Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,163 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:55 AM Jun 2015

The Democratic party needs to make something crystal clear to NH

either your primary ballots list all our candidates or you don't get to go first. Bernie is the ranking member of the Budget Committee of the US Senate, he has caucused with the Democrats since he was in the House. He provides a vote for us for leader, and he has risen through the ranks of seniority. The entire point of NH going first is that it is supposed to be an easy state to get access to voters and yes, the ballot. I have repeatedly said NH shouldn't be first for other reasons, I will admit, but this should be the line in the sand.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Democratic party needs to make something crystal clear to NH (Original Post) dsc Jun 2015 OP
To get on the Democratic primary ballot in New Hampshire all Sanders has to do.. PoliticAverse Jun 2015 #1
One cannot register as a Democrat in Vermont. longship Jun 2015 #2
what did Howard Dean do ? JI7 Jun 2015 #3
Did Howard Dean run against a Clinton? delrem Jun 2015 #5
no, Dean is supporting a Clinton JI7 Jun 2015 #7
So he might not have had "special" problems with Dem power brokers. delrem Jun 2015 #9
Bernie won't either, this is a silly meme. Agschmid Jun 2015 #19
Do you have any evidence that Clinton wants Sanders blocked from the ballot? brooklynite Jun 2015 #26
Howard Dean got on the ballot as will Sanders. PoliticAverse Jun 2015 #8
GOOD. Most relevant post on the thread, too. Kudos. merrily Jun 2015 #16
Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #20
Thank you for (hopefully) putting that issue to rest. Scuba Jun 2015 #23
I'd like to request this as an OP. Le Taz Hot Jun 2015 #30
This should be an OP. winter is coming Jun 2015 #33
The same applies in Illinois, Obama could not have been a "registered Democrat" in Illinois. tritsofme Jun 2015 #10
Party affiliation is even more private in Wisconsin dragonlady Jun 2015 #32
I don't know how many times that has been posted. Under Vermont law, it's merrily Jun 2015 #14
Apples and oranges. Running as a candidate in VT does have a party affiliation and he could seaglass Jun 2015 #21
Or in Texas or in Illinois or in Minnesota where I live. jwirr Jul 2015 #37
So, the following candidates swore to a lie? TexasProgresive Jun 2015 #17
Dems need to get him on the ballot in all contests gwheezie Jun 2015 #4
And the DNC agreed. jwirr Jul 2015 #38
Just how would you do that? New Hampshire's primary is set by law... TreasonousBastard Jun 2015 #6
Remove their delegates from the national convention mythology Jul 2015 #40
If New Hampshire wants to be relevant ... oldandhappy Jun 2015 #11
Trying to keep him off the ballot is cowardly. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2015 #12
A question, Rincewind Jun 2015 #13
How do you suggest Sanders "obey" this law without lying under oath? merrily Jun 2015 #15
By joining the Vermont Democratic Party, okasha Jun 2015 #34
That would not make him a "registered" Democrat within the meaning of the oath. merrily Jul 2015 #35
If it worked for Dean it should work for Sanders. okasha Jul 2015 #36
I don't think Sanders is going to have a problem. The DNC fundraising took money away from Sanders. merrily Jul 2015 #39
Was this law enforced for candidates TexasProgresive Jun 2015 #18
There is party affiliation for candidates in Texas. seaglass Jun 2015 #22
The N.H. law requires an oath that one is registered as a party member TexasProgresive Jun 2015 #24
It seems they have gotten around that in the past by showing that a candidate has been on a seaglass Jun 2015 #25
I think you have the correctly described the issue here... Sancho Jun 2015 #27
I think what will happen is that the support of the state D party will be deemed sufficient to allow seaglass Jun 2015 #28
You may be correct, but I don't know NH dynamics. Sancho Jun 2015 #29
Hasn't this stuff of "going first" become less meaningful? PRB Jun 2015 #31
Just to play the game... Sancho Jul 2015 #41
I think that anyone who casts a vote for the Democratic leader of the Senate dsc Jul 2015 #42
I suspect you've seen this...it's not really a matter of what Democrats think...it's up to the SoS Sancho Jul 2015 #43
we should make it crystal clear dsc Jul 2015 #44

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. To get on the Democratic primary ballot in New Hampshire all Sanders has to do..
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:10 AM
Jun 2015

is file a notarized copy of an oath.

The required oath includes the statement:
"I am a registered member of the Democratic party"

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. One cannot register as a Democrat in Vermont.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:21 AM
Jun 2015

Or where I live, in Michigan.

I have been a Dem activist for years. Back in the day, to be part of the party process you had to register as a Democrat. But the GOP legislatures in many states changed that so that nobody could register to vote as a partisan. MI did that and apparently Vermont has apparently had it for a long time.

Bernie cannot register as a Democrat in Vermont, and I cannot in MI either.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
9. So he might not have had "special" problems with Dem power brokers.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:42 AM
Jun 2015

It seems to me that this Dem primary is all about that -- to the limit.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
19. Bernie won't either, this is a silly meme.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 06:37 AM
Jun 2015

He will be on the ballot and I'm sure he will do well.

brooklynite

(94,599 posts)
26. Do you have any evidence that Clinton wants Sanders blocked from the ballot?
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:17 AM
Jun 2015

Or is a good conspiracy theory too juicy to give up?

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
8. Howard Dean got on the ballot as will Sanders.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:39 AM
Jun 2015

Note that the New Hampshire Democratic Party has indicated they support Sanders' inclusion on the primary ballot.

"The New Hampshire Democratic Party will work to satisfy any concerns of the New Hampshire Secretary of State to ensure Sen. Sanders is on the democratic primary ballot," Buckley said. (From: http://www.wmur.com/politics/question-is-bernie-sanders-eligible-to-run-in-the-nh-democratic-primary/32674614 )

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
30. I'd like to request this as an OP.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 09:15 AM
Jun 2015

This same issue has been brought up ad nausea here and it needs to be cleared up once and for all. Good Bookmaring material as well.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
33. This should be an OP.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 09:50 PM
Jun 2015

If nothing else, it will make it easier to find the next twenty times this nonissue is raised.

tritsofme

(17,380 posts)
10. The same applies in Illinois, Obama could not have been a "registered Democrat" in Illinois.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 02:49 AM
Jun 2015

We have open primaries, you choose which partisan ballot you want each time you cast your ballot, but there is no party registration.

dragonlady

(3,577 posts)
32. Party affiliation is even more private in Wisconsin
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 09:30 PM
Jun 2015

The primary ballot lists all the candidates from every party (Constitution, Libertarian, Pirate Party, whatever), each in its own section. The voter must choose only one party's section, but that choice is made in the voting booth.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
14. I don't know how many times that has been posted. Under Vermont law, it's
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 04:01 AM
Jun 2015

impossible to register as a Democrat, as a Republican, as a Green, as an Indie, as anything. You are a registered voter, period. That's all she wrote.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
17. So, the following candidates swore to a lie?
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 06:31 AM
Jun 2015

LBJ
GHWB
GWB
Herbert Hoover
Rick Perry
If he gets on the ballot- Cruz.
You cannot swear an oath that you are registered in a party if you live in a state that doesn't recognize party registration without swearing a lie. If N. H. holds Mr. Sanders to this law they need to do the same for Perry and Cruz and explain why they didn't do it for others such as Dean.

I swear I vote in the Democratic primary and for the Democratic candidates in the General. I cannot swear I am a registered Democratic party member.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
4. Dems need to get him on the ballot in all contests
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:36 AM
Jun 2015

Very foolish if they don't. Bernie could have fucked it up for dems by running as an independent. He's running as a dem. Let's not get too cute. I'm an HRC supporter by the way and hope she is the nominee but if Bernie gets the dem nomination it will be because more dems voted for him than HRC. I can live with that and will campaign for him.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
6. Just how would you do that? New Hampshire's primary is set by law...
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:38 AM
Jun 2015

to be the first and they're not about to be told or threatened who to put on the ballots.

The law, btw, is not Federal, it's their own state law saying that if any other state tries to have an earlier primary, theirs will automatically move up. I think that goes back to the '70s.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
40. Remove their delegates from the national convention
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 10:07 PM
Jul 2015

If New Hampshire were to refuse to put Sanders on the ballot, don't seat their delegates and instruct contenders to not campaign there, similar to Florida and Michigan in 2008.

That said, Sanders will be on the primary ballot so this is irrelevant.

Rincewind

(1,203 posts)
13. A question,
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 03:47 AM
Jun 2015

this is a state election law that has been on the books for decades, so, why doesn't Senator Sanders have to obey a law that everyone else has to obey? Are there any other laws he can ignore? If he wants run as a Democrat, he can join the party.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
35. That would not make him a "registered" Democrat within the meaning of the oath.
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 11:36 AM
Jul 2015

My guess is that the New Hampshire requirement, if truly a state requirement, is unconstitutional under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, if nothing else.

Nader, to his credit, challenged a lot of these unduly restrictive ballot laws successfully. Though probably not this one as he may not have been running "unregistered."

But, I understand the New Hampshire Democratic Party has recognized Sanders as a Democrat. It would be hard not to, as the DNC attempted to fundraise at his expense practically the second he made his unofficial announcement about running as a Democrat.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
36. If it worked for Dean it should work for Sanders.
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 01:57 PM
Jul 2015

And let's keep in mind that Sanders got a lot of free advertising out of that Dem fundraising.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
39. I don't think Sanders is going to have a problem. The DNC fundraising took money away from Sanders.
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 02:15 PM
Jul 2015

Most people have a finite amount of money they can donate per month or year to all causes combined; and Sanders is not taking PAC money, so individual donations are more important to him than anyone. I have a feeling helping Bernie was the last thing that the DNC intended its fundraising email to do. Your results may differ.

As far as what Dean did, Dean still had to sign an oath saying he was a registered Democrat. If he personally did not feel he was being misleading under oath or worked something out with NH, cool, I guess.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
18. Was this law enforced for candidates
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 06:33 AM
Jun 2015

from states like Texas which do not do party registration? You can't swear to what you can't do.

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
24. The N.H. law requires an oath that one is registered as a party member
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 07:23 AM
Jun 2015

That is not the same thing as declaring one is a (fill in the blank) party member. Party affiliation is not being a registered party member. I vote in the Democratic primaries and for the Democratic candidates in the general so I am a Democratic voter but I am NOT registered as a member of any party.

So must a candidate from any state that is similar to Texas i.e. Vermont, Michigan and others, swear to a lie in an oath? And were other candidates in the past from such states force to sign this lie to get on the ballot? Let's include Carnival Cruz and pRick Perry.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
25. It seems they have gotten around that in the past by showing that a candidate has been on a
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:13 AM
Jun 2015

party ballot, at least that is what the SOS states. I won't disagree that the law needs to be updated, my statement went directly to whether a CANDIDATE could be affiliated with a party in VT, which s/he clearly can - same as TX.

http://kcbx.org/post/quirky-new-hampshire-law-might-keep-bernie-sanders-ballot

"Whenever the question has come up, there was some way to usually show the person has been on the ballot of that party," New Hampshire's long-serving Secretary of State Bill Gardner told NPR. "I really don't know." ''

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
27. I think you have the correctly described the issue here...
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:31 AM
Jun 2015

most others in the past can point to the fact that they ran or were elected as Democrats. If some kind of board or SoS investigated, the evidence is that Bernie had an opportunity to run as a Democrat, and he actively chose to run as an Independent.

Maybe the GOP would want to throw in a monkey wrench, or whatever theory you have, but Bernie has a problem if NH rules against him.

The effect of having a small organization, no money, no army of lawyers, and no previous national experience is that these things happen.

The really big issue is that Bernie is NOT a Democrat. He's had decades to support the Democratic party, and he has refused. Choices have consequences. He can't honestly swear to something that is not true.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
28. I think what will happen is that the support of the state D party will be deemed sufficient to allow
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:36 AM
Jun 2015

him on the ballot. I do not believe any D candidate will challenge that. Not sure what the point would be of any other party challenging his inclusion on the ballot.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
29. You may be correct, but I don't know NH dynamics.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 08:51 AM
Jun 2015

You many recall some primary shenanigans in the last election with people resigning to open the door for challenges, etc.

There may be some reason the GOP would want to interpret the law in a way that they think is advantageous for/against Tea Party candidates or some other weird circumstance that may have no direct connection to Bernie.

I think I read that the deciding agent in NH was mostly GOP, but I don't have a link.

 

PRB

(139 posts)
31. Hasn't this stuff of "going first" become less meaningful?
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 09:57 AM
Jun 2015

Cincinnati Reds used to be the first team to play at season's start. Just from tradition. That no longer happens. So not sure if this makes much difference.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
41. Just to play the game...
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 10:22 PM
Jul 2015

If all you had to do is "swear" you are a Democrat (but some states don't have registration, so maybe you can't demand a state registration), then anyone who wants to - a libertarian, green party, tea party, etc. candidate could "swear" for the moment they were a Democrat. Then you'd have 45 or maybe 300 Democrats in the primary!!!

That's the reason for some of the state laws. It keeps people from "fusion" campaigns (more than one party) or quick switches which make a mess of primaries.

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
43. I suspect you've seen this...it's not really a matter of what Democrats think...it's up to the SoS
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 10:58 PM
Jul 2015
http://www.wmur.com/politics/question-is-bernie-sanders-eligible-to-run-in-the-nh-democratic-primary/32674614

Question: Is Bernie Sanders eligible to run in the NH Democratic primary?
Gardner: Law says he must be a registered Democrat when he files
In Vermont, party primary winners must either accept or reject the nominations of his or her party.

Gardner said Condos confirmed that Sanders, after winning the Democratic primaries of 2006 and 2012, rejected the Democratic nomination and at the same time filed papers to be on the general election ballot as an independent -- and in each election, won.

In the early 1970s, Sanders ran for governor and other offices as a member of the Vermont Labor Union Party. He resigned from that party in 1979. Sanders has never run in a general election as a Democrat.
But when it comes to filing to appear on the New Hampshire primary ballot, none of that may matter. Here, it’s the state law that counts and the state law requires party registration. It's Gardner’s job to administer state election laws.

Devine also pointed out that Vermont Gov. Howard Dean had no trouble getting on the 2004 New Hampshire primary ballot. And, he said, neither Texas nor Tennessee have party registration, yet George W. Bush and Al Gore also ran in the Granite State.

Sanders’ situation is slightly different, and Gardner says it’s unique.
Sanders rejected Democratic nominations, while Dean and Gore served as a governor and a U.S. senator, respectively, as Democrats, and Bush was a Republican governor.

dsc

(52,163 posts)
44. we should make it crystal clear
Wed Jul 1, 2015, 11:08 PM
Jul 2015

if they keep Sanders off the ballot then we won't seat delegates from that primary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Democratic party need...