2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie: I want an America where young black men are not harassed, killed and shot in the streets.
Bernie continuing his tour of not reaching out to minorities(sarcasm), brought down the house in Iowa and brought the crowd to its feet by railing against the absurdity of the current criminal justice system and the need for reforms. He also called for bringing 11 million immigrants out of the shadows and onto a path toward citizenship. Very excited to see what he says at today's rally in Pheonix.
"And like everybody in this room, I want to see an America where when young black men walk down the street they will not be harassed by police officers, they will not be killed; they will not be shot!" (Standing Ovation)
"To his credit, President Obama did something extraordinary the other day, he had the courage to go to a federal jail and talk about the absurdity of a criminal justice system in which if we don't change it 1 out of 4 male African Americans born today will end up behind bars. That is NOT the America we believe in."
"And that's why we believe it makes more sense to invest in jobs and education, not jails and incarceration!"
"And to our 11 million brothers and sisters who are living in the shadows today, we say loudly and we say clearly we are going to bring you out of the shadows and on a path toward citizenship. And we're not going to divide families up, brothers and sisters... we are the wealthiest nation in the world, there is nothing we cannot accomplish."
Whole speech is worth watching, but comments about specifically about race start at 15:00 ->
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I've always known, based on his record, that he was a champion of social justice. With the current state of the nation, though, those most affected by injustice need to hear it.
And they are. I hope we're all listening.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)i really needed to hear that from Bernie, even though I've donated, volunteered, and attended
a Portland OR organizing/meet-up for him already. That whole Netroots dust-up was great in
a way, because Bernie fucking LISTENED to BLM's pain and passion and then embraced it .. what? ..
within a few hours, in a major speech before 12,000 supporters. Now that is a real people's
representative, if ever there was one. I love this guy.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)and the speech before 12,000...I haven't been to the 'puter since yesterday afternoon.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Recommended and bookmarked for later viewing
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)chance to join Bernie and other courageous Democrats, see Barbara Lee eg, to vote against them? NCLB, now she says she might have made a mistake, Bush's Iraq War, now she says she might have made a mistake, The Patriot Act, still waiting to my knowledge, for an apology for signing away our Constitutional rights.
The 'mistakes' she has made, her opposition to Marriage Equality eg, have been huge, more like the votes we would expect from the right.
Bernie otoh, has a nearly perfect record on all this issues.
So explain to us why we Liberals, should support someone who voted FOR everything we opposed while she was in the Senate, and AGAINST issues like Marriage Equality which we liberals and Bernie supported?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Which seems to have worked marvelously.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)I keep hearing the same note over and over.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)A lot of us are gun owners. My grandfather and his cousins were all avid hunters and owned what some would call "arsenals". Hell, more black people than whites among people I know are gun owners and most have a concealed carry permit and some that don't are seriously considering it.
I don't get the question in context of the statement. The votes (which I support and agree with) and the belief that black folks shouldn't be harassed and killed by cops are lightyears from mutually exclusive.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)But cops aren't the only ones killing blacks. America just buried 9 wonderful souls killed with the help of lax gun laws.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)check.
IMO Bernie voted on gun issue that represent the way his state wanted him to. They have a gun manufacturer who supplied guns for the American Revolution. They are also a state of hunters like my own state of MN.
As president of the USA I expect him to reflect the wishes of the people of the USA.
eridani
(51,907 posts)High gun ownership and low crime--he is representing his constituents, but clearly understands that the US is way larger than Vermont.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though, more realistically, it's probably because Vermont has a high proportion of gun owners and he was voting the way his constituents wanted him to. (Which, to a large extent, is his job.)
ram2008
(1,238 posts)High gun ownership rate, with very low gun violence.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Why enact a 50 state federal repeal of PPLCA?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And I'm relatively skeptical of most gun control proposals. All I'll say about his vote is that it's disappointing (it's not even particularly a "red meat" issue to gun owners, which would at least be politically understandable).
jwirr
(39,215 posts)law and voting the way your state wants you to vote.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The gun problem is a gang issue in LA and Chicago. Not a problem of rural white America.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/05/politics/bernie-sanders-gun-control/
jeff47
(26,549 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Wednesday, April 17, 2013
WASHINGTON, April 17 Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today voted for expanded background checks on gun buyers and for a ban on assault weapons but the Senate rejected those central planks of legislation inspired by the shootings of 20 first-grade students and six teachers in Newtown, Conn.
Nobody believes that gun control by itself is going to end the horrors we have seen in Newtown, Conn., Aurora, Colo., Blacksburg, Va., Tucson, Ariz. and other American communities, Sanders said. There is a growing consensus, however, in Vermont and across America that we have got to do as much as we can to end the cold-blooded, mass murders of innocent people. I believe very strongly that we also have got to address the mental health crisis in our country and make certain that help is available for people who may be a danger to themselves and others, Sanders added.
The amendment on expanded background checks needed 60 votes to pass but only 54 senators voted for it. To my mind it makes common sense to keep these weapons out of the hands of people with criminal records or mental health histories, Sanders said.
Under current federal law, background checks are not performed for tens of thousands of sales up to 40 percent of all gun transfers at gun shows or over the Internet. The amendment would have required background checks for all gun sales in commercial settings regardless of whether the seller is a licensed dealer. The compromise proposal would have exempted sales between family, friends, and neighbors.
In a separate roll call, the Senate rejected a proposal to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. That proposal was defeated by a vote of 60 to 40.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-votes-for-background-checks-assault-weapons-ban
The sudden "concern" about racial issues and guns is noted.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Has zero to do with the content, but mission accomplished. So "reasonable", as you like to proclaim yourself.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)he is a Socialist who sees all problems as class struggle.
Young black men aren't in jail because of a lack of jobs. They are there because they are disproportionally targeted.
BTW, Vermont despite having a very low number of black residents has one of the highest rates of blacks in jail.
ram2008
(1,238 posts)Did he not just say he wants to end the absurdity of criminal justice system and the harassment and targeting blacks in the street? What else could he possibly say?
Poverty -> Lack of education/role models-> battle for resources -> Committing Crime to survive/Violence -> Jail -> and the circle continues
Economics is the root of all of it.
msrizzo
(796 posts)Sandra Bland was not poor.
artislife
(9,497 posts)msrizzo
(796 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)that bogus assertion up to knock it down.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Bernie Sanders is not in the habit of lying like other candidates. If he came out on stage and said, "I will end racism while I'm President," he would be laughed at by every black and brown person in this country. And yet, Hillary people demand nothing less. Why?
I wonder why you would attack the candidate with the best record on civil rights? Hmm, could it be that maybe she has some of the stench of the Crime Bill and Welfare Reform and 2008 on her? Are you trying to play offense so everyone forgets that shit? Believe me, they might have tried to forget, but they will remember.
The funny thing is that many who believe themselves to be "politically savvy" have fallen for this campaign-generated swiftboating. And now a whole segment of white Hillary supporters have taken up the trumpet and just *care* so much. They care so much they hammer it in every thread to prop up their candidate. Isn't that special, a campaign talking point.
Transparent as glass.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I was wondering the same thing.
Could it be that this is just a game to some people?
I wish I could rec your post.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)in a primary for the Democratic nomination.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Why is it only Dems who are way too far to the right of Bernie think socialism is a dirty word?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)or saying socialism is a clean word or a dirty word.
The ISSUE is Sanders sees everything primarily from a Socialist perspective.
He see first the class struggle. Which is why his rhetoric is the way it is and has been for the last 50 years.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)When someone starts hurling around that term like it's an insult I remember all of the right wing Republicans who do the same exact thing.
Like I said, cheap shot.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)I didn't use the word as an insult. LOL!
I pointed out Sanders' adherence to a Socialist script he learned 50 years ago means he incorrectly reduces everything to a class struggle.
This is a simple, true assessment of him, his rhetoric and his world view.
Not everything reduces down to a class struggle.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's a real turn off.
Don't expect people to listen to you after doing so, you may have valid points but I stopped listening.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)I did mention it.
That said> I do think if we were having a philosophical discussion with him he would absoluately lean towards democratic socialism more than truly communistic socialism.
But the framework he uses is Socialist. Old school.
It's not about him being "bad". It's about him being one-note and limited.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I disagree that he's old school and limited but that's what the primaries are for.
Valid criticism should be welcomed.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)That is just nonsense. If you actually listened to him, you wouldn't push that silly meme. For example, when he talks about police violence against blacks, he talks about the need for police reform, for community policing, etc. Class struggle doesn't enter into it.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)which is not primarily a class issue, and Bernie is not approaching it as one.
The one-note see-everything-as-a-class-struggle talking point is incorrect.
Even if it was correct (and it is not), we should be so lucky to finally have someone sticking up for us in a class struggle. The $2 billion dollar woman (or how ever much she will raise for this election) is certainly not going to wage a class war on our side.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 02:05 AM - Edit history (1)
Mm-hm... keep trying. This meme is old though, so beware, people are used to countering it.
onecaliberal
(32,878 posts)Masters and the status quo and then keep wondering why things don't change.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 02:04 AM - Edit history (1)
Total RW attack. Shame on you.
Bernie is running as a Democrat for president. He's doing so because he thinks he has to. I do too.
Bernie is one of the best Democrats there is. He out-Democrats the Democrats that have a 'D' after their name. He is like FDR. Did you hate him too? Or is Bernie advocating for something far removed from an FDR New Deal platform? What are the socialist policies he is running on?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Not worth the bogus alerts it'd get.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)most states. He has identified himself as a Democratic Socialist which is the party that we know best as the party of most of the Scandinavian countries in Europe. And they are capitalist countries with strong social programs.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)and not a Democratic Socialist.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)as the oldest member of my family who are almost all POC.
yes there is discrimination and police brutality - I do not need him to tell me over and over about that - we live with that everyday. I will accept that he is aware of it and has a plan for helping. And I will accept his history of civil rights action as proof. And as MLK said that plan includes helping my family get paying jobs and education.
So many are acting as if he should go to Iowa - where I lived most of my life among a mostly white population and talk non-stop about the problems of race. What they want to hear in Iowa is what the hell he is planning to do about their problems. That is what they want from Hillary also. When Jesse Jackson went to Iowa when he was running for president he actually talked to the farmers about their problems but Bernie is not supposed to do that. If he does he is accused of no caring about the rest of the country.
In Cedar Rapids Iowa last night he was the only candidate who did bring up those issues.
You can continue to demand he talk about what you want but instead I think you should ask your candidate to start telling us clearly what she thinks about TPP and Keystone XL and Glass-Steagell. She seems to be very reluctant to say much about economic issues.
BTW isn't wealth inequality class struggle? It is to me.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)when it comes to practicalities but his rhetorical framework is closer to that used in Socialism.
And I admit that seems like I"m splitting hairs. So sorry for that.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)and the thing is, if O'Malley drops out I'm voting for Bernie in the NY primary if he's still in.
Unless Biden joins, then that changes everything.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)he existed.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I didn't think one was hideworthy and I would hope that no jury would vote to hide it. People should be able to read what you think and see where you stand. I think this thread makes it very obvious.
And my answer is yes, the thread I posted was entirely transparent. I was making fun of people who push this stupid meme. And yet, here it is again.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oops- but I still will push the point that Bernie's frame of reference is first and foremost from class struggle.
It's his oeuvre.
He's been doing it too long to change.
It may resonate with you.
It did with me when I was 16-18.
I'm pretty much an old hippy-chick who once even lived in a commune for a short time.
And I can appreciate a lot of his rhetoric. But it's limiting.
We'll see how he evolves that way over the next several months.
My edits were for clarity and style
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)public response, Bernie's appeal to self-IDed conservatives and Republicans is much better than any other Democratic candidate. As an old hippie dude, I have seen this country losing a class war for over 30 years. If you're interested I can come up with sources showing Bernie's appeal across party lines.
The age of Reagan has made Bernie's policies and message mainstream, imo.
BTW, I have a lot of respect for O'Malley. He is definitely my second choice after Bernie and I think would have the potential to be an excellent president.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)appalachiablue
(41,156 posts)unemployment for African Americans is 51%, Hispanics 33% and whites 31%. Youth unemployment in this country is a disgrace, a major social and economic venom robbing this generation of their future. Lack of investment in education and jobs for the young is causing more injury by way of drug use, crime, homelessness and other troubles. This is compounded by extreme racism and discrimination, brutal, predatory police policies targeting blacks and PoC in particular, also the poor of all groups, the mentally ill, vulnerable and more.
I don't think you meant to say that employment is steady among young African American men. That black people are profiled, abused, arrested and killed and it is rampant in this country, even in Vermont, and New England, NYC, LA, the South and all over is reality and an American atrocity that has to be addressed.
epi.org, research-young workers
http://www.epi.org/research/young-workers/
PatrickforO
(14,585 posts)There's a BIG electorate out there. Speaking for myself, I ALSO want to hear about reinstating Glass-Steagall, breaking up the big banks, free college, expanded Social Security, single payer healthcare and a host of other things, which taken as a WHOLE will make millions of American lives better. Absolutely address racism and address it aggressively, but we really need to talk about some other kitchen table issues besides that if we want to win the general election and begin getting things done.
And it's a complete bafflement to me why this isn't being pointed at Clinton too, after her performance in the 2008 primary. Because she DID play the race card several times, as did her husband. Yes it was a hard fought primary, but still...
As I mention below, I think this is a right wing 'divide and conquer' strategy. Because look down the list of the names of all the DUers who posted here and you'll notice that the ones most vociferously complaining about Bernie's so called lack of addressing racism HAVEN'T EVEN BOTHERED TO POST ON THIS THREAD!!!
That says something to me...and it ain't good.
appalachiablue
(41,156 posts)Summer of Sanders!
Do Not Underestimate Bernie Sanders!
SANDERSTORM is Here!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thank you for posting this!
Prism
(5,815 posts)There goes that Bernie as savior meme.
Such a shame. So many attacks against the man rely on people actively going out of their way to not listen to a word he says.
Why oppose a real candidate when you can attack an imaginary one?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)What is wrong with him?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)because I could have sworn I just heard him say that "we've come a long way towards ending racism but we still have a log way to go" not five minutes ago in RED Phoenix, AZ. I hate it when that happens.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Or just read posts on DU. That's a sure way to know what Bernie thinks and feels.
appalachiablue
(41,156 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
arcane1
(38,613 posts)historylovr
(1,557 posts)DLnyc
(2,479 posts)Starting around 17:15 in video:
" . . . That is the America we can become if we stand together and not let them divide us up -- by race, by gender, by sexual orientation. Let us stand together, let us remake America together! Thank you very much!"
Important words!
PatrickforO
(14,585 posts)The people arguing the most vociferously that Bernie isn't addressing racism are NOT on this thread. Why is that, I wonder?
Because they keep posting and posting and posting and posting the same thing. I'm not convinced...he hasn't talked about...he needs to understand...
THIS IS WHAT DIVIDE AND CONQUER LOOKS LIKE, FOLKS. Do you wonder who might be behind it?
It might be a tortuous path, but I'll bet it leads directly to...
The Koch brothers.
Can you hear them laughing? I can.