2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie, you're not in VT anymore. Dealing with hecklers and disrupters is a political fact of life.
Maybe Bernie didn't have to deal with this much in Vermont, but in Seattle I've never been to a political event where there weren't protesters waving signs somewhere.
So all the candidates, including Bernie, need to arrange events to keep disrupters from reaching the stage and grabbing the mike. But, if the protesters do get up there, the event organizers need to have clear plans for how they will deal with it.
Seattle has the extra added bonus of anarchists who are always ready to stir up the pot (and have no reason to be supportive of a pro-"nanny state" "Democratic Socialist" . Some of them might have been in the audience, taking the opportunity to boo. But hecklers and disrupters are everywhere. Every candidate needs a good plan.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Yelled "You lied" to President Obama. Did President Obama exit, no,took a moment to throw a look of disdain towards Wilson. There will be lots of times when controversy happens. One has to be able to handle this.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Different circumstances call for different actions. I think Bernie made the right call.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Insult and disrespect a sitting President out loud, while that President was formally addressing the House.
Disrupting campaign speeches and other public speeches does not rise to the same level.
The amount of vocal, outright, bigoted, racist hatred hurled at a sitting President is, well, unprecedented. Bernie has dealt with one interruption. The other was shared and the brunt hurled at O'Malley.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Do you really believe he has never been disrupted or heckled by a partisan agitator?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)if he has been heckled, it's been in quieter not so televised and public circumstances. and you are attempting to compare it to SOTU address while on the floor? really?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The poster about 4 posts above mine did.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...comparing Bernie speaking at an event in support of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid -- before his own rally later that evening -- to a Presidential State of the Union event.
Major fail.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Joint session of congress, this was not a rally in the campaign trail.
It was prime time heckler from a Congressional Member who should have known better than shouting out during the SOTU. If Bernie is not able to deal with the BLM hecklers then there is going to be too many times he will be heckled, trashed, smeared, etc facing him on the campaign trail, if he is elected there will be much more. Tho is something he needs to be coached and someone to advise him properly on working with BLM, it isn't going away because he walked away during his rally.
Comparing the SOTU to a Bernie was a major failure and those who knows about the two events knows which is more important.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...would ever walk away from a SOTU.
Big. Fat. Fail.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Long way, maybe he never intended to go very far. It is his problem to handle.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Your response reminds me of the stupid dancing Ashley Simpson did when caught lipsynching.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...IMNSHO.
That poster, in fact, reminds me greatly of another one we used to have here at DU named "randomthoughts" or something similar.
Just weird random remarks that are never on target and obviously are meant to confuse and obfuscate any issue they comment on. It gets tiresome.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Joe Wilson did not rush up to the podium before Obama was due to speak, sieze the podium and make some kind of speech.
This wasn't a state of the union address. It wasn't his event. He was a guest speaker. Bernie did what I would have done.... he walked. Not a win for anyone certainly but not a fail either. We're still talking about it after all. It's a distraction.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Just walk away and neglect the duties. Even George W did not walk away when shoes was thrown.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He has Secret Service protection. Bernie does not.
Bernie was correct to walk away from the crackpots.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)BLM and get this over.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)He was a guest. He was due to speak. His podium was hijacked. The organizers of the meeting decided it was best to wrap things up. That's why Bernie walked away - the organizers ended it, not him. He was a guest speaker. it wasn't his event.
Either way, apples and oranges are being compared here. I maintain he did the same thing... we just have to agree to disagree at this point.
John Poet
(2,510 posts)President Obama's "heckler" did not take over the podium or the event. One situation bears no resemblance to the other whatsoever.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Let it appear someone gets under your skin, Bernie failed. Now everyone knows he skips out and more will come. If he had met with BLM and listened to them it would have been over after NN. My example was to show there will be hecklers, coming from all directions, Bernie needs some advisors to coach him to avoid or at least defuse future meetings. It is his campaign, he can run it the way he chooses.
cali
(114,904 posts)Demanding that a Jewish man who lost most of his paternal family to the Holocaust, bow down, grovel before you and publicly apologize for unspecified crimes against poc, is vile. And sorry, but Bernie sure ad Hell has had to deal with hecklers in Vermont.
Funny that you're just fine with this. Your comments have made that clear
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)but that's typical of you.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Don't start with that real world crap..it messes with their mojo.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)He was a guest speaker at someone else's event. It wasn't his place to keep them off the stage. That was the responsibility of the sponsors of the event, and that didn't happen. Bernie waited until it became clear that the protesters weren't going to allow him to speak, then left the stage, but not the event. Blaming the victim much?
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)the one at Westlake Mall. He's got many other options and he should exercise them.
That's not blaming the victim, that's asking for some common sense. Disrupters and protesters are a fact of political life. He's got to either learn to deal with them (not by just leaving) or else avoid events that he can't control.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)Considering he's protested and been arrested for same, I find it hysterically funny that you feel the need to be 'splanin' how he should be running his campaign.
Of course, he could ask for SS protection and avoid the public like some other candidates. Maybe he could even run a virtual campaign from his keyboard, but somehow, I doubt that's his style (thank gawd).
BTW, it IS blaming the victim (but you already know that).
stranger81
(2,345 posts)he should be turning down every speaking invitation he gets.
While he's at it, maybe he could stop having rallies, too.
Better yet, why doesn't he just quit while he's ahead of expectations and let Hillary have her turn.
Am I rite?
stranger81
(2,345 posts)Particularly considering how industrious you've been today?
artislife
(9,497 posts)R B Garr
(16,985 posts)somewhat dismissive comments about not voting based on skin color, since racism had been overcome in this country because people voted for Obama.
This is just a trumped up attempt to bring his religion into something to inoculate him from criticism. Talk about vile.
The comments about Seattle anarchists is a very good one. I've been wondering myself how he will deal with more adversity then he gets out of his sheltered, rural state. Now we see some of his limitations.
Turin_C3PO
(14,077 posts)It's an ethnic identity (for most). There are many, many, atheists who identify as Jewish. It's just as much an ethnic group as Mexican or Arab is. Neither of these groups are based on skin color but no one denies the innate prejudice that many Americans have towards them. So it is with Jewish people and should be recognized as such.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the bow down bullshit makes me want to vomit
ignorant young rabblerousers (or paid operatives) who don't know or care what his family went through or everything he has done for civil rights
any support i give will be through naaacp
blm disruptors don't exist to me anymore. they deserve to be ignored
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)And maybe the point of the OP, that Bernie needs to start building a decent campaign with things like security, demographic outreach etc is valid.
He's not in Vermont but he's running a national campaign as if he is.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The only question is which opposition planted them? Hillary or Rove?
Perhaps he should deal with them the way Hillary does, she has them dragged out by white guys in suits, or isolated in a 'free speech' zones.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)So they weren't planted by her.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They are intentionally targeting Sanders only.
So you are saying Rove planted them? It's plausible.
riversedge
(70,310 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Hillary will never be targeted they work for her.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)You have no more evidence than the witch hunters of Salem.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)By whom they refuse to target
riversedge
(70,310 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Why would that be? Hmmmmmm
riversedge
(70,310 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)It was rank and file progressive attendees that booed her back then, no particular group. I see that you keep posting this WRONG info all over DU.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)just *might* be the reason the crowd booed, ya think? Part of Bernie's appeal is that he's open and accessible, unlike Hillary, ensconced behind the Secret Service and gated properties of grocery chain moguls and the likes of Kanye and the Kartrashians. Going forward I imagine Sanders will have beefed-up security at bay, which is kinda sad. Thanks, #BLM.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They protest corporations and corporatists, not politicians who fight against them.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)He needs to learn how to deal with hecklers and disrupters. They'll be bothering him more and more if he doesn't.
https://www.popularresistance.org/lets-not-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders/
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Should he start using Hillary's tactics on disruptors?
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)are kept off the stage -- or have a plan for handling them if they manage to get up there anyway.
Hecklers and disrupters are a political fact of life. He won't be able to avoid them if he gets the nomination, unless he does adopt tactics like Hillary's and Obama's.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)So you do think that's what Bernie should do. Thanks!
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)I think Bernie should have his security people block access to the stage. If he becomes the nominee, the Secret Service will be doing this. He might as well get used to it.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Somehow I don't see them opposing Sanders...
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)because they oppose all government. Bernie Sanders isn't a hero to them; he's a threat. He wants to use government to help people, not dismantle it.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)All because they've got a bug up their ass about him not sufficiently sucking up to them.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)in the future.
Bernie needs to develop a better plan than walking off the stage if protesters-- of any type -- arrive.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)and prompted the "Let Bernie speak!" chants.
This *ain't* rocket science.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)At Netroots he threatened to leave if they didn't stop. At Westlake Center, he did leave.
He can't continue to handle protesters this way if he's going to win the nomination and go into the general. It was the BLM yesterday. It will be some other group tomorrow. And during the general, there will be all manner of Rethug protesters if Bernie doesn't learn to control his events now.
Protesters shouldn't be able to get up on stage and grab the mic. And there should be a plan to handle them if they jump up in the audience and decide to disrupt. So far Bernie doesn't seem to have one, but he needs to if he's going to succeed.
This ain't rocket science. Disrupters at political events must be expected and prepared for.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)They also shored up more support for Sanders, so perhaps I should be thanking them.
His "unfortunate" reaction was letting them speak. Tazing would have been a truly unfortunate reaction, but I can get behind hauling their asses out (cuffing and hauling out if they get physical like the #BLM chicks did). We'll see what changes his campaign make going forward.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Gotta get caught up on that sordid little detail...
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)and I suggested that he use it towards hiring proper security.
Those idiot BLM "protesters" (err, hired agitators, I suspect) should have had their heads knocked together and been dragged out to the damn street like the trash they are.
And I'm not a Sanders supporter, even.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I think if they had been hired, they would have been better organized.
Well done, Pnw,you got me to up your post replies number.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)But go ahead and "explain" anyway as if he only lived on the moon.
Perfect.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...so why are you lecturing him?
Oh, you think his "plan" should be more like Hillary's: avoid crowds at all costs. If you must meet with the hoi polloi, do it in controlled events where you only meet with a hand-picked few. Other than that, just hobnob with the big donors. $2500 a plate definitely keeps the riff-raff out.
While you're at it, be sure to get a few selfies with the glitterati. Because nothing says "I'm for the common good" like a selfie with the Kardashians.
And whatever you do, don't schedule any public events in Seattle, that anarchist haven.
Yep. Now THAT, my friends, is a PLAN!
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Or penned up in 'Free Speech Zones'.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,035 posts)The limit is 2700 dollars, American.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I rounded down. But either figure will still keep the riff-raff out.
As a friend of mine said recently: "I'm Riff, you're Raff."
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)This entire thing was a complete fraud from the word go, as is the woman behind it. The proof is all there.
appalachiablue
(41,177 posts)a 'clean up' attempt here, after all the deception, disruption, attacks, divisive energy and lost time..
Thanks much!
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)so disrupters don't end up on stage, grabbing his mic.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Your heartfelt advice to "Bernie" is disingenuous. You'd be leading the howling mob if Bernie Sanders so much as said a single word in opposition to these protesters taking over the venue and shutting it down.
Bernie acted gracefully in difficult circumstances, and you can't even give him that much.
appalachiablue
(41,177 posts)kacekwl
(7,022 posts)After waiting for about 20 min. it was obvious they would not allow him to continue. Cut your losses and move on . In the end I believe the folks who were there to hear Bernie speak were the real losers. No upside for BLM I'm afraid.
aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)Hillary knows how to keep people far away.
riversedge
(70,310 posts)I read it and thought we should all reflect on it:
BTW--yes, agree with your OP also
August 9, 2015
Interrupting Bernie: Exposing the White Supremacy of the American Left
You know, Ive always liked Bernie Sanders. I appreciate that as a U.S. Senator, he has been willing to speak the truth about many important social issues, but hes also a U.S. Senator, which means that he is only going to be as progressive as his electorate allows him to be.
That said, Id generally been pretty disappointed with the lack of racial justice analysis in his economic inequality platform as a candidate for president. That is, until a few weeks ago when some phenomenal Black activists at the Netroots Nation Presidential Town Hall forced his hand.
For all of the this is not the way sentiment were hearing from White progressives, it was the interruption at Netroots (alongside other direct pressure) that led to Bernies explicit platform on racial justice.
Notably, Black Lives Matter activists havent been successful (though I am sure not for lack of trying) in interrupting Hillary Clinton in the same way (that secret service protection and massive campaign budget for private security sure is handy), but even she has had little choice but to pay attention to Black Lives Matter as a movement.;;;;;
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)He was respectful to them even though they failed to offer him the same courtesy. Exactly what does he need to learn about hecklers again?
msongs
(67,453 posts)did not provide platform security
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)If he becomes the nominee, the Secret Service won't be letting anyone up on the stage, grabbing his mic. He might as well get used to more security now.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)What's up with that?
It's Bernies fault that BLM targets him for unexplained reasons (cough! Hillary! cough!)! Blame the victim, typical RW/Third Way® tactic.
Cough! Cough!
LuvLoogie
(7,035 posts)There are quite a few, otherwise level-headed, people who lose their shit over her. And there are too many, less than level-headed, people that would go the extra mile if given the chance.
Hillary is a nuts & bolts type of campaigner, it seems. She has over 20 years on the national and international stage, with daggers flying at her from the Right and, more recently, the Left. She has a head start because she has done the work.
Bernie is trying to build a national presence based on his personality. His ideas aren't new. Trade unionism isn't new. Progressive taxation isn't new. He "champions" single-payer health care, yet he voted for the ACA. He compromised his principles for the lesser of two evils.
And he'll do it again. He's a politician. Welcome to the national spotlight Bernie.
matt819
(10,749 posts)HappyPlace
(568 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Bernie is fine. I'm sure he appreciates your concern.
dgibby
(9,474 posts)More like victim blaming, and just keeps doubling down with every post. Sooooo classy.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)before in my memory. Perhaps you have others like these in mind?
I've lost patience with those who think yelling in my face is effective political action. As such, I've lost patience with most of DU. I think I may join those who have demonstrated some sense by vacating this cesspool.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Oh, wait. Hers are restricted to billionaires and have security
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)No one else would have, or could have, handled it better.