Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 10:14 AM Sep 2015

Martin O’Malley Campaign Pushes for Five More Debates

The manager of former Gov. Martin O’Malley’s presidential campaign is urging other Democratic campaign managers to agree to five additional debates in the early states.

Dave Hamrick, who is managing Mr. O’Malley’s campaign, sent the letter to the campaign managers on Sunday, asking that they would also ask the Democratic National Committee to drop their clause sanctioning the debates.

“By limiting the number of debates Democrats hold this year, the D.N.C. is allowing the Republican presidential candidates — namely, Donald Trump — to dominate the national debate, and whoever our nominee is will emerge stronger as the result of a vigorous debate process,” Mr. Hamrick wrote.

“Specifically, we are asking for two additional weeknight, non-holiday peak season debates in Iowa and New Hampshire respectively, and one additional weeknight, non-holiday peak season debate in South Carolina and Nevada, respectively,” he said, asking for those to fall before Feb. 1, 2016.

....

NYTimes
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Martin O’Malley Campaign Pushes for Five More Debates (Original Post) Capt. Obvious Sep 2015 OP
Good! I hope he gets them. RiverLover Sep 2015 #1
Time for HIllary to put her money where her mouth is. morningfog Sep 2015 #2
five would be closer to what is needed restorefreedom Sep 2015 #3
Awesome! There should be more debates. R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2015 #4
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #5
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
2. Time for HIllary to put her money where her mouth is.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 10:24 AM
Sep 2015

I won't hold my breath.

I'll call it now. Team Hillary will say something to the effect of: "We welcome more debates, we would love more debates, the people would benefit from more debates, but only if they are with support of the DNC. It's out of our hands. We will not violate the terms of the DNC sanctioned debate schedule. (Even though if I came along, the exclusivity clause would be a nullity.)"

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
3. five would be closer to what is needed
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 10:30 AM
Sep 2015

and it might happen. as hillary's numbers keep leaping off the cliff, she herself will want them. then all of a sudden, hillary wasserman schultz will say we "need more debates" and then presto chango! more debates

they will be too late to help hrc, but will hopefully help om

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
4. Awesome! There should be more debates.
Mon Sep 14, 2015, 10:44 AM
Sep 2015

To not have more debates raises questions as to the sincerity of the DLC and its leadership.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Martin O’Malley Campaign ...