2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton’s Big Week Is the Turnaround We Expected
Hillary Clintons Big Week Is the Turnaround We ExpectedBy Rich Robinson @robinsonwins
For her to lose, someone on the Democratic side must bring her down. Bernie Sanders wont do it. Martin OMalley isnt credible enough to do it. And who are Lincoln Chaffee and Jim Webb? Bidens recent exit from the race was advantageous, because he would have had the credibility to attack Clinton. I believe one reason he did not run is that he didnt want the job if that was the only way he could get it.
So the path is now clear for Madam President. A few weeks ago she couldnt win; now she is unstoppable. This too will change over the course of the long campaign. But if Hillary Clinton has shown one trait to be admired, it is her resilience in the face of adversity.
http://www.sanjoseinside.com/2015/10/23/hillary-clintons-big-week-is-the-turnaround-we-expected/
DCBob
(24,689 posts)but I'm sure most didn't expect all in one week!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)And a big chunk of it was an absolute gift from the teahaddist bastards themselves on the witch hunt committee!
DCBob
(24,689 posts)It was a free 11 hour campaign ad highlighting her tenure as SOS and how competent and knowledgeable she is about foreign affairs. Yes, it was gift from the Republicans.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)still_one
(92,397 posts)I don't know if the republicans will continue the Kangaroo Benghazi Court or not, but they will continue to spew it out through the MSM, and the campaign will have to keep up with that continuously, if we are to learn anything from the lessons of John Kerry and the "swift pukes".
There are also five more scheduled debates, with the media just waiting for a "gotcha" moment, that will saturate the airwaves 24/7.
No question this was a good week for her, but nothing should be taken for granted. In my view that would be a big mistake.
Remember President Obama in the second debate I believe against Romney. He was tired, and didn't perform up to par. While I personally thought he did fine, the media was slamming him for his "dismal debate performance", and the subsequent poll numbers reflected such.
GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)riversedge
(70,304 posts)yes, I believe it does--for sure!
.....In the 2008 primary, Hillary got beat by enthusiastic Barack Obama supporters who showed up at caucus meetings. Hillary won Texas primary, for instance, but the delegate vote was even because Obama won the Democratic caucuses. Obama won the caucus in Iowa, lost the primary in New Hampshirebut prevailed because of the math of the rest of the nation. Clinton won California, but Obama won the delegate count nationally.
The Clinton campaign learned from that experience and is motivating the mass of women supporters who felt cheated last time. They had an experienced, qualified woman candidate who lost to a relatively inexperienced African-American man. The takeaway from that experience was that the system is more misogynist than racist.
One might say gender doesnt matter, but it does in this election. It matters greatly because we have never had a woman President. In an equally qualified race, Hillary deserves the job for that reason. And this time around, she has no problem articulating that very point............