Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum25 Reasons to Vote for Bernie Sanders Over Hillary Clinton
Interesting read from H.A. Goodman. Too many of the 25 are server related. Not that I don't think it's a valid issue, but seems like he's repeating himself to get to 25.
My favorite:
7. Bernie Sanders has advocated breaking up the banks and reinstating a Glass-Steagall Act. Clinton does not advocate either policy objective.
It's no secret that Wall Street is in Hillary Clinton's corner and few believe the populist rhetoric from the former Secretary of State. Bernie Sanders, however, is a genuine reformer who eagerly takes on the "billionaire class."
25 Reasons I'm Voting for Bernie Sanders Over Hillary Clinton and the GOP Nominee
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2327 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
25 Reasons to Vote for Bernie Sanders Over Hillary Clinton (Original Post)
portlander23
Sep 2015
OP
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)1. LOVE this! My favs are, like you #7, but also #14.
Really agree with #14!!!!
Thanks for posting!! Bookmarking.
Thanks for posting!! Bookmarking.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)2. Agreed about the unnecessary reiteration of the email server issue.
The bottom line for me is a Clinton Presidency means a continuation of the Bush-Obama doctrine of saturating the Third World with American military operations.
For example, Obama increased military operations in Africa by 217% after taking office, and this is the result:
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/13/africa_is_our_new_quagmire_special_ops_human_rights_abuses_partner/
What goes on the rest of the year is, however, shrouded in secrecy as the U.S. military pivots to Africa and shadowy contingents of Navy SEALs and Army Green Berets shuttle on and off the continent under the auspices of various programs. This includes Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET), low-profile missions that lay the groundwork for each years Flintlock exercise, providing instruction in all manner of combat capabilities, from advanced marksmanship and small unit tactics to training in conducting ambushes and perfecting sniper skills.
The U.S. military says little about JCET activities in Africa or elsewhere. Special Operations Command, which oversees Americas most elite forces, will not even disclose the number of JCETs carried out by American commandos on the continent. AFRICOM, for its part, refuses to reveal the locations of the missions, citing operational security reasons and host nation sensitivities. And what little information that command will divulge only raises additional questions.
According to AFRICOM, special operators conducted approximately nine JCETs across Africa in Fiscal Year 2012 and 18 in 2013. Documents obtained by TomDispatch through the Freedom of Information Act from the office of the assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs indicate, however, that there were 19 JCETs in 2012 and 20 in 2013. The reports provided by the Pentagon to keep Congress informed of training of Special Operations forces show that, from October 2011 to October 2013 (fiscal years 2012 and 2013), there was only one month in which U.S. commandos did not conduct Joint Combined Exchange Training somewhere on the African continent. In all, according to those documents, Special Operations forces spent nearly 2,200 days in 12 countries under the JCET program alongside more than 3,800 African soldiers.
The U.S. military says little about JCET activities in Africa or elsewhere. Special Operations Command, which oversees Americas most elite forces, will not even disclose the number of JCETs carried out by American commandos on the continent. AFRICOM, for its part, refuses to reveal the locations of the missions, citing operational security reasons and host nation sensitivities. And what little information that command will divulge only raises additional questions.
According to AFRICOM, special operators conducted approximately nine JCETs across Africa in Fiscal Year 2012 and 18 in 2013. Documents obtained by TomDispatch through the Freedom of Information Act from the office of the assistant secretary of defense for legislative affairs indicate, however, that there were 19 JCETs in 2012 and 20 in 2013. The reports provided by the Pentagon to keep Congress informed of training of Special Operations forces show that, from October 2011 to October 2013 (fiscal years 2012 and 2013), there was only one month in which U.S. commandos did not conduct Joint Combined Exchange Training somewhere on the African continent. In all, according to those documents, Special Operations forces spent nearly 2,200 days in 12 countries under the JCET program alongside more than 3,800 African soldiers.
I fully expect Hillary to continue in this same vein: lots of questionable under-the-radar operations with shadowy objectives. DO NOT WANT.
delrem
(9,688 posts)3. Correct. Way too much was wasted on "email".
There was so much more that escaped the author - and the "email scandal" and "Benghazi scandal" are nothing, except maybe red herrings.
jfern
(5,204 posts)4. #1 is very important
ISIS wouldn't exist without hawks like Hillary.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)5. k & r. Thanks for posting. nm