Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:05 PM Oct 2015

Sanders supporters listen up! Please, stop calling our opponents names like "Clintonistas"!!

Last edited Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:01 PM - Edit history (2)

That's what rush calls Hillary's supporters. Don't be like rush, grow up and quit acting like petulant 3rd graders!

I don't care what they call us, but we don't have to go there! For one, it's wrong to call fellow Democrats names and for two, it's childish!

They are 'Clinton supporters". If you can't type that out, then don't bother posting!

Edited: Removed cuss words. Also, some Bernie supporters have asked me to also please ask Hillary supporters to please also not call Bernie names. So, if you support Hillary, please stop calling Bernie supporters names. Thank you.


147 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders supporters listen up! Please, stop calling our opponents names like "Clintonistas"!! (Original Post) ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 OP
You don't like Hillarians or Hillpeople either then? Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #1
No. Grow up. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #7
This BS supporting Berniebro thanks you for your concern. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #61
Sanders supporters have nothing to say for their man: So they attack Hillary! lewebley3 Oct 2015 #105
Right. Nice try. More projection from the socially liberal, economically conservative crowd. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #110
Hillary is a Dem: She will sign anything Dem's have votes for: Thats what counts! lewebley3 Oct 2015 #147
Yeah, but she makes it so fucking easy, so fucking often, ChairmanAgnostic Oct 2015 #135
Hillary has not change Her positions radically: Thats propaganda: lewebley3 Oct 2015 #146
I can't stop laughing... Hillpeople! (nt) Ino Oct 2015 #127
How about "The Hills Have Eyes? Katashi_itto Oct 2015 #143
The Clinton supporters actually started it. Easy enough to google and check the date/time with Doc Brown Oct 2015 #2
Mom he hit me first! upaloopa Oct 2015 #5
I don't give a shit who started it! Grow up! nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #8
I don't give a shit either. I'm just stating who started it. Doc Brown Oct 2015 #25
Hey welcome to DU! zappaman Oct 2015 #89
reading threads does not require a password. nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #136
Of course... zappaman Oct 2015 #138
i used to read before i joined :) nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #140
s saturnsring Oct 2015 #95
Welcome to DU... SidDithers Oct 2015 #49
Uh, welcome to DU. Actually, the whole "Sandernista" meme started when MADem Oct 2015 #80
Correct dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #142
If you're going to complain, be fair about it. valerief Oct 2015 #3
If you haven't used it, then help me put a stop to it. And I have called out Clinton supporters for ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #11
I actually usually trash Bernie-Clinton squabble threads. I'm killing time now, so valerief Oct 2015 #18
Same thing applies to "Bernie-bots" or "Berniebros." MineralMan Oct 2015 #4
it's childish! And more than a bit annoying considering one of these two people will have to face ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #16
Yes. That's why I never use terms like that and MineralMan Oct 2015 #31
Thank you MM. It looks like my fellow Bernie fans are going with the childish name calling... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #41
Well, they do it at their own risk, on either side. MineralMan Oct 2015 #48
Name calling is name calling no matter who does it or who they do it to. A Simple Game Oct 2015 #133
It would not be political if it wasn't childish. I haven't seen a political season yet LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #108
Totally agree. BlueCheese Oct 2015 #93
I'm not a fan of the name-calling either n/t arcane1 Oct 2015 #6
Thanks for the advice. I'll file it under Autumn Oct 2015 #9
Grow the fuck up! BFD??? Really? How childish! nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #12
Guess what? It's a fucking primary, if your feelings get hurt because someone smears your Autumn Oct 2015 #20
I'm not sad. I don't like seeing Bernie supporters being childish brats. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #22
Well as soon as you buy the board we will take your directive into consideration. Until then Autumn Oct 2015 #33
And I will be there every chance I get to call it out. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #43
You go right on ahead and do that and other posters will do what they chose. n/t Autumn Oct 2015 #45
I will. And I find it interesting that you would call her what rush calls her. I'll keep... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #77
What does rush call her? Got a link to me calling her what rush calls her? Autumn Oct 2015 #128
chewing off the foot of your own Bernie Supporter Sheepshank Oct 2015 #130
I have no Bernie supporters. I am a Bernie supporter. Autumn Oct 2015 #131
Got that link to me calling Hillary what rush calls her? I've been waiting. Autumn Oct 2015 #134
Really? Cheviteau Oct 2015 #122
Here's what's "insane", to use your term. Appointing one's self net nanny and telling people Autumn Oct 2015 #129
I agree whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #10
OMG, really?? nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #14
I don't know if you honestly believe you are in charge, but you may want to cool your djean111 Oct 2015 #13
I'm not in charge, but I can say what I want. It is, after all, an open discussion board. I prefer ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #15
Do you not get the hypocrisy? Yes, we ALL can say what we want. djean111 Oct 2015 #19
So, you're opting for the childishness? nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #23
The childishness is on both sides. Although I don't think that Bernie's supporters have djean111 Oct 2015 #32
it's not an "order". It's a strongly-worded suggestion that we not damage our potential ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #36
Um, no, it reads as a ranty little "order". djean111 Oct 2015 #42
Really? You can say what you want but we can't post unless we say what you want us to say? Autumn Oct 2015 #26
So, you want to continue the negative name-calling. Got it. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #30
I'll post what I want. Got that? n/t Autumn Oct 2015 #35
Even if it's childish name-calling? Got it. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #38
We are proud of the term Clintonistas. I also like Hillcats! leftofcool Oct 2015 #17
Who is "we"? I'm a Democrat. Am I part of "we"? I like "Hillcats". At least it isn't negative and ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #21
You're facing an uphill slog on this one. Bubzer Oct 2015 #125
I liked Hillcats! That actually did make me laugh out loud and feel fierce like a Tiger. bravenak Oct 2015 #37
I don't mind "Clintonista" and I think "Bernistas" sufrommich Oct 2015 #24
How about "Hillary supporters" or "Bernie supporters"? You can't tell me that when someone uses a ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #29
I don't know,I guess I don't understand the sufrommich Oct 2015 #39
I actually like being a Sandernista kenfrequed Oct 2015 #50
I was under the same impression. bunnies Oct 2015 #118
Deaniac was a very clever name. sufrommich Oct 2015 #120
:) bunnies Oct 2015 #123
:). nt sufrommich Oct 2015 #124
The Chisholm Trail is not in Texas. Major Hogwash Oct 2015 #27
I really hate being told what to say, or do or how to act. in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #28
This thread is several months late. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #34
I actually think I had to ask you personally kenfrequed Oct 2015 #47
Oh brother MohRokTah Oct 2015 #65
At another site used by many here they make it clear BS stands for Bull Shit and they use that here. Autumn Oct 2015 #68
When I see a Bernie supporter calling another Democrat names, I think "BS!" nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #70
I don't lose any sleep on what Bernie or Hillary supporters do. I'm not their Mamma n/t Autumn Oct 2015 #84
You really need to thicken your skin MohRokTah Oct 2015 #72
It doesn't bother me at all just pointing out a fact. Autumn Oct 2015 #83
Considering your usual tone kenfrequed Oct 2015 #73
If think you've never used a mobile device to post on Internet forums. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #75
Rush has fans here lately.ature and not funny. n/t livetohike Oct 2015 #40
*sigh* kenfrequed Oct 2015 #44
"Respect goes in all directions. I will continue to call them 'supporters'" ...Thank you, Ken. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #74
yes. BS-ers. grasswire Oct 2015 #78
Link 'em, please. Thanks. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #81
sorry, I have no idea what threads I saw those in. grasswire Oct 2015 #116
Here you go Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #126
Your request would hold more weight if you also asked Clinton supporters to stop calling liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #46
I have done that, multiple times. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #54
I'm a Clinton supporter and I will suggest it Godhumor Oct 2015 #55
The Sanders supporters... chillfactor Oct 2015 #51
#BERNIESUPPORTERSSOBAD Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #66
We suck, Ed. We’re MEAN!!!! dorkzilla Oct 2015 #102
Yet today I saw a Clinton supporter's post calling Bernie supporters "Bernie-baggers" and saying tblue37 Oct 2015 #52
Translation: Don't Make ChislomTrailDem Turn this Station Wagon Around! FSogol Oct 2015 #53
Thanks for the laugh :) nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #57
Thanks for (trying) to talk some sense into people. FSogol Oct 2015 #58
Well, I certainly have seen what it got me: NO WHERE. Oh well, kids will be kids. nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #63
Precisely. nt tblue37 Oct 2015 #56
How about avoiding posting on those flame posts Politicalboi Oct 2015 #59
Aggreed. kacekwl Oct 2015 #60
You know for every one of these "peace" threads that pops up d_legendary1 Oct 2015 #62
agreed it is a horrible strategy. I want Bernie to win. That means persuading undecideds emulatorloo Oct 2015 #64
Name-calling is a polarizing element. If someone is calling me names, I'm not likely to sympathize ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #71
Hard to take serious angrychair Oct 2015 #85
I have called out Hillary supporters for doing the same. That you haven't seen that does not ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #86
Not in this OP title angrychair Oct 2015 #87
How grievous. Then again, one could consider developing a sense of humor. Smarmie Doofus Oct 2015 #67
It's not meant to be funny. Name calling is meant to be derisive and we wouldn't tolerate for... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #69
Wake up. What in the world are you talking about? Smarmie Doofus Oct 2015 #90
What in the world are YOU talking about? Deliverance? LOL! My name is derived from the fact that I ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #96
We cannot assume those attacking Clinton are fredamae Oct 2015 #76
I do find it interesting that they repeat the insult rush limpballs uses to refer to Hillary's... ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #79
Some of us aren't Rush fans Fumesucker Oct 2015 #91
Exactlty.......and I'm sure with fredamae Oct 2015 #82
Those aren't terms generally use. 99Forever Oct 2015 #88
I appreciate the effort. BlueCheese Oct 2015 #92
Excuse me, you should not use the F word! I mean... give advice to yourself, please! Yupy Oct 2015 #94
You are right. I have made the necessary edits. Thank you and welcome to DU! nt ChisolmTrailDem Oct 2015 #100
Sanders supporters have been called a whole lot worse. Vinca Oct 2015 #97
there shouldnt be any negative posting on either candidate here either, let the right do that. saturnsring Oct 2015 #98
The Grand Poo Bah has SPOKEN Cassiopeia Oct 2015 #99
after the primary we will need to rally around whomever wins to fight the greater menace...the gop dembotoz Oct 2015 #101
Sheesh, what a grouch! n/t RoccoR5955 Oct 2015 #103
Yes, agreed relayerbob Oct 2015 #104
NO. Purveyor Oct 2015 #106
I think that's fair. Agschmid Oct 2015 #107
I never call Hillary supporters "Clintonistas" Jack Rabbit Oct 2015 #109
I am first and foremost a progressive democrat. phylny Oct 2015 #111
Hillaryious!!! Fast Walker 52 Oct 2015 #112
Watch out, I was given a 2 hides in 5 mins for adding an "s" to the front of Hillary. peacebird Oct 2015 #114
wow, thanks for the warning Fast Walker 52 Oct 2015 #132
I prefer to be called a Sanderista fbc Oct 2015 #113
I'm a Sandernista who thinks anyone too ashamed to be called a Clintonista can join us Sandernistas! marble falls Oct 2015 #115
I just call them Hillary supporters.... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #117
Calling me a Sandernista is bestowing an honor. Please feel free Zorra Oct 2015 #119
when I read threads like this Nevada Blue Oct 2015 #121
i just assumed they were all shorthand restorefreedom Oct 2015 #137
Sanders' supporters are welcome to use the term "Clintonistas" Orrex Oct 2015 #139
There is no escape from...... Mnpaul Oct 2015 #141
I refuse to let Rush Limbaugh decide what words I use, or what they mean. Scuba Oct 2015 #144
Gotcha, will call you Bernbots from now on. Live and Learn Oct 2015 #145

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
110. Right. Nice try. More projection from the socially liberal, economically conservative crowd.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

Compassionate Conservatism lives in the Democratic Party..

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
135. Yeah, but she makes it so fucking easy, so fucking often,
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:02 PM
Oct 2015

Ya know what I mean?

Seriously, if any other candidate changed positions so radically, so often, and with so much predictability, they'd be laughed out of any race for any office, much less president.

 

lewebley3

(3,412 posts)
146. Hillary has not change Her positions radically: Thats propaganda:
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 03:07 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary is a solid Dem: Your vulgarism reflect on you:
you are using them as place holders for your lack
of ideas.

Sherri Brown has just endorsed Hillary: He is a smart
Dem: and my favorite for VP: The GOP can not
win without Ohio.

 

Doc Brown

(16 posts)
2. The Clinton supporters actually started it. Easy enough to google and check the date/time with
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:07 PM
Oct 2015

"Bernista" or "Sandersitas"

MADem

(135,425 posts)
80. Uh, welcome to DU. Actually, the whole "Sandernista" meme started when
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:57 PM
Oct 2015

Sanders was running for Mayor of Burlington, VT. His campaign EMBRACED the term....so, whatever.

FACTS are important here--at least they used to be. Here's some evidence to back up my assertion, from 1989:

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/03/06/us/burlington-journal-exit-a-socialist-to-let-history-judge.html

It's not that ''Bernie,'' as everyone calls the 47-year-old politician, would have had much difficulty staying in office. After a few early stumbles, Mr. Sanders, whose socialist fervor remains unabated, has grown more popular locally despite losing a statewide Congressional race last year.

But he believes it is time to move on to other things, such as writing and lecturing. He says someone else must lead the ''progressive coalition,'' the informal third party that rallied around him and won 6 of the 13 seats on the Board of Aldermen. Those Aldermen came to be known in political circles as ''Sandernistas.''


And as for "BernieBros" -- that term is being used BY Sanders supporters in an endearing fashion. Again, I offer proof:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/128066158

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
142. Correct
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 04:18 AM
Oct 2015

It was of course an attempt to use the socialist thing as an insult, trying to taint Bernie supporters by associating them with the Sandinistas of Nicaragua. I've since seen Bernie supporters proudly wearing the label, which is their choice, but I wouldn't recommend it, being seen as allies of the Sandinistas doesn't bother me at all but it would bother a lot of the general population.

Anyway the irony of the OP is rich. You're throwing a Clinton insult (which I have rarely if ever seen) back at us Bernie supporters, requesting we cease and desist, when it was just a rephrase of them playing the red card against Bernie supporters. Your OP should be addressed to the Clinton people, not the Bernie people.

For my money the best Clinton tags are Hillarians, Hillionaires, and Hillpeople. Clintonistas makes no sense, the Clinton supporters are way to the right of Bernie supporters and of the Sandinistas. I guess if you are Rush Limbaugh you think, or are paid to pretend that you think, they are far to the left so there is that.

On the Hillarysupporter site I noticed Clinton supporters calling us all sorts of truly disgusting nicknames, told me a lot about what kind of people are advocating for Hillary here. Some of them are just good Democrats with different political views, but there's a very different thing going on with others, which I will not attempt to describe but I see no place for it in the Democratic Party. I always thougght our party was better than that, got an education though.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
11. If you haven't used it, then help me put a stop to it. And I have called out Clinton supporters for
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:12 PM
Oct 2015

tearing down our candidate, who may end up facing a republidiot challenger in the GE.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
18. I actually usually trash Bernie-Clinton squabble threads. I'm killing time now, so
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:16 PM
Oct 2015

I'm responding today, but I'll likely continue with my trashing in the future. I'm more interested in policy than politics.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
4. Same thing applies to "Bernie-bots" or "Berniebros."
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:09 PM
Oct 2015

They are Bernie Sanders supporters. Both sides are using negative-feeling names for supporters.

That trick never works.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
16. it's childish! And more than a bit annoying considering one of these two people will have to face
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:15 PM
Oct 2015

an opponent we cannot allow to win!

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
31. Yes. That's why I never use terms like that and
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

discount the opinion of posters who do. We're all on the same side here, or should be, anyhow. We oppose Republicans. The rest is just details. The voters will decide, not DU.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
41. Thank you MM. It looks like my fellow Bernie fans are going with the childish name calling...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:27 PM
Oct 2015

...option. I am embarrassed by it.



MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
48. Well, they do it at their own risk, on either side.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:32 PM
Oct 2015

Convincing people to change sides is difficult enough without starting by calling them names. I don't think that ever works, really. What does work is to listen to their arguments and then make your own case, logically, calmly and reasonably.

It's like saying, "Pepsi drinkers are all complete morons. You should drink Coke. Here. Drink this and stop being an idiot."

Compare that to, "I've never really cared for the taste of Pepsi, even after trying it. Have you tried Coke? Here's one if you'd like to try it."



A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
133. Name calling is name calling no matter who does it or who they do it to.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:50 PM
Oct 2015

So maybe you should set an example and tell everyone that you made a mistake by using the term republidiot in an earlier post. It does look hypocritical.

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
108. It would not be political if it wasn't childish. I haven't seen a political season yet
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:30 PM
Oct 2015

without the childish bullying, name calling and pushing that most grow out of in elementary school. But political season brings out the child in most people.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
93. Totally agree.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:28 PM
Oct 2015

All these terms are immature and childish. And do nothing but cause people to immediately stop reading.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
20. Guess what? It's a fucking primary, if your feelings get hurt because someone smears your
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:17 PM
Oct 2015

candidate or any candidate foe that matter or calls their supporters names then maybe you need a new hobby that doesn't give you a case of the sadz

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
33. Well as soon as you buy the board we will take your directive into consideration. Until then
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

I 'll just do as this poster says,

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251728128#post15

ChisolmTrailDem (6,388 posts)
15. I'm not in charge, but I can say what I want. It is, after all, an open discussion board. nt


Spin your way out of that. Your post was very revealing.
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
77. I will. And I find it interesting that you would call her what rush calls her. I'll keep...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:55 PM
Oct 2015

...that in mind whenever I see you around the board.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
128. What does rush call her? Got a link to me calling her what rush calls her?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:20 PM
Oct 2015

Link or slink. I have no clue what he calls her, I call her HRC, Hillary or Clinton.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
130. chewing off the foot of your own Bernie Supporter
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:39 PM
Oct 2015

who'd a guess that's where you would go with you fellow supporters?

Not me. lol

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
131. I have no Bernie supporters. I am a Bernie supporter.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:42 PM
Oct 2015

Anyone can say they are a Bernie supporter and several have, but their words out them. Everytime

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
134. Got that link to me calling Hillary what rush calls her? I've been waiting.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:57 PM
Oct 2015

Link it or edit your lying post. I call her Hillary, HRC or Clinton. I'm going to keep asking until you post a link of me calling her what rush calls her. Even it means I have to ask "whenever I see you around the board.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251728128#post77

ChisolmTrailDem (6,409 posts)
77. I will. And I find it interesting that you would call her what rush calls her. I'll keep...

...that in mind whenever I see you around the board.

Cheviteau

(383 posts)
122. Really?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 04:15 PM
Oct 2015

I hope you don't get promoted to the 4th grade this year. The poster has a point. You don't. It's insane to sling mud and smear the very candidate that we may ask to carry our banner next November. You need to go the other side where that kind of shit is not only allowed but encouraged.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
129. Here's what's "insane", to use your term. Appointing one's self net nanny and telling people
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:22 PM
Oct 2015

what they may post and then turning around saying to another poster that they will post as they please.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251728128#post15

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
13. I don't know if you honestly believe you are in charge, but you may want to cool your
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:13 PM
Oct 2015

authoritarian jets, there. Hillary supporters have been referring to "Bernistas" and such for quite a while. Don't hand it out if you can't take it, would be my advice.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
15. I'm not in charge, but I can say what I want. It is, after all, an open discussion board. I prefer
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:14 PM
Oct 2015

not to be calling our possible GE candidate negative and derogatory names.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
19. Do you not get the hypocrisy? Yes, we ALL can say what we want.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:17 PM
Oct 2015
I'm not in charge, but I can say what I want. It is, after all, an open discussion board.


Bwahahahaha! You just cannot give orders, that's all. Or expect to be obeyed. Real simple.
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
32. The childishness is on both sides. Although I don't think that Bernie's supporters have
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

created a website just to jeer at Hillary's supporters.

Anyway, I just ignore it, it is also a bit childish to think you can actually order other posters how to post. Just don't click, or use the filter thing. As you say, it is an open discussion board. Authoritarianism and bossiness will not work here. Why get all hissy-fit about what are basically just harmless names? And some of us, both "sides", really don't care; I am actually proud to be a Bernista or whatever.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
36. it's not an "order". It's a strongly-worded suggestion that we not damage our potential
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:25 PM
Oct 2015

Democratic nominee.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
42. Um, no, it reads as a ranty little "order".
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:28 PM
Oct 2015

As a matter of fact, you just may sound like a "petulant 3rd grader", yourself.
You are getting needlessly and pointlessly agitated over something trivial.
Have a nice day.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
26. Really? You can say what you want but we can't post unless we say what you want us to say?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:20 PM
Oct 2015
Read what you just posted and your OP. Fucking ridiculous. A bad case of do as I say and not as I do.
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
21. Who is "we"? I'm a Democrat. Am I part of "we"? I like "Hillcats". At least it isn't negative and
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:17 PM
Oct 2015

making us look like brats.

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
125. You're facing an uphill slog on this one.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 04:44 PM
Oct 2015

It's honorable that you want to see insults diminish. But I think you're off base here. People on DU don't care what that bloviating gas-bag Rush has to say about anything. He's slowly being marginalized into non-existence. I think Hillary supporters have largely embraced and taken over the term Clintonista, and have made it a positive term... regardless of how Rush intended it to be used.

I think ceding that term would be a win for Rush in the war of words... he'd have won because he will have successfully attached a negative meaning to it.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
29. How about "Hillary supporters" or "Bernie supporters"? You can't tell me that when someone uses a
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:21 PM
Oct 2015

name like "Clintonistas", they're doing it because it's a term of endearment.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
39. I don't know,I guess I don't understand the
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:26 PM
Oct 2015

negative connotation with "ista",it's a pretty common suffix and has been for awhile,it's just spanish for "ist".

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
50. I actually like being a Sandernista
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:33 PM
Oct 2015

I never minded it all.

I do usually call 'Hillary supporters' just that.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
28. I really hate being told what to say, or do or how to act.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:21 PM
Oct 2015

Especially from a keyboard warrior I don't personally know.

Please don't do that. I'll say whatever I feel the need to say, when I want to say and and how I want to say it.

Bernistas
BS supporters
Bernbullies
BernieBro

Give me an effing break, would you please? Sheesh. They dish it, they're getting it back.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
65. Oh brother
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:40 PM
Oct 2015


BO was thrown around on the internet throughout 2000. Seriously, using just initials is commonplace and if you don't like it, you should stay off Internet forums.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
68. At another site used by many here they make it clear BS stands for Bull Shit and they use that here.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:45 PM
Oct 2015
I'm sure you know the place.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
83. It doesn't bother me at all just pointing out a fact.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:01 PM
Oct 2015

I just consider the source and laugh it off.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
73. Considering your usual tone
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:48 PM
Oct 2015

It is hard not to take what you say as somewhat pointed, bordering on insult.

I also never used 'BO' because it was diminutive and absurd. I have enough typing skills that I can manage to type someone's name.

I think you are making excuses for bad behavior.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
44. *sigh*
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:31 PM
Oct 2015

Ok, I am going to say that this is a strange post.

I really hadn't seen 'clintonistas' before. Maybe I don't come here often enough. I usually say 'Clinton supporter' or 'Hillary supporter'

I DO see a bit more Bernista or Sandernista (I actually don't mind Sandernista as much... I actually kind of self apply it sometimes.)



But you know what? What I cannot stand is the absurd number of times I see Clinton supporters use the initials BS, frequently in the same sentence where they take the time to spell out the name of their candidate. I have also seen a lot of posts were Sanders people are referred to as BS'rs. I have always politely asked them to stop and they refuse or ignore my request.

Respect goes in all directions. I will continue to call them 'supporters' or whatever but I am not going to castigate the few times I see 'Clintonista' (this was the first on this message board) when I can find dozens of uses of 'BS' a day.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
78. yes. BS-ers.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:56 PM
Oct 2015

I saw that yesterday. I also saw the word "unhinged" used yesterday for Bernie supporters.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
46. Your request would hold more weight if you also asked Clinton supporters to stop calling
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:32 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie Sanders supporter Bernistas.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
55. I'm a Clinton supporter and I will suggest it
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:34 PM
Oct 2015

No need for those sorts of nicknames for any candidate's supporters.

chillfactor

(7,576 posts)
51. The Sanders supporters...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:33 PM
Oct 2015

will be the down-fall of Sanders...do not expect them to behave like rational, mature adults...

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
102. We suck, Ed. We’re MEAN!!!!
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:17 PM
Oct 2015

And you know we’re only doing this to piss people off, we don’t actually think Bernie is a viable candidate with the courage of his convictions who would make a much better president. I think they’re on to us.

tblue37

(65,409 posts)
52. Yet today I saw a Clinton supporter's post calling Bernie supporters "Bernie-baggers" and saying
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:34 PM
Oct 2015

we are "as dumb as a brick and twice as thick" and that we "lack intellectual wherewithal."

I have *never* insulted anyone on DU, and neither have most other DU members. Yet those of us who favor Bernie get name-called like this.

There is *a lot* of ugly name-calling going on from both sides, but the perpetrators are a small but vocal group. Neither the majority of Bernie supporters nor the majority of Hillary supporters are playing that nasty game.

I wish those who are engaging in such unseemly attacks on either if the two people who will be our nominee would just knock it off. It is making DU suck.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
59. How about avoiding posting on those flame posts
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:36 PM
Oct 2015

Let them have their pity party all to themselves. All 6 of them will end up fighting over their own words anyways, they don't need us.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
62. You know for every one of these "peace" threads that pops up
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:39 PM
Oct 2015

Five or six "mud slinging" threads show up. Unfortunately you're not gonna convince the die-hards to drop the slurs, slang, or misinformation about the candidate you support. And in an election year even less though do I respect your efforts to have a decent argument about the issues.

I would like to have meaningful discussions about the issues, but this is DU...

emulatorloo

(44,131 posts)
64. agreed it is a horrible strategy. I want Bernie to win. That means persuading undecideds
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:40 PM
Oct 2015

and soft HRC supporters who could still maybe be persuaded to stand up for Bernie in the primaries.



 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
71. Name-calling is a polarizing element. If someone is calling me names, I'm not likely to sympathize
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:48 PM
Oct 2015

with them on anything.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
85. Hard to take serious
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:08 PM
Oct 2015

That you really mean what you say when your own post only calls out one side on what is very clearly a group giving as much as it is getting.
Second, Bernie supporters from here have not set up a website, free from DU TOS rules, to insult Bernie supporters ("dumb as a brick and twice as thick" as an example).
I do not "name call" as you say. I do my best to keep my disagreements to policy and political philosophy differences. I think it would be best you did too and resist flame baiting by calling out one group over the other when no one is innocent.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
86. I have called out Hillary supporters for doing the same. That you haven't seen that does not
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:09 PM
Oct 2015

mean it hasn't happened.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
87. Not in this OP title
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:16 PM
Oct 2015

Not in the body of your OP.
Maybe in trying to defend it, yes you have. Unfortunately for you, you lit a fire with the language you used from the beginning.
No hard feelings from me but it might be more accessible with a broader message. Just saying.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
69. It's not meant to be funny. Name calling is meant to be derisive and we wouldn't tolerate for...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:45 PM
Oct 2015

...any other group of people.

Would we, Smarmie Doofus?

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
90. Wake up. What in the world are you talking about?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:19 PM
Oct 2015

I call Sanders supporters "Sandernistas" all the time. And "Bernistas".

Jeeeeeezus Christ. I'm 61 years old. I grew UP in NYC. I KNOW *EXACTLY* who Chisolm was and IS, historically.

If you are arrogant enough and *DUMB* enough to think you're "On the Chisolm Trail", it may actually be ... to borrow movie dialogue popular in the period (OK I'll be specific: "DELIVERANCE"; since you're evidently a bit SLOW in this dept.) ... a case of: "Amtree.?? ! This river don't lead on to *Amtree*. Y'all done taken a wrong *TURN*."

Lighten up and get over it already. And see if you can find your way BACK.

Good god.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
96. What in the world are YOU talking about? Deliverance? LOL! My name is derived from the fact that I
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:53 PM
Oct 2015

am from a town that is quite literally on the Chisholm Trail, an old west Texas cattle trail that was used to move cattle from the ranches in Texas to San Antonio and then up to Kansas City, Kansas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chisholm_Trail



I am a Chisholm Trail Democrat, which is not an easy thing to be in these parts! And the reason the "h" is missing from my moniker is because I simply made a typo and didn't catch it before I hit the submit button on my DU registration. It bugs me to this day, but oh well.

So, I have no idea what you're talking about. ""If you are arrogant enough and *DUMB* enough to think you're "On the Chisolm Trail"... As I am literally on the Chisholm Trail at this very moment (well, it's a few miles to the west, but close enough), your comment makes no sense. Chisolm, who, historically?

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
76. We cannot assume those attacking Clinton are
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:55 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie supporters no matter how "they" present themselves anymore than I consider Bernie attackers claiming to be Clinton supporters to be who they say they are.

Best to ignore the petty crap and plow forward. You are correct...This is being done to Divide Dems...Now Who would want that the Most?

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
79. I do find it interesting that they repeat the insult rush limpballs uses to refer to Hillary's...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:56 PM
Oct 2015

Last edited Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:31 PM - Edit history (1)

...supporters.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
92. I appreciate the effort.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:26 PM
Oct 2015

I am not yet a full-on Clinton supporter (the NSA still sticks in my craw), but I do like her as a candidate.

I'm okay with the term "Clintonista".

I'm less okay with the threads basically accusing her of taking bribes from the Saudis, calling her supporters not thoughtful, saying that her black supporters are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome, etc. etc. As far as my concerns with internecine fighting go, the term Clintonista is way, way, way down the list.

Vinca

(50,279 posts)
97. Sanders supporters have been called a whole lot worse.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:56 PM
Oct 2015

In more than 10 years I had never alerted on anyone until I was called a repulsive name for supporting Bernie. The jury agreed with me.

 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
98. there shouldnt be any negative posting on either candidate here either, let the right do that.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 02:59 PM
Oct 2015

karl rove and the gop don't need help from du'ers

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
101. after the primary we will need to rally around whomever wins to fight the greater menace...the gop
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:03 PM
Oct 2015

was gonna put something cheeky in about let gather around president nominee Martin O....

but lets not break down any fences we can not mend

relayerbob

(6,544 posts)
104. Yes, agreed
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:18 PM
Oct 2015

Alienating and vilifying one another is what has cost the Democrats in numerous elections in my 58 years. It also turns off people who might consider voting but just see the Dems calling names as just as bad as the Republicans. Grow up people. We need POSITIVE campaigns based on ideas, not hate and anger ... that feeds into the GOP narrative.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
107. I think that's fair.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:28 PM
Oct 2015

It won't happen but I appreciate the effort, and I will try to do better. I don't think I usually do this but I will pay attention.

Thank you.

Jack Rabbit

(45,984 posts)
109. I never call Hillary supporters "Clintonistas"
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

I call my fellow Bernie supporters Sandernistas. First of all, it sounds like Sandinistas, a group of Nicaraguan revolutionaries who were a thorn in the side of the Reagan administration; as humans, they were far more honorable than Reagan or his advisers.

The suffix -ista deliberately brings up images of Mexican bandit/revolutionaries of a hundred years ago, who were more honorable than today's Wall Street banksters who bankroll Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.

So I would never call Mrs. Clinton's supporters or her organization Clintonistas. It's just not right.

phylny

(8,380 posts)
111. I am first and foremost a progressive democrat.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:49 PM
Oct 2015

I have given money to Bernie Sanders' campaign, but I will financially support the candidate who gets the nomination.

Therefore, I have no nasty words for any candidate or any supporters.

Stay united, stay strong

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
114. Watch out, I was given a 2 hides in 5 mins for adding an "s" to the front of Hillary.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:56 PM
Oct 2015

People have extremely thin skin here if you criticize her highness.
In case you don't know, two hides close together gets your accouont frozen for review. Mine was down 4 days.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
117. I just call them Hillary supporters....
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 04:07 PM
Oct 2015

Also, see this:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=727997

"Bernistas" was used first and some of the Bernie supporters took it as the insult it was intended to be.

I didn't.

I considered it to be an example of Hillary supporters being uninformed of the implications.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
119. Calling me a Sandernista is bestowing an honor. Please feel free
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 04:08 PM
Oct 2015

to call me a Sandernista anytime!

Origin of the term "Sandinista"

The Sandinistas took their name from Augusto César Sandino (1895–1934), the charismatic leader of Nicaragua's nationalist rebellion against the US occupation of the country during the early 20th century (ca. 1922–1934). Sandino was assassinated in 1934 by the Nicaraguan National Guard (Guardia Nacional), the US-equipped police force of Anastasio Somoza, whose family ruled the country from 1936 until they were overthrown by the Sandinistas in 1979.

Women in revolutionary Nicaragua
Main article: Role of women in Nicaraguan Revolution

The women of Nicaragua prior to, during and after the revolution played a prominent role within the nation's society as they have commonly been recognized, throughout history and across all Latin American states, as its backbone. Nicaraguan women were therefore directly affected by all of the positive and negative events that took place during this revolutionary period. The victory of the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) in 1979 brought about major changes and gains for women, mainly in legislation, broad educational opportunities, training programs for working women, childcare programs to help women enter the work force and greatly increased participation and leadership positions in a range of political activities.[98] This, in turn, reduced the burdens that the women of Nicaragua were faced with prior to the revolution. During the Sandinista government, women were more active politically. The large majority of members of the neighborhood committees (Comités de Defensa Sandinista) were women. By 1987, 31% of the executive positions in the Sandinista government, 27% of the leadership positions of the FSLN, and 25% of the FSLN's active membership were women.[99]

Supporters of the Sandinistas see their era as characterized by the creation and implementation of successful social programs which were free and made widely available to the entire nation. Some of the more successful programs for women that were implemented by the Sandinistas were in the areas of education (see; Nicaraguan Literacy Campaign), health, and housing. Providing subsidies for basic foodstuffs and the introduction of mass employment were also contributions of the FSLN. The Sandinistas were particularly advantageous for the women of Nicaraguan as they promoted progressive views on gender as early as 1969 claiming that the revolution would "abolish the detestable discrimination that women have suffered with regard to men and establish economic, political and cultural equality between men and women." This was evident as the FSLN began integrating women into their ranks by 1967, unlike other left-wing guerilla groups in the region. This goal was not fully reached because the roots of gender inequality were not explicitly challenged. Women's participation within the public sphere was also substantial, as many took part in the armed struggle as part of the FSLN or as part of counter-revolutionary forces.[100]

Nicaraguan women organized independently in support of the revolution and their cause. Some of those organizations were the Socialist Party (1963), Federación Democrática (which support the FSLN in rural areas), and Luisa Amanda Espinoza Association of Nicaraguan Women (Asociación de Mujeres Nicaragüenses Luisa Amanda Espinosa, AMNLAE). However, since Daniel Ortega, was defeated in the 1990 election by the United Nicaraguan Opposition (UNO) coalition headed by Violeta Chamorro, the situation for women in Nicaragua was seriously altered. In terms of women and the labor market, by the end of 1991 AMNLAE reported that almost 16,000 working women—9,000 agricultural laborers, 3,000 industrial workers, and 3,800 civil servants, including 2,000 in health, 800 in education, and 1,000 in administration—had lost their jobs.[101] The change in government also resulted in the drastic reduction or suspension of all Nicaraguan social programs, which brought back the burdens characteristic of pre-revolutionary Nicaragua. The women were forced to maintain and supplement community social services on their own without economic aid or technical and human resource.[99][102]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandinista_National_Liberation_Front#Origin_of_the_term_.22Sandinista.22

Nevada Blue

(130 posts)
121. when I read threads like this
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 04:11 PM
Oct 2015

I just remember that when the chips are down, we are united, and a little back-and-forth stuff does not ultimately get in the way of that. When Hillary sat before the hearing committee last week, we all rallied around her. I'm sure that when the right starts slinging real mud at Bernie, everyone will rally round him as well. Therefore, the name-calling (or request for elimination of same) just tells me it's a slow news day and we're all just kind of circling round until the next real volley comes in from the right flank.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
137. i just assumed they were all shorthand
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:09 PM
Oct 2015

none of them bothered me. omalley needs one....omalleyites? omallarbars?

i don't give a shit what rush says. there is a lot at stake in this election, and if we don't have a little sense of humor, we will all be bonkers by election day. i respect the feelings of the op that is is immature, etc. and it may be. but i personally never found any of it demeaning

a proud bernista

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
139. Sanders' supporters are welcome to use the term "Clintonistas"
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:01 PM
Oct 2015

Those who use it will thereby unmistakably reveal their true colors and motivation. Better to have them out in the open and easily identifiable.


And, once they've identified themselves, the adults can ignore them and discuss the issue like grownups.


k/r

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders supporters listen...