Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DavidDvorkin

(19,480 posts)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:41 PM Jul 2015

Alan Grayson doesn't want to raise taxes on the rich

Florida Rep. Alan Grayson, who is now running for Senate, has loudly insisted for years that he's the Democratic Party's leading exponent of what it means to be a true progressive. So it comes as quite a shock to see him articulate views about taxation that don't sound progressive at all:

He's pledged to make income inequality and other progressive priorities a focus of his bid. And Grayson told NBC he'd like to make eliminating the income tax for the poorest Americans a key priority. But he seemed more reluctant to tackle the tax rate for top income-earners like himself.

"One way that you could try to address [income inequality] is through the tax system, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you tax people who make more money more," he said.

"At the top end, it's a complicated situation," he added. "I can tell you, in fact, there are repercussions and second order effects that come from modifying the tax rates at the top."


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/07/17/1403225/-Alan-Grayson-the-self-described-Elizabeth-Warren-of-2016-doesn-t-want-to-tax-the-rich-more
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alan Grayson doesn't want to raise taxes on the rich (Original Post) DavidDvorkin Jul 2015 OP
For himself, then? bravenak Jul 2015 #1
I think there are repercussions for too high taxes, even at the top. But I don't think we are at Hoyt Jul 2015 #2
Obviously not, given that their taxes used to be a lot higher than they are now. DavidDvorkin Jul 2015 #3
Like I said, we aren't at the point repercussions occur. Hoyt Jul 2015 #5
Alan stops by here now and then Hydra Jul 2015 #4
He doesn't really stop by here DavidDvorkin Jul 2015 #6
Thats too bad Hydra Jul 2015 #8
That's too bad.....:( artislife Jul 2015 #7
Ouch Recursion Jul 2015 #9
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I think there are repercussions for too high taxes, even at the top. But I don't think we are at
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:46 PM
Jul 2015

that point for upper income people.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
4. Alan stops by here now and then
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:53 PM
Jul 2015

Maybe he'll outline what he thinks should be done.

I think there are better ways to control wealth than taxation, but we're not doing those things either, so...ya, we need to be taxing the hell out of Wall St and others.

DavidDvorkin

(19,480 posts)
6. He doesn't really stop by here
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 10:00 PM
Jul 2015

Someone in his campaign occasionally posts a long position paper here. No one from his campaign replies to questions those posts raise.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Ouch
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 11:58 PM
Jul 2015


Now, sure, everybody agrees there are marginal repurcussions. But then again some of those are good.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Alan Grayson doesn't want...