Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:02 AM Jul 2015

Bernie Sanders negatives are HUGE!!!!!

He's rumpled. Agreed.
He has cotton candy hair. Agreed
Someone tweeted he looked grumpy. Oh you twitter.
He wrote an article decades ago about how men's magazines present sexual fantasies from the perspective of men citing men's sexual fantasies published in men's magazines resulting in the conclusion that women and men should approach sexuality as equals. i am horrified.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders negatives are HUGE!!!!! (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jul 2015 OP
Also he's getting crushed in the polls, just lost a major union endorsement, has minimal fundraising DanTex Jul 2015 #1
And 18% of *Democrats* say they would not consider voting for him (nt) Recursion Jul 2015 #3
Well now I am totally confuzled. Should I go with that 18% or the 92% that swoon over his Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #9
Right, no threat at all whatchamacallit Jul 2015 #4
No threat to the GOP, no. His supporters might damage Hillary's chances in the GE if they DanTex Jul 2015 #6
Really. What right wing smears are Bernie supporters repeating? Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #12
When we tell you facts, you often perceive it as a right wing smear or some attack against your London Lover Man Jul 2015 #18
Did he seek that endorsement? No he did not. So he did not lose it. And he is a Democratic Luminous Animal Jul 2015 #5
Good strategy. Don't seek union endorsements. DanTex Jul 2015 #8
I know it. Talk about right wing smears, then omit the word "Democratic" from Democratic Socialist. GoneFishin Jul 2015 #20
And are those poll numbers... daleanime Jul 2015 #10
He's a Democratic Socialist, not a socialist. And rising quickly in the polls. grahamhgreen Jul 2015 #30
And he eats kittens. zappaman Jul 2015 #2
Now hold on a minute, just because some neighbors.... daleanime Jul 2015 #11
That explains the furry ears. SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #22
It was just a criticism of rape culture and the internalized gender role stereotypes of patriarchy Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #7
Most people will see (know about) this, how? immoderate Jul 2015 #14
I don't think most people will read it and understand it in those terms. Cheese Sandwich Jul 2015 #17
My point is, (most) people will never be aware it exists, much less delve into its nuances. immoderate Jul 2015 #19
Don't sell us short. I got this far. n/t SusanaMontana41 Jul 2015 #23
None of those issues bother me... brooklynite Jul 2015 #13
He'll just have to settle for winning the following November. frylock Jul 2015 #15
And with that hair! nt artislife Jul 2015 #21
If he gets the most votes (and barring "irregularities") he will win. immoderate Jul 2015 #16
Most candidates DON'T "get the most votes" brooklynite Jul 2015 #24
The same way as any other politician. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #27
Just like President Kucinich did? brooklynite Jul 2015 #28
President Kucinich didn't get through the primary. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #29
People provide the votes. Unless there is a tie, (rare) one of them will get the most. immoderate Jul 2015 #31
Bernie2016 newfie11 Jul 2015 #25
I clicked in just to see if 'negatives' were a new euphemism for something else... nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #26

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
1. Also he's getting crushed in the polls, just lost a major union endorsement, has minimal fundraising
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:18 AM
Jul 2015

capacity, and is a self-described socialist in a nation where only 48% of the electorate would even consider voting for one.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
9. Well now I am totally confuzled. Should I go with that 18% or the 92% that swoon over his
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:32 AM
Jul 2015

cotton candy hair. Enquiring minds want to know.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
6. No threat to the GOP, no. His supporters might damage Hillary's chances in the GE if they
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:28 AM
Jul 2015

keep repeating right-wing smears against her though. But of course they would never do that. Oh, wait.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
18. When we tell you facts, you often perceive it as a right wing smear or some attack against your
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:51 AM
Jul 2015

favorite candidate, when factchecking.

Oh, and Correct the Record is not a valid site for resources.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
5. Did he seek that endorsement? No he did not. So he did not lose it. And he is a Democratic
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:25 AM
Jul 2015

Socialist. Now how about you spend some time actually refuting his platform from a Democratic perspective. Tear them apart. Put some effort into it.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
11. Now hold on a minute, just because some neighbors....
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:38 AM
Jul 2015

have complained about the smell of burning hair it's.....oops.



 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
7. It was just a criticism of rape culture and the internalized gender role stereotypes of patriarchy
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:29 AM
Jul 2015

Even though it was poorly executed. That's how I read it anyway And you seem to be roughly seeing that too. I don't think most people are going to get that though.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
17. I don't think most people will read it and understand it in those terms.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:46 AM
Jul 2015

Yet this seems to be the actual meaning.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
19. My point is, (most) people will never be aware it exists, much less delve into its nuances.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:35 AM
Jul 2015

Let's invoke some reality here.

--imm

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
13. None of those issues bother me...
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:40 AM
Jul 2015

...neither do any of his positions.

It's just that thing about not being able to win in November.....

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
16. If he gets the most votes (and barring "irregularities") he will win.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:46 AM
Jul 2015

There is no good reason he can't. And he won't get us into a war.

--imm

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
24. Most candidates DON'T "get the most votes"
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:16 AM
Jul 2015

...and no substantive explanation from his supporters as to how he will.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
27. The same way as any other politician.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:35 AM
Jul 2015

He'll tell voters what his ideas are, they'll agree with them, and they'll vote for him.

brooklynite

(94,598 posts)
28. Just like President Kucinich did?
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:41 AM
Jul 2015

he won'thave the financial resources to hire staff to organize support,or to pay for advertising to counter what the Republicans put up.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
29. President Kucinich didn't get through the primary.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:48 AM
Jul 2015

Heck, did he even get through the first 2 primary states?

While you obviously see the two as being the same, a lot of voters already seem to disagree with you, and it's my contention that as the campaigns go on, that number will grow.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
31. People provide the votes. Unless there is a tie, (rare) one of them will get the most.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 11:48 AM
Jul 2015

That will be the winner. Simple.

--imm

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders negatives ...