2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’ Problems With Black Voters Go Much Deeper Than Him Just Blaming The Media (WaPo)
As they see it, Sanders is arguing that the structure of the economy is the ultimate reason that America seems to be holding back its black citizens. It's too difficult for people in the working class to find a job and too expensive to get an education. That's true whether you're black or white, but since white families more likely have other advantages -- inherited wealth, for example, that allows them to borrow more easily to finance a college degree -- the economy's problems are more pronounced for black workers.
The seasonally adjusted black unemployment rate was 9.5 percent last month, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while the white rate was 4.4 percent (black unemployment rates are usually twice that of white rates). Census data show that about 19 percent of the black population had at least a bachelor's degree last year, compared to 30 percent of the white population. The Pew Research Center found that the net worth of the typical white household was $141,900 in 2013. That amount was more than 13 times the typical black household's net worth of $11,000.
From the point of view of the protesters, though, this explanation has things backward. Since before the country's founding, they argue, the American economic elite has used race to divide workers against one another, preventing them from banding together and putting people such as Sanders in power who would alter the balance in the economy in favor of the working class. In other words, it isn't that the economy is the cause of racial disparities, but rather that racism is the cause of economic disparities.
"We have a fundamental disagreement with Bernie Sanders that racism is somehow an offshoot from economic exploitation when the reality is that race and class in America are inextricably linked to the rise of capitalism in this country," activist Kimberly Ellis told Weigel. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/09/14/why-bernie-sanders-problems-with-black-voters-go-much-deeper-than-him-just-blaming-the-media/
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)They just aren't that into him. So what?
Some are. Most aren't apparently.
People can vote for whoever they want. If most black people want Hillary Clinton, go for it. That's my theory. Pick whoever the hell you like best. It's your vote. Your free choice. Go for it.
If Hillary Clinton wins by that, that's ok. We'll cross that bridge later.
We can't force people to like Bernie Sanders. Let people vote for whoever they want. It's not a problem.
It's like saying the Grateful Dead has a problem getting black fans. It's not a real problem. They just won't sell as many records, but they're still a good band.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... is that he ain't going anywhere without them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)We leave the "rejoicing" to people who post RW talking points about Hillary's email problems, Benghazi problems, etc.
They enjoy it so much.
frylock
(34,825 posts)People are posting about Benghazi problems here? I mean, I've seen the posts about Clinton's incredible display of poor judgment by using a private mail server and mixing personal and State Dept emails, and the lame-ass excuses made to explain the use of that private mail server, but I haven't seen any posts about Clinton's Benghazi problems.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... it's been mentioned as part of the "baggage" the RW will use against her in the GE - in posts stating that she should just abandon her campaign, because all of that "baggage" is too much to overcome and the Democrats will lose the GE because of it.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I imagine there will be several attack ads pushing the Benghazi bullcrap.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)But I, for one, don't believe Democrats should choose their nominee based on what the Republicans will say about him/her.
It's not like there's a magical Dem candidate of whom the GOP are going to say, "We've got nuthin' on this guy/gal, so let's just keep our mouths shut and hope for the best."
What they don't have against any (D) they will simply fabricate. And FOX-News will confirm that the fabrication is fact.
And so it goes.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)It's tiresome.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)this kind of behavior of being stoic will only alienate the free loving, happy go lucky members of the Democratic Party.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Some are. Apparently most are not. That's fine.
They're welcome to participate. I'm sure Bernie Sanders will love to welcome black supporters. But if they just aren't that into him I don't really think it's a big problem.
Hillary will be the nominee. Life goes on.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)And life will go on.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Optimism in the face of her tanking poll numbers.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)widened in large part because of the New Deal and the G.I. Bill, I am not sure that FDR is the person you want to quote.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Because this is going to be one of those weeks . . . again . . . and again . . . and again.
It's like recycled garbage, you can only use 40% of it to make up new stuff!!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)They portray sanders as a gun nut, a rapist, a white supremacist, a quisling, a coward, a pedophile, a commie, anything they think will stick. The goal isn't to advance Clinton in the primaries, it's to wholly ruin the career of someone running against her.
This was the strategy in 2008 as well.
And in both cases, it has the nasty tinge of bigotry. In 2008, the senator they sought to ruin was a black man. In 2016, he's a Jewish man. and just as was the case eight years ago, the ugly tropes and dog whistles are flying thick as mosquitoes in august.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Sanders began this campaign as the underdog. At the onset, he was trailing Clinton by 40 points in some polls.
It's important to remember that he's always been behind in the polls--with just about everyone.
However, a shift has happened--especially in the states in which Bernie is actively campaigning. His polls have skyrocketed. He's gained 30 points in Iowa and 20 points in New Hampshire and now he leads in both states, according to the latest polls.
But if you look at national polls--and individual state polls where the primaries aren't soon--you see Sanders behind. He's behind with EVERY demographic--just as he once was in Iowa and New Hampshire.
So---it is a massive manipulation to suggest that black voters do not like Sanders. It's using poll numbers to lie.
The truth is--black voters don't know Sanders yet. You could cherry pick the statistics and erroneously suggest, "Sanders is not doing well with those who live in South Dakota!" or "Most voters in the Mountain Time Zone aren't into Sanders!" or "Hispanic voters reject Sanders!"
The campaign has not yet come to these populations yet. But it will. The same thing happened in 2008. Hillary was ahead nationally, and in states that didn't have impending caucuses. These stats were used to bash Obama and suggest her inevitability. Eventually her leads in those states melted away--with Obama winning the majority of them.
So, African Americans have not yet rejected Bernie--They are similar to all populations that haven't experienced the full brunt of his campaign.
To make the claim that Sanders isn't doing well with African Americans is to make inferences behind the numbers--that are completely false. This is a meme being floated to pour cold water on the likely victories in Iowa and NH that Sanders will most likely pull off. The Clinton campaign has to rationalize Sander's latest surge in Iowa and NH and also stop his momentum coming out of these states, otherwise her campaign is complete toast. What better way to minimize a two-state win--by suggesting that black voters don't like Bernie, as he goes into South Carolina and then shortly after, Florida?
Qutzupalotl
(14,317 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)I would expect Hillary to still win the state -- she absolutely has too or her campaign will be over-- but I expect Bernie to eventually close to within single digits there from the current 24 point deficit.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...that Hillary is losing so much ground in SC all ready. I think her general support is eroding. Combine that with the boost Bernie gets when his campaign heats up in these individual states--and I think it's possible that he takes SC.
Bernie was behind 30 points in Iowa. He's now ahead by 10. That can happen in SC too.
frylock
(34,825 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... he's been "having a problem with black people" for more than a week.
So pointing out that fact this week is no different than having pointed it out last week, or the week before that, or the week before that.
frylock
(34,825 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)I'm glad you have confidence in your candidate-of-choice.
I don't share that confidence, but that's neither here nor there. Time will tell.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I realize that's a bitter statement, but it's the fucking truth.
There are many things about Sanders that are fair game to argue about. He aint perfect. And if people have legitimate objections to SPECIFIC actions he has taken or things he has said or done, okay sure.
But these FUCKING LIES ABOUT HIS COMMITMENT TO CIVIL RIGHTS, CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM AND SOCIAL ISSUES is a deliberate opportunistic political smear job based on ROVE/GOP style racist wedge politics.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Cut them some slack, they don't have a lot to work with beyond pushing that one and the 'evil socialist' one.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)And I'm a Hillary supporter...
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)Gotta have a horse-race.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)and I'm a Bernie supporter.
Peace to you, ellisonz.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thank you for saying that.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)I try to do what I can.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Journalism should stir up shit, and stimulate debate and scrutiny.
The problems is too often, they don't do that responsibly
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Bernie Sanders tries to meet with Black leaders but nobody shows up: Only 6 CBC members attended
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=589553
A very warm but mostly white crowd welcomes Sanders in mostly non-white Atlanta.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251587673
Online And In Person, Bernie Sanders White Supporters Advance A Black Lives Matter Conspiracy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251535654
The Ironic Hijacking of the Bernie Sanders Campaign by Elitist White Progressives
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251539502
Bernie Sanders and the Black Vote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251588739
Sanders gets raucous, but mostly white welcome in South Carolina as he works for black support
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141185124
Can Bernie Sanders Be Less White?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251469025
Sanders supporters are wealthier, whiter, and more male than Hillary supporters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251542288
Bernie Sanders Not Doing Well With Minorities
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017271081
"Interrupting Bernie: Exposing the White Supremacy of the American Left"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=508942
A sober look at Sander's Greensboro, NC rally...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=591120
Bernie Sanders Problems With Black Voters Go Much Deeper Than Him Just Blaming The Media (WaPo)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251594315
Can't the Cornel West apologists admit that his use of the word "n***ized"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=594113
Froma Harrop: Bernie Sanders problem with blacks and others
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251603222
Can Bernie Sanders Win Working Class (ahem, white) Votes?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251602626
Bernie Sanders's ability to rally black supporters may be critical to his success
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251603172
Bernie Sanders & Cornel West Go To South Carolina. Were Black Voters Listening?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251599969
ancianita
(36,093 posts)brush
(53,788 posts)And the Sanders campaign didn't help itself gain more black supporters by bringing on noted Obama hater Cornell West as a surrogate.
What were they thinking?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)What has Hillary done to reduce the incarceration rates of POC?
What has Hillary done to address racial inequities in the criminal justice system?
What has Hillary done to address racial inequities in unemployment?
talking the talk <> walking the walk
brush
(53,788 posts)What Hillary has or has not done is not the issue. It's the decision made by the Sanders campaign to bring on a well know Obama hater to try to woo votes from the Obama coalition.
That seems quite counter intuitive, don't you think?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)brush
(53,788 posts)wants to woo votes from your so called "elephant in the room".
Picking someone despised by many of those voters is not the smartest thing to do I would think?
There have to be other prominent AA supporters of Bernie that don't come with the Obama-hating baggage that West has.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)to have an opinion about him.
This is true in the south and it's true across the country. And his outreach is just getting going. He had to focus on areas where he was known to get volunteers and donations.
Now he is using those volunteers and donations to staff up in the south and in the Super Tuesday states.
Even in next door neighbor NH, his numbers skyrocketed just in the last 2 months. As he becomes known elsewhere, his numbers will climb as well.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Plenty are and much more every month. That's just a fact.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... is not "an accusation of racism" by any stretch of the imagination.
It is what it is. He's not doing well with that demographic - the numbers tell the story.
If I said that Hillary was not doing well with the male demographic, is that an accusation that she's a misandrist?
If I said that HRC doesn't poll well among Jews, is that an accusation that she's anti-Semitic?
Come on, Bonobo - you're smarter than this. Really.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)It is only perceived as being implied by those who want to believe it is being implied.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)According to Gallup, just 23 percent of black voters view Sanders favorably. Hillary Clinton's figure is 80 percent. That's mainly because very few have even heard of Sanders -- only a third say they were familiar with him, while 92 percent said they were familiar with Clinton.
So what's the corporate media's solution?
Frame Bernie, and pigeon hole him, hoping it jells before his name recognition and message grows to the point that they can't.
This is nothing but more corporate media manipulation of the American People and it has been going on at least since July.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)It's all a vast conspiracy. The PTB are out to "get" Bernie.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)the PTBs or corporate media would never do such a thing and "Al Gore actually claimed to have invented the Internet."
The Washington Post is one of the leading rags that pushed that meme as well before the selection of 2000 and the sorry bastards are still doing it.
The Internet .Sucks
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-internet-sucks/2015/05/13/43acd540-f9b0-11e4-9030-b4732caefe81_story.html
Going back almost to the days when Al Gore invented the Internet, the federal government has been in charge of online addresses through its contract with the California-based nonprofit ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers). Now, responding to growing international complaints because of the Edward Snowden affair, the feds are extricating themselves from this Series of Tubes.
I remember you as a strong supporter of Gore, I'm surprised that you believe today that the corporate media or PTBs are above such behavior.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)These are not honest attacks, Nance.
Come on, you're smarter than that. You know how it is played.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)And pointing out the FACT that BS isn't resonating with AAs is not a matter of opinion; it is a FACT.
Can BS turn that FACT around? That remains to be seen.
You are referencing posts pointing out the facts as "attacks". Is it an "attack" to state facts? Really?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)So is the intention.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)And there are way too many people here who are attributing "intentions" that simply don't exist.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)And the quantity betrays the intentions.
Look in the AA forum. See the massive influx of concerned white people who happen to be Hillary supporters that recently discovered the place.
If I were a black person, I would be as irritated with them as I am, as a Jew, to have the "support" of rightwing Christian fundamentalists..
brush
(53,788 posts)On the AA forum?
You mean the ones that are doing all the alert stalking and getting members suspended?
I don't exactly call that support.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)1% in june 6% in July 14% in August PPP
still low but steadily rising
Hillary Loses 33 Points With White Female Voters, Now Tied With Bernie Sanders in The WaPo-ABC poll
so we shall see how the trends continue
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... has lost 33 points among white female voters, you'll believe anything.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)and the trends continue to look good for Bernie
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)to women. Is that your official position? Did you wish to amend that?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... that BS is having major problems connecting with AA voters, is simply a fact - not a rhetorical device.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)I'll study the poll numbers re BS's support among AAs. I'm sure if I study them long enough, they'll say something other than what they're saying.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)because those are so obviously wrong!"
Armstead
(47,803 posts)No African Americans are not excited about a candidate they have never heard of, just like 80 percent of the country had never heard of him.
And their enthusiasm has been dampened by lies spread by opportunistic opponents of Sanders.
The whole "coincidence" that BLN targeted Sanders as the first candidate they "challenged" in a disruptive manner gave ammo to his political opponents who, in a moment of Rovian distortion, decided to use that to totally distort everything about who Sanders really is and what he really stands for....Thus setting up a divisive campaign to desperate identity politics from the larger issues. It is especially disgusting because Sanders is one of the most committed candidates to social justice and civil rights there is.
Fuck that noise. It is NOT legitimate debate or objective analysis.
jfern
(5,204 posts)I mean the 6 members of the CBC Sanders met with included both founding members of the CBC still in office. Not exactly the most obscure 6.
They attack Cornel West, but also attack Sanders' supporters for being White Supremacist. The irony. West certainly uses that term a lot himself.
And Jews born in the US in 1941 weren't generally considered white at the time. Of course he was very lucky that he was born in the US instead of his father's native Poland.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)you would get the idea he is the most anti-black candidate ever. of all the possible memes, this is just amazing to me.
artislife
(9,497 posts)a conversation about it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 15, 2015, 07:53 AM - Edit history (1)
You should do an op so we can add to the list every time they post a new one.
White HC supporters who are exploiting the racial divide need to be called on it.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Sanders is not appealing to a couple of the key demographic groups in the Democratic coalition. The polling shows this and the fact that only six members of the CBC showed up at a Sanders meeting is further evidence of the fact that Sanders' appeal is not working outside a very narrow group of supporters.
I like Sanders and he is closer to my positions according to that online quiz than Hillary Clinton's position but I am supporting Hillary Clinton because I am not convinced that Sanders is viable in the general election. If you want to expand Sanders' appeal to other groups, Sanders needs to demonstrate viability.
Viability is very important to African American voters. Sanders is not going to appeal to voters in key demographic blocks without some real evidence of viability. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/09/bernie_sanders_presidential_campaign_what_would_it_take_for_the_vermont.html
Again, Sanders would have a stronger campaign if someone could provide a good explanation as to viability and I doubt that Sanders will make significan inroads with the African American community without this proof. I was a bundlers event last week held by some African American professionals and right now in Texas there is strong support for Hillary Clinton in the African American community.
It is not racist to point out facts and the polling numbers are facts. Prove to me and others that Sanders will not get blown out in a general election contest where the Kochs will be spending $887 million and the RNC candidate may spend another billion dollars. Without that proof, you can not blame voters in a primary situation for not wanting to support your candidate.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)divide us preventing all of us from banding together.
He states this repeatedly.
Apparently, the writer of this article has never listened to Bernie speak.
ancianita
(36,093 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)and frames to promote.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)It requires some serious DoubleThink to believe these things are true - as Luminous Animal points out, Sanders is the one candidate that is speaking directly to the concerns of the people claiming he is ignoring their concerns.
jfern
(5,204 posts)have never actually listened to him.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)and drive down wages? If he really does not understand that--if he really thinks that all the isms will be corrected by throwing money at them, then he is not a socialist, he is a capitalist. And he will be unable to fix what is wrong with this country. He might be able to fix New England, but not this country.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)asking for a movement, it will take nothing less.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)A most ignorant article. He specifically points out that it is a strategy to divide us but if we reject it and stand together we can accomplish anything.
It is a key point of his stump speech.
Apparently, the author of the article (and you) have never listened to any of Bernie's speeches.
ancianita
(36,093 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)ancianita
(36,093 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)he can make it somewhat liveable. Climate change is upon us and if nothing else he is willing to stand up against the oil industry. We need someone to do that right now. Not sometime in the future. He may have a real chance to win, but only if we are all able to give in a little.
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)We have so much work to do. The South Koreans are so far ahead of us. They take education seriously, while we fight over race which is not real. We are all Americans and we are foolish for fighting this game.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)He also wrote about Hiilary's recent visit to Wall Street. He characterized this as Hillary's "Elizabeth Warren moment". And this column only uses two sources, from what I can tell: one is an erstwhile Sarah Palin fan. The other is a BLM activist. That's pretty thin sourcing to boldly claim that Sanders has deeper problems with the black community.
So while he is free to write his opinion for the Post, I don't find anything in this column very convincing or supportable.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Left has won Hillary Clinton?
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I don't believe he has the slightest notion of what "the left" actually is.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Sanders has a problem with black voters because Sanders is a capitalist. I think that would be a surprise to many black folks.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Sanders never said 'racism is somehow an offshoot from economic exploitation' or anything remotely like it.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)that economic exploitation makes poverty worse for minorities. Before Reagan we spent money on education, and the phrase education is the great equalizer was a true statement. Hell, back then you could get a free college education in California. But over the decades the Republicans have defunded education and made thousands of for profit prisons and the Democrats went along with it. Democrats are so busy being pragmatists they have let the proverbial frog boil to death. It is time for Democrats to stop being pragmatists and start fighting the corruption.
ancianita
(36,093 posts)out "the other" that cleared control of the land base for slavery of "the other."
Racism creates poverty.
Fighting the current corruption is to fight against that long history of corruption -- to grow the moral courage to make reparations and live in economic peace with each other.
So yeah.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)The 90 days of the Summer of Bernie are coming to an end.
Response to Major Hogwash (Reply #40)
DisgustipatedinCA This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Paper, plastics, rhetoric, and glass!
artislife
(9,497 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)PatrickforO
(14,577 posts)As someone on another thread pointed out, the percent of African Americans who are aware of Bernie pretty much matches the percent that are supporting Bernie.
They will do ANYTHING to dilute his message because no one in the establishment wants him to win or even to be heard. If they can bury him under a faux controversy like this, then the Koch brothers will rub their wrinkled, liver spotted, greedy old hands in glee!
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)PatrickforO
(14,577 posts)From: In These Times.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251592588
An excerpt:
Will Crosby, 63, a veteran political organizer in Chicagos bruising electoral battles, is worried that the black community will be caught flat-footed in the 2016 presidential campaign.
The way he sees things, too much of the black electorate is sleepwalking in lockstep support of Hillary Clinton. She is by far the black electorates favored candidate, with an 80 percent approval rate.
But Crosby thinks Bernie Sanders is the best presidential candidate for African Americans. Bernie Sanders is talking about issues that directly affect our community and hes doing it in a fearless way, Crosby says. Unfortunately, he adds, Sanders message has yet to penetrate into the black community.
Crosby and other Chicago-based black activists have formed a group called the Bernie Brigade that attempts to showcase Sanders progressive platform and long history of support for the black struggle. The group canvasses for Sanders in majority-black neighborhoods and holds pro-Sanders events. Were still very much engaged in an educational process, he notes. Many in our community are unfamiliar with Bernie. They just see an elderly white man from remote, white Vermont. And, quite frankly, thats a hard sell.
Crosby says attitudes are easily changed when they hear Sanders political spiel and his policy prescriptions, especially on reforming the criminal justice system and curbing wealth inequality. But a black electorate that feels warmly toward Clinton may not take the time to listen. According to a CNN poll from June, Sanders had the support of just 2 percent of black Democrats. ..................(more)
The rest: http://inthesetimes.com/article/18405/building-black-support-for-bernie
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I said the shit word before and I think it got banned.
I don't really care what you folk think. Or the mainstream media. I know, as a former journalist, they are wrong more than correct.
Bypass them.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)really got something here.... by thanksgiving the third way turkey will be cooked....
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)Hillary "I would rather talk to white people" Clinton goes down better with the disenfranchised African Americans?`
Racism is being used to divide and conquer.
Like the rich keep the poor around to scare the middle class to show up those those jobs as George Carlin put it. If the elitists can use some other minority for the poor white people to look down on and blame their problems on, even better.
That's how demagogues create their armies.
As far as the growth of Capitalism goes, it expanded on the backs of slaves and corpses of the Native Americans. Not the proudest moments in American history.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)This is a candidate that 58% of all Democratic-leaning voters - and 75% of non-white voters - had never heard of six months ago.
Instead of reading into the numbers some sort of deep-seated problems or misunderstandings, these dumb reporters need to give everyone a chance to talk to each other and get to know the candidates. Geez!
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)The "experts" @ WoPo and from Camp Weathervane @ DU say it, so it MUST be true!
Guess I'll Bern my yard signs today.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)but Bernie-haters or cynical supporters of other candidates say he did.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)This kind of philosophical knitpicking is just self defeating PC crap that will hold back to any effort to advance eitehr the specific interests of African Americans or the poor/working/middle class as a whole.
Yes racism is a separate and serious problem that has to be tackled as a priority. But poverty and blockage to economic opportuities, sicial services and te levers of power is a huge part of the problems that face AAs as well, as it affects everyone.
This kind of chicken-and-egg speculation means that we continue to be divided, while the larger problems get worse.
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)They aren't problems with his thoughts on equality, the problem is with his priorities. He has made a drastic shift righting those errors from the beginning of his campaign. He has greatly evolved on where he puts these priorities at this point. It was a wake up call for him and he didn't hit snooze. Good for him.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)racism are also well documented. One of the many reasons I can't enthusiastically support her the way I can Bernie and Martin O'Malley.