Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
202 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The attacks against Hillary here show the same level of derangement as the TeaPartiers. (Original Post) RBInMaine Oct 2015 OP
How Can Facts Be Confused With Fallacies - Seems The HRC Supporters Are The Ones Deranged cantbeserious Oct 2015 #1
It's hard to accept that Bernie is losing redstateblues Oct 2015 #12
Typical Misdirection By HRC Supporters cantbeserious Oct 2015 #18
Sometimes the truth hurts redstateblues Oct 2015 #77
Depends on who's truth is talking, right? Phlem Oct 2015 #108
And if the polls reflected otherwise he would be? JonLeibowitz Nov 2015 #158
I think the most important determination is in the numbers. randome Nov 2015 #172
Sometimes you THINK you know the truth when you don't... Like Hillary beating Obama last time? cascadiance Nov 2015 #185
"Hillary is too stupid to be President" -Mineral Man v2.0.08 Fumesucker Oct 2015 #2
Just an example... MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #59
One has to wonder if that is used during the GOTV efforts... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2015 #99
"Hillary will say ANYTHING and do ANYTHING to win. STINKING ROTTEN !!" Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #148
That was written shortly after her ugly comment about MineralMan Nov 2015 #173
A lot of RW talking points. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #3
If they channeled that energy into propping up their own candidate instead... JaneyVee Oct 2015 #4
This is a dishonest representation of what's going on. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #19
Framing is what is happening. scscholar Oct 2015 #27
really? wendylaroux Oct 2015 #5
Do folks know of "executive privilege" and why it exists? Your comment makes the OP's point. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #7
well okay wendylaroux Oct 2015 #9
Yes, executive privilege lovemydog Oct 2015 #23
Well thank you very much :) wendylaroux Oct 2015 #24
You're welcome. lovemydog Oct 2015 #28
and wendylaroux Oct 2015 #37
Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #6
Ain't that the truth redstateblues Oct 2015 #11
+1 betsuni Oct 2015 #51
Most Bernie supporters irl aren't like these few gwheezie Oct 2015 #8
When have we called Clinton a rapist? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #10
It would be nice if for once you posted a link. sheshe2 Oct 2015 #29
I think he was making a comparison to what the TPs are claiming. jonno99 Oct 2015 #44
Scoot can't speak for themselves and post a link? sheshe2 Oct 2015 #55
Nope - just trying to be helpful...nt jonno99 Oct 2015 #66
Because, as they say, "there's no there there"! George II Oct 2015 #54
Just for you, George: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #74
so 4 people Andy823 Oct 2015 #78
Who said "all Clinton supporters called Bernie a racist"? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #79
Following me around now beam me up scottie? George II Oct 2015 #84
Responding to you in a thread where I already posted is "following" you around, George? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #88
George II admitted that he was an alert stalker on that other site.....GII is "projecting" virtualobserver Oct 2015 #104
Trying to prod me into a hidden post no doubt. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #106
LOL Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #150
Now there's a DUer who deserves respect. beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #151
I think that was an admission that you got him good and he has no comeback. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #116
I posted the links downthread, I thought maybe they were invisible or something. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #119
Nope and it appears to be quite catchy. Might even be deadly since it makes people vote Live and Learn Oct 2015 #123
DU loved Bernie until he challenged Hillary. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #126
Yep, pretty sad. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #136
...he also kicks puppies and chases kittens up trees. Kalidurga Nov 2015 #145
He fondles farm animals too! beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #147
+1 nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #114
Yes, it's certainly possible to make comparisons. sibelian Oct 2015 #13
I think you mispelled Sanders as 'Hillary' TheProgressive Oct 2015 #14
desperate much? DianeK Oct 2015 #15
Ha! They're in denial.. accuse you of "desperation". Sad. Cha Oct 2015 #16
Refresh our memories... who was it who called Hillary "morally depraved"... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2015 #96
Haha! go for it! Cha Oct 2015 #101
You already have... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2015 #122
that's right .. keep going. Cha Nov 2015 #133
You seemed to think in 2008 that Clinton was racist neverforget Nov 2015 #157
Don't forget "warmonger." okasha Oct 2015 #120
YUP R B Garr Oct 2015 #17
When you have NOTHING to attack a candidate with ... 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #20
I am watching the trashers of BLM act like they love BLM. bravenak Oct 2015 #21
Can you imagine Clinton literally shouting Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #31
Yeah. I can imagine doing it myself if you wanna get technical. bravenak Oct 2015 #39
Well said rbrnmw Oct 2015 #63
It's bizarre rbrnmw Oct 2015 #61
I had to go through my bookmarks to try to understand the metamorphosis. bravenak Oct 2015 #64
I would expect no more. Cha Nov 2015 #160
you go far enough to the left you will meet the crazies from the right demosincebirth Oct 2015 #22
The "horseshoe theory" of politics in America has some merit. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #69
I never heard that, but in this cycle it seems to fit. demosincebirth Oct 2015 #94
I can understand he desperation of some people who see Bernie's candidacy as the last hope Ron Green Oct 2015 #25
And who is stoking that "fear"? NanceGreggs Oct 2015 #130
Let me guide you toward some reading; or, in the happy event you've read them, let's talk: Ron Green Nov 2015 #135
Nice dodge ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #139
Those plagues are surely on the way, and Bernie's candidacy won't stop them, as he Ron Green Nov 2015 #146
I'm not worried about anyone "hurting Hillary" at all. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #152
You don't seem to be reading what I'm writing, so I'll just say Ron Green Nov 2015 #155
You don't seem to want ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #188
The peril IS real, and many supporters ARE overreacting. And it's understandable. Ron Green Nov 2015 #191
According to the polls ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #192
Most voters, Dems included, are low info. This is just how it is. Ron Green Nov 2015 #193
Oh, I fully acknowledge ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #195
That's right. And we need a working schooner, Ron Green Nov 2015 #196
We need an experienced captain ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #197
I disagree with some of your basic assumptions, but I hope Ron Green Nov 2015 #198
Princeton Study Declares U.S. government an Oligarchy rhett o rick Nov 2015 #187
I just don't understand the "desperation" of the BS supporters.. if they have such a great Cha Nov 2015 #161
It's because they see this great candidate shut out by Ron Green Nov 2015 #166
Oh the irony.. Kentonio Nov 2015 #176
I don't alert on people and try to get them a hide and when they have 5 hides they're on a Cha Nov 2015 #177
I was referring more to the attempts of Clinton supporters here to shut down discussion Kentonio Nov 2015 #179
Oh please. They're nothing compared to the deranged posts about Bernie: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #26
Do you have links for those deranged claims? Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #32
They'll probably alert on my post anyway, I've gotten used to it. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #43
Holy crap. That is insane. No wonder they're so defensive. CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #35
Those glass houses were reduced to sand a long time ago. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #45
+1, they seem to love playing the victim. /nt Marr Oct 2015 #41
It is Halloween, maybe it's more fun than posting positive threads about their candidate. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #46
There are a large number of non-Democrats here. onehandle Oct 2015 #30
In what way do they have this agenda? Is it possible they seek to move the party closer Ron Green Oct 2015 #33
Are you speaking as a Green, or as a Ron? n/t pnwmom Oct 2015 #60
What do you mean? Ron Green Oct 2015 #107
There have been many Green party members here in the past and your screen name pnwmom Oct 2015 #109
This is my name. I ran for office in 2012 on the ballot with Barack Obama, Ron Green Oct 2015 #115
A secret agenda? Warren Stupidity Oct 2015 #40
So doing what is right for the country AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #42
We have an anti-shit policy agenda.. frylock Oct 2015 #118
"same level of derangement as the TeaPartiers" madfloridian Oct 2015 #34
Attacks or criticism? HassleCat Oct 2015 #36
I believe that is an accurate assessment. FarPoint Oct 2015 #38
Not so fun when the foot's on the other shoe DJ13 Oct 2015 #47
There's plenty of deranged bullshit posted about Bernie too. tammywammy Oct 2015 #48
You misspelled Bernie. quakerboy Oct 2015 #49
And they only get worse as Sanders’ chance slowly slips away. NYC Liberal Oct 2015 #50
good to see you working so hard to lose the presidency .......hillary will never be president. bowens43 Oct 2015 #57
Except of the United States. shenmue Oct 2015 #65
I'll take that bet. NYC Liberal Nov 2015 #143
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #162
Yeah we're just fucking crazy,crazy,crazy.................... Armstead Oct 2015 #75
"you will need every goddamn vote you can get on November!" NYC Liberal Nov 2015 #144
The collectve "you" Armstead Nov 2015 #164
Sure we do. Aerows Oct 2015 #52
It's called an election Joe Turner Oct 2015 #53
bullshit...typical whiny nonsense from hillarys supporters...... bowens43 Oct 2015 #56
Ever heard of projection? The losing candidate's redstateblues Oct 2015 #73
Losing what? Phone polls? frylock Oct 2015 #121
I think they mean the Nomination. Apparently, the more people get to know.... Walk away Nov 2015 #170
Right, and that's why the DNC is showcasing her in all these debates. frylock Nov 2015 #174
She came very close to winning a race with one of the finest natural candidates in a century! Walk away Nov 2015 #182
Hillary and her supporters have been saying 6 debates is enough for several months now. frylock Nov 2015 #184
Not me! I would love to see Hillary win more debates. Walk away Nov 2015 #194
Critical thinking challenged much? zentrum Oct 2015 #58
You would know that Hillary is left of Che Guevara, if you've spent bullwinkle428 Oct 2015 #62
Really? Phlem Oct 2015 #67
The whining has devolved into derangement AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #68
Next we'll all be strangling kittens Armstead Oct 2015 #71
Booga Booga Armstead Oct 2015 #70
"Feel the Bern" as a slogan conjurs up images of being attacked with a hot poker by your angry old Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #72
Well that's because we support an angry old uncle wih a hot poker Armstead Oct 2015 #81
How about "Progress for Progressives" or "Sanders for the Future".....my compliments. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #83
Oh I kind of like the old geezer with the hot poker Armstead Nov 2015 #132
Getting desperate i see Robbins Oct 2015 #76
Well the majority of the TP hootinholler Nov 2015 #141
AGREED Skittles Oct 2015 #80
HRC supporters beware redstateblues Oct 2015 #82
Well, I'm anti Clinton and am definetly deranged Armstead Oct 2015 #85
What ever. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #86
Correction..... it's Whattttttttevvvvvvvvvverah! Armstead Oct 2015 #91
Like Tea Party derangement? I can see the "shouting" hyperbole is moving up a notch. jalan48 Oct 2015 #87
You got that right! NonMetro Oct 2015 #97
Third Way Tea Partiers. frylock Oct 2015 #124
The far right of both parties Mnpaul Nov 2015 #183
Any simpleton can say a thing is true: look at the W Bush administration. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #89
Attacks and providing legitimate criticisms are not the same. PoliticalMalcontent Oct 2015 #90
agreed.... chillfactor Oct 2015 #92
It's deranged to think that if she becomes president, HRC is going to leap out of a Trojan Pantsuit betsuni Oct 2015 #93
Don't forget she will sell our children to Goldman Sacks and donate the money to the Clinton bravenak Oct 2015 #102
How did I forget GOLDMAN SACKS??????!!!!! betsuni Oct 2015 #125
So much evil in her agenda, easy to let something slip. bravenak Oct 2015 #127
I can't speak for others, sus453 Oct 2015 #95
Thank you for sanity. 840high Oct 2015 #98
No derangement... SoapBox Oct 2015 #100
Hillary will be president. That is why I only read articles about her not Barnie BrainMann1 Oct 2015 #103
And I bet you don't think your post is disrespectful at all. nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #110
Your post is deranged. Broward Oct 2015 #105
+ 1000 nt Live and Learn Oct 2015 #112
Hit and run post. Cowardly buncha crap. Ron Green Oct 2015 #111
Yeah, you guys keep saying that, but can never produce examples.. frylock Oct 2015 #113
Wait, just days ago HRC supporters were mocking Sander and his supporters for complaining about cui bono Oct 2015 #117
Psychological projection is a defense mechanism corkhead Oct 2015 #128
Hillary is center right establishment. gvstn Oct 2015 #129
It's like the horse shoe theory. Jamaal510 Nov 2015 #131
Facts Are Facts colsohlibgal Nov 2015 #134
Sad but true also that the Hillary whiners and crybabies here sound so Republican. ::exits laughing. Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #137
Many of the attacks on HRC on this board are from right wing sites Gothmog Nov 2015 #138
THIS! MrWendel Nov 2015 #149
Complete with the RW language Bobbie Jo Nov 2015 #186
I think it's worse. eom MohRokTah Nov 2015 #140
K&R RandySF Nov 2015 #142
Hard to argue that. zappaman Nov 2015 #153
but, they do.. bernie supporters=pure. It's the mean ol Hill supporters who... Cha Nov 2015 #167
Low blow, dude,.... & totally false. southerncrone Nov 2015 #154
No, they don't. eom saltpoint Nov 2015 #156
That's because DU is the mirror image of Free Republic. Beacool Nov 2015 #159
The attacks are on issue positions n/t eridani Nov 2015 #163
hmm Truprogressive85 Nov 2015 #165
It makes no sense to be unfair to Clinton. Vattel Nov 2015 #168
Got that right.. almost word for word in many cases. DCBob Nov 2015 #169
"Hillary Clinton Beats Up Old Man" NCTraveler Nov 2015 #171
Funny SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #175
I know whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #178
ah, an ad hominem attack on critics through the use of a false analogy: nice try TheSarcastinator Nov 2015 #180
one of Sanders supporters posted a whole bunch of rabid links from the Clinton crazies. Doctor_J Nov 2015 #181
What a coincidence. I happen to think the same thing of some of those who attack Bernie. I think Cal33 Nov 2015 #189
Clinton simply takes too much corporate money to believe she will not govern for the top 1%. mhatrw Nov 2015 #190
UnRec! bvar22 Nov 2015 #199
For the 200th post in this thread, I'll again say HIT AND RUN! Ron Green Nov 2015 #200
"Cowardly, or just lazy?" Capt. Obvious Nov 2015 #201
oh please DonCoquixote Nov 2015 #202

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
12. It's hard to accept that Bernie is losing
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:56 PM
Oct 2015

and that his surge has hit the ceiling after his promising start.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
77. Sometimes the truth hurts
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:40 PM
Oct 2015

I've passionately backed candidates before that didn't win so I get it. Bernie is a good guy. He's just not presidential and the polls reflect that.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
158. And if the polls reflected otherwise he would be?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:02 AM
Nov 2015

Some people make a determination of who is presidential based on substance, not a poll. Evidently others choose not to.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
172. I think the most important determination is in the numbers.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 10:27 AM
Nov 2015

You can't argue with math and Clinton looks like she has this sewn up. That's simple reality.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
185. Sometimes you THINK you know the truth when you don't... Like Hillary beating Obama last time?
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:39 PM
Nov 2015

When she was further ahead in the polls then against him than she is against Bernie now?

Just saying so doesn't make it so!!!!

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
59. Just an example...
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:19 PM
Oct 2015

The rest here is pretty hateful, Fume...

I feel like checking out for a while. Nothing can be gained with this dialogue. I'm disgusted by what is said against Sanders... I do see things said against both, but frankly, I don't think it's a nice conversation you can have anymore with some (and I do not say all) the HRC over-reachers.

As flip flop at MM's long forgotten verbiage is, I these other people are just too fucking much.

MineralMan

(146,336 posts)
173. That was written shortly after her ugly comment about
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 10:41 AM
Nov 2015

RFK. I do have to wonder, though, why you're calling me out in a thread where I'm not participating. What's that about?

I was an Obama supporter at that time, and Hillary's reference to JFK was, indeed, stupid. Very stupid. She's not making mistakes like that any longer, and I support her candidacy in 2016.

For anyone who has forgotten what she said, see this link:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24796393/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-regrets-rfk-assassination-remark/

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
4. If they channeled that energy into propping up their own candidate instead...
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:44 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie's campaign wouldn't be polling in the low 20s.

Baitball Blogger

(46,761 posts)
19. This is a dishonest representation of what's going on.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:11 PM
Oct 2015

In recent days there has been a definite push from pro-Clinton supporters on DU to frame the issues and what we're seeing is a very subjective perception of the facts. Sometimes it goes to such an extreme that it is beyond belief.

Just look at the facts and you would have to recognize it. Part of the process of supporting a candidate involves standing up to any smear tactics, and showing how the candidates are being treated differently is fair game.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
23. Yes, executive privilege
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:24 PM
Oct 2015

was one of the claims Nixon's lawyers made regarding the tape recordings.

From other sources, prosecutors and judiciary committees gained strong evidence that crimes had taken place. They used that testimony to compel the release of the tapes. It ultimately came down to the Supreme Court, which ordered the tapes' release. But only to parts relevant to Watergate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

Interestingly, Hillary Rodham Clinton was a young high level staffer on the House Judiciary Committee surrounding the Watergate scandal.

Hope this helps a bit. I find it all fascinating.

Response to RBInMaine (Original post)

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
11. Ain't that the truth
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:52 PM
Oct 2015

they are getting more nasty by the day-especially as the polls show Bernie's surge has flattened out

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
8. Most Bernie supporters irl aren't like these few
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:50 PM
Oct 2015

Not the ones I know. The dems who support him also think highly of Hillary. And the group that supports Bernie who hate Hillary go with trump as their 2nd choice. Well I only know 2 of those. The rest are dems who don't hate Hillary.
I support HRC, then OMalley then Bernie but I think all if them are decent people. Why would I become unhinged over Bernie? If he wins the nomination, I'm going to vote for him. I try to ignore the hate coming from supporters unless they post something so funny it makes me lol.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
10. When have we called Clinton a rapist?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:52 PM
Oct 2015

A protector of pedophiles?
A segregationist?
Accused her of being bought and sold by a foreign nation?

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
78. so 4 people
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:40 PM
Oct 2015

And I only recognized on name, means that all Clinton supporters called Bernie a racist?

No myself I think the person who posted the op in order to stir things up and cause more divisions here on DU is the problem. Why make a an obvious flame bait thread unless you want to cause problems?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
79. Who said "all Clinton supporters called Bernie a racist"?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:43 PM
Oct 2015

And I think all of us should start ignoring the flamebait, myself included.

It just leads to more division, hidden posts and burned bridges.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
151. Now there's a DUer who deserves respect.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:40 AM
Nov 2015

You don't see cali going to another website and whining about how persecuted she is on DU or stalking and launching attacks on other members.

She's one tough cookie.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
119. I posted the links downthread, I thought maybe they were invisible or something.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:40 PM
Oct 2015

Bernie Derangement Syndrome isn't a myth.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
123. Nope and it appears to be quite catchy. Might even be deadly since it makes people vote
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:42 PM
Oct 2015

against themselves and their future.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
126. DU loved Bernie until he challenged Hillary.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:45 PM
Oct 2015

Since he announced he's become a vile monster who hates women, children, minorities and apple pie.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
13. Yes, it's certainly possible to make comparisons.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:58 PM
Oct 2015

Who knows, perhaps some passing undecided voter will read your OP and copy the general sense of the squeaky freakishness exhibited by the Tea Party and paste it wholesale onto their internal map of People Who Aren't Convinced by Hillary.

I have to say I think it's rather unlikely. The two groups aren't very similar.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
96. Refresh our memories... who was it who called Hillary "morally depraved"...
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:15 PM
Oct 2015

and a "proven liar"? Oh, one more: "a lying, pandering fighter" for herself.

Three guesses, and none of them are Sanders supporters.

neverforget

(9,437 posts)
157. You seemed to think in 2008 that Clinton was racist
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:21 AM
Nov 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5168167&mesg_id=5168234
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Ah therein lies the conundrum...
hypothetically if she gets the nom with her racist smears how is going to win the ge without the Black vote or those of us who abhor her racist, extortionist candidacy?

R B Garr

(16,993 posts)
17. YUP
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:04 PM
Oct 2015

That kind of talk won't fly with the general public and it's one of the main reasons I knew I could not be associated with Sanders. No thanks.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
20. When you have NOTHING to attack a candidate with ...
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:22 PM
Oct 2015

calling his supporters "deranged as TeaBaggers" just has too do.

THIS ^ is what is really sad

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
31. Can you imagine Clinton literally shouting
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:37 PM
Oct 2015

at BLM protestors and lecturing them that they need to listen to her?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
39. Yeah. I can imagine doing it myself if you wanna get technical.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:45 PM
Oct 2015

People always yell at protestors, I have no idea why I should not expect them to get yelled at.
Confession time. I yell anytime I feel like it. I stand on chairs. I will berate large groups of people with no hesitation. You cannot possibly imagine the things I can imagine. Haven't had a fustfight though in about a year and a half, I think I have calmed down very well. Almost saintlike, Imo.

This is how I imagine that meeting yesterday:
Black folks can TRY to yell at other black folks about white supremacy but it has a tendency to get them removed because we are already knowing about that and discussing it as we speak so kindy join the meeting without yelling cause it's be nice if we joined together and we got Usher here and John Lewis so we wanna kinda have this meeting on racial profiling. Thx.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
61. It's bizarre
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:21 PM
Oct 2015

It takes some seriously twisted logic to say what is being said. There are those of us who see it and have to make sure we logged into the right place.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
25. I can understand he desperation of some people who see Bernie's candidacy as the last hope
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:29 PM
Oct 2015

for us to turn away from Empire and toward a more connected and sustainable world. I agree with this assessment, although not with the most extreme attacks on Clinton. But for you to equate their legitimate fear with the derangement of the teabaggers is wrong, for the reason that our country and the world sorely need a new connectedness rather than a right-wing dystopia.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
130. And who is stoking that "fear"?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:54 PM
Oct 2015

Who is encouraging people to believe that Bernie is their last hope? Who is preaching that the middle-class will be financially ruined, that corporations will take over the country, that we will all find ourselves living in a state of perpetual war if "the other candidate" gets elected?

Who is promoting the idea that the nefarious powers-that-be in the gov't, the media, the Democratic Party, the polling companies, et al, are all conspiring against one candidate, and are acting at the behest of "the other candidate"?

Who keeps telling people that their "last hope" candidate is constantly being persecuted, and that any political figure who endorses that "other candidate" has been bought-and-paid-for, has "caved", and is actually "against the People" - despite their well-known history of championing the rights of "the People" throughout their careers?

It seems obvious that "the legitimate fear" of which you speak is more a matter of fear being deliberately instilled rather than a fear being based on the facts.

It is a sad reality that some people are easily led - and nothing draws them together more than the power of manufactured fear.






Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
135. Let me guide you toward some reading; or, in the happy event you've read them, let's talk:
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:11 AM
Nov 2015

Gar Alperovitz, Gus Speth, David Korten, Richard Wolff.

What do you think about what these guys (oh, for some balance, let's add Naomi Klein) are saying?

Before I can accept this "manufactured fear" concept, I need to remind you that all serious writers about the future (see above) are agreed that a real system change is in order and long overdue. These are not wild-eyed lefties, but people who understand that a connected, sustainable and sustaining world is the only survivable kind. They universally call for the dismantling of the financial system that has brought us to this brink, and the election of one who at least acknowledges this corrupt system is but a starting place for the work we've got to do.

"Manufactured fear?"

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
139. Nice dodge ...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:19 AM
Nov 2015

... but no cigar.

There is only one candidate whose supporters are promoting the idea of him being "their last hope" - lest war, famine, pestilence and death befall them if the "other candidate" wins.

That is "manufactured fear". And very obviously so.

And suggesting reading material by "serious writers" does not change that fact.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
146. Those plagues are surely on the way, and Bernie's candidacy won't stop them, as he
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:23 AM
Nov 2015

acknowledges. What must happen is what he says: a better, more involved and democratic politics. He is NOT sufficient to turn it around, but absolutely necessary in my opinion.

Clinton is truly more of the same, and will NOT call for or even allow a new politics. Many people know this, and in their legitimate, not manufactured, fear, sometimes crank up the hyperbole. They know their candidate's chances are slim as those of our planet, so perhaps you can cut 'em a little slack. They're not going to hurt Hillary.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
152. I'm not worried about anyone "hurting Hillary" at all.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:40 AM
Nov 2015

That doesn't change the fact that fear-mongering seems to be the focus of one candidate's supporters - and that candidate isn't Hillary.

It's a topic you seem to want to avoid - and I can understand why.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
188. You don't seem to want ...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 06:35 PM
Nov 2015

... to address what I've said.

Which candidate's supporters are using fear to motivate people to vote for him?

What's funny is all of the posters here who, when reminded how important having a Dem in the White House because of upcoming SCOTUS nominees, immediately cry that they won't give in to that "fear tactic" and vote for HRC if she's the nominee.

But then those same people post that Bernie is "the last chance" to save us all from inevitable doom - and don't even see the irony in doing so.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
191. The peril IS real, and many supporters ARE overreacting. And it's understandable.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 09:02 PM
Nov 2015

Without the benefit of big money, big endorsements, big media, they feel bereft. I get that. They see Hillary as a supreme danger, and I have to agree: she's the very wrong direction at this time for us and for the world, but she will most likely prevail.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
192. According to the polls ...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 09:22 PM
Nov 2015

... MOST Democrats support HRC. Now, if you want to characterize all of those voters as "seeing Hillary as a supreme danger" who are nonetheless supporting her candidacy, you can peddle that. But it flies in the face of logic and common sense.

The number one mistake, IMHO, BS supporters have made from day one is their focus on what's wrong with Hillary, as opposed to what's right with Bernie.

Given BS's stagnating poll numbers, his fans have now moved on to using the fear factor - the world will come to an end if Bernie is NOT elected. Democracy as we know it will vanish, we will live in a constant state of war, your children will be sent to die in the Middle East - yadda, yadda.

What BS's supporters are doing is trying to make HRC appear to be evil incarnate, instead of trying to promote the positives (such as they are) of a Senders presidency.

And if you've seen the poll numbers, it's pretty apparent that this tack isn't working.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
193. Most voters, Dems included, are low info. This is just how it is.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 09:30 PM
Nov 2015

The dangers of our course of Empire and the attending planetary crises have been on some people's radar long before Bernie announced. They see his candidacy as a faint hope, even fainter now as you point out.

I don't argue with you about the politics. You just don't acknowledge the bigger problem.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
195. Oh, I fully acknowledge ...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 09:37 PM
Nov 2015

... that we as a nation are facing enormous problems. That's why I want someone with vast experience in both domestic and foreign affairs steering the ship of state.

NanceGreggs

(27,819 posts)
197. We need an experienced captain ...
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 10:20 PM
Nov 2015

... who has consistently navigated treacherous waters and lived to tell the tale.

You can characterize HRC as a "Disney cruise ship" from now until next November. The FACT is that the vast majority of Democrats see things differently - and you can ignore that FACT all you want.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
198. I disagree with some of your basic assumptions, but I hope
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 11:29 PM
Nov 2015

we can agree to do so.

I do recommend the writers I mentioned up thread; it's really all about a paradigm shift, as they say, but this time really and truly.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
187. Princeton Study Declares U.S. government an Oligarchy
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:20 PM
Nov 2015
http://truthinmedia.com/princeton-study-declares-u-s-government-an-oligarchy/

Not that that matters to some who are more than willing to give up their freedoms for a promise of something shiny.

Cha

(297,753 posts)
161. I just don't understand the "desperation" of the BS supporters.. if they have such a great
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 04:19 AM
Nov 2015

candidate why do they try to shut down discussion?

I've seen it too many times.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
166. It's because they see this great candidate shut out by
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 07:56 AM
Nov 2015

a system that is not going to change (because the system is in control.) Do you still not understand?

Cha

(297,753 posts)
177. I don't alert on people and try to get them a hide and when they have 5 hides they're on a
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:28 PM
Nov 2015

forced vacation.. for however long.

It's happened to a lot of my friends.

You just got kicked out of a private group.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
179. I was referring more to the attempts of Clinton supporters here to shut down discussion
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:32 PM
Nov 2015

On the basis that no-one else but Clinton can win the nomination.

Sorry if you've had people alert stalking you and your friends, I think people forget sometimes we're all on the same side.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
32. Do you have links for those deranged claims?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:40 PM
Oct 2015

Without links you got nothing. So put up or shut up bmus.


Oh wait.

Never mind.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
30. There are a large number of non-Democrats here.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:33 PM
Oct 2015

Many admit it. They have an anti-Democratic Party agenda.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
33. In what way do they have this agenda? Is it possible they seek to move the party closer
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:40 PM
Oct 2015

to Democratic ideals? How can you tell a given anti-Hillary post is from a non-Democrat?

pnwmom

(108,999 posts)
109. There have been many Green party members here in the past and your screen name
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:32 PM
Oct 2015

could suggest you are more of a Green and less of a Democrat.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
115. This is my name. I ran for office in 2012 on the ballot with Barack Obama,
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:36 PM
Oct 2015

as a Democrat. That establishes my credentials, but I'm one who supports Bernie Sanders because he's the best thing the Democratic Party could hope for to regain what tattered credibility they have since the decline beginning with Hillary's husband.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
42. So doing what is right for the country
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:48 PM
Oct 2015

is an 'anti-Democratic Party agenda'?

Well, I guess so if you are the third way.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
36. Attacks or criticism?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:41 PM
Oct 2015

When somebody posts, "Hillary is only running to benefit herself," that's an attack. When somebody posts, "Clinton has not been consistent on some issues," that's a criticism. We could do without the attacks. I know many people would like to see the criticism stop, as well. In fact, there have been suggestions that we refrain from any criticism, since Sanders stands no chance, and Clinton will be the nominee. Of course, Clinton isn't helping herself when she fires little flaming arrows toward Sanders, like the "sexism" suggestion. She would be better off pretending Sanders is already toast. Sanders' supporters here on DU would be better off not drawing so many "obvious conclusions" regarding Clinton's honesty and character.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
48. There's plenty of deranged bullshit posted about Bernie too.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:57 PM
Oct 2015

Both Bernie & Hillary have, at best can be described as over enthusiastic supporters.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
143. I'll take that bet.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:17 AM
Nov 2015

And either way, she will get a damn sight closer than Sanders could ever hope to.

Response to NYC Liberal (Reply #143)

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
75. Yeah we're just fucking crazy,crazy,crazy....................
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:35 PM
Oct 2015

I guess we're not good enough to vkte for Clinton, so many will proably sit this out....I know Du just a small speck in the universe.

But this attitude is pissing off a whole of other specks and you will need every goddamn vote you can get on November!

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
144. "you will need every goddamn vote you can get on November!"
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:19 AM
Nov 2015

I'm not running for office, so I don't need any votes.

If your vote for president is based on other peoples' "attitude" and not what's good for the country -- well then I don't even know what to say, except good luck.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
164. The collectve "you"
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 06:14 AM
Nov 2015

It's not based on that solely, and if it comes to that, personally, I'll once again yield to the extortion and grudgingly support the Dem candidate on voting day to keep the GOP out of there.

But if the collective "you" once again chooses to marginalize those who want something better than the same old corporatism crap, and be condescending and dismissive, you're going to lose a hell of a lot of support and enthusiasm, and ,help usher in the GOP once again anyway.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
52. Sure we do.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:13 PM
Oct 2015

You still aren't going to beat me up for my lunch money.



Anything but the adults talking about financial reform, pushing a platform that Americans can get affordable healthcare, and making our veterans that come back wounded can be supported, too.

Anything but the adults talking about NAFTA, the TPP and how the prior stripped us of jobs, how the latter will strip everybody of price controls and left at the mercy of pharmaceutical companies.

Bernie opposes the TPP. He wants to jail bankers that committed crimes against the American people. He wants our government to take some accountability and help the people they sent off to war.

He wants the opportunity for people to get an education and make it affordable so students don't graduate drowning in debt.

How ANYBODY can be against those goals astounds me. Hillary for damn sure isn't for them. Why are you supporting her very own statement that attending college should cost you an arm and a leg and cripple you for decades once you graduate?

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
53. It's called an election
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:15 PM
Oct 2015

People get behind their candidate and do as much as they can to help their candidate get elected. Both sides will say negative things about the challenger. Get used to it....it's politics.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
73. Ever heard of projection? The losing candidate's
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:33 PM
Oct 2015

supporters constantly cast themselves as victims. Somebody call the whaambulance

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
170. I think they mean the Nomination. Apparently, the more people get to know....
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 10:10 AM
Nov 2015

Hillary, the better they like her!

frylock

(34,825 posts)
174. Right, and that's why the DNC is showcasing her in all these debates.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:30 PM
Nov 2015

Because the more people see of Hillary, the more they like her. That was proven in 2008.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
182. She came very close to winning a race with one of the finest natural candidates in a century!
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:16 PM
Nov 2015

And in the interim she has added Secretary Of State to her resume and now she is running against a yelling Socialist who isn't even a party member.

I think Hillary and her supporters would enthusiastically endorse more debates. She is an excellent debater and she has a broad base of knowledge. If the DNC doesn't want more debates it's not helping Hillary. She won the first one hands down according to everyone but Bernie's small but prolific group of internet campaigners.

I am more interested in getting this over with so that Hillary can start running again the nominated republican.

Debates! Yes let's have some more! Hillary's polls go up whenever she is under attack!

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
194. Not me! I would love to see Hillary win more debates.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 09:30 PM
Nov 2015

The good news for Hillary is that the pukes know that she is the candidate that they will have to run against in the general. They all challenge her in their debates. This gives her a chance to reply in the press with rebuttals . Maybe you can try to get any republican candidate to take Bernie seriously and attack him. Then he might get some attention too. I don't think it's going to happen but it's worth a try! It's more likely that they will try to make a spoiler out of him and say nice things. That's not really newsworthy.

As far as the DNC is concerned, it's their money to spend as they please. I don't think much of it comes from the far left Dems. They seem to have historically hated the DNC. Bernie did not have to run as a Democrat. He chose to.

bullwinkle428

(20,631 posts)
62. You would know that Hillary is left of Che Guevara, if you've spent
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:21 PM
Oct 2015

one iota of time at any site where right-wingers post with any regularity.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
70. Booga Booga
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:31 PM
Oct 2015

Sorry we're just fucking CRAZZEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY!

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
72. "Feel the Bern" as a slogan conjurs up images of being attacked with a hot poker by your angry old
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:33 PM
Oct 2015

uncle....one of many poor campaign choices made.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
81. Well that's because we support an angry old uncle wih a hot poker
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:45 PM
Oct 2015

so it's only logical.

I apologize that the Sanders campaign has not had the same resources provided by Wall St. Corporate Insiders to engage the services of high priced marketing/markting/polling firms to come up with a better slogan, omparable to that memorable one for Clinton....er what is her slogan again?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
83. How about "Progress for Progressives" or "Sanders for the Future".....my compliments.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:51 PM
Oct 2015

Any other generic slogan would be competitive with FTB....sounds kind of demanding of others, as in "FTB....or else!"

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
76. Getting desperate i see
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:38 PM
Oct 2015

Now us sanders supporters are just like the tea party

First we were a bunch of racists.then we were sexists.

Skittles

(153,204 posts)
80. AGREED
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:43 PM
Oct 2015

anti-Hillary hysteria is WAY over the top and I say this as someone who has not been a fan since her IWR vote

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
82. HRC supporters beware
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:50 PM
Oct 2015

the alerters are prowling tonight- Figure if they can't win they can try to shut us down

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
85. Well, I'm anti Clinton and am definetly deranged
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:53 PM
Oct 2015

I kinda hate to see the country repeat the same old patterns that got us into the mess we are on.

God Save the Corporate States of America.

(But I'm still calm and rational in the 3D world.)

In a more serious vein,it is not one-sided "unhinged" behavior. Some of this "hysteria" is a feedback loop between suppoters of both sides. Like the rather insulting and provocative OP here. One gets a little tired of hearing that shit.

And one gets a little frustrated that all criticisms, including serious raising of issues, are labeled as eitehr "whining" or unhinged."

Go ahead and kick my ass if you want.


 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
89. Any simpleton can say a thing is true: look at the W Bush administration.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:57 PM
Oct 2015

They put the freaking words they wanted you to believe on a backdrop behind whichever admin criminal was speaking.

Now if you wish to be taken as a serious individual, and not a propagandist or pot-stirrer, you'll need to get busy fleshing out your comparison between the left and the baggers. Last I checked, you're more closely aligned to them than I am, so it's going to require some explanation. You wanted to post. You pulled up a blank page so that you could. Now say something.

90. Attacks and providing legitimate criticisms are not the same.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:57 PM
Oct 2015

By the same token I imagine a lot of people will be turned off to politics if Hillary is handed the nomination without proper vetting.

My wish is that everyone keeps things civil and factual.

betsuni

(25,660 posts)
93. It's deranged to think that if she becomes president, HRC is going to leap out of a Trojan Pantsuit
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:04 PM
Oct 2015

and be worse than the worst Republican. On her first day she'll start a few wars and reintroduce the draft, slash SS and Medicare, raise the retirement age, send more jobs overseas, all the usual bad things and many many more, not because she has to but because she wants to. Just as they've said for all these years that Obama wants to. How many damn times can a person be wrong? You'd think they'd notice it after awhile.

But it's never going away, is it.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
102. Don't forget she will sell our children to Goldman Sacks and donate the money to the Clinton
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:25 PM
Oct 2015

Foundation.

sus453

(164 posts)
95. I can't speak for others,
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:06 PM
Oct 2015

. . . but I want to vote for a real and progressive Democrat. Hillary has some good qualities, but she has
always been, and continues to be, a corporate Democrat and a war monger. In the primaries I'll vote for someone who did not vote to go support Bush's war in Iraq (I don't for a second believe she was misled - she had all the information the rest of us had), who did not help push us into a no-win situation in Libya, who does not engage in dangerous saber rattling against Iran and the Palestinians. I'll vote for someone who does not get most of their funds from super pacs, and someone who did not spend time on the board of directors for WalMart.

Is that derangement? Is that related to the willful ignorance and neofascism of the Tea Party?

It seems like perhaps the original poster wanted to start a confrontation among us. I don't think we need to fall for this.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
100. No derangement...
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:21 PM
Oct 2015

She's just getting called out for the lies, personal attacks and of course her flip flops/"evolutions".

If she would pick a position and stand by it, right or wrong, she wouldn't be called out.

Broward

(1,976 posts)
105. Your post is deranged.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:28 PM
Oct 2015

Btw, as a Hillary supporter, your ideology is more closely aligned with the Tea Party than Sanders supporters.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
117. Wait, just days ago HRC supporters were mocking Sander and his supporters for complaining about
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:38 PM
Oct 2015

attacks, real attacks, smear mongering attacks that had no basis in reality.

Now you are complaining about some nonexistent attacks that you have fabricated? I have seen not one "deranged" attack on Hillary.

More projection from irrational Hillary supporters... *yawn*

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
128. Psychological projection is a defense mechanism
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:49 PM
Oct 2015

people subconsciously employ in order to cope with difficult feelings or emotions.

Psychological projection involves projecting undesirable feelings or emotions onto someone else, rather than admitting to or dealing with the unwanted feelings.

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
129. Hillary is center right establishment.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:53 PM
Oct 2015

She would start a war with Iran if she thought it would get her votes.

She wouldn't even stand up for gay rights until the polls said at least 50% of Americans already did, even though at least 9 countries had already legalized gay marriage.

Support her all you want but she is the worst type of politician.

If elected I hope she uses her political skills to do some actual good for us, rather than being worried about a second term. I doubt it.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
131. It's like the horse shoe theory.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:05 AM
Nov 2015

The DUers in question and the TP may be political opposites (except for any undercover TP trolls here), yet they behave the same. They use similar tactics when it comes to their causes and against anyone they perceive to be their political adversaries (including HC and Pres. Obama), they're vocal minorities off-line, they decry the so-called "establishment", and they pay little/no heed to checks-and-balances. HC isn't my #1 choice, but I have nothing against her and would have no problems voting for her in a general election. She did a good job as a Senator and as SOS, and I know her agenda would be much different and much superior to anything that any of the R's have to offer.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
134. Facts Are Facts
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 12:08 AM
Nov 2015

Hillary takes so much money from Wall Street to reign in Wall Street. She has taken in too much cash from the War/Security Apparatus to hamper the perpetual war machine.

She is just too entrenched in the ways of the DLC. She is comfortably better than all the republicans except maybe Kasich but not enough to impress true progressives.

Sooner or later the transfer of cash from the 98/99 % to the 1/2% has to stop and reverse, we need a new FDR, not another third way Dem.

I still am amazed that the rabid HRC crowd is so in love of Hillary they cannot comprehend the truth or just don't wish to.

Too each his or her own. As a she I am anxious to see a woman in the WH, but not any woman. Elizabeth Warren would have me in her camp in no time. But Hillary is no Elizabeth a Warren, she is more like a female Chris Dodd.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
186. Complete with the RW language
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 03:47 PM
Nov 2015

"Race card"
"Sexist card"
"Race baiting"
"Race nagger"

I've never seen so much RW "sharing" here in all of my 10 years.

What's up with that??

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
165. hmm
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 06:42 AM
Nov 2015

How dare people question candidates on issues

I have seen HRC supporters called other democrats " loony left" , far left ", "unhinged" something I expected from Rush, Levin or Hannity.

You want Sanders supporters to play nice ,while HRC supporters attack him and his potions; sorry you don't put your hands in the viper's den and not anticipate getting bit.



 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
168. It makes no sense to be unfair to Clinton.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 08:23 AM
Nov 2015

There are so many good reasons to prefer Sanders. A few examples:

Sanders wants to remove marijuana from the federal scheduling system altogether. Clinton has not even said that she wants it taken off the Schedule I list. She wants more research.
Clinton voted to authorize Bush to wage war in Iraq should he judge that the “threat” posed by Iraq warranted it. Sanders voted no on the Iraq War Resolution.
Clinton wanted an even bigger surge in Afghanistan.
Clinton supported regime change in Libya, with disastrous results. Sanders opposed going to war in Libya.
Sanders has a history of being honest, Clinton has been caught being dishonest on many occasions.
Sanders is opposed to all capital punishment, Clinton is not.
Clinton worked behind the scenes to help consolidate the coup in Honduras.
Clinton said that refugee minors who fled violence in Honduras and other parts of Central America should be sent back as soon as their parents are found. She said this even though a large percentage of those refugees had a right to seek asylum, and that process requires staying in the United States for months or even years.
Clinton voted to build a wall along the US-Mexican border, and once said that she is “against illegal immigrants.”
Clinton supports raising the cap for the H1B visa program for tech workers which would further undermine tech wages in the USA and cause unemployment among American tech workers.
Clinton said that TPP “sets the gold standard” for trade agreements.
Clinton supported DOMA and has recently received the honor of four pinocchios from the Washington Post for her distortions in trying to make excuses for her vote.
Clinton opposed marriage equality until 2013.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
169. Got that right.. almost word for word in many cases.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 08:41 AM
Nov 2015

I often listen to RW loon radio during my commute and its nearly the same crap I hear here on a daily basis. The DU left and RW loons seem to have the same agenda and same lack of intellectual thinking.. I assume due to their profound political bias.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
171. "Hillary Clinton Beats Up Old Man"
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 10:12 AM
Nov 2015

You mean to tell me you think that headline might be a case of ratfucking, or worse?

Lol

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
175. Funny
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:06 PM
Nov 2015

I was thinking the Hillary supporters are like the teaparty - vote against their best interest.

No more of the same!

She might paint the walls and put in some cheap new carpet - she might even do a little landscaping (with plants that add no real value to the environment) - She will never address the foundation problems.

She is the problem - not a real solution.

Wake up america - the house is coming down.

TheSarcastinator

(854 posts)
180. ah, an ad hominem attack on critics through the use of a false analogy: nice try
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 01:41 PM
Nov 2015

So those who criticize Clinton for supporting the invasion of Iraq are "just like the Tea Party"? Allrighteythen, brave cultural critic. Carry on.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
181. one of Sanders supporters posted a whole bunch of rabid links from the Clinton crazies.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 02:03 PM
Nov 2015

Where are yours?

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
189. What a coincidence. I happen to think the same thing of some of those who attack Bernie. I think
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 06:43 PM
Nov 2015

we are both correct.

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)
190. Clinton simply takes too much corporate money to believe she will not govern for the top 1%.
Sun Nov 1, 2015, 08:07 PM
Nov 2015

What in the world is deranged about assuming politicians look out for their biggest campaign contributors?

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
199. UnRec!
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 02:30 PM
Nov 2015

...for posting unsupported attacks on members of DU.
Anyone could say the same about the rabid Hillary supporters.
This OP is meant to stir shit because the poster has nothing else,
and needs some attention today.

Ron Green

(9,823 posts)
200. For the 200th post in this thread, I'll again say HIT AND RUN!
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 04:59 PM
Nov 2015

Whoever made this pathetic OP never again posted in the thread.

Cowardly, or just lazy?

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
202. oh please
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 05:28 PM
Nov 2015

some people indeed may be rabid, but you cannot put the equation (people who have concerns about hillary) = (teabaggers) because if that is done, everyone gets demonized. Someone who si worried about her eagerness to go to Syria, where we could actually trigger a WAR WITH RUSSIA is not the same as some teabagger chanting "benghazi!"

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The attacks against Hilla...