2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBLM Outliers want to wage war on white liberals.
It's obvious. They don't want allies, they want enemies. I've seen it so many times with these kind of outliers, people so prejudiced and spiteful that they'll adopt a cause and fight against it and against white allies/other POC so the struggle can go on. Those women don't represent BLM anymore than a white Republican would. They didn't take the opportunity to talk about Brown or Garner or Bland, instead they physically threatened an old man on stage and acted like fools.
I'm just saying it like it is. As a POC myself, a Sanders supporter, and someone who wants equality; I will stand with white liberals who are willing to fight alongside us against discrimination and racism.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)I don't want the op to.leave and your comment was rude bull.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)meaningless posts?
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Why do you feel entitled to do that?
7962
(11,841 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)OF COURSE a normal proportion of those are the kind of hard social conservatives who are hostile to liberals and to people of other colors, religions, and ethnicities (the outliers from THEIR point of view).
Understand that and the behavior of some in this group comes into focus. Black cons have a real problem -- today's GOP is their enemy, pushing many to turn to leftward activist groups for help and to a Democratic Party whose policies some can't stand any more than their tea-party soulmates.
BTW, research has shown that the percentage of conservatives in a population is HIGHER in hot climates. I haven't read how that would affect numbers for our country (aside from the striking confirmation offered in general by political demographic maps), but most of our black citizens in this country are clustered in southern states. Here in Georgia they're almost a third of the population, with those who register and vote being predominantly Democrat, BUT!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)i don't know what kind of point you're trying to make with that gobbledygook, but take it elsewhere.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I haven't had enough caffeine yet to even try to sort that out. I guess "conservatives in hot climates" whitesplains all those Latin American leftists from.Mexico to Venezuela.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)The references elsewhere to the BAR make better sense.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)For not leaving and for sharing your opinion.
Polly Hennessey
(6,807 posts)p.s. I've been here at DU since 2003. I'm a Democrat;always have been. My intuition tells me that the BLMers are doing more harm than good. I don't have many posts because I listen and learn from most of you. Just wanted to let you know you are not alone.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)There was nothing offensive in the OP.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)That's my opinion.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And a lot of OPs involve at least some speculation.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)I consider the post racists and not up to the standards of DU discussion.
I consider the thread post as 'stirring hate' that we all don't need that right now.
Ok...
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Not to tell another poster to stop posting.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)My response has more meaning than an 'alert'....
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I certainly found it rude and offensive.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)/bye.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)along DU party lines to stay.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)And, what does 'passed along part lines' mean? Thanks...
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)all I will say is it was judged to leave it and it was along party lines.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)SunSeeker
(51,724 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)is just horrid.
I've been accused of many things already because I don't exactly "toe the line" one some thing or I let the emotion get the better of me and lash out. I've been reigning it in lately, I truly want things to change for the better and sometimes you got to say how you feel without a filter.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Your post however, was uncalled for.
In my opinion, pitting races against each other is not a good thing to do.
Maybe I am wrong- maybe I am right.
If I am wrong on this, I am sorry....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)I don't think it's crazy at all that a couple of members of BLM Seattle didn't like their leadership agreeing to "play nice" for a speaking spot before Bernie.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Nervous?
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)If you think the post is offensive, you have an alert button.
840high
(17,196 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)Think about this...
It's obvious. They don't want allies, they want enemies. I've seen it so many times with these kind of outliers, people so prejudiced and spiteful that they'll adopt a cause and fight against it and against white allies/other POC so the struggle can go on.
As if Black people need more hate in their lives and they pick fights with everyone that they can. They just love police killing their unarmed kids and they're asking for more killings by anybody.
What amazes me is how people just fall in line with what this person is saying. How do they know s/he is not a troll? That person is telling folks things they want/need to hear. That anger has to go somewhere and they put a bullseye on them. So perhaps one of them can be shot at one of Bernies appearances. That will get Blacks to vote for Bernie for sure.
romanic
(2,841 posts)But if that's what you get from my OP, well i can't change your mind. You have a right to your opinion and I have a right to mine.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)I've certainly seen that playbook in leftist/progressive circles before. Particularly in the 80's, when activist environmental groups were suddenly getting too "successful."
romanic
(2,841 posts)But twist the soul of the movement into something more vicious.
villager
(26,001 posts)...and I've seen that game played in decades, and movements, past.
romanic
(2,841 posts)Scary to think of that but I didn't want to believe it could be possible.
Mbrow
(1,090 posts)The WTO, again in San Diego and L.A. We would get police in plain clothes marching in the streets with us, acting like our people but stirring shit up with calls to do violence and do damage. How could we tell they were Cops? It's all in the footwear, plus the fact that when they were called out on it, the police lines magically opened up and let them out. Nothing would surprise me about actions aimed at Bernie or any other outsider candidate .
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)It was official business.
romanic
(2,841 posts)There's two completely different Facebook pages claiming to be BLM Seattle? The older one (which is more likely legit) weren't even in the know as to what one of the women (Marissa) was planning to do that day.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The other is by the woman disrupter.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Many folks supporting BLM may reject that, but the choice of interpretation doesn't belong to them. It belongs to all those not necessarily friendly folks among all the other groups that make up -the- other group.
Psychologists tell us it only takes 10 percent reinforcement to birth a meme.
MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)Are you sure about that? I haven't seen the full tape but of what I have seen no one was shitting their pants out of fear.
cali
(114,904 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)standard of "threatening bodily harm". How do we rate a bullet to the head of a hunted race? Yawn?
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)If someone got up in my face like that, I might have reacted ENTIRELY differently. But I'm not someone accustomed to being on the national stage... Sanders handled it well.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)apathetic blue dog and corporatist Democrats.
John Crock
(6 posts)So someone with a 93% ACLU rating (32% higher than hrc) spent a lifetime working for poor, middle class, income inequality, healthcare, education and similar- these MORONS think republicans will be better? How stupid can you get?
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)(sent forth by the wealth backed folks that play progressives on TV or the Republicans who do not even bother to hide their anti-Black Lives agenda)
Us older folk have seen these tricks before:
Put a wedge between those whose lives literally are at stake and the allies that would help them. All of the Republicans and the establishment Dems do not have a life long record of supporting equality for all (some may evolve in a triangle shaped pattern, but only one of the players had the backs of the oppressed consistently for fifty years, attacking the strongest ally is no accident.)
It is called a Rovian tactic these days but the tactic predates that turd.
flamingdem
(39,328 posts)It reminds me of operatives of yore
zeemike
(18,998 posts)We saw it back in the 60s and there is evidence that it was a FBI program instituted by Hover.
Dived and conquer...it works. And is working still.
TM99
(8,352 posts)in the anti-nuclear arms movement.
Agent provocateurs are very well known. They can be plants. In our case, they were often military. They can also be convenient patsies. Find someone with wood to burn and abject rage. Point them in a direction, and let them do as much harm as possible.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)Calling people morons isn't going to win anyone to your cause.
Two posts in, and already the insults?
Enjoy your stay.
840high
(17,196 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Remember. Keep it like Bernie.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)BLM are not the "outliers" here.
romanic
(2,841 posts)I clearly meant outliers to BLM itself, which is what Marissa (one of the women seen on stage) was with her affiliation with another group.
flamingdem
(39,328 posts)Not for Hillary but for some kind of extremist group. In the olden days these types worked for the SWP or RCP and would disrupt liberal activist groups - mostly true believers but sometimes paid by more formal sources - talking 1980s ish.
Talk about not knowing how to take criticism.
flamingdem
(39,328 posts)Beholden to an obscure group of black nationalists. Been there, seen this. Ideologs help no one in a mass movement.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)for their own ends--and that's the Tumblrinas' job!
there's a turnover coming down the pike, and pretty soon, like when a lot of second-wave feminists accused transwomen of being male "infiltrators" into the hallowed halls of womanhood (I wish I were making this up)
cer7711
(502 posts)What was accomplished here?
Now, if they had shut down a Klan rally . . .
Response to cer7711 (Reply #53)
Post removed
mudstump
(342 posts)Please hire some security asap. I worry about your safety given the fact that you are speaking truth to the status quo and the oligarchs and plutocrats that run this country or those who want to run it are going to bring out everything they have to marginalize you, your message, your huge crowds and the money you have raised. These people who disrupted your rally should have never have had access to you or the stage. Security should have stopped them and if they continued to disrupt they should have been removed. You have too many enemies and not enough security.
stranger81
(2,345 posts)And welcome to DU.
George II
(67,782 posts)....as Sanders walked out, there was a "security" person looking STRAIGHT at the black woman with her arm in the air - RIGHT AT HER. Seconds later, she was on stage with Sanders.
Why wasn't she stopped or restrained? He looked twice her size.
With all the conspiracy theories being floated out there are Hillary Clinton being behind the disruptions, how do we know that Sanders' people weren't behind it? That would accomplish two things - open the floodgates of outrageous indignation against both Hillary Clinton AND BLM. Two birds with one stone.
djean111
(14,255 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...was all the rage here last night.
djean111
(14,255 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,014 posts)As a wise man once said: "All my skin folk, ain't my kin folk."
romanic
(2,841 posts)Got ya. -_-
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 9, 2015, 06:31 PM - Edit history (1)
Their cause is just so focusing their energy might not seem very important. I don't want to generalize their mindset, I just hope that over time they'll come to more appreciate the power and relevance of the Sanders candidacy. They've got a right to their skepticism but as this narrative unfolds I think they'll see people they trust and respect giving their nod of approval to Senator Sanders.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)portlander23
(2,078 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:49 PM - Edit history (1)
Seriously, just no. People get to choose their own allies.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)It looks more like they want to have a conversation with white liberals and perhaps neither side knows how to make that happen. I think we should just sit tight and watch this play out if we can't participate in what is happening at the moment.