Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 12:17 AM Aug 2012

Restrictive voting laws tied up in court

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/restrictive-voting-laws-tied-up-in-court/2012/06/06/gJQAt1MaJV_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage&tid=obnetwork

Stricter ID laws and other controversial voting restrictions, passed this year by several Republican-controlled legislatures, are hitting legal roadblocks that could keep many of the measures from taking effect before the November elections.

Curbs on early voting, new ID requirements and last-minute efforts to rid voter lists of noncitizens have been met with vigorous opposition from the Justice Department and civil rights groups, and in some cases, the provisions have been blocked by federal or state judges.

“There has been a real push-back by the courts to these widespread efforts to restrict the vote,” said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, which opposes the new laws. “If those seeking to suppress the vote won round one, round two seems to be going to the voters.”

snip

Last year, new ID measures were introduced in 34 states and passed in Kansas, Mississippi, Rhode Island and Wisconsin. Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas tightened existing voter ID laws to require a photo ID. Legislation in five other states was vetoed by their governors, according to the National Council of State Legislatures.

Since then, two state judges in Wisconsin have ruled its voter ID law unconstitutional. A Missouri court threw out a ballot initiative that would have allowed voters to decide whether photo IDs should be required, calling the language “misleading.”

good article...gives me a bit of hope.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Restrictive voting laws tied up in court (Original Post) BlueToTheBone Aug 2012 OP
kick Dawson Leery Aug 2012 #1
Been wishing, hoping and praying . . . elleng Aug 2012 #2
Your're not the only one. Many of us, out here, are doing the same thing. demosincebirth Aug 2012 #3
Off topic but I love Dusty. demgrrrll Aug 2012 #4
Isn't it funny most of those states are deep red ones davidpdx Aug 2012 #5

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
5. Isn't it funny most of those states are deep red ones
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 07:25 AM
Aug 2012

With the exception of Wisconsin and RI. I have started calling them voter repression laws.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Restrictive voting laws t...