Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,832 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 11:47 PM Jun 2012

"Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?" Mother Jones

Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?

Mother Jones

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/06/concerned-women-americas-6-million-anti-obama-campaign

"SNIP............................................

Concerned Women for America, a conservative anti-feminist operation dedicated to "bring[ing] Biblical principals into all levels of public policy," announced late last week that it is spending $6 million to run ads that highlight "the consequences of President Obama's health care plan." But $6 million is an unusually large ad buy for the group, which hasn't explained (and doesn't have to disclose) where it got the money.

The ads claim that the bill is forcing doctors to drop many patients and that it will add billions of dollars to the deficit. Starting on June 20, the ads have been running in six key swing states: Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Virginia, New Mexico and New Hampshire, and CWA claims that the ad is the first presidential ad to run in the general election in Minnesota.

During a presidential election, it's not unusual for outside groups to run ads attacking either candidate, especially using money from donors whose names don't have to be disclosed, as is the case with the CWA ads. The media buy was sponsored by CWA's lobbying arm, the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee, which is a nonprofit 501(c)4. Unlike CWA, the CWA Legislative Action Committee is allowed to get involved in politics.

The $6 million advertising blitz vastly exceeds the action committee's entire budget from the past several years. According to its most recent tax filings, filed in October last year, CWA's advocacy arm only brought in $2 million in 2010, and ended the year about $500,000 in the hole. The previous year, the group brought in less than a million dollars.

..............................................SNIP"
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Who's Paying for $6 Million of New Anti-Obamacare Ads?" Mother Jones (Original Post) applegrove Jun 2012 OP
It's as if they secretly hope the Supremes will uphold it. tanyev Jun 2012 #1

tanyev

(42,632 posts)
1. It's as if they secretly hope the Supremes will uphold it.
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 08:28 AM
Jun 2012

They love those big rile the troops election issues.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Who's Paying for $6...