2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Sniper Fire Revisited (2008)
While I would love nothing more than to vote for a woman president, I guess I will "let this cat out of the bag". It cannot be wished away. A Commander in Chief cannot take lightly life and death in a war zone. It needs to be said and the Republicans will use it as a whip along with everything else. She lied about sniper fire, it was not "misspeak" as she claimed. One does not misspeak a revelation or story, one fabricates:
Hillary Clinton ran for President in 2007, she made an outlandish claim that as first lady, she had to run through a hail of sniper fire in Bosnia. "It was a moment of great pride for me," Clinton recalled from behind a campaign podium.
[link:
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Good grief.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...it's coming.
mymomwasright
(298 posts)She said it and it isn't a conspiracy theory!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)There are much bigger issues to consider.
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)mymomwasright
(298 posts)I cant tell you how many numerous times I had to "button up" troops just because the current POTUS was black or "Muslim" because of stupid conservative BS. So to characterize this as a non-issue is disrespectful to those who need to believe their leaders stand for integrity in the military! It may not mean squat to you, but it does to them!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I know you fear Hillary and you should because she is a very strong candidate it will probably win the WH easily.
madokie
(51,076 posts)she'll say anything that she thinks will help further her cause. Get over it.
I'm a 15 month in-country Vietnam Vet and I've yet to embellish my story in any way. Of course I'm not a liar though, never have been and won't be starting now. As my mom would say son always tell the truth then you don't have to worry with remembering what you said later on.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)"Liars do what liars do, they lie".
You got that right liars do what liars do they lie. She told a bald faced lie and we all know it. Deal with it but don't try to convince me otherwise and whatever you do don't put me in the same class as her. Got it?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)See, the great thing about being a reasonable, rational person is that I don't have to hold every human to some way-too-creepy high of a bar that it makes me blind to all the other wonderful and admirable qualities and traits about that person. In other words, I can recognize that humans make mistakes, while also recognizing that mistakes don't define a person. Hey, don't worry, I won't put you in the same class as her.
Surely you would hold yourself to such a high bar by never telling a lie, yes?
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #49)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)hope all is well with you
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I'm freakin' loving primary season, even though it ain't begun yet!
mymomwasright
(298 posts)<SARC>
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)The military tends to conservative. I have worked for the DoD my whole career. I know it. Everybody overstates things now and again. This is a gigantic non-issue. It's already cooked into the numbers.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)And she definitely did NOT exaggerate. An exaggeration would have consisted of an embellishment of the facts, but in this case her story wasn't an embellishment it was made up bullshit from the gitgo.
And it wasn't "misspeaking" it was a flat ass lie.
Why did she feel the need to do it? I have no clue, but the fact that she did showed me a disturbing lack of character.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Whitewater was 75% bullshit, Vince Foster was 100% bullshit.
Snipergate is an example of a politician with a very tenuous relationship with the truth. She didn't "misspeak", she fucking lied.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)You're a senator, a former First Lady of Arkansas and of the US, and you're running for President, yet you feel a need to lie to make yourself somehow look bigger/more important? Where does it end? When do the lies stop? Why should we believe anything that comes out of her mouth?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Deflect all you want, but there's documented video evidence of her making that statement.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)To make such a big deal out of it is akin to RW bashing.
frylock
(34,825 posts)an exaggeration. Just like her new economic policy. An exaggeration.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Its the human element. Bernie has said and written some dumb things in his past. I dont much care about that crap.
Hillary is a good decent person who I believe will be a very good President and she can win. That's the bottom line.
mymomwasright
(298 posts)Truth has no place in the decision of our leader?
frylock
(34,825 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Another thing we shouldn't hold against her?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)someone into STFU. Man oh man is the frequency of their use being cranked up by Hillary Clinton supporters...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Saying you caught a bigger fish than you actually did is an exaggeration. Nonexistent sniper fire is a lie.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It gives low information voters a reason to doubt her denials of the ones that are pure bull s*$#
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)indicates that she takes lightly life and death in a war zone is truly ridiculous.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)Does it indicate that she takes battlefield deaths lightly? Not really. Be that as it may, her record of support for immoral wars that kill lots of innocent bystanders is one big reason I favor Sanders.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)show me that Hillary likes to "play tough" for the armchair warriors, which disgusts me.
Response to mymomwasright (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)11cents
(1,777 posts)Specifically, this paragraph:
"To some degree, hard feelings are inevitable in politics. The Times has recently documented how successful
conservative groups such as Karl Roves American Crossroads are at planting anti-Clinton messages among
Democrats. That Hillary hater on Facebook may be a professional troll. Theyre also spending big bucks on focus
groups, studying how to make the partys likeliest nominee look like a gold-plated bitch come November 2016."
In any case, it's the "more in sorrow than in anger" tone that marks the post out as mendacious.
mymomwasright
(298 posts)I am not a troll, as it is probably much to your chagrin. As a combat vet and reformed conservative of 15 years I support only the complete truth teller as I can best see in them. Liars and wishful thinking don't square with me. Have a nice day!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Entire fortunes have been built from planting bullshit about the Clintons, but these are her own words. She planted them.
While the majority of criticisms against the Clintons are bullshit, this is not one of them. How one feels about it is another story.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)mymomwasright
(298 posts)EOM
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Politicians "embellish" stories all the time. Some of them become politicians because they think of the way things should be, not the way they are. Reagan was the prime example. He would lapse into a dream state and tell bizarre stories at the drop of a hat. The best one was how he was present when US troops liberated a Nazi concentration camp. Politicians are always telling how they stuck up for a homeless person, helped an old lady cross the street, rescued a kitten from a tree. We let them get away with most of it, although I'm not sure we ought to. When it comes to wars, combat zones and military stuff, we get picky because we are gripped by this "hero" mentality. But don't get me started on that. I'm not sure this "sniper fire" thing is a big deal. It suggests Clinton is a typical politician, but that's about all I would read into it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Reagan said he was one of the concentration camp liberators when in reality he was a stateside officer making recruitment films.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)He said he was there, although I don't remember him saying he was an actual participant. Either way, it's very, very strange.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But Reagans fabrications also included whoppers about conflict zones reminiscent of those put forth by Williams and Clinton. During Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamirs November 1983 visit to the U.S., Reagan told Shamir that during his service in the U.S. Army film corps, he and fellow members of his unit personally shot footage of the Nazis concentration camps as they were liberated. Reagan would tell this story again to others, including Holocaust survivor Simon Wiesenthal. But Reagan was never present at the camps liberation. Instead, he spent the war in Culver City, California, where he processed footage from the liberation of the camps.
http://www.salon.com/2015/02/07/ronald_reagans_wartime_lies_the_president_had_quite_a_brian_williams_problem/
mymomwasright
(298 posts)I'm not a big traitor Reagan fan, but was he on tape, all over the internet making these claims? Maybe I missed your point, are you saying every Commander in Chief deserves a pass if they make an over the top statement regarding a combat zone? You, right here, are defending a LIE! Not a "slip of the tongue".
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I just cited the fact that Reagan said he was at the liberation of the death camps when he wasn't.
Politicians of all stripes, even some I admire, gild the lily.
And don't put words in my mouth...
mymomwasright
(298 posts)EOm
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)-I detested Reaganism
-Lots of politicians , even some I/we admire, like the current president and vice president, gilded the lily.
-The stolen valor argument is absurd.It's not like she gave herself a Purple Heart.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I'm a combat vet and I don't take too kindly to someone telling bullshit stories about what they did or didn't do.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I see your Vietnam Service Ribbon. My military experience was way, far away from combat. In fact, I got into a technical specialty to stay away from the shooting, because I knew I would step in front of one the first day. I heard so many sea stories I figured there was no point in trying to figure out who really did what. The clue that a big exaggeration was on the way was when some guy started a story with the phrase, "Hey. This is a no-shitter..."
madokie
(51,076 posts)your service was as important as any of ours. It was you guys/gals who took care of us when we needed it or brought us the muchly needed supplies or hell even the letters from home that meant so much to us. For all that I thank you.
We were all in it together
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)when a working class person would be hounded as a no account liar.
Which of your examples is on video and in recent memory being completely full of shirt about there little story and how is dodging sniper fire "helping a little old lady across the street"?
I'm thinking the puppy rescue story might not go as well if video evidence actually showed the fable maker to actually kick the ship out of Fido.
Absurdly poor judgment and relic mindedness to think such a whopper would not be definitely refuted in 24 hours. No, it is nothing in a practical sense as your examples, we can't flat out disprove them with the person's own words run over video backed up by living memory that no such thing happened. You think something like that involving someone of Clinton's exposure would be a complete non story? Please!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)not an exaggeration.
http://www.stripes.com/news/veterans/what-is-stolen-valor-1.107359
Some phonies, with zero military experience, create their stories from whole cloth.
...
In the United States, thousands of cases have been documented in recent years in which judges, politicians, celebrities, veterans group officials, antiwar activists, other prominent persons and average citizens have been exposed for lying about their military record.
Some of them simply boast of their fictional exploits.
It is a LIE.
Response to Ino (Reply #46)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)tymorial
(3,433 posts)Thank you for reminding me of this incident. I can't imagine a commander and chief making up a story like this is going to play well with the troops.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Oh.
That's what you can say.
I shouldn't be surprised.
But look what it lead to: Brian Williams and his misspeak.
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Go to the pinned thread that mentions Bernie logos.
Then go to last or near last post and you will see the Sanderstorm
put your cursor over the image
Left click
You will see a menu of options
click on save image as a url
Then
go to your profile
scroll down to your signature line
copy...it will look like a link
save
and then you will have it.
It seems strange to copy an image into a link but that is how you do it!
appalachiablue
(41,145 posts)send 'Sanderstorm' to contacts so I'll give it a go!
Got it! Some of these are so creative and wild. Love it! Haven't seen a "Bernami" yet, that will be smthg.!
artislife
(9,497 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)"sex fights cervical cancer," we can live through this. although i do think this has some relevance,as it sheds light on a candidate's feelings about war and combat
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Or did it come from a peer-reviewed medical journal?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i do think someone's war "history" is important, but i really want to see where they differ economically. want some answers from hillary not more dancing.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)Being a "combat vet" did you ever fly and do a 'hot landing'? Scary shit. At least she's been to Bosnia. Oh, and when did trolling become an acceptable form of communicating?
People that aren't experienced "combat vets" like you would swear they were under attack during a 'hot landing'.
Telcontar
(660 posts)Not seeing how that could possibly be interpreted as a "hot landing".
postatomic
(1,771 posts)...and is even a little comical. Have a nice life.
Telcontar
(660 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)This goes straight to the core of "do you trust candidate X?"......no way we don't see this hundreds of times if she's the nominee. No bueno.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Despite the fact that this was in the news previously I don't think very many people are aware that she made these claims and if she becomes the nominee I fear the Republicans will take her down with this. Most Republican acts are total bullshit so we can defend ourselves against them, but because Hillary was stupid enough to lie in front of the cameras we really don't have a good defense against this one. I seriously can not understand how people can consider her a good candidate, we really don't want her in the general election when she is carrying this sort of baggage.
askew
(1,464 posts)followed by video of her receiving flowers on the tarmac, followed by Sinbad who was on the same flight making fun of Hillary for lying and just ask "If she'd lie about something this trivial, what else is she lying about? Hillary can't be trusted." Over and over and over again. Her tendency to lie and exaggerate has gotten her in trouble throughout her entire career and I think it will be her undoing in the general election. Voters have to actually like the person they vote for president. They liked W. They liked Obama. They don't like Hillary. I don't see that changing unless Trump gets the nomination.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)which may trick some people into believing the ones that are.
udbcrzy2
(891 posts)She was just making it up. I call that a lie and she didn't have to do it.
En Garde
(94 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)It makes our political system suck, it makes DU suck, it is crap.
I'll take Sanders over Clinton any day ON THE ISSUES. I don't care about this bullshit.
DVRacer
(707 posts)This is the main reason I don't think I could ever vote for her. I was there in Bosnia at Camp Eagle in '95-'97 she lied no if's and or but's. I was injured durning that time and am disabled because of it.
DVRacer
(707 posts)[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/]upload a picture[/url]
VF-84 TARPS
VF-41 TARPS
A/C Operations Detachment Keyhole satellite
I specialized in image interpretation and gave in the field real time updates.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/TARPS
Response to DVRacer (Reply #73)
Darb This message was self-deleted by its author.
Darb
(2,807 posts)I don't trust much these days and this type of shit makes me nuts.
Vote however you want to vote.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Terrible candidate.
Just terrible.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)I'm sure Hillary supporters would be understanding of his human foibles and not go there.
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)But she lied, she went along with the war mongers to invade Iraq and when she lied about being under sniper fire (Bosnia) not sure, and caught out that she lied, she went ballistic on President Obama, both she and her husband. Yet, he was kind to her and made her Secretary of State. I sorta feel that the Clintons are so into power that they would trample anyone to get back in the White House.
If Mr. Sanders is not gaining ground and O'Malley also not gaining ground, I am wishing that Mr. Biden steps in. If he does not, and Kuchinich (sp) nor Richardson step in, perhaps Mrs. Clinton will be inevitable. I hate liars, liars cannot be trusted plus she is for bankers and not for poor people. The only person who was for poor people was John Edwards and man, did he fuck up!