2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Bernie Sanders Surge Appears To Be Over
Not good news for Bernie from Nate!
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/the-bernie-sanders-surge-appears-to-be-over/?ex_cid=538fb
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Nate didn't write that, you never know.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)just looking for something to lighten up this downer.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)valuable white privilege of them all.
What are they, like 99.9% white?
What if the first two must win or be close Presidential primaries were in Washington D.C. and Maryland?
Or name two others of your own a little more representative of race makeup in America than Iowa and N.H.
Then what would all the pandering and framing of the issues look like?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)dsc
(52,166 posts)Now Maryland with a candidate in the race would likely not really be pandered to as much but to take one issue, ethanol. We have an ethanol program only because Iowa has the first caucus. If DC went first, DC statehood would be sacred.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)two almost totally all white states set the trend for who is supposed to be the winner is pretty far out. They are also small states with small electoral numbers which means they are pretty rural. I don't think I would bet the farm on these two states or even the first three.
onecaliberal
(32,898 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I don't think it was poorly written, I don't think the credentials of the writer can be questioned, I don't think they made up the poll numbers....but it does appear that you don't like the numbers. So is that the crock?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)As far as the 538 article goes.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)it doesn't matter to me personally how many times it is posted.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)"White supremacist liberal" posts. Lots more to catch up with those.
Meh... IMO, the article is good, but we shouldn't make too much of it. It's a snapshot in time and a lot of things can, and will, happen.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)NOT
Nobody buys this type of subversive crappola anymore. They can try all the silly memes they want, but I'm pretty sure folks will believe their own eyes and their own ears this go round.
magicmama
(50 posts)He's badly underestimating Bernie. And he will be wrong at the end.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)are way behind the curve.
Believe what ever helps you sleep at night but until we get a couple debates behind us none of these polls really matter.
brooklynite
(94,729 posts)...based on 2008 numbers, Sanders can expect to get 8 million votes. Pretty respectable, but not enough to win.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)That's why there were 28,000 people in L.A. last night to hear him?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)There are certainly 28,000 Sanders supporters in L.A.; there's probably about a quarter of a million, all told, but that's still only 20% of the Democratic voters in the city.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)He continues to attract crowds in the tens of thousands. Doesn't appear Sanders has peaked. JMHO
Recursion
(56,582 posts)What does pulling a large crowd in a large city tell you about increased support in the future?
QC
(26,371 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)We have 5 months to go and ANYONE who knows anything about politics knows that's an eternity. Polling didn't save Eric Cantor. Neither did money. If polls haven't budged by January then I'll start believing it. Right now it's just a weapon to try to discourage opposition.
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)still_one
(92,403 posts)closer to the first primary in Feburary, I think we will get a more accurate picture
delrem
(9,688 posts)Well, these pollsters, they do know who buys the most polls. That's their business.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)give their customers what they want!