2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRobert Scheer: Clinton strenuously supported bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton ProbeRobert Scheer
Truthdig
We came, we saw, he died, Clinton boasted with a chuckle over the brutal death of a defanged dictator, ignoring the fact that the secular Gadhafi, long past his boisterous prime, was hardly a serious threat to the stability of the region. Gadhafi had been in a war with precisely the fanatics that, as she testified, Clinton was counting on to go to the aid of our ambassador, but they rewarded our support for their rebellion by meting out the same brutality they had exercised on Gadhafi himself. So much for the Smart Power mantra that Clinton and her ideological compatriot, U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power, have been proclaiming as the harbinger of a new Clinton Doctrine.
That Clinton had strenuously supported the bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition as a nation was confirmed in an email to her from her confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who on Aug. 22, 2011, proclaimed the start of the bombing as a historic moment and added you will be credited for realizing it. Blumenthal went on to predict that [w]hen Gaddafi himself is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation home. You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment. The most important phrase is: successful strategy.
The only value in disclosure of the secretary of states private emails is to confirm that she was considerably more hawkish than President Obama, and the only question about her zeal is whether it was driven by political cynicism or ideological hubris.
That is a distinction without a difference to the innocent victims of what Clinton trumpets as Smart Power, but it may be useful in assessing whether as president she would be even more reckless than any Republican opponent. Quite a limited choice, but one we are likely to be stuck with, given the dropping of Democratic alternatives in the wake of what much of the media has proclaimed a Clinton triumph over her Republican congressional critics.
Related:
Ignoring U.S. Destabilization of Libya, GOP Benghazi Hearing Asks Clinton All the Wrong Questions
Hillary Defends Her Failed War in Libya
Robert Scheer: Go Ahead, Back Hillary Clinton and Forget All About Her Record
randys1
(16,286 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I guess no one should have bashed GWB about that Iraq thing either. Just buy the official line and support the war.
randys1
(16,286 posts)comes back to a thread once the hit and run has been posted.
You do understand this is an overt attempt to make sure she doesnt win the WH.
And you do understand that if she is the GE candidate, this would mean someone like Ben Carson does win?
Got that do we ????
Armstead
(47,803 posts)But in fairness to the OP, while they are prolific, he also posts articles that are critical of Sanders and that occsionally have poitive things about Clinton.
In this case, while I was among those rooting or Clinton in the hearings, the author Riobert Scheer does raise a valid point outside of the usual "Bad GOP" V. Clinton, which is: What the hell were we doing in a mini version of Iraq, and inflaming a situation that resulted in less stability and replaced one awful dictator with a chaotic turf battle among extremists?
randys1
(16,286 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)this idea that disagreeing on this forum undermines democracy is astonishing to me. Truly.
randys1
(16,286 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)as to take such a risk.
You want to keep to going this way? Then the blow back either way is on the force feeders not the person coughing up what you are choking them with.
If Clinton gets in and "pragmatically" fucks us those as those from her school of thought (and yes it is literally HER school of thought, we are talking a DLC founder here at at the highest echelons at that, no mere tagalog status for Madame) tend to do then you own it.
If the TeaPubliKlans get in over her then that too is on you for madly hammering away at that square peg no matter how often you were told the hole is round, please dear God, please look and see the hole is round!
I guess if one pounds long and hard enough the damn hole will be so big anything will go in it, one day a parallelogram will go in the hole if we make it big enough!
randys1
(16,286 posts)Utter nonsense.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)no matter how much finger pointing and redirecting you want to do.
Just forever swallow what we keep shoving is not a solution and I don't give a damn whether you insist on believing it is or not and a pinkie swear that you'd just love to be the one force fed and the hyper phony you wouldn't have to force feed me, aid be even happier chowing down on that but... if the situation was to hypothetically arise isn't convincing to me.
randys1
(16,286 posts)I cant help it if some cant or wont see it.
Autumn
(45,108 posts)true I have no problem with any attempt, overt or otherwise to make sure she doesn't win the WH. Got that do ya ????
msongs
(67,420 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)As the article notes, Obama was and is noticeably less hawkish.
If Obama had listened to Hillary about Syria, we'd probably be hunkered down with 100,000 troops in Damascus right now.
Hillary's warmongering is my single biggest reasons for not supporting her.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and she gets to the WH there will be 100,000 soldiers in a boots-on-the-ground war 90 days after she's sworn in. I'd make book on that. She's very much a believer in the Prophesies of the Archdemon Kissinger.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)We came, we saw, he died, Clinton boasted with a chuckle
SICK! SICK! SICK!
Exulting over any death any more makes me hurl. And of course, its someone who never had to put their ass in danger for any reason. Fuck this shit.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Seriously, you post this every time someone offers documented proof of this woman's malfeasance and misfeasance. It's OLD.
cpompilo
(323 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)but there is a group who benefits from that
and it isnt Bernie Sanders the candidate
merrily
(45,251 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)just like Iraq.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/31/the-top-ten-myths-in-the-war-against-libya/
1. Genocide.
2. Gaddafi is bombing his own people.
3. Save Benghazi.
4. African Mercenaries.
5. Viagra-fueled Mass Rape.
6. Responsibility to Protect (R2P).
7. Gaddafithe Demon.
8. Freedom Fightersthe Angels.
10. Defeat for the Left.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)from experience. They keep putting down their money to be cheated by the same three-card monte dealer again and again and again, EVEN AFTER THEY KNOW THE GAME IS RIGGED.
We are one unbelievably imbecilic society.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Buncha' brown people in a third world country killed by the U.S. military when a Republican is in office? OUTRAGE!!!111Eleven!!
When a Democrat is in office? <crickets>
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)is the precise term you're looking for.
When they do spying on everyone, rendering, mass murder, senseless warmongering - BAD
We do same thing - DOUBLE PLUS GOOD!!! - Grunt, snort, oink, belch, ooga booga - YAY, TEAM!!
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)who considers himself a "far left freak." The topic of discussion was the Libyan intervention, right after it happened. I was being very, very critical of the Obama Administration for ignoring the Congressional vote prohibiting a strike vs. Libya and for ginning up a number of bullshit propaganda lies to justify the strike (see Common Dreams article above).
The "far left freak" sneered at my concerns, absolutely convinced that Libya "was different than Iraq" and that we bombed that country to help stop genocide. Could he not see that the same argument was used vis-a-vis Iraq - Saddam gassed his own people, "don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud", etc?
No, he couldn't see it. More accurately, he didn't want to see it. He wanted to believe the lies.
That's what we have now - a Party of dutiful ballot-punchers, who don't want to see that the Empress has no clothes and will hear no criticisms because she's "Presidential" or something. I cannot take anything they say seriously, because there is no past policy too despicable for them not to rationalize.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)They root for the label on the front of the laundry.
The content is wholly irrelevant.
I am one of nature's doubters and skeptics - born that way - and question ANY AND ALL arguments, especially those from so-called received authority or conventional wisdom. No matter WHO is making the argument.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002405978
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002768036
http://betterment.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6720333
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=468383
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025452028
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=161306
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002752959
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php/www.scn.org/youtube.com/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x638549
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3611795
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=240964
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002467606
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I hate saying I told you so...
There were others who were similarly concerned at the time that de-stabilizing the regimes under the false "Arab Spring" enthusiasm was going to backfire badly.
I admit, Hillary's war blood lust is an enormous obstacle to supporting her. She's going to be more of the same and I refuse, REFUSE! to be a party to it anymore...
I just can't.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Cheney and Bush are psychotic sociopaths, so they have zero conscience.
What's Hillary's excuse? How does someone sleep at night, knowing they've murdered innocent women, children and men who did nothing wrong, but be born in the wrong country? A country the USA decided needed to be destroyed because of the destabilization in the region - CAUSED BY HILLARY'S IWR VOTE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ. She had a part in creating ISIS. How does she sleep at night?
Please keep her away from the codes.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)untroubled and secure in the knowledge that they are advancing the most wonderful thing ever seen on earth: The Glorious American Imperium and its oligarchic overlords who make the world safe for brutally exploitative pirate capitalism, which is itself ordained by god or Milton Friedman, who are one in the same. They love Big Brother with all their hearts nd always will
KoKo
(84,711 posts)or...what the rest of Average Americans need to deal with these days just to survive the job layoffs from from "Mergers & Acquisitions" the inability to safe money working two jobs and if you are near Retirement the ability to get a bit of interest on your SAVINGS in the BANK...after the Crash of '07-'08 and what has come after.
MEANWHILE! The Top 1%'s Kids get Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford....etc. down through the Advantage School Hierarchy...and it's all taken care of with Trust Funds and Inheritance.
We have a Mess today.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Look at the consequences. Mrs. Clinton could be disqualified on that basis alone.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)There were only two reasons to vote for the IWR- One, you were dumb enough to actually trust Dick Cheney and GW Bush, which evidences such an utter lack of judgment that you should't be allowed to walk the dog or change the litter box without supervision, or Two, you were a craven, sniveling, crawling political coward who only wanted to cover your own miserable ass.
Both are presumptive disqualifiers from any position higher than sewage commissioner.
cpompilo
(323 posts)their society and government with massive economic aid, that might have been useful. Instead, under her auspices and the CIA's assistance we armed Al-Qaeda in Libya, and "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb" Hillary forgot any humanitarian followup in favor of, "You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment". This was her "smart diplomacy" which resulted in tragic failure - perfect credentials for denying Hillary the big chair in the White House.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)She's too allied with NeoCons and the Past of Kissinger, Strobe Talbott and Albright who were her Mentors. She's not an Independent Thinker and relies on many Handlers to back her up when she makes a mistake in judgement.
Plus this will be Bill Clinton's Term 3. We shouldn't let ourselves be fooled that she isn't acting for Clinton Dynasty and Bill will be running the show. If she had divorced him (after Monica/Blue Dress)...I might think differently.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)or swept under the rug.
I am so sick of this shit.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"That Clinton had strenuously supported the bombing that destabilized Libya beyond recognition as a nation was confirmed in an email to her from her confidant Sidney Blumenthal, who on Aug. 22, 2011, proclaimed the start of the bombing as a historic moment and added you will be credited for realizing it. Blumenthal went on to predict that hen Gaddafi himself is finally removed, you should of course make a public statement before the cameras wherever you are, even in the driveway of your vacation home.
You must go on camera. You must establish yourself in the historical record at this moment.
The most important phrase is: successful strategy. "
portlander23
(2,078 posts)Misson Accomplished
reformist2
(9,841 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)a war crime which was simply barbaric. 'No decent person could watch that and not shudder' or words to that effect. Both those men viewed Gadaffi as a 'brother'.
Our racist FPs of course are not interested in the cultures we set out to destroy. That African nation was one of the most developed on the Continent. Gadaffi was funding other African nations, trying to help build them up. America's take on African and ME cultures and nations is so reminiscent of the British Empire's. Racist, brutal and just plain wrong.
I opposed that invasion just as I opposed Iraq. And once again, those of us who spoke out against both invasions, turned out to be sadly right.
Some day maybe there will be hearings about these criminal invasions for profit. But not in the current atmosphere of fear and hatred for people we know nothing about.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)if you strike it, strike it, strike it, it gets unstable-stable-stable
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)What happened in Benghazi happened because of the disastrous invasion of that country which Hillary supported. THAT is what should be investigated.
And those four tragic deaths were just a few of the many, many innocent lives lost because of that awful invasion. And the people there are now living in a hell hole, thanks to our so-called Humanitarian Mission which we abandoned once the oil was secured.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, portlander.