Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 08:22 AM Jul 2015

Poll Finds That If Trump Runs As An Independent, Democrats Will Win In A Landslide

SNIP
....The Republican Party will already begin 2016 in a big Electoral College hole. Statistically speaking, the GOP will already require a dramatic shift in the electorate to win the White House. A Trump third-party candidacy of modest popularity would make the election unwinnable for the Republican nominee.

Donald Trump is not a serious threat to win the Republican nomination, but if he stays in the upper tier of candidates through the early primaries, Trump and his ego could launch an independent bid for the White House.

Some Republicans already believe that Trump is a Democratic plant that has been sent to destroy their party, but Republicans created Trump as a political entity, and it would only be right if he ended up costing them any chance of taking back the White House.

MORE
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/20/poll-finds-trump-runs-independent-democrats-win-landslide.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll Finds That If Trump Runs As An Independent, Democrats Will Win In A Landslide (Original Post) misterhighwasted Jul 2015 OP
I hope that this happens Gothmog Jul 2015 #1
It's hard to predict anything with Trump. misterhighwasted Jul 2015 #7
Trump claims to have 10 billion dollars. It won't break him to run from his own pocket. apnu Jul 2015 #15
We can only hope Adenoid_Hynkel Jul 2015 #2
Oh - pleeeze, make it happen - Oh Please! liberal N proud Jul 2015 #3
Too early to tell but wouldn't it be nice DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #4
He has the ego for it. gollygee Jul 2015 #5
Trump won't run as an independent. bvf Jul 2015 #6
I would rather him not ericson00 Jul 2015 #8
Thank you...That's a different way of looking at things... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #9
its such a stupid talking point ericson00 Jul 2015 #11
His ego may just force him to run Independent. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #10
Well then, let's help him out by pushing him to run as an independent. mmonk Jul 2015 #12
please.please.please.please... cyberswede Jul 2015 #13
What a deliciously nasty horrid situation the RNC finds themsleves in. Sheepshank Jul 2015 #14

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
7. It's hard to predict anything with Trump.
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 09:05 AM
Jul 2015

I'm not sure how serious he is, what his purpose in this campaign is, or if this is just what a billionaire does for entertainment.

apnu

(8,759 posts)
15. Trump claims to have 10 billion dollars. It won't break him to run from his own pocket.
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 02:39 PM
Jul 2015

He could blow 1 billion on a failed presidential bid, and that would affect absolutely nothing in his life. In fact, he'd probably be worth more having run and failed and blown a cool billion on his ego exercise.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
2. We can only hope
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 08:28 AM
Jul 2015

I tend to think he isn't seriously committed to it.

But, having lost his TV show, he's going to need something to keep his ego in the headlines, so maybe....

If he doesn't run a third party, the GOP is going to have go out of it's way to placate him.

Either way, good news for us.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
6. Trump won't run as an independent.
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 08:56 AM
Jul 2015

I'll bet on it. The Kochs would blow him up real good (uh, figuratively, of course), before they would let that happen.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
8. I would rather him not
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 09:13 AM
Jul 2015

because even tho as the poll shows, Bush gets hurt by Trump a lot more, notice how Hillary does lose a few points enough to keep her under 50%. The media has tried to like this to Ross Perots's supposed effect, which is nothing but a lie. I've shown this debunked in further detail. By far the most damaging thing that happened to Bill Clinton politically (and the center-left agenda) was the 50% of the vote thing; it ruined his mandate twice and hurt him in the media, which brought about Whitewater, Travel"gate," and was the GOP's excuse for their crap. The Perot-myth also gave cover to Clinton haters on the fringe-left and Dixiecrat wings too, hence why some allowed the Whitewater vultures at him. It also hurt his legacy too and gave the GOP an excuse to keep running nutties. I'd rather Hillary win 50.01% to 49.99% with 270 electoral votes than win 46-30-20-remainder with 400 electoral votes.

Trump or no Trump tho, I think Hillary will beat Jeb Bush by at least 8 points regardless and with at least 350 electoral votes. But she needs both the mandate, and also the respect of the left; the effect of Perot keeping Clinton under 50% also took that away in part. I don't know why anyone thinks Bush can win; his brother left with approvals lower than those Jimmy Carter left with, and close to Nixon. Billy Carter coulda been a billionaire and not a drunk and still have lost the 1988 election if he had run and been nominated.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
9. Thank you...That's a different way of looking at things...
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 09:17 AM
Jul 2015

John Kennedy did not have a majority either and he said it affected the legislation he advocated.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
11. its such a stupid talking point
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 10:19 AM
Jul 2015

because in most cases, a plurality is as good as a majority. In countries with parliaments, the party with the plurality of seats almost always runs the government anyway, even if they don't win a majority. In most runoff elections, the first place plurality winner wins the majority vote. Some countries have plurality elections like us but with 40% as the cutoff. I wish if Reagan had to have won 1980, he'd just gotten 49.8 instead of 50.8, because then this talking point might not exist, as Reagan is the GOP's god. The Perot lie is also in part a defense of Reagan: they want people to forget that in 1992, his legacy was not popular. People voted Bush Sr. out because they were tired of Reagan/Bush trickle down economics.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
13. please.please.please.please...
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 01:34 PM
Jul 2015

Someone should start a "Draft Trump" campaign when he's eliminated from the Republican primary field.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
14. What a deliciously nasty horrid situation the RNC finds themsleves in.
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jul 2015

Can't alienate Trump for fear he does splinter off on his own.

Can't support him and for fear of irreversable damage to the whole party.

I feel just awful for them.

Bring me wine!!!!!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Poll Finds That If Trump ...