Want a quick look at all state's latest polls for the Democratic Primaries?

[MineralMan]

Try Wikipedia's page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016

It's updated frequently, and reflects recent polls in all 50 states, with historical poll results, as well. It's a good, one-stop source for what's going on. It will continue to be updated throughout the campaign.

There are many other sources, of course, but not many that show all 50 states in one place.

Note: Polling has not been done in all states, so there are gaps at this point, and some states only show older polls, since no more recent data are available.

[Agnosticsherbet]

1. It appears that with good candidates in the race tings

things have tightened a bit in some states. It still looks a bit one sided.

[MineralMan]

2. I like this link, because I can see when the latest

poll was done and then look down to see earlier polling. Trends show up pretty clearly.

Pretty soon, there will be more states with poll results.

At this point, Clinton is still ahead in all states according to these numbers, although her lead is decreasing in some. Oddly, Vermont hasn't been polled for quite some time. Could be that Sanders is ahead there at this point, but without poll numbers, that's not clear.

Senator Sanders still has more work to do. That's clear enough.

[Agnosticsherbet]

6. I like information but tired of seeing

the conflict around which is good information and which is a hit piece.

Because I vote in California in June 2016, I have chosen not to support anyone. Chances are good that the race will be decided before I go to the polls, and refusing to choose a champion helps me keep confirmation bias at bay.

[MineralMan]

9. Yes. It's very likely that the winner will be clear by the

date of California's primary. Personally, I think the winner will be known as of March 1, 2016, which is Super Tuesday. That's the big shakeout day for Presidential Primaries. If there's a clear leader with several primary wins on March 2, the answer will be clear. That's the day of Minnesota's straw caucus vote for President, too.

[yallerdawg]

3. I'm going to "favorite!"

Quick click on reality!

Thank you, MM.

[MineralMan]

10. My pleasure. I'm always looking for places I can visit

that are accurate, reliable and up-to-date. Wikipedia's contributors are on top of things like this, so you can expect poll results to show up on that page within 24 hours.

[JaneyVee]

4. Hold on, Clinton is leading in Vermont?

Seems a bit suspect, no? I haven't seen VT polling.

Btw, thanks for the link.

ETA: I just saw your post #2 which cleared it up.

[morningfog]

5. The most recent polling was from Oct 2014. Before either candidate had announced.

Not relevant to the race today.

[MineralMan]

8. Yes. It's crucial to look at the date of the poll.

A bunch of states are still showing Elizabeth Warren from old polls, but not Senator Sanders. The date is right there, though. There hasn't been a lot of polling in a lot of states, and none in some. Look at the national polling, and most of those states will be in line with the national polls right now, I imagine. States where active campaigning is going on are more likely to have poll figures that are recent.

[antiquie]

7. Check individual states to see how current.

California

Field Poll
Margin of error: ± 7.0%
Sample size: 356
April 23-May 16, 2015
Hillary Clinton 53%
Elizabeth Warren 13%
Joe Biden 6%
Bernie Sanders 5%
Jim Webb 1%,
Martin O'Malley 0%,
Lincoln Chafee 0%,
Undecided/other 22%

Emerson College
Margin of error: ± ?
Sample size: 487
April 2–8, 2015
Hillary Clinton 56%
Elizabeth Warren 11%
Joe Biden 8%
Bernie Sanders 3%
Martin O'Malley 2%
Jim Webb 1%
Andrew Cuomo 0%,
Other 2%
Undecided 17%

Field Poll
Margin of error: ± 5%
Sample size: 425
January 26–February 16, 2015
Hillary Clinton 59%
Elizabeth Warren 17%
Joe Biden 9%
Bernie Sanders 6%
Jim Webb 2%
Others <0.5%
Undecided 7%

Minds can change with more information.