Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:30 AM Aug 2015

I have been saying since the beginning that Hillary has an excitement problem....

and now I'm backed up by a poll.

Face it, aside from those who look back longingly on the 90's, people aren't 'FIRED UP and READY TO GO' for Hillary. She brings nothing but old news and old politics to the table. And its starting to bite her.

SNIP
According to the poll, just 35% of New Hampshire Democratic voters said they are "excited" about Clinton's campaign. And 38% of Democrats have a "very favorable" impression of Clinton (though eight in 10 Democrats do view her favorably in general).

http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-new-hampshire-2015-8

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have been saying since the beginning that Hillary has an excitement problem.... (Original Post) Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 OP
That's one poll from one state. Metric System Aug 2015 #1
Ok? Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #2
It happens that it's an important state. Agschmid Aug 2015 #3
What I meant is that it could be an outlier. Regardless, I have no problem with a competitive Metric System Aug 2015 #5
No blacks in that state it's mostly Caucasian bigdarryl Aug 2015 #40
Honestly that doesn't matter. Agschmid Aug 2015 #50
What matters is realizing how long and hard the GOP has worked to create "Hillary fatigue" in us. Hortensis Aug 2015 #61
One state where voters are actually looking at the candidates AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #53
Perhaps because she hasn't started campaigning yet? brooklynite Aug 2015 #4
Oh come on....Hillary is not an unknown upstart from Idaho... Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #6
Also she has started riversedge Aug 2015 #7
She hasn't started campaigning yet? Le Taz Hot Aug 2015 #22
lol. and dead on balls accurate. nt restorefreedom Aug 2015 #45
2008 Primary results... brooklynite Aug 2015 #47
I think she took a brief break JackInGreen Aug 2015 #49
that must be why the DNC didn't schedule debates virtualobserver Aug 2015 #29
Where's the like button? artislife Aug 2015 #41
New Hampshire is hardly representative of the country. nt onehandle Aug 2015 #8
These responses are so predictable....in fact they were predicted Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #9
Doesn't make it untrue. nt onehandle Aug 2015 #11
Furthermore, what state would you say really showcased the EXCITEMENT based around Hillary? Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #10
Yet she's leading 54-18. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #12
How soft is that support? Again, I'm asking about the excitement quotient. Hillary does not.... Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #13
Incorrect. In NH, Bernie is leading 44-37 magicmama Aug 2015 #25
NH doesn't elect presidents, all 50 states do. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #26
Pretty impressive for a newcomer like her frylock Aug 2015 #36
She's not having big rallies yet. onehandle Aug 2015 #14
She's not having big rallies, because there's little grassroots excitement for her. It's a vicious Romulox Aug 2015 #15
This is exactly it. If there were big rallies to be had, she would have them. Instead.... Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #17
She is 40-50 points ahead. There is no reason to spend that kind of money yet. onehandle Aug 2015 #18
She loses support the more people hear her talk. Maybe she can run a silent campaign? Romulox Aug 2015 #20
she prefers to run a silent auction virtualobserver Aug 2015 #30
Heee! nt artislife Aug 2015 #42
Its a feeling man, backed up now by poll data. Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #16
Bernie's rallies were advertised? magicmama Aug 2015 #27
Word of mouth, web, and social media announcements are advertising. nt onehandle Aug 2015 #31
And how much did it cost Bernie? magicmama Aug 2015 #32
The venues cost money. A lot of money. onehandle Aug 2015 #34
Yes, the venues are the only expense he has to pay... magicmama Aug 2015 #39
I think it was announced 10 days before Bernie came to PDX. oregonjen Aug 2015 #35
You'd have to be pretty damned compelling BeyondGeography Aug 2015 #19
There were a lot of brown faces artislife Aug 2015 #44
It is early in the process... Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #21
Hillary fatigue, been around too long in the public eye, and she carries too much baggage NorthCarolina Aug 2015 #23
If only people would get so excited about Congress treestar Aug 2015 #24
excitement requires one of two conditions HFRN Aug 2015 #28
Well, her excitement problem may soon be eclipsed by her legal problems. TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #33
that might cause a different kind of excitement virtualobserver Aug 2015 #37
Well, who foresaw the head of the CIA spending two years on probation? TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #38
Petraeus did so KNOWINGLY while committing a crime, Hillary did not, the Hillary hate is obnoxious uponit7771 Aug 2015 #64
But Hillary is the most electa--- John Poet Aug 2015 #43
any poll that is not a screaming hillary slam dunk restorefreedom Aug 2015 #46
New Hampshire? Bernie's back yard? Really? apnu Aug 2015 #48
hahaha. How far away do you think New York is? What state did Hillary win in 08? Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #59
My daughter and her friends are all azmom Aug 2015 #51
And a man in his 70s represents...? Metric System Aug 2015 #55
That was my question to them because azmom Aug 2015 #57
Love it: Uncle B. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #63
If a voter is 'FIRED UP and READY TO GO' rock Aug 2015 #52
Yes I do ibegurpard Aug 2015 #54
Would you rather have a fired up group of supporters, or just a 'meh, whatever' group? Joe the Revelator Aug 2015 #58
so that should be a positive for the other candidates. JI7 Aug 2015 #56
First off, one poll Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2015 #60
Her and exciting Bernie will make a good team. Sunlei Aug 2015 #62
Says FAUX news, NOT glad to see this meme repeated here... I'll pound ground for whomever is the uponit7771 Aug 2015 #65

Metric System

(6,048 posts)
5. What I meant is that it could be an outlier. Regardless, I have no problem with a competitive
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:40 AM
Aug 2015

primary. The candidate that emerges will be stronger for it.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
50. Honestly that doesn't matter.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:22 PM
Aug 2015

NH and IA go first, and the outcome of those elections determine the swing of a primary.

At this point I think we should move away from state by state primary but that's another issue completely.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
61. What matters is realizing how long and hard the GOP has worked to create "Hillary fatigue" in us.
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 08:33 AM
Aug 2015

They been running her for 2016 ever since she lost the primary to Obama in 2004, never allowing more than a few days to go by without pushing her "candidacy" back into the news.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
53. One state where voters are actually looking at the candidates
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:53 PM
Aug 2015

More to follow as the primaries close in.

brooklynite

(94,703 posts)
4. Perhaps because she hasn't started campaigning yet?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:38 AM
Aug 2015

Her campaign laid out a program back in the spring and she's followed it methodically:
1) listening tour in the spring
2) rolling out policies in the summer
3) public campaigning in the fall

Sorry if it's not exciting for you.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
6. Oh come on....Hillary is not an unknown upstart from Idaho...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:40 AM
Aug 2015

Everyone knows who she is, and if people were going to be excited by her, it would be showing in polls like this (not to mention her crowds).

1. Former first lady
2. Former Senator from a nearby state
3. Former Sec. of State
4. Former Candidate who spent a ton of time in New Hampshire in 07/08


Lets not act like she's some unknown quantity.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
22. She hasn't started campaigning yet?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:22 AM
Aug 2015

Did you just type that with a straight face? Hillary's been campaigning since 2000!

brooklynite

(94,703 posts)
47. 2008 Primary results...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:01 PM
Aug 2015

Barack Obama (very exciting): 18 M votes
Hillary Clinton (not so exciting): 18 M votes

so much for excitement

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
49. I think she took a brief break
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:06 PM
Aug 2015

Being secretary of state. I can't say a lot of the "cast iron hardcase" imaging (fairly accurate and kudos to being a badass. I wanted to use another word but it's verboten even in compliment) hurt her prospectiveness though I doubt that it was entirely intentional.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
9. These responses are so predictable....in fact they were predicted
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:50 AM
Aug 2015

in the original thread regarding this poll. Its awesome.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
10. Furthermore, what state would you say really showcased the EXCITEMENT based around Hillary?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:52 AM
Aug 2015

Where are people really fired up and ready to go? What stadiums is she packing? What overflow crowds is she speaking in front of?

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
13. How soft is that support? Again, I'm asking about the excitement quotient. Hillary does not....
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:55 AM
Aug 2015

....have it.

 

magicmama

(50 posts)
25. Incorrect. In NH, Bernie is leading 44-37
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:00 AM
Aug 2015

According to a recent poll released from yesterday. And that was a state poll which has significant strength than national polls.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
14. She's not having big rallies yet.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:56 AM
Aug 2015

This was mentioned upthread.

And you seem to be saying Senator Sanders without saying Senator Sanders.

Ralph Nader had many super-rallies with tens of thousands in attendance. He had 100,000 in just a couple of weeks.

And this was 15 years ago. Sound familiar?

Look familiar?:



And no I'm not saying he's a spoiler, I'm saying he's a flash in the pan.

Do you think all of these people at Senator Sander's super-rallies just showed up out of nowhere?

Nope. It was arranged and advertised. Same as Nader's. And Nader even charged admission.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
15. She's not having big rallies, because there's little grassroots excitement for her. It's a vicious
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:59 AM
Aug 2015

cycle.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
17. This is exactly it. If there were big rallies to be had, she would have them. Instead....
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:01 AM
Aug 2015

....she has small fundraisers.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
18. She is 40-50 points ahead. There is no reason to spend that kind of money yet.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:05 AM
Aug 2015

Welcome to politics 101.

 

magicmama

(50 posts)
27. Bernie's rallies were advertised?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:03 AM
Aug 2015

Not one dollar was spent on advertising about his rallies. That is significant. People came to Bernie because they heard about him and wanted to learn more. They get excited by listening what Bernie had to say, and they talk about it. Twitter, Facebook, social media technology sustains the excitement.

I barely see anything of Clinton's on Facebook or Twitter that shows any level of excitement. Barely anything, in fact.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
34. The venues cost money. A lot of money.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:28 AM
Aug 2015

And again, 40-50 points ahead.

And you are clearly not reading upthread, so I am done with you.

 

magicmama

(50 posts)
39. Yes, the venues are the only expense he has to pay...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 12:10 PM
Aug 2015

But the advertising is free. Clinton probably will have to make ads to get them *AWARE* that she exists and wants to have a rally.

Her rally in NYC netted only 5,500 and nobody was in the overflow section. Bernie, on the other hand consistently packs the arenas and have overflow areas also packed. That's the excitement factor as noted on OP (Note I'm staying on topic). People *KNOW* who Clinton is, and who she represents. Her planned foray into rallies will fall short in the fall in terms of excitement and number will pale compared to Bernie's rallies.

Her "listening tour" is a complete waste of time.



oregonjen

(3,339 posts)
35. I think it was announced 10 days before Bernie came to PDX.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:30 AM
Aug 2015

In that time, they moved from the Memorial Coliseum to the Moda Center because of the number of people who RSVP'd via social media. I'd say he has a lot of people interested in his message. The local news organizations did announce it as well, along with Hillary's private fundraiser she was having a few days before Bernie.

BeyondGeography

(39,377 posts)
19. You'd have to be pretty damned compelling
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:15 AM
Aug 2015

to be able to generate excitement after nearly a quarter of a century of public life at the highest levels.

Correction; nobody is that compelling.

The only potential "excitement" I see is Hillary-as-first-woman-President. But for me at least that is dulled by the pre-ordained nature of Hillary as the after-Obama nominee, which has been the feeling since 2008. That's a long time.

Hillary feels imposed, not the result of a natural competition. Too much talent is on the sidelines, starting with Warren. Not her fault that she's up 30-40 points nationally, 70-80 points with blacks and enjoys a similarly massive edge with Latinos. We'll see if it all works out in the end, but I do think she will be fighting this particular battle through next Nov.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
44. There were a lot of brown faces
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 12:22 PM
Aug 2015

In LA and Tuscon. You know, where there is a large population.

My Latina self was in Seattle.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
21. It is early in the process...
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:20 AM
Aug 2015

and she has been known to everyone for a very long time.

These two things can combine to quell any excitement factor.

It is the trustworthy numbers that worry me. If those continue to be upside down for her, she can't argue against the GOP smears that will be endless. If people don't trust her they won't believe her rebuttals.



 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
23. Hillary fatigue, been around too long in the public eye, and she carries too much baggage
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:46 AM
Aug 2015

making her an easy target for the GOP and the conservative media outlets. I personally think that in a General election she would be toast.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
24. If only people would get so excited about Congress
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 10:48 AM
Aug 2015

Instead of just letting the same old people slide in.

Hillary would be the first woman to be President, and that'll excite a lot of people (the Republicans negatively).

I'm not so big on excitement. Most people live their lives without reference to who is President. And most people don't think of Hillary as all the labels put on her about banking, insurance, corporations, war hawk, etc.

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
28. excitement requires one of two conditions
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:04 AM
Aug 2015

either

1) widespread contentment with the status quo

or

2) perception that the candidate is an outsider that was not part of creating the status quo

simple as that

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
33. Well, her excitement problem may soon be eclipsed by her legal problems.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:25 AM
Aug 2015

Hard to see how the FBI could criminally charge Petraeus and not Hillary Clinton--both mishandled and gave unauthorized people top secret materials.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
37. that might cause a different kind of excitement
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:32 AM
Aug 2015

I can't see anyone charging a Secretary of State with anything like that.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
38. Well, who foresaw the head of the CIA spending two years on probation?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 11:37 AM
Aug 2015

But yeah, that would be exciting in a different way. Hillary's best defense is that her counterpart and lackey, Leon Panetta, was even worse at handling classified info.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
46. any poll that is not a screaming hillary slam dunk
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 12:49 PM
Aug 2015

has to be wrong

c'mon,people! how many times do we have to be told?

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
59. hahaha. How far away do you think New York is? What state did Hillary win in 08?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:35 PM
Aug 2015

That saved her from a quicker elimination?

azmom

(5,208 posts)
51. My daughter and her friends are all
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:36 PM
Aug 2015

Feminists. They can't even get excited about her. She represents the 90's to them.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
57. That was my question to them because
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 03:50 PM
Aug 2015

They are all young and a little ageist, if you ask me.

I believe that Uncle B ( that's their nickname for him) resonated with them because they had never heard of him before so to them he was new. The way he speaks, his honesty, and the fact that he was the first candidate to campaign for free college is also a factor.

All of her friends are graduating with debt and they are fearful that they won't be able to find jobs once they graduate. Bernie has tapped into that.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
63. Love it: Uncle B.
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 08:41 AM
Aug 2015

I have to admit I'm pleasantly surprised at the level of interest young people are giving his campaign. It shows they are interested in an issue-based election. Their feeling the Bern is really encouraging in this cynical world.

rock

(13,218 posts)
52. If a voter is 'FIRED UP and READY TO GO'
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:51 PM
Aug 2015

for a candidate, that brings one vote to him. If a voter is 'for' a candidate, that brings one vote to him. See the difference?

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
54. Yes I do
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 01:55 PM
Aug 2015

The one that is fired up and ready to go will be talking to all their friends and acquaintances...which equals one vote and potentially more.

 

Joe the Revelator

(14,915 posts)
58. Would you rather have a fired up group of supporters, or just a 'meh, whatever' group?
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:34 PM
Aug 2015

Again, just look back on 2008 to see where that gets you.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,436 posts)
60. First off, one poll
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 07:38 AM
Aug 2015

Second, she doesn't need to generate the same amount of excitement. She already has a lot of people committed to her candidacy from the outset. Bernie has the much tougher job of convincing people to switch from her to him.

uponit7771

(90,359 posts)
65. Says FAUX news, NOT glad to see this meme repeated here... I'll pound ground for whomever is the
Thu Aug 13, 2015, 08:49 AM
Aug 2015

... candidate no doubt.

I'm fired up and ready to NOT have a republican in the Oval Office

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I have been saying since ...