2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDes Moines Register: Paris attacks likely ‘a game changer’ in Democratic race
All eyes on the debate tonight.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/11/14/paris-attacks-likely-game-changer-democratic-race/75774712/
Paris attacks likely a game changer in Democratic race
Jennifer Jacobs, jejacobs@dmreg.com 11:17 a.m. CST November 14, 2015
Squeamishness about Bernie Sanders' foreign policy savvy and greater confidence in Hillary Clintons experience could play a role in redefining the Democratic presidential race in the wake of the terrorist attacks in Paris, Iowa voters and politics watchers say.
National security may not be the decisive issue for Iowa Democratic caucusgoers, but it will move people and those that are moved will support Clinton, said Democratic strategist Chris Kofinis, whose company, Park Street Strategies, conducted a focus group in Des Moines Friday night.
All 31 undecided Democratic likely caucusgoers in the focus group, conducted just hours after news emerged about the mass violence in Paris, think Sanders is the candidate who has had the stronger message so far.
But nearly all see Clinton winning the Iowa caucuses and nomination.
.................... They consider the third debate participant, Martin OMalley, to be a non-factor.
The worlds attention shifted to Paris Friday...............
The Paris massacre is a game changer for the Iowa caucuses and the 2016 U.S. presidential elections, Iowa politics watcher Steffen Schmidt, a political science professor at Iowa State University, wrote in a blog post Saturday morning. (Republican presidential candidate) Rand Paul is finished. So is Bernie Sanders. The priorities have just totally changed....................
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
DanTex
(20,709 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)riversedge
(70,238 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)Better she withdraw with dignity than have her shame exposed.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
brooklynite
(94,581 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Response to riversedge (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BootinUp
(47,154 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)her IWR vote as well as her tenure as Secretary of State.
To a logical person, I am not sure how this will help her.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And that more war will somehow help Hillary.
riversedge
(70,238 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)emulatorloo
(44,128 posts)if our goal is to convince undecideds and soft HRC supporters to switch their votes to Bernie. Eyes on the prize.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)to vote for themselves.
By the way, I put a thread up not too long ago about how many people have actually switched votes as a result of our discussion on DU.
The response was very very few to almost NONE.
This is not suprising to me.
I appreciate your enthusiasm for the politics of the situation however. Don't give up.
emulatorloo
(44,128 posts)Yeah DU'ers are hardcore. Everybody has their mind made up here.
I was more referring to GOTV phone calls and door knocking.
Appreciate the good words of encouragement
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)I cannot remember the last time you posted anything of merit.
Additionally, you use that smiley way too much.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)RKP5637
(67,109 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)msongs
(67,407 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Shes going to be exposed as complicit.
The best way to stop ISIS is to cut off the funding but it's coming from inconvenient "allies" like the Saudis and the Gulf States
Tonight I'll be watching for the candidate that vows to starve the beast. I'll bet it's not Clinton.
...
Abandoning the Enlightenment values that produced democracy will not plumb the depths of the vestigial authoritarian impulse that resides in us all, the wish for kings, the desire for order, to be governed, and not to govern. Flexing and posturing and empty venting will not cure the deep sickness in the human spirit that leads people to slaughter the innocent in the middle of a weekend's laughter. The expression of bigotry and hatred will not solve the deep desperation in the human heart that leads people to kill their fellow human beings and then blow themselves up as a final act of murderous vengeance against those they perceive to be their enemies, seen and unseen, real and imagined. Tough talk in the context of what happened in Paris is as empty as a bell rung at the bottom of a well.
...
It's not like this is any kind of secret. In 2010, thanks to WikiLeaks, we learned that the State Department, under the direction of then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, knew full well where the money for foreign terrorism came from. It came from countries and not from a faith. It came from sovereign states and not from an organized religion. It came from politicians and dictators, not from clerics, at least not directly. It was paid to maintain a political and social order, not to promulgate a religious revival or to launch a religious war. Religion was the fuel, the ammonium nitrate and the diesel fuel. Authoritarian oligarchy built the bomb. As long as people are dying in Paris, nobody important is dying in Doha or Riyadh.
...
It's time for this to stop. It's time to be pitiless against the bankers and against the people who invest in murder to assure their own survival in power. Assets from these states should be frozen, all over the west. Money trails should be followed, wherever they lead. People should go to jail, in every country in the world. It should be done state-to-state. Stop funding the murder of our citizens and you can have your money back. Maybe. If we're satisfied that you'll stop doing it. And, it goes without saying, but we'll say it anyway not another bullet will be sold to you, let alone advanced warplanes, until this act gets cleaned up to our satisfaction. If that endangers your political position back home, that's your problem, not ours. You are no longer trusted allies. Complain, and your diplomats will be going home. Complain more loudly, and your diplomats will be investigated and, if necessary, detained. Retaliate, and you do not want to know what will happen, but it will done with cold, reasoned and, yes, pitiless calculation. It will not be a blind punch. You will not see it coming. It will not be an attack on your faith. It will be an attack on how you conduct your business as sovereign states in a world full of sovereign states.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39727/paris-attacks-middle-eastern-oligarchies/
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Response to riversedge (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
artislife
(9,497 posts)I don't know what is scarier..listening to the right rattle their sabers or h supporters.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Of ALL the members of the Senate in 2002, Hillary should have known Bush was peddling a pack of lies.
Hillary was 'co-president' from 1993-2000, when the US bombed Iraq weekly or monthly to enforce the no-fly zones enacted after the first Iraq War. The Clinton White House enforced crippling sanctions on Iraq the whole time. It made not a bit of sense that Iraq had an active weapons of mass destruction program when the country couldn't even get spare parts to repair their sewage treatment plants. Never for an instant did I, and the millions marching against the war, believe Iraq could possibly be a danger to the US after the destruction of the First Iraq War and subsequent bombings and sanctions.
It never made a bit of sense that secular Saddam, known for brutally repressing the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood, had anything to do with Al Qeada and 9/11. Not for a single moment did I, or the millions of others marching in the streets, believe Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. Hillary should have known this, too.
If she is smart and competent and the co-president during her husband's term, she would have been leading the charge for NO votes on the IWR. Instead, she voted yes and authorized the epic travesty of the Iraq War and all that followed, the biggest mistake the US has made during my lifetime.
Without the Iraq War, there would have been no Al Queda in Iraq, no ISIS, no Paris attacks.
I hope Bernie and Martin bluntly point out her poor judgement and the tragic consequences of that poor decision tonight.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but the gop and the ge as well
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Hillary has a lot to answer for