Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAlan Grayson doesn't want to raise taxes on the rich
Florida Rep. Alan Grayson, who is now running for Senate, has loudly insisted for years that he's the Democratic Party's leading exponent of what it means to be a true progressive. So it comes as quite a shock to see him articulate views about taxation that don't sound progressive at all:
He's pledged to make income inequality and other progressive priorities a focus of his bid. And Grayson told NBC he'd like to make eliminating the income tax for the poorest Americans a key priority. But he seemed more reluctant to tackle the tax rate for top income-earners like himself.
"One way that you could try to address [income inequality] is through the tax system, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you tax people who make more money more," he said.
"At the top end, it's a complicated situation," he added. "I can tell you, in fact, there are repercussions and second order effects that come from modifying the tax rates at the top."
He's pledged to make income inequality and other progressive priorities a focus of his bid. And Grayson told NBC he'd like to make eliminating the income tax for the poorest Americans a key priority. But he seemed more reluctant to tackle the tax rate for top income-earners like himself.
"One way that you could try to address [income inequality] is through the tax system, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you tax people who make more money more," he said.
"At the top end, it's a complicated situation," he added. "I can tell you, in fact, there are repercussions and second order effects that come from modifying the tax rates at the top."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/07/17/1403225/-Alan-Grayson-the-self-described-Elizabeth-Warren-of-2016-doesn-t-want-to-tax-the-rich-more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1056 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alan Grayson doesn't want to raise taxes on the rich (Original Post)
DavidDvorkin
Jul 2015
OP
I think there are repercussions for too high taxes, even at the top. But I don't think we are at
Hoyt
Jul 2015
#2
Obviously not, given that their taxes used to be a lot higher than they are now.
DavidDvorkin
Jul 2015
#3
bravenak
(34,648 posts)1. For himself, then?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. I think there are repercussions for too high taxes, even at the top. But I don't think we are at
that point for upper income people.
DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)3. Obviously not, given that their taxes used to be a lot higher than they are now.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)5. Like I said, we aren't at the point repercussions occur.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)4. Alan stops by here now and then
Maybe he'll outline what he thinks should be done.
I think there are better ways to control wealth than taxation, but we're not doing those things either, so...ya, we need to be taxing the hell out of Wall St and others.
DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)6. He doesn't really stop by here
Someone in his campaign occasionally posts a long position paper here. No one from his campaign replies to questions those posts raise.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)8. Thats too bad
Missing an opportunity there. We must be too radical :p
artislife
(9,497 posts)7. That's too bad.....:(
Recursion
(56,582 posts)9. Ouch
Now, sure, everybody agrees there are marginal repurcussions. But then again some of those are good.