Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'd like to award Bernie Sanders a pair of used Flip Flops (Original Post) Renew Deal Nov 2015 OP
Did you or anyone see the debate JackInGreen Nov 2015 #1
Yes. That's the point Renew Deal Nov 2015 #12
As soon as he left the stage JackInGreen Nov 2015 #15
I saw that he botched the line Renew Deal Nov 2015 #17
Then we saw very different things JackInGreen Nov 2015 #18
Funny how saying "The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails!" got Snotcicles Nov 2015 #31
Well of COURSE JackInGreen Nov 2015 #32
It's a trusted method that the practiced use to trick the easily tricked. nt Snotcicles Nov 2015 #38
Cherry picking. As usual. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #23
Are they Hillary's? mmonk Nov 2015 #2
Welcome back. MineralMan Nov 2015 #3
It did MM. And thanks. mmonk Nov 2015 #9
Usual tactic JackInGreen Nov 2015 #5
They're worn by every politician Blue_Adept Nov 2015 #6
No, they're Rainbow sandals, not Stuart Weitzman sandals. eom NorthCarolina Nov 2015 #19
Wasn't someone here trashed for saying Sanders..... NCTraveler Nov 2015 #4
He didn't change his mind. He still thinks other issues are more important. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #7
^^THIS^^ JackInGreen Nov 2015 #8
Exactly! you can watch the WSJ remarks and judge for yourself. femmedem Nov 2015 #22
Whenever something is off protocol, it should be scrutinized. mmonk Nov 2015 #10
Is the FBI looking into Benghazi now? ctsnowman Nov 2015 #11
It's all the same thing. Renew Deal Nov 2015 #13
No the FBI is not investigating Benghazi ctsnowman Nov 2015 #14
Email came from Benghazi Renew Deal Nov 2015 #16
Clinton put public business on her private server- ish of the hammer Nov 2015 #20
They like to bundle it remember? JackInGreen Nov 2015 #25
They are not investigating Clinton n/t emulatorloo Nov 2015 #46
hey, works for me- ish of the hammer Nov 2015 #48
Wow, Benghazi is so powerful it went back in time and set up an email server!! (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #24
Neither the State and Intelligence Inspectors General nor the FBI are involved with TwilightGardener Nov 2015 #44
No. They are completely separate issues. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #45
Nope. Dead wrong. Two separate issues, but Clinton would sure love us all TwilightGardener Nov 2015 #42
Actually, they are investigating neither. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #37
So revealing Bernin4U Nov 2015 #21
I really don't blame the senator. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #26
He's really getting desperate. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #27
It's not a tired attack. Fawke Em Nov 2015 #39
. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #47
I have steered clear of any criticism of Bernie in the past, but if he oasis Nov 2015 #28
He has clearly flip flopped by not changing his position in the slightest.. Kentonio Nov 2015 #29
His position on what? We are talking e-mails here, correct? oasis Nov 2015 #49
We're talking about the committee/media obsession JackInGreen Nov 2015 #51
As I stated in my post, if Bernie goes no further on this, I'll oasis Nov 2015 #56
Be wary JackInGreen Nov 2015 #57
Thanks. (eom) oasis Nov 2015 #59
He did not say anything beyind what Clinton herself has said Armstead Nov 2015 #55
I accept your assesment since I know oasis Nov 2015 #58
Has Sanders has joined the witch hunt or is he practicing working with Republicans? Agnosticsherbet Nov 2015 #30
Adversity doesn't build character... DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #33
And what does agreeing with Clinton and most objectuve observers reveal? Armstead Nov 2015 #52
Yes, he's a politician. Skidmore Nov 2015 #34
The FBI investigation is not the madville Nov 2015 #35
Didn't these flip flops belong to Hillary? n/t Nedsdag Nov 2015 #36
So Hillary supporters silenttigersong Nov 2015 #40
Good thing you did UglyGreed Nov 2015 #41
I think everyone believes a law enforcement investigation should proceed. TwilightGardener Nov 2015 #43
So you think the FBI investigation should end? jfern Nov 2015 #50
Bernie was not talking about the FBI investigation. The FBI is not investigating Hillary. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #61
He was talking about the FBI, and DOJ investigations, which do concern Hillary jfern Nov 2015 #62
No, the FBI and DOJ are not investigating Hillary. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #63
The FBI is investigating, and what they find may or may not concern Hillary jfern Nov 2015 #64
The question was about the media storm created by the Benghazi committee. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #65
You really should catch up on the news Oilwellian Nov 2015 #67
You should catch up on the news. The FBI is not investigating Hillary. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #69
Here's an article that states there is an FBI investigation Oilwellian Nov 2015 #70
The FBI is not investigating Hillary. None of your cites support that. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #72
Those things are nasty and need to be thrown out. N/t azmom Nov 2015 #53
Prolly smell like vinegar. nt Snotcicles Nov 2015 #54
This is complete bullshit Jokerman Nov 2015 #60
Gross Reter Nov 2015 #66
I hope Bernie gets a blow out in them workinclasszero Nov 2015 #68
used? by who? Hillary? 2pooped2pop Nov 2015 #71

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
1. Did you or anyone see the debate
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:41 AM
Nov 2015

Where he was asked about this and clarified on the spot? I keep seeing this posted and I dobt hear any response to that.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
15. As soon as he left the stage
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:04 PM
Nov 2015

He was questioned about it and indicated the context for his statement , did you see that? Or are we cherry picking?

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
18. Then we saw very different things
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:07 PM
Nov 2015

I suggest you rewatch that bit if you can find it. God knows CNN wants to control it.

 

Snotcicles

(9,089 posts)
31. Funny how saying "The American people are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails!" got
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:13 PM
Nov 2015

twisted into some sort of an exoneration. But that's what they do, here on DU.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
32. Well of COURSE
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:15 PM
Nov 2015

No room for nuance and complexity when you're READY. I've never understood how some can turn ambivalence or support over petty matters as a denial of any and all culpability for anything else.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
5. Usual tactic
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:46 AM
Nov 2015

'Attack your opponent for your own failings, say it often, say it loud, marginalize those that argue' I swear there are tulip bulbs here that bud turd blossoms.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
4. Wasn't someone here trashed for saying Sanders.....
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:45 AM
Nov 2015

meant in the debate exactly what he is saying now. It made perfect sense if I remember the op correctly but they were solidly trashed for saying he meant exactly what he is saying now. Seems said op was correct.

femmedem

(8,204 posts)
22. Exactly! you can watch the WSJ remarks and judge for yourself.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:27 PM
Nov 2015
He says the investigation should continue unimpeded, but shouldn't be a focus of the campaign. His remarks are being twisted.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
10. Whenever something is off protocol, it should be scrutinized.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:56 AM
Nov 2015

That's a big difference than wishing to hear the politicization of the private server (namely for conspiracy theories from the right).

ctsnowman

(1,903 posts)
11. Is the FBI looking into Benghazi now?
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:59 AM
Nov 2015

Or did you mix up the email investigation with the Benghazi one.
I thought only the repubs were doing that.

ctsnowman

(1,903 posts)
14. No the FBI is not investigating Benghazi
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:03 PM
Nov 2015

Just the email BS. IMHO both are total BS but they are not the same.

ish of the hammer

(444 posts)
20. Clinton put public business on her private server-
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:14 PM
Nov 2015

The FBI is investigating to see if any laws were broken.
Is that true?
If it's true, it's not an attack.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
25. They like to bundle it remember?
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:32 PM
Nov 2015

If anything discovered while looking into anything else it's invalidated if the initial inquiry is invalidated, hadn't you heard?

ish of the hammer

(444 posts)
48. hey, works for me-
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 04:22 PM
Nov 2015

I'm tired of all this e-mail shit.
although, I'm curious if Dole Foods and Chiquita are contributors to the Clinton campaign or super pacs.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
44. Neither the State and Intelligence Inspectors General nor the FBI are involved with
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:47 PM
Nov 2015

or concerned about Benghazi. They are concerned with how her server was managed/secured and how classified material was handled on it. So yes, they can and have been separated. Your opinion on it matters not at all.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
45. No. They are completely separate issues.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:48 PM
Nov 2015

Benghazi was a trumped up witch hunt by a pack of rabid Republicans hell bent on investigating Clinton and the Obama Administration for any and everything.

Yes, the existence of the private server came out of these hearings, but upon learning this fact, real investigators - the FBI - got involved to determine whether there was classified information on the server and whether the server was properly secured to protect that information.

Two completely separate issues. Hell, the FBI isn't even really investigating "emails," they are investigating the content as it relates to national security.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
37. Actually, they are investigating neither.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:48 PM
Nov 2015

They are investigating if she A. Had any classified or sensitive information on her private server and B. if she did, was the server sufficiently secure enough to protect that information.

I know people keep yelling about "emails," but the investigation isn't really about that. The FBI doesn't give a flying flip about her emailing Ben Afflack's charity or planning Chelsea's wedding. I don't care about that, either.

FWIW, the information doesn't have to be formally classified as "top secret" or "secret" to be considered "sensitive." Sensitive information can include personnel records like an employee's personal information. It's not a state secret, but if it contains medical information, for example, it's considered sensitive under HIPAA laws.

Clinton and many members of her staff certainly had the proper clearance to handle this information, so that's not the issue. The issue is whether a malicious state actor from China or Russia gained access to the server and could possibly have acquired this classified or sensitive information. (Those are the two countries that employee the most hackers - outside of us - for this type of espionage).

And, before someone points out (again) that the dot gov servers have been hacked and wonders why this is a big deal, I'll tell you. Dot gov has layers of security. Someone might have hacked into one portion of the government's servers and gotten some sensitive info (like personnel records), but between the encryption, the logging and monitoring and the other security measures, this hacker would have a very difficult time getting to the classified information.

In her defense, Clinton probably doesn't know much about this type of technology and the security that should surround it, but the people she hired to set the server up should have. From what I've read thus far, however, they either didn't know how to properly secure that server or didn't care. Her role in this mess, however, is that she hired this firm and worked outside of regulated federal channels apparently for convenience.

The FBI probably is also trying to determine if her actions were criminal or simply negligent. I don't know this for a fact since I don't work for the FBI, but as a former crime reporter and, now, the content manager for a cyber security firm that works closely with the FBI, my educated guess is that they are conducting a digital forensics investigation to determine that very issue.

I'm sure someone will slam me since I'm a Bernie supporter, but on this issue, I happen to know what I'm talking about given my background and work history.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
27. He's really getting desperate.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:34 PM
Nov 2015

Resorting to this tired old attack from Republicans tells me all I need to know about the man.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
39. It's not a tired attack.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:06 PM
Nov 2015

The FBI isn't a group of Republican operatives and the FBI is conducting a digital forensics investigation into the security of the server.

All Bernie said is that we should let the FBI do it's job while the campaigns should concentrate on the issues. He said this right after the debate, too. It's not a shift. It's not desperate. It's just fact.

It's not unfathomable to consider that Americans can both be sick of the M$M's hype over the emails instead of focusing on the issues while still holding the belief that the FBI should be allowed to continue its investigation.

What's disingenuous is for Clinton supporters to purposely not "get" the fact that Benghazi and emails are a completely separate issue from the security of her server.

oasis

(49,400 posts)
28. I have steered clear of any criticism of Bernie in the past, but if he
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 12:41 PM
Nov 2015

continues on this course, I will be forced to do a flip flop of my own.

Sad to say, because I really had a lot of respect and admiration for him.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
51. We're talking about the committee/media obsession
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 04:50 PM
Nov 2015

Vs the ongoing FBI investigation. The committees we all know and even he I think has stated were bull. Saying the FBI should continue if they see fit is no flip flop. It's same as he said moments after the debate.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
57. Be wary
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 05:18 PM
Nov 2015

The only further I think he might go is if questioned on it again and I think, given history, he'll shut em down. The stories that might come out of that though you can almost be assured will feature 'trashes' 'flip flops' or 'walks back', just like this has.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
55. He did not say anything beyind what Clinton herself has said
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 04:53 PM
Nov 2015

An FBI investigation is underway. It should be allowed to proceed and be completed according to standard procedure.

He never said she is guilty or accusatory, and he is not hyping it up now. He answered a question. He's just saying the same thing most others say about it.

oasis

(49,400 posts)
58. I accept your assesment since I know
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 05:24 PM
Nov 2015

you to be one of the more reasonable and credible Bernie supporters.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
30. Has Sanders has joined the witch hunt or is he practicing working with Republicans?
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:01 PM
Nov 2015

So much for running a campaign on the issues.

Benghazzi proved to be a Republican Witch Hunt to damage Hillary Clinton.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
52. And what does agreeing with Clinton and most objectuve observers reveal?
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 04:50 PM
Nov 2015

The FBI is conducting an investigation. It will likely determine that nothing illegal happened. It is a law enforcement investigation.

The response by most objective observers say let it be completed. Clinton has said let it be completed.

Sanders did not say anything about whether or not Clinton is Guilty. He simply said an investigation is underway and it should be allowed to tun its course.

OMG! How despicable.

If that is the worst thing that Sanders has ever said or done, I'd suggest he be given a halo.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
34. Yes, he's a politician.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:16 PM
Nov 2015

Career politician. Insider.

And he has feeet of clay. Flipflops are a nice choice.

madville

(7,412 posts)
35. The FBI investigation is not the
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 01:17 PM
Nov 2015

Congressional Benghazi investigation. While the Congressional Benghazi investigation exposed the email scandal, it is it's own independent issue now.

There is no problem with people being tired of hearing Congressional Republicans gripe about Benghazi and emails while still understanding that the FBI investigation is legitimate.

silenttigersong

(957 posts)
40. So Hillary supporters
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:06 PM
Nov 2015

are using the FBI investigation into HRCs server set up as an attack on Bernie Sanders?I thought Sen.Sanders said "Let it play out"any final word from the FBI ?

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
41. Good thing you did
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:11 PM
Nov 2015

not offer to buy Hillary a pair every time she has changed her tune....... We don't have these around for your benefit anymore.


TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
43. I think everyone believes a law enforcement investigation should proceed.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 02:25 PM
Nov 2015

Unless they're afraid of what it will uncover. The email server is an FBI investigation, not a political one. It would be wrong of Bernie or anyone to say it shouldn't be seen to conclusion. Doesn't Hillary want to be exonerated, anyway?

SunSeeker

(51,657 posts)
61. Bernie was not talking about the FBI investigation. The FBI is not investigating Hillary.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 05:37 PM
Nov 2015
In his most explicit critique of Hillary Clinton's email controversy to date, Democratic presidential rival Bernie Sanders told The Wall Street Journal that if the former secretary of state skirted public-records requests or compromised classified information, concerns about the issue are "valid questions."

Asked whether he regretted his remark that the American people are sick of hearing about her "damn emails" during the last debate, Sanders said in the Wednesday interview that he did not and that the investigation should "proceed unimpeded."



Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/bernie-sanders-hillary-email-215548#ixzz3qegH3aVT

SunSeeker

(51,657 posts)
63. No, the FBI and DOJ are not investigating Hillary.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 05:42 PM
Nov 2015

The CIA already said Hillary did not do anything wrong.

The allegations that Hillary did not disclose emails is Trey Gowdy bullshit.

SunSeeker

(51,657 posts)
65. The question was about the media storm created by the Benghazi committee.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 05:51 PM
Nov 2015

That is what generated the media circus over the Clinton email stories and what he said everyone was so damn sick and tired of hearing about. Now Bernie has endorsed that witch hunt of an investigation as "valid." Shameful.


The FBI is not investigating Hillary. Quit repeating bullshit right wing talking points.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
67. You really should catch up on the news
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 06:40 PM
Nov 2015

The WSJ article that has caused this stir also says the following, which was conveniently left out of the smear campaign against Bernie:

Sen. Sanders of Vermont, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, also said the federal investigation of the security surrounding Mrs. Clinton’s private email account is appropriate.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/bernie-sanders-takes-gloves-off-against-hillary-clinton-in-interview-1446684586


There are tons of articles out that discuss the FBI investigation. Obama's Justice Department is carrying it out. That doesn't sound like a right wing conspiracy to me.

SunSeeker

(51,657 posts)
69. You should catch up on the news. The FBI is not investigating Hillary.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 06:46 PM
Nov 2015

The only investigation of Hillary is by the Benghazi committee, an expensive witch hunt. That is investigation that Dems correctly say should be shut down. But Bernie says it should go on "unimpeded." Shameful.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
70. Here's an article that states there is an FBI investigation
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 07:31 PM
Nov 2015

You really should catch up.

WASHINGTON — Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it had been a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Mrs. Clinton’s email setup did in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.

Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server was compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said he had not been trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/17/us/politics/obamas-comments-on-clinton-emails-collide-with-fbi-inquiry.html?_r=0


Oh! Look! Here's another one!


The lengthy Benghazi probe may be behind her, but Hillary Clinton is still facing months of investigation into her emails.

The Democratic presidential front-runner testified for 11 hours last month before the House Select Committee on the deadly attacks in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012 - the same panel that discovered her use of the secret email server earlier this year.

Clinton has faced questions about whether the emails sent through a private server at her New York home was sufficient to ensure the security of sensitive information while she was secretary of state.

The FBI is investigating the security of Clinton's private email setup after classified data was found to have been transmitted over her server.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3299310/Benghazi-probe-Hillary-Clinton-facing-months-FBI-investigation-emails.html#ixzz3qf8NLgGk


There are so many articles written about classified data being found on her server. Your unwillingness to accept that fact, doesn't mean the FBI investigation isn't happening as we speak.

SunSeeker

(51,657 posts)
72. The FBI is not investigating Hillary. None of your cites support that.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:08 PM
Nov 2015

The NY Times has notoriously botched the story of Hillary's emails, claiming that there was a FBI criminal investigation involving them when there never was. I know you could care less, but this video by journalist Kurt Eichenwald explains what the FBI is actually doing better than anything I've seen, and shows the actual IG reports that all these stories are based on.



The IG reports had nothing to do with Hillary's handling of emails while Secretary of State. They were about the State Department FOIA staff's handling of emails for purposes of response to FOIA requests.

And as your Daily Mail article notes:

Former federal prosecutor Peter Zeidenberg told McClatchy: ‘If the emails were not marked, it would not be possible – at least not in my view – to establish that Ms Clinton knowingly mishandled classified information.’


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3299310/Benghazi-probe-Hillary-Clinton-facing-months-FBI-investigation-emails.html#ixzz3qfjPBMve

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
68. I hope Bernie gets a blow out in them
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 06:43 PM
Nov 2015

Like his new allies did on the republican witch hunting committee.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I'd like to award Bernie ...