Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 07:24 PM Nov 2015

NY Times: Poll Watch: Overseas Elections Offer Warnings for U.S. Pollsters

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/11/10/poll-watch-overseas-elections-offer-warnings-for-u-s-pollsters/

-snip-
Pre-election polls in numerous countries this year have widely missed their marks, often by underestimating support for candidates on the ideological fringes. The polling failures in countries like Britain, Poland and Israel point to technical issues that could well foreshadow polling problems in the United States, many analysts believe.

“The industry has a collective failure problem,” said John Curtice, the president of the British Polling Council and a professor of politics at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow. Partly this is the result of changing methodologies. “It’s now a mix of random-digit dialing — that is, telephone polls — and Internet-based polls based on recruited panels,” he said. Both modes present potential problems.
-snip-

xposted in Sanders group
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
2. No kidding?! They also under poll Millennials deliberately to skew the numbers they do have.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 07:33 PM
Nov 2015

The Corporate Owned pollster polls aren't even close to reality and the Corporate Owned MSM is going to have egg on its face when Bernie wins Iowa and NH. I can't wait to watch the spin.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
3. I think they have shifted from measuring opinions to attempting to shape opinions. I take all
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 08:01 PM
Nov 2015

corporate sources of information with a grain of salt.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
5. Just like experts in a legal case, it depends on what side is paying for the poll.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:58 PM
Nov 2015

It's not like this is a new science. They can make their polls very accurate if they choose to.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. Wait...you mean excluding everyone under 26 might skew the result??
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:36 PM
Nov 2015

Who could'a thought!!!

(I eagerly await the post from someone claiming such people never vote, so I can yet again post the demographics from the 2012 and 2008 election. Obama lost both if you don't count "the kids&quot

ejbr

(5,856 posts)
6. However
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 10:00 PM
Nov 2015

do any of these countries have unverifiable voting machines that have been known to switch votes so that any polling may be moot like we do?


With a media and a populace who don't seem to give a fuck?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
9. Could be. If no insiders grow a conscience and a spine to speak up we are screwed. I hope it's
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 10:14 PM
Nov 2015

not too late. But it looks pretty bad.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
8. Well, either the pollsters are right and I'll get
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 10:04 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary for my next president, or they'll be wrong and Bernie will be my next president.

It's a good problem to have.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times: Poll Watch: O...