Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

romanic

(2,841 posts)
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:32 PM Aug 2015

BLM Outliers want to wage war on white liberals.

It's obvious. They don't want allies, they want enemies. I've seen it so many times with these kind of outliers, people so prejudiced and spiteful that they'll adopt a cause and fight against it and against white allies/other POC so the struggle can go on. Those women don't represent BLM anymore than a white Republican would. They didn't take the opportunity to talk about Brown or Garner or Bland, instead they physically threatened an old man on stage and acted like fools.

I'm just saying it like it is. As a POC myself, a Sanders supporter, and someone who wants equality; I will stand with white liberals who are willing to fight alongside us against discrimination and racism.

104 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BLM Outliers want to wage war on white liberals. (Original Post) romanic Aug 2015 OP
Just leave...please.... TheProgressive Aug 2015 #1
why? or do you agree that white liberals are white supremacists. cali Aug 2015 #4
Really cali, this is your reply? TheProgressive Aug 2015 #6
why yes. care to explain either or both your rather cryptic and cali Aug 2015 #11
No, not to you now... TheProgressive Aug 2015 #13
You seem to be setting yourself up as a person entitled to sit in godlike judgment of the rest of us Ken Burch Aug 2015 #21
Because the post made too much sense and some dont like the curtain pulled back. nt 7962 Aug 2015 #59
Well that curtain is wide open now. nt Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #67
Roughly half of all black people are CONSERVATIVE. It's the basic personality-wiring thing. Hortensis Aug 2015 #71
What? Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #73
Second the motion. okasha Aug 2015 #75
I don't think that these 2 women were that kind of outlier. LWolf Aug 2015 #80
Cali's response was better than yours. nt ladjf Aug 2015 #77
I'm not going anywhere. romanic Aug 2015 #5
Thanks. PDittie Aug 2015 #28
Good. 840high Aug 2015 #54
I kinda agree with you, Romanic Polly Hennessey Oct 2015 #103
Why? Ken Burch Aug 2015 #14
It is offensive speculation. I would think DU is better than that. TheProgressive Aug 2015 #16
It's not your place to tell people to leave. Ken Burch Aug 2015 #19
I stick by my opinion. TheProgressive Aug 2015 #22
the appropriate response would have been to alert on the OP as potentially offensive Ken Burch Aug 2015 #23
I am not one to alert posters.... TheProgressive Aug 2015 #24
I am surprised that no one alerted on your post. Live and Learn Aug 2015 #31
Please, help yourself to the alert button... TheProgressive Aug 2015 #33
I'll help myself to the ignore feature. Maedhros Aug 2015 #76
It was and it passed MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #34
Interesting. Thanks for the info. nt Live and Learn Aug 2015 #35
Any chance you can post the results? TheProgressive Aug 2015 #42
Nope MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #44
What parties do you refer to? TheProgressive Aug 2015 #45
I thought we are all of the same party here. What other party or parties are you talking about? nt SunSeeker Aug 2015 #51
LOL. No, it doesn't. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #55
disgusting. how.low can you go? calling the op racist cali Aug 2015 #37
It's fine. romanic Aug 2015 #43
For the record, romanic, I did not call you a racist... TheProgressive Aug 2015 #46
What is better speculation? That the Clinton camp paid them? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2015 #63
I'm not sure why you would post such a thing. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2015 #17
Why should the OP leave? NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #27
WTH? 840high Aug 2015 #52
Edit. Don't even know why I kicked this disgusting thread. Number23 Aug 2015 #68
You are correct.... Stellar Aug 2015 #74
You got me all wrong. romanic Aug 2015 #84
Fail. NaturalHigh Nov 2015 #104
You wonder if someone wants the movement to be sabotaged from within? villager Aug 2015 #2
I wouldn't say sabotage. romanic Aug 2015 #7
But that also benefits outside interests villager Aug 2015 #15
You do have a point. romanic Aug 2015 #18
When we marched in Seattle against Mbrow Aug 2015 #30
+10 nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #62
It was used against Occupy too. nt Live and Learn Aug 2015 #32
Not outliers. Founders of BLM Seattle. HooptieWagon Aug 2015 #3
Which BLM Seattle? romanic Aug 2015 #8
One was a 16 yo kid. HooptieWagon Aug 2015 #26
Uhhh… Nope. nt MrScorpio Aug 2015 #9
-this- is what it means to not control the message. HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #20
"instead they physically threatened an old man on stage and acted like fools. " MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #10
yes. they did. cali Aug 2015 #12
Well I am glad we have lowered the MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #60
Watch the video. WorseBeforeBetter Aug 2015 #56
Of course. Because everyone knows their true support will come from racist Republicans and GoneFishin Aug 2015 #25
blm=morons John Crock Aug 2015 #29
more likely operatives - not the true movement that needs and has the support of actual progressives Dragonfli Aug 2015 #36
Just wrote a similar opinion down thread flamingdem Aug 2015 #40
Yep it is nothing new. zeemike Aug 2015 #65
I saw it in the 1980's TM99 Aug 2015 #66
Maybe you need to learn about how to win your audience shenmue Aug 2015 #47
No - they think Hillary will be better. Go figure. 840high Aug 2015 #57
Dude no name calling JackInGreen Aug 2015 #64
22% of the Democratic party is black. 18% of the party supports Sanders Recursion Aug 2015 #38
Who said BLM were the outliers? romanic Aug 2015 #41
Those two looked like operatives flamingdem Aug 2015 #39
Wow shenmue Aug 2015 #48
I was right, they are extremists flamingdem Aug 2015 #49
there's actually been a big attack on allies on Tumblr: they're accused of riding discrimination MisterP Aug 2015 #50
Ready, Fire, Aim cer7711 Aug 2015 #53
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #58
Dear Bernie Sanders, mudstump Aug 2015 #61
***THIS*** stranger81 Aug 2015 #69
Watch the video or check the photographs... George II Aug 2015 #70
Bwahahahaha! You get the prize for the longest reach of the year! BERNIE's PEOPLE ARE djean111 Aug 2015 #78
It's as plausible as Clinton's campaign or George Soros being behind it, a theory which... George II Aug 2015 #81
No, not really. n/t djean111 Aug 2015 #82
FFS ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #72
BLM angel123 Aug 2015 #79
So im a sellout then. romanic Aug 2015 #85
Their cause is just Babel_17 Aug 2015 #83
Oh yeah.... This thread will help...... Adrahil Aug 2015 #86
Kick bravenak Oct 2015 #87
Kick bravenak Oct 2015 #88
Kick bravenak Oct 2015 #89
Kick. It is halloween! bravenak Oct 2015 #90
Ten more bravenak Oct 2015 #91
Ha bravenak Oct 2015 #92
Yeah bravenak Oct 2015 #93
() bravenak Oct 2015 #94
Go bravenak Oct 2015 #95
Five bravenak Oct 2015 #96
Four bravenak Oct 2015 #97
Three bravenak Oct 2015 #98
Boom bravenak Oct 2015 #99
Dang this took forever bravenak Oct 2015 #100
nope portlander23 Oct 2015 #101
I am pretty sure white liberals are not their target to wage war on. Kalidurga Oct 2015 #102
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. why? or do you agree that white liberals are white supremacists.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:36 PM
Aug 2015

I don't want the op to.leave and your comment was rude bull.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
21. You seem to be setting yourself up as a person entitled to sit in godlike judgment of the rest of us
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:56 PM
Aug 2015

Why do you feel entitled to do that?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
71. Roughly half of all black people are CONSERVATIVE. It's the basic personality-wiring thing.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 09:03 AM
Aug 2015

OF COURSE a normal proportion of those are the kind of hard social conservatives who are hostile to liberals and to people of other colors, religions, and ethnicities (the outliers from THEIR point of view).

Understand that and the behavior of some in this group comes into focus. Black cons have a real problem -- today's GOP is their enemy, pushing many to turn to leftward activist groups for help and to a Democratic Party whose policies some can't stand any more than their tea-party soulmates.

BTW, research has shown that the percentage of conservatives in a population is HIGHER in hot climates. I haven't read how that would affect numbers for our country (aside from the striking confirmation offered in general by political demographic maps), but most of our black citizens in this country are clustered in southern states. Here in Georgia they're almost a third of the population, with those who register and vote being predominantly Democrat, BUT!

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
73. What?
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 09:24 AM
Aug 2015

i don't know what kind of point you're trying to make with that gobbledygook, but take it elsewhere.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
75. Second the motion.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:30 PM
Aug 2015

I haven't had enough caffeine yet to even try to sort that out. I guess "conservatives in hot climates" whitesplains all those Latin American leftists from.Mexico to Venezuela.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
80. I don't think that these 2 women were that kind of outlier.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:41 PM
Aug 2015

The references elsewhere to the BAR make better sense.

Polly Hennessey

(6,807 posts)
103. I kinda agree with you, Romanic
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:49 PM
Oct 2015

p.s. I've been here at DU since 2003. I'm a Democrat;always have been. My intuition tells me that the BLMers are doing more harm than good. I don't have many posts because I listen and learn from most of you. Just wanted to let you know you are not alone.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
22. I stick by my opinion.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:00 PM
Aug 2015

I consider the post racists and not up to the standards of DU discussion.

I consider the thread post as 'stirring hate' that we all don't need that right now.

Ok...

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
23. the appropriate response would have been to alert on the OP as potentially offensive
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:07 PM
Aug 2015

Not to tell another poster to stop posting.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
43. It's fine.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:57 PM
Aug 2015

I've been accused of many things already because I don't exactly "toe the line" one some thing or I let the emotion get the better of me and lash out. I've been reigning it in lately, I truly want things to change for the better and sometimes you got to say how you feel without a filter.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
46. For the record, romanic, I did not call you a racist...
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:27 AM
Aug 2015

Your post however, was uncalled for.

In my opinion, pitting races against each other is not a good thing to do.

Maybe I am wrong- maybe I am right.

If I am wrong on this, I am sorry....

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
63. What is better speculation? That the Clinton camp paid them?
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:36 AM
Aug 2015

I don't think it's crazy at all that a couple of members of BLM Seattle didn't like their leadership agreeing to "play nice" for a speaking spot before Bernie.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
74. You are correct....
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 10:02 AM
Aug 2015

Think about this...

It's obvious. They don't want allies, they want enemies. I've seen it so many times with these kind of outliers, people so prejudiced and spiteful that they'll adopt a cause and fight against it and against white allies/other POC so the struggle can go on.


As if Black people need more hate in their lives and they pick fights with everyone that they can. They just love police killing their unarmed kids and they're asking for more killings by anybody.

What amazes me is how people just fall in line with what this person is saying. How do they know s/he is not a troll? That person is telling folks things they want/need to hear. That anger has to go somewhere and they put a bullseye on them. So perhaps one of them can be shot at one of Bernies appearances. That will get Blacks to vote for Bernie for sure.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
84. You got me all wrong.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 02:04 PM
Aug 2015

But if that's what you get from my OP, well i can't change your mind. You have a right to your opinion and I have a right to mine.

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
2. You wonder if someone wants the movement to be sabotaged from within?
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:33 PM
Aug 2015

I've certainly seen that playbook in leftist/progressive circles before. Particularly in the 80's, when activist environmental groups were suddenly getting too "successful."

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
15. But that also benefits outside interests
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:48 PM
Aug 2015

...and I've seen that game played in decades, and movements, past.

Mbrow

(1,090 posts)
30. When we marched in Seattle against
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:19 PM
Aug 2015

The WTO, again in San Diego and L.A. We would get police in plain clothes marching in the streets with us, acting like our people but stirring shit up with calls to do violence and do damage. How could we tell they were Cops? It's all in the footwear, plus the fact that when they were called out on it, the police lines magically opened up and let them out. Nothing would surprise me about actions aimed at Bernie or any other outsider candidate .

romanic

(2,841 posts)
8. Which BLM Seattle?
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:40 PM
Aug 2015

There's two completely different Facebook pages claiming to be BLM Seattle? The older one (which is more likely legit) weren't even in the know as to what one of the women (Marissa) was planning to do that day.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
20. -this- is what it means to not control the message.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:55 PM
Aug 2015

Many folks supporting BLM may reject that, but the choice of interpretation doesn't belong to them. It belongs to all those not necessarily friendly folks among all the other groups that make up -the- other group.

Psychologists tell us it only takes 10 percent reinforcement to birth a meme.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
10. "instead they physically threatened an old man on stage and acted like fools. "
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 10:43 PM
Aug 2015

Are you sure about that? I haven't seen the full tape but of what I have seen no one was shitting their pants out of fear.

 

MyNameGoesHere

(7,638 posts)
60. Well I am glad we have lowered the
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:14 AM
Aug 2015

standard of "threatening bodily harm". How do we rate a bullet to the head of a hunted race? Yawn?

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
56. Watch the video.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:59 AM
Aug 2015

If someone got up in my face like that, I might have reacted ENTIRELY differently. But I'm not someone accustomed to being on the national stage... Sanders handled it well.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
25. Of course. Because everyone knows their true support will come from racist Republicans and
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:08 PM
Aug 2015

apathetic blue dog and corporatist Democrats.

 

John Crock

(6 posts)
29. blm=morons
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:12 PM
Aug 2015

So someone with a 93% ACLU rating (32% higher than hrc) spent a lifetime working for poor, middle class, income inequality, healthcare, education and similar- these MORONS think republicans will be better? How stupid can you get?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
36. more likely operatives - not the true movement that needs and has the support of actual progressives
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:43 PM
Aug 2015

(sent forth by the wealth backed folks that play progressives on TV or the Republicans who do not even bother to hide their anti-Black Lives agenda)

Us older folk have seen these tricks before:

Put a wedge between those whose lives literally are at stake and the allies that would help them. All of the Republicans and the establishment Dems do not have a life long record of supporting equality for all (some may evolve in a triangle shaped pattern, but only one of the players had the backs of the oppressed consistently for fifty years, attacking the strongest ally is no accident.)

It is called a Rovian tactic these days but the tactic predates that turd.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
65. Yep it is nothing new.
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:44 AM
Aug 2015

We saw it back in the 60s and there is evidence that it was a FBI program instituted by Hover.

Dived and conquer...it works. And is working still.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
66. I saw it in the 1980's
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 02:40 AM
Aug 2015

in the anti-nuclear arms movement.

Agent provocateurs are very well known. They can be plants. In our case, they were often military. They can also be convenient patsies. Find someone with wood to burn and abject rage. Point them in a direction, and let them do as much harm as possible.

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
47. Maybe you need to learn about how to win your audience
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:27 AM
Aug 2015

Calling people morons isn't going to win anyone to your cause.

Two posts in, and already the insults?

Enjoy your stay.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
38. 22% of the Democratic party is black. 18% of the party supports Sanders
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:47 PM
Aug 2015

BLM are not the "outliers" here.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
41. Who said BLM were the outliers?
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:54 PM
Aug 2015

I clearly meant outliers to BLM itself, which is what Marissa (one of the women seen on stage) was with her affiliation with another group.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
39. Those two looked like operatives
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:48 PM
Aug 2015

Not for Hillary but for some kind of extremist group. In the olden days these types worked for the SWP or RCP and would disrupt liberal activist groups - mostly true believers but sometimes paid by more formal sources - talking 1980s ish.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
49. I was right, they are extremists
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:40 AM
Aug 2015

Beholden to an obscure group of black nationalists. Been there, seen this. Ideologs help no one in a mass movement.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
50. there's actually been a big attack on allies on Tumblr: they're accused of riding discrimination
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:50 AM
Aug 2015

for their own ends--and that's the Tumblrinas' job!

there's a turnover coming down the pike, and pretty soon, like when a lot of second-wave feminists accused transwomen of being male "infiltrators" into the hallowed halls of womanhood (I wish I were making this up)

Response to cer7711 (Reply #53)

mudstump

(342 posts)
61. Dear Bernie Sanders,
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:32 AM
Aug 2015

Please hire some security asap. I worry about your safety given the fact that you are speaking truth to the status quo and the oligarchs and plutocrats that run this country or those who want to run it are going to bring out everything they have to marginalize you, your message, your huge crowds and the money you have raised. These people who disrupted your rally should have never have had access to you or the stage. Security should have stopped them and if they continued to disrupt they should have been removed. You have too many enemies and not enough security.

George II

(67,782 posts)
70. Watch the video or check the photographs...
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 08:47 AM
Aug 2015

....as Sanders walked out, there was a "security" person looking STRAIGHT at the black woman with her arm in the air - RIGHT AT HER. Seconds later, she was on stage with Sanders.

Why wasn't she stopped or restrained? He looked twice her size.

With all the conspiracy theories being floated out there are Hillary Clinton being behind the disruptions, how do we know that Sanders' people weren't behind it? That would accomplish two things - open the floodgates of outrageous indignation against both Hillary Clinton AND BLM. Two birds with one stone.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
78. Bwahahahaha! You get the prize for the longest reach of the year! BERNIE's PEOPLE ARE
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:40 PM
Aug 2015
BEHIND THIS? What bullshit.

George II

(67,782 posts)
81. It's as plausible as Clinton's campaign or George Soros being behind it, a theory which...
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 01:42 PM
Aug 2015

...was all the rage here last night.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
83. Their cause is just
Sun Aug 9, 2015, 02:02 PM
Aug 2015

Last edited Sun Aug 9, 2015, 06:31 PM - Edit history (1)

Their cause is just so focusing their energy might not seem very important. I don't want to generalize their mindset, I just hope that over time they'll come to more appreciate the power and relevance of the Sanders candidacy. They've got a right to their skepticism but as this narrative unfolds I think they'll see people they trust and respect giving their nod of approval to Senator Sanders.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
102. I am pretty sure white liberals are not their target to wage war on.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:10 PM
Oct 2015

It looks more like they want to have a conversation with white liberals and perhaps neither side knows how to make that happen. I think we should just sit tight and watch this play out if we can't participate in what is happening at the moment.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»BLM Outliers want to wage...