Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:48 PM Jun 2015

two questions for Hillary supporters......

I can understand why Bill Clinton might stay out of the limelight during the primaries.

But during the general election, his ability to frame issues would make him a powerful asset.

The republicans are easily 100 times crazier than they were when he was President.
He could slice them to ribbons.

Do you think that the Big Dog will be the primary attack dog in the general if she wins the nomination?

Just being the first "First Gentleman" would be pretty amazing.

Former President in that role?

What do think his role would be?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Gothmog

(145,335 posts)
1. That is to be decided at the time
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:50 PM
Jun 2015

It depends who is the VP and if the VP is comfortable being the attack person

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
2. The foundation
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:53 PM
Jun 2015

One of his big things will be promoting the foundation. I'm sure his speaking fee will be astronomical, so he'll rake in the bucks for the foundation. The whole family has been doing exactly that for a while now.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
11. Not illegal
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jun 2015

I believe it's customary for serving presidents to refuse speaking fees, but their wives have taken in big charitable contributions for ages. I imagine Bill ad Chelsea Clinton will do the same when Hillary becomes president. (Yes, I admit she'll probably win.) I much prefer the Sanders model, which holds to the traditional role of a public servant. I think a former secretary of state should not charge what the market will bear, but only what is reasonable, and should only appear for worthy causes. Yes, the Clintons use their foundation as a political tool. Canadian energy corporations do not give money to US charities because they're worried about American kids getting obese. They give money because they want to be connected to people who can help them, and the Clintons are such people. Is it quid pro quo? Legally, no. I don't like it, but it will pass ethics guidelines, which I would argue are too loose.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
3. His role should be whatever the new President wants it to be.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 12:56 PM
Jun 2015

He is the best politician of his generation.

He could fill what ever role he wants.

I suspect, like first wives, he will choose a role

Sancho

(9,070 posts)
5. I doubt he will campaign for Hillary, but he will likely help with fundraisers.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:19 PM
Jun 2015

Bill would upstage Hillary in some cases, so I would think he would attend "closed door" events, continue with the Foundation, and maybe hit some late night shows or other entertainment spots.

Of course, I might be wrong.

Haha..Bill would make an awesome VP!!

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
6. I certainly hope he campaigns for HIllary if she's the nominee
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:21 PM
Jun 2015

I see him as an asset - the same way Michelle Obama was an asset for PBO.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
7. If I were Hillary, he would be standing next to me a a large portion of events.
Tue Jun 30, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jun 2015

Very limited speaking. Just a little laugh here and there. When people see his face they smile. They get a good feeling. Everyone in their right mind would want that association. Just like people who hand things out before they present something. It automatically associates the speaker with something good. It is done on a smaller scale in every single campaign.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»two questions for Hillary...