2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIMO, Hillary's campaign is not behind the BLM disruptions. But...
I also think she should defend Sanders from their distorted claims instead of slyly echoing them in her own statements.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)And their both running for prez. If he gets stepped on its his own fault. Nobody else.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)it is about whether you win or lose, not how you play the game.
They are BOTH politicians.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)You either kill or be killed. There is no nice.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)He doesn't do politics.
Or so I've been told...
Gman
(24,780 posts)He asks for votes. He gets elected then runs for reelection or higher office. By definition, he's a politician.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Nothing.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)It would be talking down to them.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)She can defend Sanders without attacking them.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)So far only 1 is getting the majority of the attention, that's my concern.
Racial injustice must be brought to each and every Democratic candidate. Why some are insisting bringing it to the GOP, heavens knows. We all know they could care less.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Suspicion is not evidence, and throwing out accusations without anything tangible to back it up could have consequences.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)However I don't expect anyone to do this. Dog eat dog.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)And why do you think Sanders needs Hillary to defend him? What is what you all treating him like he's weak?
You want a president who needs Hilary to fight his battles for him? Maybe you all should consider something you think can handle some heat?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)um, yah, okay
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)That you feel Bernie needs Hillary to protect her from? Your post is not responsive to mine.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)nor do his supporters
THOSE distorted claims
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)They do not deserve defending. They deserve to be denounced.
No one in this country, no politician, no one in power, is giving adequate attention to the killing of black people by police. That is what matters. Not your sense that others should defend you because of your own actions and your own refusal to prioritize something besides yourselves and one politician's career.
I most certainly would oppose Clinton's coming out to defend a bunch of self-entitled white people over a social protest movement for black lives. The notion that you think your feelings matter more than those lives shows greatly distorted priorities. I hope Clinton NEVER speaks up in defense of the bruised feelings of the few over a social movement for the oppressed, over those targeted with death and murder. I would be gravely disappointed in her if she did. If she behaved like you or others here, that would seriously prompt me to question my support of her.
As for Bernie, if he can't defend his own positions on this or any other issue, he doesn't deserve to be president.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The massive, pervasive chip on your shoulder has become tiresome.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)But apparently, being able to notice the zero protests of Clinton, Obama or Lynch makes me a white supremacist.
n8dogg83
(248 posts)about Hillary paying BLM to protest. I think they showed up to Bernie's event because it is open to the public and easy for the them to get into and disrupt. Hillary's events are so pre-screened and usually consist of $2,700/plate fundraisers that they wouldn't have much opportunity to disrupt her events. I do, however, fully expect Clinton to use this to her advantage. She has proven herself willing to use race as a wedge before. Regarding Bernie and BLM in general. I know Bernie campaign has reached out to BLM "quite consistently" as said by BLM themselves. He will continue to speak out about race issues. I just hope BLM doesn't do more harm than good by bringing down the one person who, I feel, will go to bat for them in the White House.
senz
(11,945 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Last edited Sat Aug 8, 2015, 09:29 PM - Edit history (2)
he needs to show that he can handle stuff like this, which is nothing compared to what he would face as president.
Hillary speaking up will only make him look weak; and what about her her? Do you think any of his supporters would appreciate it?
They would say that she is pandering, that she just want to make him look weak, that she planned the whole thing just to speak up, etc.
They better each handle their own campaign without interference from the other
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Does ya want her to hold Bernie's hand thru this crisis too?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)and would totally support it if HRC was the target. Am I getting this right?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)she probably has some serious security going on.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)BLM is too scared of the security to dare challenge Hillary? Is that the reason?
gollygee
(22,336 posts)If you want to protest, the first thing you need is opportunity.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Might be a little more believable if they ever showed an interest in protesting Hillary. BTW you can make a big, disruptive noise from the audience. That technique has brought many a rally to a halt. No, me thinks something else is afoot.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Time to stop acting like the Clintons are honest people
stranger81
(2,345 posts)That's not an issue based campaign -- it's political stalking.
Enough of this subterfuge. It's complete and utter bullshit.
senz
(11,945 posts)I hope the real perps (the ones who are behind it) can be identified.
senz
(11,945 posts)against Obama in 2008. It's how she rolls. And it's a huge part of what turned me off to her way back then.
It IS how she rolls. Gah, does she ever disgust me.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Except by conspiracy theorists. Sanders also shouldn't need to be defended by Clinton. Guy is running for President. Serious question considering your op. Have O'Malley or Webb defended Sanders? There is simply no connection to Clinton so it seems strange you would single her out as the one who needs to defend Sanders.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)O'Malley is responding to the damage done to his own candidacy as best he can.
But Clinton makes statement that "some believe that economics will solve racial problems but I disagree" (nudge, nudge, wink, wink)
Rather than "nudge nudge, wink" maybe Hillary ought to be at least be trying to help heal this growing gap on the non-GOP side, instead of subtly exploiting it.
That's why.