Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Handy White House Chart: Health Reform Benefits (Original Post) flpoljunkie Jun 2012 OP
It's still all SO confusing. Denninmi Jun 2012 #1
These might prove helpful ... 66 dmhlt Jun 2012 #2
Same for everybody else. Igel Jun 2012 #4
Health care has been a mess for how long; and-justice-for-all Jun 2012 #3

Denninmi

(6,581 posts)
1. It's still all SO confusing.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 11:30 AM
Jun 2012

I keep reading and hearing contradictory things everywhere.

For example, take the "free preventative care" provision.

I've read that this only applies IF your insurance plan was purchased in 2010 or later.

I've also read that it means you can go for a routine physical or certain other thing without paying a co-pay? Fine, but what if you are on a high-deductible plan? Do you still have to pay the full charge?

I've also read that, if the doctor discovers a new condition during the routine exam and treats you for it, such as writing a prescription, then the whole thing is no longer covered.

More ???? than answers.

66 dmhlt

(1,941 posts)
2. These might prove helpful ...
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 01:43 PM
Jun 2012

And they're from the Link provided in the graphic, and found in less than a minute by just using a search for "preventive"

http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2010/07/preventive-services-list.html

http://www.healthcare.gov/law/features/rights/preventive-care/index.html

WRT co-pays if you're on a high-deductible, and if your doctor treats a new condition - that would clearly be something you would need to check with from your OWN insurance carrier.

Igel

(35,356 posts)
4. Same for everybody else.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 06:17 PM
Jun 2012

There are a lot of generalities and few specifics. Some things are fairly specific in the legislation; many others are vague until they write the regulations.

This is true for you and for the insurance companies.

I read the list above and think, pretty much for each one, either "more cost to insurer" or "more cost to government." The anti-Medicare-fraud is an exception.

And I think that it's probably too late to sell the insurance company stock in my mother's investment account and in her IRA. The writedown against her retirement has already been taken.

and-justice-for-all

(14,765 posts)
3. Health care has been a mess for how long;
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 05:46 PM
Jun 2012

since WWII?. Ever since then, they have only added to the mess and never fixed it. The best thing to do is open Medicare for all and be done with it, and they could still put most of these constraints on the private insurers to keep them from fucking people over for a profit.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Handy White House Chart: ...