2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNate Silver (538) says Colorado model DOESN'T predict Romney win...
Nate Silver @fivethirtyeight
It's late, so I'll be blunt: I saw their paper and I think there are glaring problems with their methodology. (2/5)
Nate Silver @fivethirtyeight
The U. of Colo. model fits the equivalent of 7 unknowns to 8 elections. That's not a good idea. (3/5)
Nate Silver @fivethirtyeight
The Colo. model also assumes huge effects from unemployment if incumbent is a Dem., but none if he's GOP. Hard claim to defend. (4/5)
Nate Silver @fivethirtyeight
Also, it's false advertising to claim CU model has predicted the last 8 elections right. It's a new model. Hasn't predicted anything yet.
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight
hlthe2b
(102,279 posts)predictive modeling
still_one
(92,192 posts)Or destruction of social security and medicare plus a lot of other issues
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)The CU researchers are smoking too much crack.
They keep forgetting one key factor: Republican obstructionism.
LiberalFighter
(50,931 posts)They are sniffing their ass.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)And marijuana will be legal!
Just bought some Vanilla Kush.. really good quality stuff...
longship
(40,416 posts)You shoot at the side of a barn, then paint a target around the bullet hole.
I think that describes the methodology fairly well.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Hopefully he'll post more on the blog.
marlakay
(11,468 posts)And registered to vote yesterday. She is for Obama.
she is in monument area. Her husband is in air force but he is keeping residency in Texas because of low taxes and fees.
She told me she is excited after all these years of her vote doing nothing in Texas to vote in a swing state.
SILVER__FOX52
(535 posts)but hearing it from Nate Silver is great. We're going to see a lot of " swift boating " nonsense this Election, i.e. silly Polls, Rumors, etc. Don't believe anything you read a first blush. The right-wing Crazies are going to ramp-up their clutter and lies.