Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 02:35 PM Aug 2012

Beware of being snowed by meaningless documents.

Maybe there's something nefarious in those 950 pages (it's probably not those companies that were started after his retirement, however, because his retirement agreement gave him an interest in companies started up to 10 years after he left.)

Or maybe, those 950 pages are supposed to inoculate him against further calls for even MORE papers -- i.e. his tax returns. I can hear them saying: "They've read 950 pages and have found nothing! And now they want even more documents! They'll never be satisfied."

THESE ARE THE WRONG DOCUMENTS. WE NEED TO SEE THE TAX RETURNS.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

cleduc

(653 posts)
3. I agree about the warning to be careful
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 02:59 PM
Aug 2012

and that the tax returns are ideal.

But we're not going to see the tax returns.

However, some of those documents might have clues that lead to other stuff that disproves his claims or may help to keep the story in the media. So I'm not complaining about their release

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
4. I'm not complaining. People shouldn't be making a big deal out of this though
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 03:15 PM
Aug 2012

when we don't know if the documents are 1) real or 2) important.

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
5. This is HUGE: Romney's IRA contains an entity that did not even exist until 2008!
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 03:21 PM
Aug 2012

My post from ian62's earlier thread, at
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1187132 :

I had thought that Romney's $100 million IRA must have come from huge valuation gains on low-valuation contributions of his original Bain Capital stock. This would have been a borderline fraudulent piece of accounting at best.

But apparently, Romney's IRA contains at least one entity that did not even exist until 2008! IMO, unless the IRA bought those shares on the open market, that CANNOT be anything except tax fraud, because only employee compensation of a few thousand dollars a year can constitute a legal IRA or 401K contribution. Romney must be treating shares of post-2002 Bain investment creations as stock dividends on his original Bain shares, or else rolling over new Bain entities that somehow got into Bain 401Ks as post-2002 employee compensation valued below $15,000 a year.

From http://gawker.com/5936873 :

Romney has long claimed, despite evidence to the contrary, that he retired from Bain Capital in 1999. The Bain documents we obtained indicate that his involvement with the company extended years past that date. ...

Sankaty Credit Opportunities IV-—of which Romney owns more than $1 million in his IRA and which earned him between $50,000 and $100,000 in 2011, and which is likewise described as an investment made pursuant to his retirement package-—wasn't even created until July 2008. That's nine years after his retirement from Bain and five months after he withdrew from the 2008 GOP primary.

... it's difficult to explain an apparent $1 million-plus payment from Bain, made in 2008, as being pursuant to a retirement package that was negotiated in 1999."

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
6. Not really. His retirement agreement gave him ownership interest
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 05:22 PM
Aug 2012

in new Bain entities created within 10 years of his retirement. Why couldn't that have gone into his IRA account?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Beware of being snowed by...