Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:03 PM Jul 2015

New York Times Says There Was ‘No Factual Error’ In Hillary Clinton E-Mail Referral Story

By Erik Wemple July 24 at 10:12 AM

Hillary Clinton delivers a speech concerning the U.S. economy at the New School in New York on July 13. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)

Current New York Times lead: “Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.”

Bold text added to highlight passive voice.

The original lead for the story was much the same, but with a key difference. The requests for a criminal investigation “into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state,” as reported by Politico’s Dylan Byers.

Bold text added to highlight active voice.

One of the story’s reporters, Michael Schmidt, told Politico, “It was a response to complaints we received from the Clinton camp that we thought were reasonable, and we made them.”

more...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2015/07/24/new-york-times-says-there-was-no-factual-error-in-hillary-clinton-e-mail-referral-story/

New York Times Alters Clinton Email Story

By DYLAN BYERS
7/24/15 4:58 AM EDT

The New York Times made small but significant changes to an exclusive report about a potential criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's State Department email account late Thursday night, but provided no notification of or explanation for of the changes.

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."

That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."

The Times also changed the headline of the story, from "Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email" to "Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account," reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton's possible role. The article's URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.

more...

http://www.politico.com//blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times Says There Was ‘No Factual Error’ In Hillary Clinton E-Mail Referral Story (Original Post) Purveyor Jul 2015 OP
Its the NY Times so let us be fair... Popcorn 51 Jul 2015 #1
DOJ: No, We Weren't Asked To Launch A Criminal Probe Into Clinton's Emails Gothmog Jul 2015 #2
What's with the ice machine? jberryhill Jul 2015 #3
no criminal investigation OKNancy Jul 2015 #4

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
4. no criminal investigation
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:20 PM
Jul 2015

From a DOJ offl: “The Dept has received a referral related to the potential compromise of classified info. It is not a criminal referral.”

https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»New York Times Says There...