2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI wonder how long it will take for McConnell to pass the nuclear option?
We won't hear anything coming from the GOP about super majorities to pass their Koch brother approved legislation.
Nobel_Twaddle_III
(323 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)to STOP BUYING SHIT!!
trublu992
(489 posts)GREAT JOB HARRY RIED!
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)FBaggins
(26,737 posts)It doesn't do any good to get rid of the filibuster if we hold the White House...
... nor are Senate Democrats likely to use it much since they would just be putting themselves out to keep the President from having to use a veto (when he isn't up for reelection and they are).
... lastly - they don't need to get rid of the filibuster for a large percentage of their agenda. They can just use the reconciliation rules.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Then again forcing Obama to veto stuff could be an option they try. They can now repeal the ACA in both the House and Senate and that would force Obama to veto it. I think it would backfire though.
FBaggins
(26,737 posts)At least... not directly.
Republicans can pass a budget through reconciliation (so it can't be filibustered) that fails to fund ACA pieces that they disagree with. The president won't have a "kill ACA" bill to veto, he'll be forced to threaten to shut down the government by not signing the budget.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)IIRC a "bill" doesn't have to be just about one thing, or even related things; they can slip all sorts of unrelated shit into any bill they want, with the caveat that a budget bill can only contain budgetary items. The White House needs to watch everything that comes across the transom; "P.L. 111-148 is hereby repealed in its entirety" will wind up in a LOT of bills coming out of this Congress, and Obama needs to veto every fucking one of them - with Brian Schweitzer's VETO branding iron, if that's what it takes to get the point across.