Schedule II)?

At any rate, here's more on Johnson and the convention this weekend for those who are interested. Maybe Obama needs to be reminded that a lot of the votes he got in 2008 were from people who are socially liberal.

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/12073671-libertarian-party-comes-of-age-with-johnsongray-ticket-in-2012

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I really like Gary Johnson's positions on social issues... (Original Post) victoryparty May 2012 OP
Let's elect Obama 2d term. I always remember Johnson is a republican. He stands southernyankeebelle May 2012 #1
Other Repubs victoryparty May 2012 #2
I understand how you feel. But I think Obama will do it in his 2d term. southernyankeebelle May 2012 #6
'Social issues' are a way the 1% keep the 99% distracted from the coalition_unwilling May 2012 #3
Thank you! You'd think after the Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! lies that the Republicans used to win back BlueCaliDem May 2012 #4
Republicans survive because of Abe Lincoln's observation coalition_unwilling May 2012 #9
I think you're diminishing the importance of social issues quite a bit... Hippo_Tron May 2012 #14
Wow, I hope that wasn't directed at me :) I think social issues are very important, make no coalition_unwilling May 2012 #16
Yes they are just as important Hippo_Tron May 2012 #23
Well, social issues are linked to issues of wealth, but not 'inextricably' (at least not coalition_unwilling May 2012 #25
While Johnson may be OK on some 'social issues' his overall proposals aren't too great WI_DEM May 2012 #5
President Obama has to be electable get the red out May 2012 #7
Fuck Gary Johnson grantcart May 2012 #8
I'm pretty sure Johnson's and Paul's stance on smot poking Blue_Tires May 2012 #13
I know Skinner has relaxed the rules quite a bit, but how is this not advocacy? Tarheel_Dem May 2012 #10
Why do we care if he's an "Accomplished triathelite"? JoePhilly May 2012 #11
A pro-choice libertarian candidate? Blue_Tires May 2012 #12
What's he running for? Iggo May 2012 #15
In other words, he's a less well known version of Ron Paul EvolveOrConvolve May 2012 #17
Or, in other words.... ohheckyeah May 2012 #18
Yep EvolveOrConvolve May 2012 #24
Fuck Gary Johnson and any Libertarian douchebags who like him. Ikonoklast May 2012 #19
Is it "promote the libertarian night" around here tonight?...nt SidDithers May 2012 #20
Not by the OP anymore. :-) Paulie May 2012 #21
How sad is it when Pab Sungenis May 2012 #22
 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
1. Let's elect Obama 2d term. I always remember Johnson is a republican. He stands
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:18 PM
May 2012

on the same policies as other republicans I am sure.

 

victoryparty

(441 posts)
2. Other Repubs
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:25 PM
May 2012

Yes, Johnson was a GOP governor, no doubt about it. But I don't think most Republican politicians support gay rights, legalizing cannabis or ending military involvement in Afghanistan.

I just wish Obama would consider a few of Johnson's positions on social issues.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
3. 'Social issues' are a way the 1% keep the 99% distracted from the
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:30 PM
May 2012

reality that 1% control 40% of the wealth in the U.S. and 10% control 80% of the wealth in the country.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
4. Thank you! You'd think after the Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! lies that the Republicans used to win back
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:41 PM
May 2012

the House and did NOTHING to help create jobs once they had, it would've given people a clue that they know how to use the bait and switch tactic with impunity because they never get punished for it by the electorate. But it appears some people never learn.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
9. Republicans survive because of Abe Lincoln's observation
Thu May 3, 2012, 01:37 PM
May 2012

that you can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time.

Sad but true.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
14. I think you're diminishing the importance of social issues quite a bit...
Thu May 3, 2012, 06:28 PM
May 2012

Before the Civil Rights Act, we had the New Deal coalition voting to keep the wealth far more evenly distributed than it is today. It was absolutely wonderful, as long as you were white.

IMO, some of my fellow 99%ers can go fuck themselves.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
16. Wow, I hope that wasn't directed at me :) I think social issues are very important, make no
Thu May 3, 2012, 07:13 PM
May 2012

mistake, but they are not as important as the obscene concentration of wealth in this country, a concentration that is color- and gender-blind.

Using your example of 'race,' the southern white elite historically used and uses racism as a tactic to keep black and white workers antagonistic towards one another on the basis of a non-essential characteristic (skin pigmentation), as a means of distracting them from the plain fact that their essential characteristic, i.e., the fact that they were working class, united them.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
23. Yes they are just as important
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:17 PM
May 2012

Furthermore they're inextricably linked to issues of wealth. When abortion is illegal, rich people go get it done elsewhere. When rich people get caught with drugs, their lawyer gets them off with a slap on the wrist. It really doesn't help if you're black, either. When poor people get caught with drugs they go to prison for years and then are unemployable for the rest of their lives. Gay kids with rich parents can go to a private school where they actually deal with bullies. Gay kids with poor parents are fucked if the school system condones bullying (and it does, way too often).

So yes, fuck my fellow 99%ers who are anti-choice, homophobic, drug warriors. And I resent the notion that I'm being distracted from the real issues, because I think social issues are just as important as economic ones. Both have to do with issues of fairness and justice. If we only focus on issues of economic justice, then the world becomes a place where there's economic justice for everyone who's straight, white, male, and Christian. That's how things were in the 1950's. You can't achieve true economic justice for everyone, without focusing on social issues as well.

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
25. Well, social issues are linked to issues of wealth, but not 'inextricably' (at least not
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:29 PM
May 2012

in my opinion).

Merriam-Webster defines 'inextricably' as 'in an inextricable manner' and defines 'inextricable' as 'Impossible to disentangle or separate.' But it is all too possible to disentangle social issues (what Marx might call the superstructure) from economic issues (what Marx might call the substructure). The two are in a dialectical relationship, that's for sure, but a dialectical relationship is not an inextricable relationship.

What I'm arguing is that the ruling class (the 1%) uses social issues (like race or gender) to divide the working class (the 99%) against itself and keep it from focusing on its real enemy, the ruling class.

Can we at least agree that there is a class war happening right now and that the ruling class is the real enemy? If we cannot agree on that, then we're each coming at this from a different set of premises and will have to agree to disagree.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
5. While Johnson may be OK on some 'social issues' his overall proposals aren't too great
Thu May 3, 2012, 12:49 PM
May 2012

He has said that he would cut the federal budget by 43%, “Start out with the big four - Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security and defense,” Johnson said in New Hampshire in early 2011.

Governor Johnson has an excellent record of holding down the exploding growth of entitlement programs that now cripple state budgets. As Governor, Johnson presided over the beginning of managed care for Medicaid recipients in New Mexico and pushed for speedy implementation. The managed care program (known as Salud!) replaces fee-for service and covers approximately two-thirds of available services under Medicaid. Salud! has generally been described as operating with “significant savings to both the State and Federal governments,” when compared to fee-for-service.

In 2000, Governor Johnson proposed to re-impose a gross income cap on welfare recipients. In 2002, Johnson proposed limiting eligibility for Medicaid from 235% of the federal poverty level down to 200% for families with children 5 and under and 100% for ages 6-18. He also let his state’s S-CHIP program expire after vetoing an attempt to make it permanent.

Governor Johnson’s website lists some major entitlement reform proposals, including:

Block grant Medicare and Medicaid funds to the states, allowing them to innovate, find efficiencies and provide better service at lower cost.
Repeal ObamaCare, as well as the failed Medicare prescription drug benefit.
Fix Social Security by changing the escalator from being based on wage growth to inflation.

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=936

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
13. I'm pretty sure Johnson's and Paul's stance on smot poking
Thu May 3, 2012, 04:21 PM
May 2012

exists only to try and leech away some college students, who are a traditionally strong Dem bloc

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
11. Why do we care if he's an "Accomplished triathelite"?
Thu May 3, 2012, 02:54 PM
May 2012

He's a Republican running in 2012.

You'd have to be really high to vote for him.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
12. A pro-choice libertarian candidate?
Thu May 3, 2012, 04:19 PM
May 2012

talk about not knowing your base(!)...

So now 95 percent of all libertarians just shifted their vote to Ron Paul or one of the other anti-choice fringe candidates

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
19. Fuck Gary Johnson and any Libertarian douchebags who like him.
Thu May 3, 2012, 08:53 PM
May 2012

You like some of his social issues that you happen to agree with, but what about his wanting to gut Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, and just about all of the social safety net?

Libertarians can go piss up a rope.

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
22. How sad is it when
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:07 PM
May 2012

the Lunatarian candidate for President is to the left of a Democratic incumbent?

We really need to organize and get a better choice in 2016 or, win or lose this year, Obama's coalition is dead.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I really like Gary Johnso...