Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:50 PM Jul 2015

Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Corporate Tax Cheats

General Electric
From 2008 to 2013, while GE made over $33.9 billion in United States profits, it received a total tax refund of more than $2.9 billion from the Internal Revenue Service.

Boeing
From 2008 to 2013, while Boeing made over $26.4 billion in U.S. profits, it received a total tax refund of $401 million from the IRS. Boeing’s effective U.S. corporate income tax rate over this six-year period was -2 percent.

Verizon
From 2008 to 2013, while Verizon made over $42.4 billion in U.S. profits, it received a total tax refund of $732 million from the IRS.

Bank of America
Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS in 2010, even though it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of more than $1.3 trillion

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/top-10-corporate-tax-avoiders


These Corps are raiding the wealth of America's Working Class just to stash profits made in America in offshore bank accounts. What is even worse most of the $MultiMillion dollar CEOs want to see the eligibility age for social security and Medicare raised to 70.

Got to admit "Bernie gets it"
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Corporate Tax Cheats (Original Post) FreakinDJ Jul 2015 OP
Holy Crap! 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #1
Total take is estimated at $225 Billion per year FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #2
and "paid for" to whom, exactly? 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #5
Yes, name names. Who is voting for this stuff? Corporate funded candidates. sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #10
Like we always like to say on the Left 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #12
This ^^^^ n/t udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #20
would love to see which d candidates restorefreedom Jul 2015 #3
Damn Straight. Can we start naming names here? 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #6
i would ,love to see the research restorefreedom Jul 2015 #9
MEMO to Team Bernie 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #11
good idea restorefreedom Jul 2015 #35
Beat me to it! 7962 Jul 2015 #66
It's not really cheating because unfortunately it's all legal... JaneyVee Jul 2015 #4
I'm sure they pay taxes in China which they deduct from their US Tax burden FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #7
Of course "it's all legal". But that totally begs some pressing questions ... 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #8
That was exactly my point... JaneyVee Jul 2015 #25
I should have known better 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #30
Yes they can afford to "Out Lobbyist the 99%" but is Representative Governance FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #34
They have spent 30+ years making it legal for them to do this type of things. Reagan started jwirr Jul 2015 #39
GE pays huge amounts in taxes?!?!?!? RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #14
So you're defending GE's tax loop-holes 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #16
I could be wrong... malokvale77 Jul 2015 #23
I could be wrong too 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #24
Looks like they were responding to JaneyVee's post #4 beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #36
That's a refreshing change 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #44
Yes it is. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #45
No I am not RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #47
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #48
+100 malokvale77 Jul 2015 #79
MAke the corporate tax a flat rate 0 deductions and there wouldnt be any of this. 7962 Jul 2015 #68
A flat rate wouldn't do it. RoccoR5955 Jul 2015 #69
Well the current higher rate certainly isnt doing it either. 7962 Jul 2015 #70
Some here don't even bother to pretend anymore. malokvale77 Jul 2015 #22
It's authoritarianism. They think that big money is goodness and will take care of them. Afraid to rhett o rick Jul 2015 #51
Why is that still happening?!!? LeftOfWest Jul 2015 #54
"Why is that still happening?!!?" malokvale77 Jul 2015 #78
This is why $Romnie didn't want to release his Taxes during his campaign FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #28
They get tax subsidies, they don't pay any taxes. Why are you defending these tax cheats? nm rhett o rick Jul 2015 #50
K&R Cleita Jul 2015 #13
Arghhhhh...Grrrrrrrr.... SoapBox Jul 2015 #15
rec & kick MerryBlooms Jul 2015 #17
This is why Bernie matters and they will #FeelTheBern n/t udbcrzy2 Jul 2015 #18
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Jul 2015 #21
k&R azmom Jul 2015 #19
KnR beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #26
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2015 #27
question about tax refunds KT2000 Jul 2015 #29
They can deduct Foriegn Taxes Paid even if they paid no US taxes FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #31
Thanks for quick reply! KT2000 Jul 2015 #33
I think this was poorly stated, for the reason you gave. The effective tax rates in the negatives DebJ Jul 2015 #74
K & R Unbelievable, corporate tax cheats. Go USA- appalachiablue Jul 2015 #32
Why Settle For The Lesser Of Two Corporate Evils - Go Bernie Go cantbeserious Jul 2015 #37
k&r nt bananas Jul 2015 #38
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Jul 2015 #40
And each and every one of these would be just fine Le Taz Hot Jul 2015 #41
^^^ THIS ^^^ FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #42
Big Rec sent me here to kick this. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #43
I think he forgot to mention the captive insurance industry frazzled Jul 2015 #46
It is complicated and all politicians have a hand, or statement, or votes Sheepshank Jul 2015 #52
Bernie is not in the Vermont state legislature. JDPriestly Jul 2015 #72
K&R. These are the enemies! Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #49
K&R Scuba Jul 2015 #53
K&R Tommymac Jul 2015 #55
He's the ONLY candidate who is talking about this! PatrickforO Jul 2015 #56
K&R Some labor for the least, some for the most. raouldukelives Jul 2015 #57
K & R! lonestarnot Jul 2015 #58
Misleading figures. Diremoon Jul 2015 #59
I would like to see that info. It would make a stronger argument. I would also like to know what stevenleser Jul 2015 #75
Should GE, Boeing, Verizon, BOA have lay offs? Chico Man Jul 2015 #60
Do you realize that every single dollar paid out in salary is money that is not taxed? Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #61
I'm certain much of GE's tax break is due to investment and reinvestment in their business Chico Man Jul 2015 #62
Inaccurate research FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #64
? Chico Man Jul 2015 #65
kick ...rec L0oniX Jul 2015 #63
Where's Lockheed Martin? nt MADem Jul 2015 #67
These Large Corporations Are.. StarzGuy Jul 2015 #71
Republican Response below: EndElectoral Jul 2015 #73
Criminal actions of the wealthy ignored. nt WDIM Jul 2015 #76
From Bernie: 6 Ex Actions could stop Corp Loopholes stuffmatters Jul 2015 #77
That deserves a thread of its own FreakinDJ Jul 2015 #80
I agree, that deserves its own thread. beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #81
I received this on April 14 from bernie@bernie.org."Act now:close corporate loopholes" stuffmatters Aug 2015 #83
I did a search and found this petition from Tax Day: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #84
Private prisons claim rent income azmom Jul 2015 #82
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Holy Crap!
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:56 PM
Jul 2015

Last edited Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Imagine what we could do with all those "refunds", just from these four
corporations ... roughly $4 BILLION .. I'm thinking jobs to rebuild
infrastructure, paying back to SS what Bush2 plundered it for, single-payer
health care 4 all <-- it would probably cover about all of these.

Obviously I'm making very rough estimates here, but still .. $4 BILLION.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
2. Total take is estimated at $225 Billion per year
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 03:58 PM
Jul 2015

Lost to "Tax Loop Hole Legislation" bought and paid for by these coprs

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
5. and "paid for" to whom, exactly?
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:08 PM
Jul 2015

It's high time to start naming names. Who voted for these loopholes?
Who was POTUS when they were signed into law, rather than vetoed, etc.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
10. Yes, name names. Who is voting for this stuff? Corporate funded candidates.
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:16 PM
Jul 2015

Not Bernie Sanders. And this is what all the distractions we are seeing are intended to prevent, discussion of this most important issue.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
12. Like we always like to say on the Left
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:28 PM
Jul 2015

follow the money, and the votes & vetoes --or lack there of.

There is some serious research here to be done, and I trust that
Team Bernie is already on-it.

There's gold in them thar' hills.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
6. Damn Straight. Can we start naming names here?
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:09 PM
Jul 2015

This is going to be a very interesting Primary season.

Go Bernie Go!!

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
11. MEMO to Team Bernie
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:21 PM
Jul 2015

If no one's already on this, please let us know, so we can
take it on at DU for Bernie Group.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
4. It's not really cheating because unfortunately it's all legal...
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jul 2015

And companies like GE pay huge amounts in taxes, although it could be argued that they pay more.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
7. I'm sure they pay taxes in China which they deduct from their US Tax burden
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jul 2015

which is why they receive a "Tax Return" even when they pay No US Taxes

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
8. Of course "it's all legal". But that totally begs some pressing questions ...
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jul 2015

It's high time to start naming names. Who voted for these loopholes?
Who was POTUS when they were signed into law, rather than vetoed,
What's Hillary's and O'Malley's positions on these loopholes?

what did I miss?

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
25. That was exactly my point...
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:16 PM
Jul 2015

Everything they do is legal, they can afford to hire armies of accountants.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
30. I should have known better
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:29 PM
Jul 2015

yes, accountants, lawyers, lobbyists ,,, the same folks who sit around
behind closed doors to write crap into law, like the TPP, et. al.

Sorry JaneyVee if I offended in any way. I need to check handles more
closely before posting sometimes.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
34. Yes they can afford to "Out Lobbyist the 99%" but is Representative Governance
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:48 PM
Jul 2015

only afforded to those that can hire the most lobbyist

Our Representatives - Congress-critters Senators, even the President, have a fiduciary duty to those they represent - "ALL of us" and that includes 99% of Americans

So while YES the corporations have lobbied for and received the most lucrative tax loop holes imaginable - do we continue and condone this policy to the point it renders SSI merely a hidden tax platform raising the eligibility age to a point beyond the life span of 99% of those paying into the fund


jwirr

(39,215 posts)
39. They have spent 30+ years making it legal for them to do this type of things. Reagan started
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:30 PM
Jul 2015

deregulating things and every president since then as contributed to this process. Some also lowered taxes in addition. We have been going down hill for a long time.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
14. GE pays huge amounts in taxes?!?!?!?
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 04:33 PM
Jul 2015

I don't know where you got this information from, but it is out and out WRONG!
They paid a billion in taxes, but got a rebate of over THREE BILLION!
Look it up for yourself, if you don't believe me,
Unless you are living in Bizzaroland.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
24. I could be wrong too
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:09 PM
Jul 2015

but I'd like to hear exactly how I'm wrong from RoccoR5955 .

Either GE benefited hugely from a tax loophole or they didn't.
I'm all ears.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
44. That's a refreshing change
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:23 PM
Jul 2015

Everyone looking for common ground, not division & vitriol

I must be in the Bernie Sanders group.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
47. No I am not
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 08:58 PM
Jul 2015

I was merely citing the falsity that someone posted that GE pays taxes.
I wish to hell they paid all of their taxes, and had their loopholes plugged with cement!

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
79. +100
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 06:33 PM
Jul 2015

In this case we seem to all be on the same side of the issue.

It's not always easy to know here on the DU.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
68. MAke the corporate tax a flat rate 0 deductions and there wouldnt be any of this.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:35 PM
Jul 2015

And there wouldnt be any armies of lawyers working to get out of paying either

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
69. A flat rate wouldn't do it.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:37 PM
Jul 2015

Even though it would be an equal percentage, corporations with less money would feel it more than those with lots of money.
Same for the damn flat income tax.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
70. Well the current higher rate certainly isnt doing it either.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:42 PM
Jul 2015

We've got the highest corp rate in the world, but nobody pays it.
Maybe start the tax above a certain level, just like what would have to be done for an income tax. Smaller corps may not even have to pay ANY tax and they wouldnt have to spend a ton of money on lawyers to do it for them.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
22. Some here don't even bother to pretend anymore.
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jul 2015

It is sad to see so called Democrats defend corporate greed.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
51. It's authoritarianism. They think that big money is goodness and will take care of them. Afraid to
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 12:45 AM
Jul 2015

fight for freedoms and liberties.

 

LeftOfWest

(482 posts)
54. Why is that still happening?!!?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 05:09 AM
Jul 2015

Why did it ever happen?!!?

I do not get that at all. Disgusting money for me and not you sell out crap.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
28. This is why $Romnie didn't want to release his Taxes during his campaign
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:27 PM
Jul 2015

Not that he cheated on his taxes - he probably didn't. But that 99% of Americans don't realize the massive tax loop holes they use to game the system

KT2000

(20,588 posts)
29. question about tax refunds
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:28 PM
Jul 2015

what does it mean when the corporation gets a tax refund? Does this mean the government is giving them money or is this a refund from what they have already paid?

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
31. They can deduct Foriegn Taxes Paid even if they paid no US taxes
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:30 PM
Jul 2015

and receive a refund

- kinda like Free Money

KT2000

(20,588 posts)
33. Thanks for quick reply!
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:33 PM
Jul 2015

Boeing makes me sick. They get state tax breaks too or they threaten to leave. Middle class picks up the tab.

DebJ

(7,699 posts)
74. I think this was poorly stated, for the reason you gave. The effective tax rates in the negatives
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:09 PM
Jul 2015

are a much better statement.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
40. Kicked and recommended!
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:35 PM
Jul 2015

Of course your GOP would insist these players are your job creators and as such are worthy of special consideration.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
41. And each and every one of these would be just fine
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jul 2015

with Hillary or the Clown Car as president. Bernie? Not so much.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
46. I think he forgot to mention the captive insurance industry
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 07:37 PM
Jul 2015

of which tiny Vermont is the national leader--second only to the Cayman Islands in offshore tax shelters.

At conferences of the offshore insurance industry, next to the booth for Bermuda, can often be found one promoting Vermont.

While that may seem strange for a chilly, landlocked state, Vermont is an offshore haven in one very real sense: It offers American companies lucrative tax breaks through unusual insurance arrangements.

...

More than 560 United States companies, including Wal-Mart Stores, Starbucks and McGraw-Hill, have set up Vermont-based entities to insure their biggest risks and liabilities, giving them a tax benefit in the process. Vermont now rivals the Cayman Islands and Bermuda as the insurance destination of choice for American companies.

The most recent arrival is Wells Fargo, which was granted a waiver by the federal Labor Department in February to provide life insurance and long-term disability insurance to its 153,000 employees through its own private unrated insurance company in Vermont.

With its wholly owned insurer, known as a captive, Wells Fargo will benefit from improved cash flow, new investment income and tax breaks totaling at least hundreds of millions of dollars over the next 30 to 40 years,

...

But Vermont’s success in attracting insurance captives also highlights the many ways that American corporations are allowed to minimize their tax bills by moving their profits, intellectual property or liabilities to places that provide substantial tax advantages, whether it is a Caribbean island, Ireland or Singapore. And while many states in the United States provide tax breaks and subsidies to companies that move or expand operations in state, the benefits offered by Vermont are much larger.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/04/business/04vermont.html?n=Top%2FReference%2FTimes%20Topics%2FSubjects%2FT%2FTaxes


The IRS recently put captives on its "Dirty Dozen" list of tax abuses:

http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/Abusive-Tax-Shelters-Again-on-the-IRS-Dirty-Dozen-List-of-Tax-Scams-for-the-2015-Filing-Season

And yes, Bernie has pictures up of him meeting with the association of captive insurers, and he apparently didn't support the IRS attempt to tax these entities (and the ruling got scotched).

I'm not saying he's responsible for all this. I am saying that things are complex, and no public figure is totally isolated from such issues.
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
52. It is complicated and all politicians have a hand, or statement, or votes
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 01:07 AM
Jul 2015

That have enabled such corporate practices in one way or another. Thanks for trying to point it out.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
72. Bernie is not in the Vermont state legislature.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:05 PM
Jul 2015

He is a senator in the US Senate.

If someone in the Senate wants to present a bill to change insurance laws and that affects Vermont, they will. Then we can see how Bernie votes. But until that time, this is not his business. Delaware does similar things for corporate laws. When I think of insurance, I tend to think more of Connecticut, but I don't know why. I don't think of Vermont.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
57. K&R Some labor for the least, some for the most.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:58 AM
Jul 2015

Every dollar in Wall St is a dollar against representative democracy for everyone but themselves.

If they can't recognize this by now, when thanks to them even corporations are more human than human, they never will.

Diremoon

(86 posts)
59. Misleading figures.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:31 AM
Jul 2015

Sorry, but I believe that the wording of the claims is misleading. In regard to GE, I believe that they paid Zero Federal Tax, and received an additional 2.9 billion. The wording could lead one to think that they overpaid their tax and received a refund on overpayment, like a person might do. Corporations are not people my friend.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
75. I would like to see that info. It would make a stronger argument. I would also like to know what
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:10 PM
Jul 2015

loophole they used for taxes. Was it hiring disabled people or was it just accounting trickery? That answer matters.

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
60. Should GE, Boeing, Verizon, BOA have lay offs?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jul 2015

GE employs > 130,000 in the US (not all have been moved to China :/)

I'm fairly certain the tax write-offs are helping to pay an American salary or two...

Does that matter? Or should they be punished? What if they extended a job offer to you? Would you be righteous and deny it because they apparently don't pay taxes in an un-american sort of way?

Maybe we should all work for non-profits.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
61. Do you realize that every single dollar paid out in salary is money that is not taxed?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:11 AM
Jul 2015

The greatest disincentive to hiring is to not make companies earn their tax breaks through reinvestment in their businesses.

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
62. I'm certain much of GE's tax break is due to investment and reinvestment in their business
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 11:18 AM
Jul 2015

That's the nature of the accounting behind tax breaks (some of which may be investment in staff).Much of the accounting is accomplished via write offs and depreciation.

Take the $1 billion + investment GE made in the Software Center of Excellence in San Ramon. Over 1000 data scientists and engineers have been hired thus far.

You say "The greatest disincentive to hiring is to not make companies"

So, it's the fault of the Government? I'm pretty sure Bernie called them cheats.. Is that really fair?

StarzGuy

(254 posts)
71. These Large Corporations Are..
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jul 2015

...hollowing out America from the inside out with these tax refund takings. We need to elect people who will repeal these tax loopholes. Why raise the retirement age to 70? What extra profits are involved here? Why would this billionaires care about the retirement age? I'd like to know what's behind this push by these creeps.

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
73. Republican Response below:
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 02:41 PM
Jul 2015

"Why is an avowed Socialist picking on some of the most successful United States corporations? These small businesses are the heart and soul of the country. They create jobs. Sanders is trying the old tax and spend approach. Increase Tax rates for successful small businesses like Boeing and watch the layoffs and outsourcing to other countries. If the United States wants to compete abroad a better strategy is to reward these successful small businesses like GE and provide them more government tax cut incentives so that they can increase hiring and do not ship their jobs abroad. Frankly, it is much better to let the private sector handle these issues rather the government. Sanders would only take the hard-earned profits of small businesses and distribute them to the free loaders in our society. Our founding fathers believed that if you work hard you get ahead. Only a socialist like Sanders would try and turn this founding principle on its head. God Bless America, and Ronald Reagan for standing up to Socialism."

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
77. From Bernie: 6 Ex Actions could stop Corp Loopholes
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jul 2015

I scribbled down this info from a Bernie Sanders campaign email a while ago.

He proposed that much of these tax cheating loopholes could be stopped by executive action, outlining "6 Executive Actions Obama could take to stop Corporate Loopholes." If executive actions are possible to close these loopholes, then Bernie certainly makes a compelling case for replacing a corporatist President with one who would restore fiscal sanity and justice to our corporate tax code. According to that Bernie email " in 1952 corporate taxes accounted for 32% of federal tax revenue. Today , despite record breaking profits & stagnant wages, only 11% of federal revenue is corporate taxes."

6 Executive Actions Obama (or a US President) Could Take to Stop Corporate Loopholes by ending:

1) Check the box loophole (offshoring profits to subsidiaries)
2) Hewlett-Packard loophole(using short term loans from foreign subsidiaries to avoid taxes)
3) Corporate inversion loophole (Merging with a foreign corp, reincorporating(TAXED) there while operating as usual in the US.
4) Carried interest loophole (the hedge fund et alios misnomer of "investment&quot
5) Valuation discounts (to keep business and property values artificially low for estate and gift tax transfers)
6) The REIT Loophole (where "rent income" loophole claimed by private prisons, casinos, even billboard owners.)


I hope Bernie send this email out again. It was the clearest and best summary of these loopholes that cost the American Treasury & taxpayers hundreds of billions per year. And guess who pays and what safety net trust funds are "borrowed against" to make up the difference?

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
83. I received this on April 14 from bernie@bernie.org."Act now:close corporate loopholes"
Sun Aug 2, 2015, 07:34 PM
Aug 2015

It then asked to sign the petition where it explained those 6 corporate loopholes that could be done "by executive action without Congressional approval."

I'm not tech savvy, sorry, and not able to get this personal email & ensuing petition points to repost on DU. But I'm happy to forward the email to anyone who knows how to do it or can tell me steps to do it myself.

Many people must have received the same email from bernie.org Lots important coming those days about opposing fast track/TPP so maybe this got overlooked in the flurry?


Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders: Top 10 Co...