Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

portlander23

(2,078 posts)
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:14 PM Oct 2015

Robert Scheer: Clinton strenuously supported bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition

An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe
Robert Scheer
Truthdig

The ugly reality of the Benghazi investigation is that the Republicans hawks investigating Clinton are fully complicit with the former secretary of state for the murderous pandemonium in Libya that led to the death of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and to the failed state that followed. It is simply immoral to now focus on whether Stevens was properly protected instead of on the nutty bipartisan arrogance of a U.S.-backed policy of regime change that left Libya in chaos, with much of its population in desperate flight from a country now ruled by three competing bands of Islamic fanatics.

“We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton boasted with a chuckle over the brutal death of a defanged dictator, ignoring the fact that the secular Gadhafi, long past his boisterous prime, was hardly a serious threat to the stability of the region. Gadhafi had been in a war with precisely the fanatics that, as she testified, Clinton was counting on to go to the aid of our ambassador, but they rewarded our support for their rebellion by meting out the same brutality they had exercised on Gadhafi himself. So much for the “Smart Power” mantra that Clinton and her ideological compatriot, U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power, have been proclaiming as the harbinger of a new Clinton Doctrine.

That Clinton had strenuously supported the bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition as a nation was confirmed in an email to her from her confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who on Aug. 22, 2011, proclaimed the start of the bombing as “a historic moment” and added “you will be credited for realizing it.” Blumenthal went on to predict that “[w]hen Gaddafi himself is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation home. … You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment. … The most important phrase is: ‘successful strategy.’ ”

The only value in disclosure of the secretary of state’s private emails is to confirm that she was considerably more hawkish than President Obama, and the only question about her zeal is whether it was driven by political cynicism or ideological hubris.

That is a distinction without a difference to the innocent victims of what Clinton trumpets as “Smart Power,” but it may be useful in assessing whether as president she would be even more reckless than any Republican opponent. Quite a limited choice, but one we are likely to be stuck with, given the dropping of Democratic alternatives in the wake of what much of the media has proclaimed a Clinton triumph over her Republican congressional critics.


Related:

Ignoring U.S. Destabilization of Libya, GOP Benghazi Hearing Asks Clinton All the Wrong Questions

Hillary Defends Her Failed War in Libya

Robert Scheer: Go Ahead, Back Hillary Clinton and Forget All About Her Record
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert Scheer: Clinton strenuously supported bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition (Original Post) portlander23 Oct 2015 OP
BASH BASH BASH Hillary, BASH BASH BASH randys1 Oct 2015 #1
Is it bashing to question and criticie the very reasons or going into Libya? Armstead Oct 2015 #2
Nope, what is bashing is a poster who only posts threads attacking Hillary, rarely or never randys1 Oct 2015 #3
Well I donlt agree ith hit and run posts... Armstead Oct 2015 #5
What any of this has to do with preventing the american taliban from taking the WH, i dont know randys1 Oct 2015 #6
no one cares about this forum. We change nothing but the circle we run with roguevalley Oct 2015 #10
227,177 user registrations and 69,848,360 posts since 2001 randys1 Oct 2015 #12
Once of prevention beats a pound of cure. No Turd Way believer should ever be nominated TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #13
So the person who will vote Dem no matter what, THEY are the ones risking the election? randys1 Oct 2015 #14
The force feeders of the failed and corrupt ideology are most certainly responsible TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #26
BIG picture...BIG BIG BIG picture... randys1 Oct 2015 #28
Is what Robert Scheer wrote a lie? I hope someone can show that it's a lie. If it's Autumn Oct 2015 #39
obama is responsible for "going into Libya" and what happened there. You're bashing the wrong person msongs Oct 2015 #7
Obama let Hillary have her way on Libya. She was an ardent advocate. Comrade Grumpy Oct 2015 #11
Don't worry. If her fanclub has their way hifiguy Oct 2015 #20
this is fucked up no matter what or who: roguevalley Oct 2015 #9
Facts are what facts are. hifiguy Oct 2015 #21
Put your fingers in your ears and repeat after me, "La-La-La-La-La". cpompilo Oct 2015 #30
Constant attacking of one of the two main DEMOCRATIC candidates is tiring randys1 Oct 2015 #31
Perhaps you confused a war with criticizing Hillary for her hair style? merrily Oct 2015 #33
You call it bashing - I call it fact. 840high Oct 2015 #38
It's important to realize that the Libyan intervention was based upon a cavalcade of lies, Maedhros Oct 2015 #4
Most people never seem to learn a goddam thing hifiguy Oct 2015 #19
No, it's just that people have malleable ethics. Maedhros Oct 2015 #23
"Situational ethics" hifiguy Oct 2015 #24
I was having a discussion (that turned into an argument) with a friend Maedhros Oct 2015 #25
It's like Jerry Seinfeld said about rooting for sports teams hifiguy Oct 2015 #27
remember how for a brief shining moment DU could believe Libya was doing great? MisterP Oct 2015 #8
My posts from that era are evident that it was going to be a disaster riderinthestorm Oct 2015 #35
How do people with blood on their hands sleep at night? in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #15
They sleep like babies hifiguy Oct 2015 #22
It's amazing to me how Healthy They Are! But, then...there's not a Cloud in their Sky KoKo Oct 2015 #40
US blowing up Libya was a brain dead scheme worthy of George W. Bush Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #16
Not to mention the IWR. hifiguy Oct 2015 #18
If Clinton had devised a plan to follow-up helping the Libyan people re-establish cpompilo Oct 2015 #34
Agree...that's why we need to question her Foreign Policy... KoKo Oct 2015 #41
ANOTHER fact that will be shouted down, ignored, hifiguy Oct 2015 #17
I haven't paid much attention to the content of the emails, but this is creepy: arcane1 Oct 2015 #29
Yeah that's messed up portlander23 Oct 2015 #32
So it seems Hillary's "we came we saw he died" quote was actually rehearsed, a way of taking credit. reformist2 Oct 2015 #37
I remember what Bishop Tutu and Nelson Mandela said after she made that awful remark about sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #44
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #36
When it says Libya, Libya, Libya on the label, label, label ... mhatrw Oct 2015 #42
That is exactly how I felt about those sham hearings. They asked all the wrong questions. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #43
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #45
K&R Katashi_itto Oct 2015 #46
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
2. Is it bashing to question and criticie the very reasons or going into Libya?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:21 PM
Oct 2015

I guess no one should have bashed GWB about that Iraq thing either. Just buy the official line and support the war.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
3. Nope, what is bashing is a poster who only posts threads attacking Hillary, rarely or never
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:24 PM
Oct 2015

comes back to a thread once the hit and run has been posted.

You do understand this is an overt attempt to make sure she doesnt win the WH.

And you do understand that if she is the GE candidate, this would mean someone like Ben Carson does win?

Got that do we ????

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
5. Well I donlt agree ith hit and run posts...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:30 PM
Oct 2015

But in fairness to the OP, while they are prolific, he also posts articles that are critical of Sanders and that occsionally have poitive things about Clinton.

In this case, while I was among those rooting or Clinton in the hearings, the author Riobert Scheer does raise a valid point outside of the usual "Bad GOP" V. Clinton, which is: What the hell were we doing in a mini version of Iraq, and inflaming a situation that resulted in less stability and replaced one awful dictator with a chaotic turf battle among extremists?

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
10. no one cares about this forum. We change nothing but the circle we run with
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:13 PM
Oct 2015

this idea that disagreeing on this forum undermines democracy is astonishing to me. Truly.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
13. Once of prevention beats a pound of cure. No Turd Way believer should ever be nominated
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:40 PM
Oct 2015

as to take such a risk.

You want to keep to going this way? Then the blow back either way is on the force feeders not the person coughing up what you are choking them with.

If Clinton gets in and "pragmatically" fucks us those as those from her school of thought (and yes it is literally HER school of thought, we are talking a DLC founder here at at the highest echelons at that, no mere tagalog status for Madame) tend to do then you own it.

If the TeaPubliKlans get in over her then that too is on you for madly hammering away at that square peg no matter how often you were told the hole is round, please dear God, please look and see the hole is round!

I guess if one pounds long and hard enough the damn hole will be so big anything will go in it, one day a parallelogram will go in the hole if we make it big enough!

randys1

(16,286 posts)
14. So the person who will vote Dem no matter what, THEY are the ones risking the election?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:42 PM
Oct 2015

Utter nonsense.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
26. The force feeders of the failed and corrupt ideology are most certainly responsible
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:12 PM
Oct 2015

no matter how much finger pointing and redirecting you want to do.

Just forever swallow what we keep shoving is not a solution and I don't give a damn whether you insist on believing it is or not and a pinkie swear that you'd just love to be the one force fed and the hyper phony you wouldn't have to force feed me, aid be even happier chowing down on that but... if the situation was to hypothetically arise isn't convincing to me.

Autumn

(45,108 posts)
39. Is what Robert Scheer wrote a lie? I hope someone can show that it's a lie. If it's
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:45 PM
Oct 2015

true I have no problem with any attempt, overt or otherwise to make sure she doesn't win the WH. Got that do ya ????

msongs

(67,420 posts)
7. obama is responsible for "going into Libya" and what happened there. You're bashing the wrong person
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:51 PM
Oct 2015
 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
11. Obama let Hillary have her way on Libya. She was an ardent advocate.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:19 PM
Oct 2015

As the article notes, Obama was and is noticeably less hawkish.

If Obama had listened to Hillary about Syria, we'd probably be hunkered down with 100,000 troops in Damascus right now.

Hillary's warmongering is my single biggest reasons for not supporting her.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
20. Don't worry. If her fanclub has their way
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:46 PM
Oct 2015

and she gets to the WH there will be 100,000 soldiers in a boots-on-the-ground war 90 days after she's sworn in. I'd make book on that. She's very much a believer in the Prophesies of the Archdemon Kissinger.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
9. this is fucked up no matter what or who:
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 05:12 PM
Oct 2015

“We came, we saw, he died,” Clinton boasted with a chuckle

SICK! SICK! SICK!
Exulting over any death any more makes me hurl. And of course, its someone who never had to put their ass in danger for any reason. Fuck this shit.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
21. Facts are what facts are.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:48 PM
Oct 2015

Seriously, you post this every time someone offers documented proof of this woman's malfeasance and misfeasance. It's OLD.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
31. Constant attacking of one of the two main DEMOCRATIC candidates is tiring
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:18 PM
Oct 2015

but there is a group who benefits from that

and it isnt Bernie Sanders the candidate

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
4. It's important to realize that the Libyan intervention was based upon a cavalcade of lies,
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 01:26 PM
Oct 2015

just like Iraq.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/31/the-top-ten-myths-in-the-war-against-libya/

These top ten myths are some of the most repeated claims, by the insurgents, and/or by NATO, European leaders, the Obama administration, the mainstream media, and even the so-called “International Criminal Court”—the main actors speaking in the war against Libya. In turn, we look at some of the reasons why these claims are better seen as imperial folklore, as the myths that supported the broadest of all myths—that this war is a “humanitarian intervention,” one designed to “protect civilians”. Again, the importance of these myths lies in their wide reproduction, with little question, and to deadly effect. In addition, they threaten to severely distort the ideals of human rights and their future invocation, as well aiding in the continued militarization of Western culture and society.

1. Genocide.

2. Gaddafi is “bombing his own people”.

3. Save Benghazi.

4. African Mercenaries.

5. Viagra-fueled Mass Rape.

6. Responsibility to Protect (R2P).

7. Gaddafi—the Demon.

8. Freedom Fighters—the Angels.

10. Defeat for “the Left”.


 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
19. Most people never seem to learn a goddam thing
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:45 PM
Oct 2015

from experience. They keep putting down their money to be cheated by the same three-card monte dealer again and again and again, EVEN AFTER THEY KNOW THE GAME IS RIGGED.

We are one unbelievably imbecilic society.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
23. No, it's just that people have malleable ethics.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:51 PM
Oct 2015

Buncha' brown people in a third world country killed by the U.S. military when a Republican is in office? OUTRAGE!!!111Eleven!!

When a Democrat is in office? <crickets>

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
24. "Situational ethics"
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:58 PM
Oct 2015

is the precise term you're looking for.

When they do spying on everyone, rendering, mass murder, senseless warmongering - BAD

We do same thing - DOUBLE PLUS GOOD!!! - Grunt, snort, oink, belch, ooga booga - YAY, TEAM!!

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
25. I was having a discussion (that turned into an argument) with a friend
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:08 PM
Oct 2015

who considers himself a "far left freak." The topic of discussion was the Libyan intervention, right after it happened. I was being very, very critical of the Obama Administration for ignoring the Congressional vote prohibiting a strike vs. Libya and for ginning up a number of bullshit propaganda lies to justify the strike (see Common Dreams article above).

The "far left freak" sneered at my concerns, absolutely convinced that Libya "was different than Iraq" and that we bombed that country to help stop genocide. Could he not see that the same argument was used vis-a-vis Iraq - Saddam gassed his own people, "don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud", etc?

No, he couldn't see it. More accurately, he didn't want to see it. He wanted to believe the lies.

That's what we have now - a Party of dutiful ballot-punchers, who don't want to see that the Empress has no clothes and will hear no criticisms because she's "Presidential" or something. I cannot take anything they say seriously, because there is no past policy too despicable for them not to rationalize.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
27. It's like Jerry Seinfeld said about rooting for sports teams
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:13 PM
Oct 2015

They root for the label on the front of the laundry.

The content is wholly irrelevant.

I am one of nature's doubters and skeptics - born that way - and question ANY AND ALL arguments, especially those from so-called received authority or conventional wisdom. No matter WHO is making the argument.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
35. My posts from that era are evident that it was going to be a disaster
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:39 PM
Oct 2015

I hate saying I told you so...



There were others who were similarly concerned at the time that de-stabilizing the regimes under the false "Arab Spring" enthusiasm was going to backfire badly.

I admit, Hillary's war blood lust is an enormous obstacle to supporting her. She's going to be more of the same and I refuse, REFUSE! to be a party to it anymore...

I just can't.



in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
15. How do people with blood on their hands sleep at night?
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:11 PM
Oct 2015

Cheney and Bush are psychotic sociopaths, so they have zero conscience.

What's Hillary's excuse? How does someone sleep at night, knowing they've murdered innocent women, children and men who did nothing wrong, but be born in the wrong country? A country the USA decided needed to be destroyed because of the destabilization in the region - CAUSED BY HILLARY'S IWR VOTE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ. She had a part in creating ISIS. How does she sleep at night?

Please keep her away from the codes.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
22. They sleep like babies
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:50 PM
Oct 2015

untroubled and secure in the knowledge that they are advancing the most wonderful thing ever seen on earth: The Glorious American Imperium and its oligarchic overlords who make the world safe for brutally exploitative pirate capitalism, which is itself ordained by god or Milton Friedman, who are one in the same. They love Big Brother with all their hearts nd always will

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
40. It's amazing to me how Healthy They Are! But, then...there's not a Cloud in their Sky
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:50 PM
Oct 2015

or...what the rest of Average Americans need to deal with these days just to survive the job layoffs from from "Mergers & Acquisitions" the inability to safe money working two jobs and if you are near Retirement the ability to get a bit of interest on your SAVINGS in the BANK...after the Crash of '07-'08 and what has come after.

MEANWHILE! The Top 1%'s Kids get Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford....etc. down through the Advantage School Hierarchy...and it's all taken care of with Trust Funds and Inheritance.

We have a Mess today.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
16. US blowing up Libya was a brain dead scheme worthy of George W. Bush
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:19 PM
Oct 2015

Look at the consequences. Mrs. Clinton could be disqualified on that basis alone.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
18. Not to mention the IWR.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:42 PM
Oct 2015

There were only two reasons to vote for the IWR- One, you were dumb enough to actually trust Dick Cheney and GW Bush, which evidences such an utter lack of judgment that you should't be allowed to walk the dog or change the litter box without supervision, or Two, you were a craven, sniveling, crawling political coward who only wanted to cover your own miserable ass.

Both are presumptive disqualifiers from any position higher than sewage commissioner.

cpompilo

(323 posts)
34. If Clinton had devised a plan to follow-up helping the Libyan people re-establish
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:34 PM
Oct 2015

their society and government with massive economic aid, that might have been useful. Instead, under her auspices and the CIA's assistance we armed Al-Qaeda in Libya, and "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb" Hillary forgot any humanitarian followup in favor of, "You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment". This was her "smart diplomacy" which resulted in tragic failure - perfect credentials for denying Hillary the big chair in the White House.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
41. Agree...that's why we need to question her Foreign Policy...
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:55 PM
Oct 2015

She's too allied with NeoCons and the Past of Kissinger, Strobe Talbott and Albright who were her Mentors. She's not an Independent Thinker and relies on many Handlers to back her up when she makes a mistake in judgement.

Plus this will be Bill Clinton's Term 3. We shouldn't let ourselves be fooled that she isn't acting for Clinton Dynasty and Bill will be running the show. If she had divorced him (after Monica/Blue Dress)...I might think differently.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
17. ANOTHER fact that will be shouted down, ignored,
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 06:39 PM
Oct 2015

or swept under the rug.

I am so sick of this shit.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
29. I haven't paid much attention to the content of the emails, but this is creepy:
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:17 PM
Oct 2015

"That Clinton had strenuously supported the bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition as a nation was confirmed in an email to her from her confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who on Aug. 22, 2011, proclaimed the start of the bombing as “a historic moment” and added “you will be credited for realizing it.” Blumenthal went on to predict that “hen Gaddafi himself is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation home. … You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment. … The most important phrase is: ‘successful strategy.’ ” "


reformist2

(9,841 posts)
37. So it seems Hillary's "we came we saw he died" quote was actually rehearsed, a way of taking credit.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 07:43 PM
Oct 2015

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
44. I remember what Bishop Tutu and Nelson Mandela said after she made that awful remark about
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:06 AM
Oct 2015

a war crime which was simply barbaric. 'No decent person could watch that and not shudder' or words to that effect. Both those men viewed Gadaffi as a 'brother'.

Our racist FPs of course are not interested in the cultures we set out to destroy. That African nation was one of the most developed on the Continent. Gadaffi was funding other African nations, trying to help build them up. America's take on African and ME cultures and nations is so reminiscent of the British Empire's. Racist, brutal and just plain wrong.

I opposed that invasion just as I opposed Iraq. And once again, those of us who spoke out against both invasions, turned out to be sadly right.

Some day maybe there will be hearings about these criminal invasions for profit. But not in the current atmosphere of fear and hatred for people we know nothing about.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
42. When it says Libya, Libya, Libya on the label, label, label ...
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 12:50 AM
Oct 2015

if you strike it, strike it, strike it, it gets unstable-stable-stable

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
43. That is exactly how I felt about those sham hearings. They asked all the wrong questions.
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:01 AM
Oct 2015

What happened in Benghazi happened because of the disastrous invasion of that country which Hillary supported. THAT is what should be investigated.

And those four tragic deaths were just a few of the many, many innocent lives lost because of that awful invasion. And the people there are now living in a hell hole, thanks to our so-called Humanitarian Mission which we abandoned once the oil was secured.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Robert Scheer: Clinton st...