2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Do you think NY State should recognize gay marriage?" Hillary: "No."
2:23 of the video.
Not a second of hesitation. Not even a millisecond.
Quite the champion of gay rights you got there.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Just go away.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)brooklynite
(94,591 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Did President Obama "evolve" in his position as well? If he did, then you have your answer.
EDIT: ...though in fairness, I do credit the President for the SCOTUS appointments that led to the decision.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)Her refusal state emphatically she wouldn't vote for someone that is anti-choice is just as bad.
I would like to hear that answer now.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But yes, her lack of defense of abortion rights, if done by a man would have been met here on DU with EXTREME anger. If you don't think so, just look at the following thread and ask yourself, what if Bernie had actually said what SHE said.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=57694
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)babylonsister
(171,070 posts)Have you never said or done something you ever regretted? Ever hear of evolving? And maybe at the time it was a purely political standpoint, which I suspect is correct.
Either way, yea, you don't like her. Message received. But why not try to find something more current if you're intent on disparaging her?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Politicians run on their record, like it or not.
This isn't exactly looking at what she did as President of the College Republicans.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)But stuff she said and did as a senator? Hell, yes, that matters.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)but you obviously forgot the conveniently. Outrage much.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)it wasn't supported then. And over whelming majority of the people were against it. DOMA passed in 1996 by superior numbers. Even Vermont didn't legalize marriage until 2009. So why didn't Bernie make them do it sooner? She represented NY state at the time and same sex marriage was not made legal until 2011.
I live near New Paltz where the first marriages were performed in 2004, NY court rejected most of all that stuff going on then in fact those that perform them were charged under the existing laws. NY did however recognize same sex marriaged perform elsewhere and did recognize domestic partnerships and the NY pension system recognized them too.
Lots of lawsuits back and forth and efforts were blocked by the NY Senate.
Well, marriage means something different. You know, marriage has a meaning that I think should be kept as it historically has been, but I see no reason whatsoever why people in committed relationships cant have many of the same rights and the same respect for their unions that they are seeking, and I would like to see that be more accepted than it is. In 2003 she supported domestic partnerships in NY.
She continued to support the issue and both she and Shumer made statement to the effect...that they would not block any legislation for the same. In fact both supported it, NY state on a whole did not.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)seperate but equal doesn't apply to this...
Ask Bernoe why his state didn't adopt gay marriage why he voted against DOMA in 1996....then get back to me. Mrs Clinton was an elected official then.
druidity33
(6,446 posts)The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)I get to vote once in the primaries, and I'm voting Clinton.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)I haven't forgotten that Obama was against it before he was for it. He position changed when it was politically "safe" to do so. The huge advances we've seen in LGBT rights are the work of the LGBT community, not Obama.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)The community led, not the politicians.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)for his previous stand on gay marriage. And remember when he invited Rick Warren to his inauguration? DU when ballistic over that.
6chars
(3,967 posts)Someone whose 20 now was something like 3 in 2002. They will care about what candidates are doing today.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)To Hillary, those are just poll-tested words written into a speech she reads with all the gusto of a beer or soda that's lost its fizz. Now Bernie on the other hand...he's The Real Thing! Go Bernie Go!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That crap is why I will not vote for her.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)to finish dripping from her fingers.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)What else that's she says now is a purely political standpoint, that she will abandon once elected? What's the science to figuring out which is a truly felt belief and which is selfishness and expediency?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)wasn't pure enough. This follows a consistent pattern of regurgitation of Clinton campaign talking points about Sanders' alleged indifference to civil rights issues. In that context, it's fair to consider Hillary's public statements while in the Senate.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)And next President!
Thanks for promoting our Choice!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Our vote is by far our greatest tool we have for effecting change in our country.
It should not be exercised lightly nor thrown away with a sense of helpless surrender.
Votes represent our hopes and our aspirations for the future, particularly the primaries when we have the opportunity and responsibility to vote for someone we think best matches our ethical outlook.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That she tries to pass her self as being. She is being disingenuous at best and at worst she is Ly*****
frylock
(34,825 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Goin' with the flow.
Rolling with polling.
Of course, that was the position of most politicians at the time.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)But it shows there is some intolerance is in there.
More deadly was her vote in favor of bombing/invading Iraq. Her supporters are saying she's handled this by her admission that she was wrong.
But...I'm sure most of us could see then this war was bogus, the USA does not initiate war. That the thought that they had anything to do with 9/11 was so wrong.
It showed a combination of bad judgment and a willingness to get swept along in a rush to war. Bernie saw through it. And Hillary might already be president but her democratic challenger in 2008, Obama, saw through it as well. He didn't have that "scarlet letter".
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Response to Bonobo (Original post)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)You have to go to the very end.....
In 2000-2012 that is where the bulk of the difference was between the parties and the nation. Republicans no to civil unions, Democrats for civil unions with full equality under the law, but not marriage...
People want to wrap themselves up in some bubble like history and political realities didn't exist and that the world is what it is today.
This issue has morphed in warp speed, and thank god for that!
Then try to make it seem throughout this thread, that Hillary couldn't say she would not support an anti choice nominee for SCOTUS.... also, a bunch of bullshit, if you actually watch the video posted.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)That isn't true.
Response to Bonobo (Reply #19)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Response to moobu2 (Reply #26)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #50)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Let's hope on the next really important issue, the wind isn't blowing the wrong way, because you just never know. How messed up is that??
frylock
(34,825 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)for decades? I'm not. Not at all.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Support of that by every politician at every moment in time wasn't, and still isn't, inevitable but is contingent upon it's being a 'winning position'.
Winning, as we have repeatedly been told by the Democratic establishment is the most important thing.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)So, when Bernie votes against gun control--because that is what his constituents want, that is ok? But when Clinton represents her constituents, it is intolerance?
Quite the double standard.
Further, it was a different time. Our society was coming around. It took time, just like it is taking time for gun control.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Are you saying NY was anti-gay marriage but VT was pro?
Had Hillary polled the entire NY state? Did she ignore gay marriage supporters in her state?
Are you saying she was actually pro-fay marriage but wasn't courageous enough to take that stand (Bernie was) or are you saying this was "pre-evolution"?
Which defense are you going to go with for this?
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)You would have understood the time. Bernie was radical by those standards and not the norm at all. You are attempting to use historical standards to judge someone today. It is a superficial look at the world.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I have to go clean my room.
I'll get back to you when I finish my chores.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)the poster's mental age.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Exultant Democracy
(6,594 posts)It was true in 2008 and surprise surprise it is true today, you can always count on the Clinton folks to class up the joint.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Really we should be shunning Bernie for his stuck up and superior "I've been right all along" attitude, what a know it all. Who the hell wants someone who has been right so many times on so many issues for so long as President, I bet he doesn't even _drink_ beer.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Do you really want a President that doesn't take time to make those Hard Choices by monitoring polls, or soliciting opinions from focus groups?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)us who worked so hard for so long to change this country. Bernie was with us back then. Hillary not so much.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I'll tell you my age. I am 49. And to me, 2002 is a very short time ago. Hillary is the same person despite what she may pretend.
Now tell me how old YOU are. Because to me, YOU sound like the one who is so young that they imagine things were so different just a short time ago.
Exultant Democracy
(6,594 posts)The people were real crude back then so you can't expect our future leaders (who were also elected official way back then) to think gay people should have equal rights.
Of course that begs the question as to why some people were able to understand right from wrong even in those distant backwards times.
Should we vote for the person who can understand right from wrong even in the dark ages, or vote for the person who is ten years behind on the curve of justice.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Hillary Clinton was in the Senate for almost the entire "dark age". She voted for the IWR and the bankruptcy bill (which made all student loans non-dischargeable).
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I suppose he could've waited until it was socially acceptable to fight for their rights too.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)You Bernie Acolytes, get back to the rest of us when you discover a candidate without flaws in their past---very much including the man you're supporting now.....
frylock
(34,825 posts)Paladin
(28,262 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Paladin
(28,262 posts)Bad showing, on your part.
frylock
(34,825 posts)with your crack about Bernie Acolytes.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)We know Hillary's record, the situation has changed, the SC ruling is the law. With the shooting in Charleston and Bernie voting with the NRA against the Brady Bill and other gun control issues is still a problem.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Frankly, I don't think it matters to her except as an issue she can use to get elected which is pretty much the standard for any stance she takes on any matter that is presented to her.
She really has no core beliefs, she's a chameleon.
Response to Bonobo (Original post)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #42)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I would prefer a candidate who does the right thing even when it is not popular to a candidate who will oppose equal rights for a minority group when it is popular to do so.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)It's ok, people evolve and change.
AuntPatsy
(9,904 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But that is my true belief, I do not stick my finger in the air.
Response to Reter (Reply #48)
moobu2 This message was self-deleted by its author.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)I dont ever remember thinking it was any of my concern who married who. Id argue that most liberals were never anti-equality.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)My next door neighbor's business partner was a lesbian carpenter and I ended up doing a lot of custom work for her gay clientele. Their money was better than a lot of straight's money at the time, if they wanted to get married, hey no problem, married people spend more on renovation and building and less on partying.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)You can rationalize it away. If someone thought I was not an equal person, with rights and dignity, as some do, I would not forget that. Especially not someone who wants the highest office in the land. She was just wrong. She SMILED and nodded ruefully. Yup, I'm a bigot, deal with it! And now she's a champion????
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)And the quickest way to get tombstoned was to oppose rights for all Americans.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)certainly not gay democrats.
RandySF
(58,893 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)But a hell of a lot of us decided on her IWR vote alone. A politician can't be wrong on a majority of the issues and try to pretend like it never happened. Her record is there for all to see.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)http://time.com/3938898/hillary-clinton-gay-marriage/
stranger81
(2,345 posts)She had to burn the village in order to save it!
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Voltaire said about Absurdities & Atrocities comes to mind .
olddots
(10,237 posts)if she didn't have her shit together then I would never back her in a million years.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)And her shit is all over the map. And all over the graveyards of the Middle East.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And i love Hillary and glad she stands with us on Marriage Equality.
It was a great weekend.
Cheers.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Using her "H" in a rainbow "HISTORY" banner that still is displayed on her twitter page is just offensive. Like she had jack shit to do with this HISTORY. I'm surprised she hasn't been taken to task for it yet.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Nominated by a Clinton.
http://time.com/3937882/ruth-bader-ginsburg-gay-marriage-ruling/
Its official: gay marriage is now a Constitutional right everywhere in America, thanks to the Supreme Courts landmark ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges case on Friday. While there was a majority decision of 5-4, there is one justice who has stood out above the rest as a steadfast and fierce supporter of marriage equality, and you might know her as the Notorious RBG. Ruth Bader Ginsburgs support of gay marriage has been crucial, from her personal opinion of the American publics shifting attitude to Aprils oral arguments and, ultimately, the historical decision that says anyone in any state can marry the person they love. Justices Anthony Kennedy, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan joined Ginsburg in agreeing that gay couples should be free to marry in all 50 states.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4542420
Hillary supported and encouraged the President's the decision. Without Hillary, we maybe waiting another 20 years for this historic decision.
askew
(1,464 posts)Hillary's supporters want it both ways. They want to credit Hillary with all of Bill's positive accomplishments but cry sexism when Hillary is blamed for Bill's mistakes.
Let's make it really easy. Hillary doesn't get the credit or the blame for Bill's decision as president. And she most certainly doesn't get any credit for RBG's appointment to the SC or for the gay marriage decision.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)She didn't evolve that long after Bernie.