Feminists Are Cheering on Hillary’s Presidential Bid
Feminists Are Cheering on Hillary’s Presidential Bid
Hillary Clinton’s unique social media entrance to the 2016 presidential race dominated news Sunday and was received well by many – especially feminists. Emily’s List, the National Organization for Women, and the Women’s Media Center were just a few of those who joined in the flurry of support for Clinton’s candidacy announcement yesterday through a video in which Clinton declared that “everyday Americans need a champion, and I want to be that champion.”
“Gender matters in the United States today,” President of the National Organization for Women Terry O’Neill wrote yesterday. O’Neill welcomed Clinton’s candidacy, and said that her campaign “is a powerful message to girls that they can aspire to the highest office, and an equally powerful message to boys that women can be leaders on an equal footing with men.”
Emily’s List president Stephanie Schriock endorsed Clinton as a “lifelong champion for women and families and the most qualified candidate to be president.” Emily’s List cited Clinton’s longtime commitment to women and families, mentioning her first job after law school with the Children’s Defense Fund.
The Women’s Media Center asked if the 2016 Hillary race would have the same sexist media coverage as her 2008 race. Indeed, Clinton’s campaign in 2008 was filled with comments on her age, looks, weight, and many other aspects of her life that were not raised for male candidates. The WMC, however, believes that women in roles of leadership and in the public eye are “crucial for continued progress.”
“From the days that she was the first chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession in 1987, to her days as First Lady when she declared at the United Nation’s 4th World Conference on Women that women’s rights are human rights, to her days as Secretary of State when she appointed the first Ambassador-At-Large for Global Women’s Issues, Hillary Clinton has made women’s issues a priority,” said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority. “It’s no wonder women are excited about not only the possibility of the first woman president, but also that this candidate is a woman who has given high priority to women’s issues from the very beginning of her career.”
http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2015/04/13/in-2016-feminists-are-rooting-for-hillary/
= new reply since forum marked as read
Thanks so much for posting this. 
And I am 70+ myself - also a mother, grandmother and woman. I have beautiful granddaughters and I also have handsome grandsons.
Our children/grandchildren are the future. Democrats provide more positive answers for their future than any GOPers do. And that's the truth.
But I am also happy and proud that Hillary has begun her campaign and I fully support her efforts.
❤
The MRA threat?
100% pure bullshit. Most are open to feminism, but some are against the term--and that makes sense, when you think about their lives and the influences on their lives. Many heavily feminist WoC won't describe themselves as feminists. Doesn't make them not feminist.
http://www.clutchmagonline.com/2013/03/newsflash-more-millennials-are-feminists/
Also, wouldn't want women to be "susceptible" to feminism, would we?
FFS. 
As I recall, the term "feminist" has been used as a deliberate put-down since I consciously became one in the 1960s, so among some white males (especially), feminism was never popular. But such put-downs never stopped me and never will. 
My husband, sons and grandsons - all of whom I dearly love and respect - are all highly skilled, well-functioning, socially conscious, intelligent males who respect women and understand just how misguided MRAs are. Moreover, I sincerely doubt whether MRAs - millennial or otherwise - were ever or ever would be supporters of any woman candidate for US President, misogynists as they are.
^N^I^Y^A^D
^R^O^C^K^S
THANK YOU
