Anybody know this guy?

[HassleCat]

Jonathan Allen of Vox.com has a piece expressing undisguised joy that Hillary Clinton is in trouble about her e-mails. I thought he was a liberal, but he appears to delight in Clinton's troubles, mentioning that she is being caught by Sanders in Hew Hampshire. Is everybody piling on Clinton? If so, why? Is it because she's the frontrunner? Because she has the "unlikeable" thing going on? Here's a link.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bernie-sanders-and-top-secret-emails-are-catching-up-to-hillary-clinton/ar-BBlGenh?ocid=iehp

[PoliticAverse]

1. He was co-author of a book on Clinton...

http://www.hrcbook.com/

[4139]

2. No, but copied chuck Todd ..

http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read-one-two-punch-tough-news-hillary-clinton-n408411

[Hoppy]

3. Iraq vote. Contributions from Goldman Sachs. That's enough for me.

She is the Dems version of using social issues for diversion while stealing us blind.

The Republicans tell the rubes that abortion and gay demands are ruining the country. Vote for us and we will fix things the way God wants them to be fixed.

Then they pass a few laws to regulate gays and abortion. At the same time, they pass laws to deregulate banks, hedge funds and so forth. God forbid Roe v. Wade is ever overturned. They will have nothing with which to bate their rubes.


With Hillary, you will get efforts on voting rights, and a few other issues that will never pass Congress but look good to our rubes. "Look. She tried but the Republicans stood in her way."

In the meanwhile, we will get TTP, the pipeline and Larry Summers and a Goldman chairman as Sec. of Treasure.

I suspect we will also get at least one war because she needs to prove she is not weak on national security.

Your turn.