Why Romney Won’t Strike Iran
Republican foreign-policy circles have hailed Mitt Romneys choice of Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan as his running-mate, noting that he believes in free trade, a strong defense, and is thinking seriously about China. Moreover, unlike the current resident of the White House, Ryan is an unabashed advocate of American exceptionalism. A world without U.S. leadership will be a more chaotic place, Ryan said in a speech delivered to the Alexander Hamilton Society last June. A place where we have less influence, and a place where our citizens face more dangers and fewer opportunities. Take a moment and imagine a world led by China and Russia.
But lets ask a practical question: How does Ryans selection affect Romneys calculation in what is if not the most important foreign-policy issue for an American president, certainly the most pressingthe decision to use military force against Irans nuclear weapons facilities?
The answer: It doesnt.
During Romneys trip to Israel last month, campaign adviser Dan Senor said: If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision. But thats an important hedge, and it throws into sharp relief the real truth: A Republican president is no more likely than a Democrat to stage a pre-emptive attack on Iran, and American support for an Israeli attack is the very best that Israeli leaders can hope to expect from the White House, regardless of which party inhabits it.
The explanation is based on three interrelated factors: domestic American politics, Washingtons history with the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the U.S. record of containing and deterring nuclear powers.
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/109873/why-romney-wont-strike-iran