2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf you are happy with the way your life is going right now, vote for Hillary
Since Hillary said the only thing that would be different in her administration than Obama's is that she is a woman, whatever that meant? But for me and a few million other, seniors, retirees and working class people things aren't going so well and we would like some new ideas.
In the last month I have been notified, thanks to a law that was passed in an add on to the Omnibus spending bill and Obama signed, that my pension was going to be cut 60% next year. Was also notified by Social Security that there would be no cost of living adjustment this year. My wife was notified her already costly $6000 deductible health insurance premium was going to be raised over $150 a month. The only good news, with my loss of income she will qualify her for an AHA subsidy next year. Problem is the only policies that qualify in our area are HMOs and her doctor she has had for over 20 years isn't in their networks.
So I hope you Hillary supporters on here will understand we aren't haters, but are desperate for a government that actually works for us.
The most often used reason I have seen on here if you don't vote for Hillary, a Republican will get elected. In other words, choose the lesser of two evils. I for one hope I don't have to make that choice again and am working for Bernie.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Otherwise we're dirt poor, the landlords trying to sell the house from under us and declining a lease and protections, our wages can't keep up with costs of living (even at over $15), and trying to find anyplace else to live almost means moving so far out of range we wouldn't be able to keep our jobs.
Yeah...
Bernie2016. I can't handle any more status quo. It's Killin us.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Armstead
(47,803 posts)People may be happy with the way their life is going overall, even if there are few glitches.
Also, there are people who are doing well personally, but care about their neighbors who aren't, and who care about larger values of society.
But overall, you are making excellent points.
(And as someone who plans on collecting Social Security in a couple of years I guess I'd better look into those cuts.)
olddots
(10,237 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:38 PM - Edit history (1)
I don't envy their lack of sight and humanity it saddens me more than any love I have lost .
hack89
(39,171 posts)Really? We are talking politicians here, not messiahs. We are talking politics not religion.
It takes a certain type of person to condemn another in such a trivial, casual manner. Religious fundamentalism immediately comes to mind.
senz
(11,945 posts)but I do know that compassion for others -- and the belief that government has a role in assuring the well being of all Americans -- is a fundamental Democratic trait.
Democrats know we can secure our unalienable rights through government -- but not through private corporations.
hack89
(39,171 posts)despite desperate misguided attempts to label us otherwise.
Tea Baggers do, as well.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I suggest anyone interested in doing so read some of Hack89's statements on Muslims, Arabs, and the Palestinian people.
Indeed.
hack89
(39,171 posts)You just think that true Dems are anti-gun and anti-Israel. You just can't stand the fact that yours is a minority view in America.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Is you support for Bernie so strong that you would denigrate others without even asking what they do for humanity?
artislife
(9,497 posts)The two sides are not really that friendly after all.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)issues are facing minorities such as myself, I say great advice.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)That are facing the same cuts in their pensions, Social Security and increases in their health insurance policies that my family is, might not agree with you.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)What happens to them matters to me.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Republicans think private charity is preferable to government assistance in helping disadvantaged Americans get a leg up. This belief is part and parcel of their anti-government, anti-social program, pro-privatization philosophy. Plus, it gives them a chance to crow about how virtuous they are as individuals.
There are extremely good arguments for building a basic safety net into the operations of our government so that all Americans can be secure in having the basics and not have to rely on "charity" to survive.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I am so sure they would rather hear you rail about how anti-government and anti-social programs their Republican parents were instead of having me take out much needed supplies to them each month. In the meantime, I will keep on doing what I know is right and you keep on whining about Hillary supporters.
senz
(11,945 posts)Do you? Seriously ??
The fact that the rest of us don't haul it out to try to win arguments and make ourselves look good doesn't mean we aren't doing it.
You come in loud and clear there, leftofcool.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Wasn't it just you who said something about charity and good works being a Republican thing?
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)that is so gd awful.you serious?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)The last thing the Democratic Party should be advocating is "more of the same."
In the Wisconsin primary, I'll be voting for Bernie Sanders.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)food stamps and doing odd jobs where they could are now employed in good paying jobs, the last one two months ago from a lower paying job. My daughter doing great in her position after three rough years. So yes, my family is doing much better!
TDale313
(7,820 posts)I don't see her challenging the status quo in any meaningful way. She will pay lip service if it's politically advantageous, but no ticking off the real powers that be.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)happy, that is the problem.......
hellraiser69
(49 posts)that not getting a COLA adjustment is really taking a cut in benefits because our cost of living did raise, especially for food, housing and medicine.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Actually, if any group should form a third party, it is they. They are something new and different in American politics and could probably benefit by defining themselves as such. It gets awkward and confusing when they call themselves Democrats.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)The way you lump people together and call them names does you a disservice. Just because someone is not voting for Bernie does not merit you using pejoratives against them. All Democrats are not exactly alike.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)so if you support Hillary for POTUS then I have to come to the conclusion that you support the Third Way.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I'm retired, have an adequate income, in good health, love Medicare, get to travel. The only glitch is that I don't get to see my grown sons as often as I'd like.
But I'm still not voting for Hillary.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But I don't know if it's accurate or not. Most of Team Hillary's people here are part of their operation, so we can't really be sure if they are really doing well or it's just a job. I do get the sense that some people are currently doing ok in the current system and are not interested in changes that might benefit other people- they believe somehow that it could negatively affect them, so you get a fear response.
For me, I've grown up entirely within the Reagan revolution/coup, and it's never worked for me or my family. I've spent years looking at and advocating for alternatives, and the biggest hurdle in my advocacy has always been the people who were afraid of change enough to the point that their response to helping everyone was "Huh? What other people?"
for your thoughtful and insightful response.
Hillary seems to have a big lead with minorities and I can't understand why? I know many of them are facing the same cuts and problems that I am and Bernie seems to be the only one that cares and has solutions, not just rhetoric.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Most people didn't know who Bernie was, and being that he's an old white man (people do judge by appearance first) he's not who you would automatically associate with social justice, and Team Hillary pounced most effectively on that. Part of the problem was Obama and other successful AAs pushing the myth that everything is hunky dory for minorities, so the Sandra Bland and other murders sorta popped the dialogue from "just be more successful, you lazy _____s" to "Oh shit, we might have a problem here, regardless of income level..."
Bernie should have been pushing his extensive resume before that and worked it into his economic equality platform. It almost killed his campaign, but Hillary dropped the ball twice with BLM when she had time to prepare...which perfectly showed her lack of commitment to the issue.
Everyone's vote is their own, but Team Hillary and Hillary herself has shown no interest in minority rights and social justice except as it can be used to attack someone else with. I can't see that as a stable base to work from as we move to the primary.
senz
(11,945 posts)except I wouldn't say Obama pushed the myth that everything is okay for minorities -- but that is such a small part of your excellent analysis.
I hope people read your comment. It's good.
I do think Obama did not help this situation by pushing his "One America" meme for his "Legacy." When Sandra Bland was murdered, the first thing that came to mind was the incident with Henry Louis Gates and how Obama correctly called it the time and then walked it back after presumably consulting with his advisers. I always felt like that was a mistake that incidents like that were tolerated until they reached the point of the murders. We needed to have this discussion about police brutality and racial profiling a LONG time before it reached this point.
We can't unify the country under a moderate republican flag- there's no room for minorities or different points of view in that utopia.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Where Obama has mentioned this even once.
840high
(17,196 posts)hellraiser69
(49 posts)the horrific unemployment rate for young black people. I have 3 mixed race grand children so this matters to me.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)is a hell of a head start. But educating one's self on the merits of the various policy positions is a hell of a lot of time and work.
senz
(11,945 posts)The well being of those who are different from themselves, or even those who are ethnically similar but poorer, does not enter their minds. If you make an argument from the premise that all people matter, they look at you like you aren't making sense. Their premise is that life's losers simply don't know how to play the game and so it's their own fault.
I am so glad I did not grow up to be like them. So glad I am not a Republican.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)OMG....anybody that disagrees with you is a paid shill...
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But usually they do it with some substance, right or wrong. Lately there's been long strings of low calorie posts showing up in discussions. Why is that, do you think?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)So every post you don't agree with is now a paid shill. Okay whatever gets you through the night I suppose. What on earth will you use to sleep at night when HRC wins the popular vote? The country is filled with paid shills for Hillary?
Hydra
(14,459 posts)You're doing my work for me
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)oasis
(49,389 posts)You can count on it.
senz
(11,945 posts)Not beneficial to working class Americans at all.
oasis
(49,389 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)hellraiser69
(49 posts)be a second coming of the DOT com boom and TPP is going to create millions of jobs just like NAFTA?
oasis
(49,389 posts)getting things done. I and many other happy Americans frolicked in the 90's Clinton economy.
When Opportunity Train pulled into the station, Conductor Bill Clinton hollered "all aboard". It was an era for those with proactive mindsets.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Washington state has nearly 2 million newly insured thanks to the ACA. There needs work done to help middle income folks. Not sure who you are blaming for what here. I work in healthcare as a Registered nurse. I care.
Hillary is far better than either Sanders OR any republican. Sanders is far better than any republican, but the only one that could steal my heart at this point is O'Malley.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)I am not blaming anyone, I just believe Bernie cares about and will fight harder for the working class, seniors and retirees and has made solid proposals, all I have seen from Hillary is rhetoric.
I noticed your Black Lives Matters banner on your post, I am an old white guy, like Bernie and am told that is why most minorities aren't supporting him. But I have 3 mixed race grand children , so black lives matter to me too, it matters to me that under Bernie's plan, they can go to college without a mountain of debt. Hopefully they can walk down the street and not be harassed or shot by law enforcement. If they decide to go into a skilled trade as I did, they can join a union apprentice program and get paid for their training. When they get a job, they can make a minimum of $15 an hour with raises bases on cost of living. That they can join a union under card check without being harassed and intimidated by their employer.
These are all things I believe Bernie hopes for too.
Please explain to me how Hillary is better than Sanders for me or my family.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)As I've looked up Sanders. I'd be quite surprised if you haven't already. If you wanted an actual debate, that would be different. I can tell you that if Sanders should be elected--unlikely, but possible, he won't get "free college" through congress because it is not a workable plan. He want to tax certain wall street profits--sounds great right? Analysts say it would raise only 51 Billion a year. Not enough for "free tuition" his other plans have similar economic holes.
So in short here (very short) Hillary is better because she understands how congress works, knows how collaboration works. she is not going to propose fuzzy math solutions--at least not to the extent Sanders is. I think all politicians do the fuzzy math thing at this point, but I've never seen anything like Sanders. Hillary is also reaching out to communities and communities of color--she takes a lot of heat too--as is proper-- but she's listening at this point, not telling. She also isn't explaining how economics is a cure all for racial injustice.
I put up the avatar today in response to a disgusting OP that was self deleted. I live in Seattle.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)As BS has proposed now, the FTT would restore and fund a big expansion of pre-K educational centers and restore funding for college for poor students.
Double it, or even triple it, and it funds college and makes a dent in funding Medicare for all.
Here's a compelling article for doing just that from the NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/22/opinion/the-case-for-a-tax-on-financial-transactions.html?_r=0
Bernie Sanders is on the right track with this idea and denigrating it just because it comes from him is short sighted.
Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #31)
Rilgin This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rilgin
(787 posts)Hillary understands congress more than a long time senator? Being generous to you. Do you really think a long time senator does not understand congress?
Your support is your own to choose. You could prefer hillarys more moderate policies to bernies. You could even opine that even though they have demonized her for years she can work with republicans. I would disagree but thats at least within reason. However you are stretching with your reasoning if part of it is thinking Hillary understands congress implying that bernie who sits in the senate doesnt.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)second them heartily.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)This, from National Nurses United:
Community health. The law provides for significant increases in funding for community health centers, one of the best provisions of all added late in the Congressional debate at the insistence of Sen. Bernie Sanders
http://www.nationalnursesunited.org/blog/entry/understanding-the-affordable-care-act-aca-and-why-medicare-for-all-is-still/
So don't even try to oppose Bernie to President Obama or try to pretend that Bernie did not support and work to achieve significant improvements to the ACA. As a nurse, this should interest you.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)it seems to be the gist of the posts I have seen supporting her.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)but I'm seriously wrestling with it.
This is something which is incredibly personal to me and very hard to talk about.
Ugh.....it's 1120am and I already need a beer.
senz
(11,945 posts)Many of us know how rough it can be. Please consider that this is a public message board and, in case you haven't noticed, there are some rather unsavory individuals who loathe Bernie supporters, so I would advise that you be careful in whatever you say and err on the side of protecting yourself.
I hope you can take a walk or call a friend or just do something you enjoy and let the beer wait. But, whatever.
Take care; we appreciate you, pinebox. You're great!
and yes you're correct of course, there are quite a few unsavory folks on here.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)Am I happy with my life? Most days.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I am slowly working an escape plan to become a refugee if things get worse.
Canada's new progressive government looks very appealing. I would likely at least start there.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)don't expect any empathy from Hillary supporters. Has one showed any concern for the millions in our situation?
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)But I'm voting for Bernie.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)This can't be allowed to continue. I really fear for the next generation (unless Bernie wins).
hellraiser69
(49 posts)and said 1.4 million people are affected by this, it is actually 10.4 million and nothing about it on the MSM. Ed Shultz had a show on about it on MSNBC but was canned shortly there after.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Surprise, surprise.
senz
(11,945 posts)He dug us out of the Bush recession and helped Americans in significant ways.
Bernie is older, more experienced, and more focused and very clear on his convictions. I sincerely believe he has what it takes to start turning this country around. If we are to avoid a real revolution later, we need Bernie now.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)We can't blame previous presidents forever.
I voted for him twice, although the second time I really didn't want to.
I remember all the swooners on DU saying how he would make everything better. I remember very well.
Now I see the same folks complaining about how bad things are. Just sayin'.
senz
(11,945 posts)I don't have all day so will make it very brief.
1) President is not dictator, not emperor, not king. It never was an all-powerful position, but with the corporate takeover of our political system, "President" is a pretty weak position. Currently, all candidates but Bernie are either beholden to corporate power and wealth or afraid of it.
2) Since the Reagan Revolution, our problems have been structural and systemic. No one can turn things around for ordinary Americans without boldly undoing what Reagan (and Clinton, and Bush II) did to us.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)will consider you for V.P.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Voted for him twice and have been sold down the river. Tired of this lesser of the 2 evils shit.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)sad to have agreement on this, ya know.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Showing.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Obama is not on the ballot but the election will be a referendum. If the country is happy then the Dems win.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)then vote for Hillary. She's a war hawk and our military would be embroiled in further ME messes.
Here she guarantees it
http://forward.com/opinion/national/324013/how-i-would-rebuild-ties-to-israel-and-benjamin-neta/
The dangers facing both our nations in the Middle East require bold and united responses. We must remain committed to preventing Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon, and to vigorously enforcing the new nuclear agreement. I would move to step up our partnership to confront Iran and its proxies across the region, and make sure dangerous Russian and Iranian weapons dont end up in Hezbollahs hands or threaten Israel. I also will combat growing efforts to isolate Israel internationally and to undermine its future as a Jewish state, including the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement. Ive spoken out against BDS in the United States and at the U.N., and will continue to do so.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Is President Obama a War Hawk too?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)But thanks for telling me what you think....I can now deliver you a personal pan pizza!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)if people's lives are not good then maybe they should think about who is in Congress.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)and I sure haven't seen it used much from this administration for things things that matter to my family.
treestar
(82,383 posts)the bully pulpit does not force them to. They are not non-entities.
Over facile arguments.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)hellraiser69
(49 posts)out of Hillary's or Obama's mouths about the pension cuts that are going to affect millions of retirees. Think what this is going to do to the economy when millions of people have
$1000 to $1500 a month to spend.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)The trustees are choosing to cut benefits to allow longer term solvency of the fund. Benefits cannot be cut to less than 110% of what the PBGC would pay when the person finally completely failed.
Central States Pension is the only one that's applied to reduce the benefits. And most importantly, Central States was one of the biggest proponents and cheerleaders for the law.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Those of us who are self-employed don't get those
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I have never had a pension
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Hillary has several and they aren't going to be cut.
Same thing I am hearing from all you Hillary supporters. "I don't have one, why should you?'
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)The person I was replying to is upset over Multi-Employer Pension Reform Act, which is being used by the Central States Pension (part of the Teamsters) to cut pension benefits.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Coming from a Hillary supporter. "I don't have one, why should you?"
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)It's a shame that the pension was to the point of $12B in assets with $35B in liabilities. That's unsustainable.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)deferred to give us a comfortable retirement. Something I worked 70 hours a week for over 30 years for. I was promised a set amount for life and now that I have given up my seniority and too old to find another job, they are telling me screw you, we are taking back 60% of what you earned, Obama signed it and haven't heard one word from Hillary being against it.
I am supposing you are a Hillary supporter because what I hear form you is "I don't have one so why should you."
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Bernie, Teamster president James Hoffa,the AARP, and several other organizations have produced alternate plans, that save the funds without cutting benefits. The trustees are just taking the easy way out and of course the repugs love it for just being another way to screw union members.
beaglelover
(3,486 posts)about my and our future with a President Hillary Clinton!!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)They won't change them for the better but they will change things.
Any Democrat elected will face a Republican House that will stop pretty much anything they try to do.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 8, 2015, 05:58 AM - Edit history (1)
financially things have been a lot better, and they've been a lot worse. The tides of life will ebb and flow. I came from an impoverished evironment and I expect to leave the world slightly better position than during my childhood. The one thing right now is that I can qualify for heathcare coverage as a cancer survivor. I think any of the Democratic candidates will ensure that a healthcare program legacy carries on and is improved upon.
I don't know about you, but I am perfectly comfortable holding Republicans accountable for their obstructionism over the past seven years--obstructionism in Congress and absolutely destructive actions taken in concert with Congress in the states they govern. Those tactics will likely be attempted again because there is a tendency to deflect all blame to the President rather than getting to the polls to vote out the Republicans. I hold the Republicans responsible and the voters who made sure that they were voted in again, either by omission or commision.
I'm voting for the person I think will realistically have a chance to get something done. I'm not voting for a Republican. And I'm not expecting one person to magically solve all the problems of the nation.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)But I have kids, grandkids and great grandkids, and I'd like to see things get better for them over the remainder of their lives.
And I don't see that taking place under any corporate controlled president,
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)do either. Sorry.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)because I think she will be a great President; she's the hardest working candidate; I like her; and I want her to win.
My life is my life, no matter who is or isn't President.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)to make your life better you will likely be disappointed. I think a lot of people thought Obama would be able to wave a magic wand and change everything. He couldn't in the face of a republican congress. I think he's been an outstanding President. Neither Bernie or Hillary will be able to make dramatic changes in the current state of our politics.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)And thanks for the advice!!!!
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)are in the spirit of "When did you stop beating your wife?"
Much of what you are blaming the Obama administration for is due to the GOPer Congress. One person can only do so much, especially when he is faced with an adamant and historically unprecedented opposition. Do you think ANY single person can make a difference in such a situation? Whoever is elected President - and I hope it is indeed the Dem candidate - will need a much more cooperative Congress to push through any agenda.
But you are not being realistic if the Dem candidate does not have the solid backing of the Democratic party and its members in Congress and Bernie's relationship with the party leadership has hardly been a wholehearted one. That may be a plus for you, but practically it is a minus. And for Bernie to receive the solid backing of Dem leadership, he will have to make the kind of compromises that many of his current supporters will see as "sellouts."
I'm glad that you like and support your candidate. Please stop your trashing of mine.
Vinca
(50,276 posts)this time around no matter who our candidate is. After last Tuesday's election, I'm very pessimistic about Democrats moving their lazy asses out the door and to the polls. This isn't an Obama year. There isn't the same kind of excitement. I'm really worried this time around.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)why should poor or working class progressives be excited?
I've been active in progressive politics for 5 decades, so I vote regardless, but I've voted for 3rd party candidates when I felt they were better suited for the office. I'm sure millions of progressives will probably do the same next year if HRC is the nominee, but more troubling is the fact that millions of young and discouraged voters will simply stay home, hurting progressive candidates at all levels of elected office.
Show me a person who is excited about voting for Hillary based on anything other than her gender and I'll show you someone who is on her payroll or who has corporate ties that will benefit from her election. While there may be a few exceptions, it won't be enough unless the GOP nominates Trump, and even then it might be 50/50.
Either way, the have-nots are fucked.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Obama talked about "The Audacity of Hope" and turning the ship around, then laughed when he got in the WH and continued Bushco policies.
There's going to have to be a LOT of change in our party before that damage is mended...and I don't think we have the time or inclination as a party to do it. I worked at a company whose stated goal was to be one step above their next door competition and not a hair above that. Dem party establishment seems to think they have a lock using that strategy and going after big money.
That doesn't excite people.
Vinca
(50,276 posts)It's bad enough Republicans in Kentucky are so bloody stupid that don't know their beloved healthcare plan, KYNECT, is Obamacare and came out in droves to vote against Obama. There's no excuse for Democrats. That's why I think our next POTUS will be a Republican. Unless there's a "star" involved, a whole lot of Democratic voters can't be bothered.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... I was after 8 years of Bush.
It would be a shame to let the GOP regain control of our government again.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Faux pas
(14,681 posts)your story hellraiser69! It should make people here stop and really think about how their fellow Americans are being royally screwed over. The status quo has got to go!
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:30 AM - Edit history (1)
Seems to kind of suggest the opposite: people with enough cushion to ride out a Republican administration are more willing to give Sanders a chance.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Check her top donors against Bernie's. Guess Wall St. and the multi-nationals are supporting her because they like her so much. I am damn sick of government by the corporations for the corporations.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I have plenty of reasons for not supporting Clinton but that never was one of them, personally.
I'm pointing out that it's the richer, whiter parts of the party that most strongly support Sanders.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Those who who are comfortable with profits from war, climate change, mass imprisonment, our hostage taking health care system and the silencing of our "fringe left" voices generally are dependent and have confidence in more of the same to assure their investments in Wall St grow.
Even if they crow to the opposite, it matters not, the money is what speaks the loudest, not the syllables.
To those who get a sour taste out of dollars from death, we continue to invest instead in a more sustainable and cruelty free future.
hellraiser69
(49 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)wins if a majority of voters want a continuation of the Obama-type moderate Democrat policies that Clinton offers as the status quo/establishment candidate).
hellraiser69
(49 posts)exactly.