Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 08:21 AM Aug 2015

Excellent article on Bernie!

Bernie Sanders has just stepped into the boxing match known as the Democratic primary— bouncing up and down, punching his gloves together, with his head held high. Bernie is ready for a knock-down, drag-out fight against the establishment. Waiting in the other corner is a political titan, Hillary Rodham Clinton. Hillary has done it all: she was First Lady, a United States Senator, ran for the Democratic nomination in 2008, and most recently, was handpicked by Barack Obama to serve as the Secretary of State. And moreover, Hillary’s political positions aren’t that far off from what Bernie is propagating. However, there lies one key difference: Bernie’s political foresight makes Nostradamus look like a Medieval street prophet.

How so? Bernie has the upper hand on Hillary with regard to a few hot button issues: the War in Iraq, the financial crisis, and pro-LGBT positions. Let’s start with the War in Iraq, a conflict that Bernie opposed from the outset.

“I am concerned about the problems of so-called unintended consequences. Who will govern Iraq when Saddam Hussein is removed and what role will the U.S. play in ensuing a civil war that could develop in that country?”

http://stupidpartymathvmyth.com/1/post/2015/06/bernard-bernie-sanders-the-political-foresight-champion.html


.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Excellent article on Bernie! (Original Post) peacebird Aug 2015 OP
gotta love Democrats with a hedge fund in the family like Hillary Agony Aug 2015 #1
Sounds similar to what Hillary said at the time: SonderWoman Aug 2015 #2
Please.. DemByDefault Aug 2015 #3
So you're taking Bush's side? SonderWoman Aug 2015 #5
The point was who believed his lies. Armstead Aug 2015 #8
That's not "taking Bush's side." Please. senz Aug 2015 #18
bwahaha. And yet you are arguing that she was so stupid she trusted Bush and Cheney cali Aug 2015 #6
The intelligence community. Just like Harkin, Leahy, and the rest. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #9
In short, My vote is not to give this war power permanently zeemike Aug 2015 #15
A bad vote dressed in pretty language is mere hiney-covering. nt senz Aug 2015 #19
WTF? Leahy opposed the war. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #24
Sounds very differnt to me Armstead Aug 2015 #7
Why not use actual quotes? SonderWoman Aug 2015 #10
Did you read my actual response? Armstead Aug 2015 #11
It "sounds like" that to you because.. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #12
Talk about using those good old memes. Do you "hate" Bernie and everyone who supports him? Armstead Aug 2015 #14
I don't believe it has one thing to do with hate RoccoR5955 Aug 2015 #16
I think some people "hate" stright talk Armstead Aug 2015 #21
Personally, I think RoccoR5955 Aug 2015 #23
Facts = hate beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #25
After thinking about it, I see your point GitRDun Aug 2015 #28
Lol no nuance allowed! GitRDun Aug 2015 #26
"Bernie’s political foresight LWolf Aug 2015 #4
I Just Watched Asshats Claim Over And Over On MSNBC Bernie Can't Win Yallow Aug 2015 #13
MSNBC is completely full of shit. Boycott! Enthusiast Aug 2015 #31
K&R CharlotteVale Aug 2015 #17
The article demonstrates Bernie's excellent judgement and foresight. senz Aug 2015 #20
"Demonstrates" is the wrong word. Should have said "illustrates." senz Aug 2015 #22
k and r nashville_brook Aug 2015 #27
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2015 #29
Isn't it about time that someone concerns themselves about unintended consequences? Enthusiast Aug 2015 #30

Agony

(2,605 posts)
1. gotta love Democrats with a hedge fund in the family like Hillary
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 08:37 AM
Aug 2015

and the ensuing cronyism.

from your article

" In sum, Bernie Sanders calls out trickle-down economics, wealth inequality, hedging, Federal Reserve bailouts, economic cronyism, and has hinted at these policies culminating in an unsustainable system that would contribute to financial turmoil. "


I'll stick with the guy sans family hedge fund, thank you...
 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
2. Sounds similar to what Hillary said at the time:
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 08:42 AM
Aug 2015

"If we were to attack Iraq now, alone or with few allies, it would set a precedent that could come back to haunt us.

...this course is fraught with danger.

...a unilateral attack...on the present facts is not a good option.

Because bipartisan support for this resolution makes success in the United Nations more likely, and therefore, war less likely, and because a good faith effort by the United States, even if it fails, will bring more allies and legitimacy to our cause, I have concluded, after careful and serious consideration, that a vote for the resolution best serves the security of our nation.

My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption, or for unilateralism, or for the arrogance of American power or purpose -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people throughout the world".

 

DemByDefault

(40 posts)
3. Please..
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 09:37 AM
Aug 2015

Clinton knew what she was voting for. Anyone who didn't know Bush was going to attack Iraq was an idiot.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
18. That's not "taking Bush's side." Please.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:42 AM
Aug 2015

Bush's transparent lies were about WMD. That was his rationale.

It was obvious -- to anyone -- that shortly after 9/11 the Bush administration was hell-bent on invading and occupying Iraq. Hillary knew that. She's not stupid.

 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
9. The intelligence community. Just like Harkin, Leahy, and the rest.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:35 AM
Aug 2015

"My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption, or for unilateralism, or for the arrogance of American power or purpose -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people throughout the world".

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
15. In short, My vote is not to give this war power permanently
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:24 AM
Aug 2015

But to give it to these mad men just this time to see what happens...and we can always repeal it later.
Talk means nothing...actions are what counts.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
24. WTF? Leahy opposed the war.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 05:54 PM
Aug 2015


So did Jeffords in case you try to claim another Vermont politician supported it.
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. Sounds very differnt to me
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:14 AM
Aug 2015

Sanders: "This will have unintended consequences. We can't afford it, and it is a mistake. We should not do it."

Clinton: This is not a good idea. But we should support the Bush administration because, golly gee, maybe saying we are ready to do war that will bring the United Nations around to maybe telling us not to do it, or maybe helping us out.....I don't know, golly, gee maybe..hmmmmmwagh..........I don't know. 9-11..... Bush is still popular. Elections, donltt want offend patriotic conservative voters.......Oh hell. Okay I don't want to do it but I'm voting yes."

 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
10. Why not use actual quotes?
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:36 AM
Aug 2015

It kinda shreds your credibility when you just make shit up: "My vote is not, however, a vote for any new doctrine of preemption, or for unilateralism, or for the arrogance of American power or purpose -- all of which carry grave dangers for our nation, for the rule of international law and for the peace and security of people throughout the world".

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
11. Did you read my actual response?
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:44 AM
Aug 2015

You thoughtfully provided the actual quote. I responded with "Sounds like this to me"

That's exactly what it sounds like (and sounded like at the time) to me. My opinion in response.

You're welcome to disagree with my interpretation. But that's why I didn't use "actual quotes." It is ( and was) my opinion of her logic. Your mileage may vary.

 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
12. It "sounds like" that to you because..
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:51 AM
Aug 2015

You're blinded by your hate for her. Reality says it soundes nothing like you portrayed it to sound.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
14. Talk about using those good old memes. Do you "hate" Bernie and everyone who supports him?
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:02 AM
Aug 2015

I don't "hate" Clinton. I kinda like her as a person (not that i know her but what I see in public eye), and I admire many of her achievements, and to a certain point agree with her on many specific issues.

But I don't think she should be the Democratic presidential candidate for a number of very specific reasons.Some of it iss certain characteristics she has.

But more important, for the general reason that she represents interest groups and a faction of the Democratic Party, and an approach to campaigning and governing, that I strongly disagree with. I believe that approach has done serious damage to the nation, and aided the GOP. That transcends my feeling towards her as a person.

We obviously disagree on those issues. Fine. That's life and politics. But your facile and all-purpose "Clinton hating" meme is total bullshit. It's high-school level crap. It's condescending.

It just shows that you "worship Hillary" and "hate Bernie" and are blinded by your "hate" of anyone who does not see things exactly as you do. See how asinine that sounds?



 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
16. I don't believe it has one thing to do with hate
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:25 AM
Aug 2015

It has to do with perception of the newspeak that Clinton, and others used, and still use today to avoid issues.
Bernie is a straight talker. No newspeak from him at all.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
23. Personally, I think
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 04:11 PM
Aug 2015

that they "hate" someone running against their "ordained" candidate. Then there's the meme that Bernie is not "really a Democrat."
I guess that those who think that Bernie is not a real Democrat are not going to support him when he wins the nomination.

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
28. After thinking about it, I see your point
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 06:20 PM
Aug 2015

You could take Hillary's statement two ways:

1). The political "hedging your bets" motive as you describe.
2). Some poorly thought out "strategy" that Hillary and potentially others thought would work.

I guess I'm more of an optimist, but given Hillary's evasiveness on topics like Keystone and others I can see why you would see the motive as pure politics.

Even if you accept the nuance, Bernie still wins this issue....so there is that.

GitRDun

(1,846 posts)
26. Lol no nuance allowed!
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 06:01 PM
Aug 2015

stop that! you're getting in the way of my black and white world!

Bernie still wins on this issue though, even if you accept the nuance.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
4. "Bernie’s political foresight
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 09:49 AM
Aug 2015
makes Nostradamus look like a Medieval street prophet."

Bernie didn’t authorize the Bush Administration to conduct operations in Iraq. Instead of pandering to the financial elite by supporting false pretexts for war, conjured up by Saruman Cheney (an incredibly nerdy LOTR reference, I know), Bernie had the mental wherewithal to comprehend the difficulties of controlling a post-invasion Iraq, whereby he predicted the creation of a power vacuum that would foster an environment of extremism.

Years later, Iraq has become a breeding ground for radical jihadists seeking to construct a Muslim caliphate. Thanks to George “Dumbya” Bush, and his pro-defense inner circle, the Middle East has reached a dangerous crossroads, one between moderate Muslims, and those who seek to distort the Koran to fit their morally backwards religious objectives, such as, oh, you know, banning the breeding of pigeons, as they fly over head and expose their genitals to unsuspecting civilians. Apparently, Middle Eastern pigeons are as well-endowed as Ron Jeremy, or, breeders supplement their diets with Cialis…

But back to my point, Bernie’s astute argument also sheds light on America’s future role in post-invasion Iraq—the underlying inferences being: 1) how long will the conflict last, 2) the level of engagement required, and 3) the role to which the US will play in dictating domestic Iraqi affairs. Factors the Bush Administration, Republicans, and duped Democrats refused or naively disregarded. Bernie’s cautious calculations and tamed foreign policy objectives demonstrate his lucid political foresight.


And so much more.

 

Yallow

(1,926 posts)
13. I Just Watched Asshats Claim Over And Over On MSNBC Bernie Can't Win
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:58 AM
Aug 2015

The general election.

Really?

His crowds are protest votes?

Bernie for President

Vote for Bernie or Wall Street

Bernie can't lose.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
20. The article demonstrates Bernie's excellent judgement and foresight.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:52 AM
Aug 2015
"Political foresight is a skill limited to a few intuitive politicians—Bernie being one of them."


His judgment far surpasses that of his primary rival.

He's a gem, and this is his time.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
30. Isn't it about time that someone concerns themselves about unintended consequences?
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:11 AM
Aug 2015

We had eight years of absolutely no concern about unintended consequences. Look what it did to us.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Excellent article on Bern...