2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary is pulling ahead in the social media race..... (xpost from HRC)
Bernies people keep crowing about him leading..
Hillary has 4.22 million followers on her twitter feed....thats a pretty impressive lead
Her Instagram page is at 286000 follower and it leads too
With her primary facebook page she has 1332007 million followers....a second page has more.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110718734
Discuss.
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)Hillary is pretty strong in this area. And just about every other area. Sanders is strong in this area as well.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Chris Christie, Hillary Clinton and many other presidential hopefuls are haunted by fake followers on Twitter.
Almost half of Chris Christies followers on Twitter are fake. This makes him the presidential candidate with the highest number of fake followers, according to Vocativ.
Hillary Clinton comes in second, with 35 percent fake followers, while presidential candidates Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders have as many as 90 percent real followers, and only 10 percent fake ones.
http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2015/07/02/chris-christie-and-hillary-clintons-fake-followers/
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)Trump is neck and neck with Sanders on something else.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)fake followers are bought and paid for, most likely by the candidate's organizations themselves.
They don't just 'happen'.
SonderWoman
(1,169 posts)And probably a 1/3 are spambots. Hmm....
jkbRN
(850 posts)I believe that name recognition has a lot to do with the number of her followers. Not to mention conservatives follow her and bash her 24/7.
Bernie seems to have his account(s), and the people that follow him perpetuate his messages so that they reverberate through out all of social media.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Two different online audit tools say no more than 44 per cent of Hillary's 3.6 million Twitter fans are real people who participate in the platform
The newly minted presidential candidate is fending off accusations that her Facebook page is full of fake 'likes'
Her Facebook fan base includes more people from Baghdad, Iraq than any US city
When she was secretary of state, her agency paid $630,000 to bulk up its Facebook likes, but pledged to stop after she left
Her fraudiness goes to the bone.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)When it comes to fake Twitter followers, Hillary Clinton is winning the presidential race by a landslide. Clinton has more fake followers and a higher ratio of bogus Twitter fans than any of the other main 2016 presidential contenders, a Vocativ analysis shows.
On the other end of the scale, the candidates with the lowest percentage of fake Twitter followers are Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. Contrary to what one might guess from his reputation for extravagant self-promotion, Trumps 2.6 million Twitter followers are 90 percent real people. Only 311,388 were deemed fake by the analysis using the tool TwitterAudit.
Bernie Sanders was tied for the highest ratio of authentic followers90 percent of his 300,000-plus followers are real people. Then comes Gov. Jeb Bush with 89% of his followers registering as real. On the bottom of the Twitter list is Clinton, with a whopping 35 percent of her 2.3 million Twitter followers coming up as fake.
TwitterAudit, a social media analysis tool, says on its website that it judges a Twitter accounts authenticity based on its number of tweets, the date of its last tweet and the ratio of its followers to friends. The fake Twitter accounts can be bots, which are accounts run by automated software programming. They can also be accounts created by real people but with an agenda of spreading political advertisements. But under both scenarios, they are certainly not a genuine measure of candidate popularity.
http://www.vocativ.com/usa/us-politics/hillary-clinton-has-more-fake-twitter-followers-than-other-candidates/
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)Hillary doesn't exist on my FB.
Trump is a source of derision.
Bernie has some strong support.
I'm not sure how I would have self-selected my friends to exclude HRC supporters, but, whoever they are, we don't travel in the same circles.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Because that's exactly what my Facebook looks like, too.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)as well as two local oriented ones and "Women for Bernie." I don't go on Twitter much.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Why should fake followers be limited to the internet? :p
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I wonder why it is that she has 4.2 million followers on the smaller of the two services, and 1.3 million followers on the larger of the services. Oh, right--a large percentage of her Twitter followers are fake.
http://www.vocativ.com/usa/us-politics/hillary-clinton-has-more-fake-twitter-followers-than-other-candidates/
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)As SOS, she bought $630,000 Facebook likes.
Now Candidate Clinton is aggressively buying Facebook likes from third world countries.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)tweets that ask you to follow them and then they will follow you. What is the point of following someone whose only purpose is to increase their number of followers, how boring?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)It includes the following tidbit:
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)posing as a gardening granny for Hillary has this caption under it: ASTROTURF? A woman cast as a kindly, gardening grandma in Clinton's campaign launch video is actually a former abortion lobbyist who once helmed a campaign for Texas state Senator Wendy Davis
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3038621/More-2-MILLION-Hillary-Clinton-s-Twitter-followers-fake-never-tweet.html#ixzz3lkdGUwTH
Faker, thy name is Hillary.
reddread
(6,896 posts)in an honest election.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)for the US State department...........
State Department bureau spent $630,000 on Facebook 'likes'
State Department officials spent $630,000 to get more Facebook "likes," prompting employees to complain to a government watchdog that the bureau was "buying fans" in social media, the agency's inspector general says.
The department's Bureau of International Information Programs spent the money to increase its "likes" count between 2011 and the beginning of 2013
http://gizmodo.com/a-state-department-bureau-spent-630-000-buying-faceboo-655295195
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And it sounds like someone owes the State Dept a nice chunk of change.
frylock
(34,825 posts)why the fuck would the State Dept even NEED Facebook likes?! I wonder how many of those 'Likes' have crossed over to 'Like' Hillary 2016, or whatever page see maintains for the primary, on FB?
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)You know, I never believed the RW trash about her, its her pro-TPP, pro-fracking, pro-Keystone BS (and a lot of other things) that bothered me about her. But something about this...I dont know - - it just really authenticates her lack of authenticity. Its bothersome and it WILL get thrown in her face *if* she makes it to the GE.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)What a racket...
azmom
(5,208 posts)Money for likes? For likes?
Edit: I just read the first comment in the article and it read like mine.
Fuck it to hell, it's just hard to believe. What a fucking waste of the people's money.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)... just imagine what a well-funded candidate could do in an attempt to buy popularity on an influential political message board.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)I would disavow them for not being trustworthy.
djean111
(14,255 posts)The sub-reddit for Bernie is amazingly well organized, there are 104,643 subscribers and 1793 online as of just now; the sub-reddit for Hillary has 652 subscribers, non currently online.
The reddit group raises money, is very well organized, there is a sub-reddit for each state, they have real grass-roots enthusiasm. Reddit discovered Bernie through some AMA's he did. They love his policies. They believe him on the issues. They don't hate Hillary; they just do not care about her, she is the old way personified, and that old way has done them no favors. Who do you think goes to get killed when Hillary boasts she will certainly have a "muscular" foreign policy?
The younger people do not even see the fancy ads. They don't care about them. They look things up for themselves. They will not do what the DNC wants them to do if Bernie is not the candidate. They see no point. That is on the DNC, and that has been years in the making.
Winning social media is not how many followers you can buy. That is laughable at best.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The Tapioca Brigade is out in force this afternoon.
frylock
(34,825 posts)the internals are probably pretty abysmal.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)I'd be happy to, but like many of us here on DU, I am unable to post there.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)would ask for proof.
frylock
(34,825 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)that make fun of her?