2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPPP poll Nov 14 Who Won DEM Debate? Clinton 67%, Sanders 20%, O'M 7%
WONDERFUL WONDERFUL
PPP poll Nov 14 Who Won DEM Debate? Clinton 67%, Sanders 20%, O'M 7%
Nov 14, 2015
A Public Policy Polling survey of Democratic primary voters nationally who watched tonights debate finds that it reinforced Hillary Clintons front runner status. Viewers overwhelmingly think she won the debate, and particularly trust her over the rest of the Democratic field when it comes to issues of national security.
Key findings from the survey include:
-67% of voters think Clinton won the debate, to 20% for Bernie Sanders and 7% for Martin OMalley. On a related note 63% of viewers said the debate gave them a more positive opinion of Clinton, compared to 41% who said it gave them a more positive opinion of Sanders, and 37% who said it gave them a more positive opinion of OMalley.
-Clinton is by a wide margin the candidate debate watchers trust the most on national security issues. 75% say they have the most faith in Clinton on that front, compared to only 17% for Sanders, and 5% for OMalley. National security issues were a primary focus tonight in the aftermath of yesterdays tragedy in France, and Democratic voters by far and away trust Clinton the most on that issue.
-Whats particularly striking is how universal the sentiment that Clinton won the debate tonight is among all the different groups within the Democratic Party. 86% of African Americans, 73% of women, 70% of moderates, 69% of seniors, 67% of Hispanics, 65% of liberals, 61% of white voters, 58% of men, and 50% of younger voters all think that Clinton was the winner of tonights debate.
-Overall among those who watched the debate tonight, 67% say they plan to vote for Clinton in the primary to 25% for Sanders, and 4% for OMalley.
Clinton came into tonights debate as the clear front runner for the Democrats and these numbers make it clear that the debate and particularly Clintons strength on national security issues just reinforced her front runner status....
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/11/democratic-voters-overwhelmingly-think-clinton-won-debate-particularly-strong-on-national-security-i.html via Public Policy Polling
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)right?
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)It may turn out that people really do believe that Hillary won the debate tonight, but let's wait for polls that aren't financed by supporters of one side.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I'm going to say this once as a Clinton supporter: the sponsored PPP poll is bullshit
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251810541
RandySF
(59,360 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Good post.
I'll delete mine.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)it's only been an hour...
how did they do it so fast?
brooklynite
(94,757 posts)DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Love the numbers. Tough reality check for some DUers.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)brooklynite
(94,757 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)This is rich...
Who paid for it and was it similar to the DLC infested survey?
Well... that does it! Looks like Time and Fox were all wrong!
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Got anything else?
riversedge
(70,330 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)MineralMan
(146,336 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)She was so presidential tonight. The others.......well no comment.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)brooklynite
(94,757 posts)60% had a more favorable opinion of Clinton after the debate vs 40% for Sanders
60% thought Clinton won the debate vs 33% for Sanders and 6% for O'Malley
MADem
(135,425 posts)Clinton looked alert and engaged, and her responses were substantive.
Her opponents were edgy and irritated, combative and annoyed, prickly and acerbic. In style and substance, she creamed 'em.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)I thought the other was was actually quite calm and was someone I was willing to listen to. He did bring up some interesting ideas.
MADem
(135,425 posts)O'Malley was calmer than Sanders, but they both seemed nervous and high strung.
Clinton was SO rock-steady. She had it wired--style and substance.
riversedge
(70,330 posts)golden ring.
MADem
(135,425 posts)moving forward. It looked a little bit like a failed attempt at ganging up.
It was their undoing. If they'd taken a shot at one another, even slightly, it wouldn't have been quite so obvious.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)This is so pathetic.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)almost like they don't want people to know who commissioned it.
nah, couldn't be that.....
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It's typical for pollsters to rotate the order in which they name the candidates, because the first candidate mentioned typically gets a better result.
All the questions had Clinton first.
Not to mention landlines.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)think
(11,641 posts)the poll.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I love it!
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Correct The Record is a strategic research and rapid response team designed to defend Hillary Clinton from baseless attacks.
Ok. Now it makes sense on why it's so out of line with the other polls.
jkbRN
(850 posts)LMAO
jeff47
(26,549 posts)such as rotating the names of the candidates in the questions. Standard practice, since the first candidate mentioned gets a boost. Instead, they asked all questions with Clinton first.
Also, LOL @ landlines.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Don't you think that's a bit of a conflict of interest?
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)One of the SuperPACS' working for her? Good God!
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Total garbage
MADem
(135,425 posts)about any other candidate in future, then!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)and did not rotate the candidate's names in their questions, as is standard practice. (The first candidate mentioned always does better, and lo-and-behold Clinton was always first!)
Brock got what he paid for.
MADem
(135,425 posts)These are, obviously, quick results, and they are packaged to be of interest to a particular client--but that doesn't mean they are SKEWED.
What will you do if you learn that they do publish screening questions later, and that they did rotate the questions?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Also, the answer for Q1 looks kinda odd.
Yes 100%
No 0%
Absolutely no one in their sample had something else come up?
MADem
(135,425 posts)the results of anyone who didn't watch. If the person said NO, they went on to the next one.
Their "universe" was "People who watched the debate."
Why would they poll people who didn't watch, when they want to gauge how well the candidates did?
I mean, come on--that's basic.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Except that was not in their methodology.
So either you're right and they're lying in their methodology, or I'm right and their sample is not at all random.
You handle that by saying in your methodology that you stopped asking questions after Q1 for people who didn't watch. And list two sample sizes, the overall sample and the debate-watching sample.
Btw, "randomly selected" doesn't appear in their methodology either.
MADem
(135,425 posts)fast results of a snapshot poll.
Look--you can disregard this information all you want. I'm sure you can find an "internet poll" that will give you the results you wish for, and that'll make you all happy!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)This doesn't have a random sample. Nor did they publish their screening questions. And it was a poll sponsored by Correct the Record, and when you pay for a poll you get to specify the methodology.
Even Nate Silver is calling them out on it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)As an added bonus, the OP supports Clinton. So clearly it's all sour grapes from Sanders supporters.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)they might be fun, but the only one that matters is election day.
jfern
(5,204 posts)for that candidate
MADem
(135,425 posts)if they ever show Sanders getting a bump.
Your assumption that they would shade their results to satisfy a client isn't supported by any fact--only your say-so.
So, fine--under the bus with PPP--you can never look to them for even the slightest improvement in the fortunes of your candidate!!
jfern
(5,204 posts)Except by Hillary supporters, appearently.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Hmmm.
jfern
(5,204 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Weidman
(71 posts)It's currently sealed in Locker A-352 in the Grand Central Terminal, key is in one of those hair color gels at Tish and Snooky's Manic Panic at Long Island City. Now quickly get it before someone buys the gels!
MADem
(135,425 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)We had to sit through a couple days of spin before any major polls were released.
This time it's instant.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Thanks
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Coordination between Correct the Record and Hillary Clinton's campaign would be illegal and you know it.
Correct the Record is a Super PAC and is not Hillary Clinton or her campaign.
Weidman
(71 posts)I got a real neat mountain that nobody's using in my backyard that you can buy for a cool million.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)You might want to delete that post before MIRT sees it.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)is because of the 'internet loophole'. They coordinate with her campaign but do it only online. If they did this shit elsewhere, yes, they would be busted for FEC violations.
To try and defend this shit speaks volumes to your character and that of your candidate. Fuck it...as long as it is not 'illegal' then go for it.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Sanders 116 (67%)
Clinton 36 (21%)
O'Malley 20 (12%)
TIME
http://time.com/4110860/democratic-debate-poll-who-won/
Sanders 81%
Clinton 14%
O'Malley 5%
CBS Local
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2015/11/14/poll-who-do-you-think-won-the-second-democratic-presidential-debate/
Sanders 94%
Clinton 4%
O'Malley 2%
http://www.enstarz.com/articles/119894/20151114/who-won-democratic-debate-did-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-or-martin-omalley-impress-you-poll.htm
Sanders 90%
Clinton 6%
O'Malley 4%
Slate
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/11/democratic_presidential_debate_who_won_vote_in_our_poll.html
Sanders 80%
Clinton 14%
O'Malley 3%
Syracuse.com
http://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/11/poll_who_won_saturdays_democratic_2016_presidential_debate.html
Sanders 92%
Clinton 5%
O'Malley 3%
Washington Times
http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2015/nov/14/who-won-2nd-democratic-debate/
Sanders 95%
Clinton 4%
O'Malley 3%
Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/democrats/11996604/Democratic-debate-who-won.html
Sanders 87%
Clinton 7%
O'Malley 5%
FOX
http://fox5sandiego.com/2015/11/14/poll-who-won-the-2nd-democratic-debate/
Sanders 88%
Clinton 9%
O'Malley 3%
CSPAN
https://www.facebook.com/CSPAN?_rdr=p
Sanders 80%
Clinton 16%
O'Malley 4%
I realize the above are online and not scientific but that far off? I have my doubts
(updated all poll results above at 12:35am Nov 15 - nothing materially changed)
reformist2
(9,841 posts)riversedge
(70,330 posts)OINK
Weidman
(71 posts)This poll is no good.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)You can try and throw mud at the poll but it's likely accurate
jeff47
(26,549 posts)1) Their methodology does not say how they got a random sample....heavily implying they did not get one.
2) They did not publish their screening questions.
3) They did not rotate the candidate's names. That's standard practice since the first name always does better.
4) The answer for Q1 is really weird. 100% of their sample watched the debate. No one had something else come up?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)As I've always said, although it's usually to Republicans like the Unskewed polls folks, if your candidate Is in such bad shape that you resort to attacking scientific polls you are in trouble.
The easy way to resolve this is to call and email the number PPP provides at the bottom of the poll. They probably won't respond until Monday.
it makes no sense at all that the most accurate polling agency out there would risk their reputation over a post debate poll. But those kind of accusations are to what Bernistas are reduced.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Even Nate Silver is calling them out on it.
So...they lied in their own report linked from the press release?
And we're supposed to believe them after they admit to lying?
Psst...Here's a Clinton supporter who started a thread saying the same thing:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251810541
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)That may have well resulted from getting it out so quickly.
Again, you have no evidence there is something wrong with the poll.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)THAT is the bullshit you are hanging your hat on?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Don't like the results. That's all this is.
Don't pretend there is anything more to it than that.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)This performance is about as bad as I have seen Sanders in terms of looking non-Presidential. He didn't look contained, he didn't look poised, and Hillary looked both of those things. And O'Malley has this odd affect to him that seems non-genuine.
Response to stevenleser (Reply #74)
Post removed
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)PPP used as valid a method as possible - calling people who watched the debate and asking relevant questions. Those participants are most likely going to vote!! No one knew the results until they were published. Professional pollsters often report who paid for the poll for transparency, which is a sign of their neutrality and professionalism. It increases confidence, because the pollster is being upfront.
College students, for example, love to be active on line and will attend a rally because there's free pizza and a social opportunity. They also don't register and don't vote; at least that's the case in recent elections. Adults watching a debate at home instead of a ballgame or Downton Abbey are going to vote.
So far, the polls have been pretty good - they reflect regional and demographic expectations, have some variability due to sampling, and show changes over time as candidates campaign. As the email story was put to rest, Hillary looked better. When Biden dropped out, Hillary gained. In fact, when O'Malley quits Hilary will gain again.
Bernie has tried and failed, so far, to get any traction with minority and immigrant populations. Last night's debate and poll didn't change the picture. Hillary has more international experience and it showed. With "likely voter" Democrats who watched the debate; most thought Hillary provided the best answers. That makes sense because of the situation in France and emphasis on international affairs. Hillary did a good job last night.
"It's a poor workman who blames their tools."
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Should have been $12 in 2008, that was the last time Mrs. Clinton had some influence and we only got $7.25 back then.
Minimum was only about $5.00 when 9-11 happened, another time when both Mrs. Clinton and Sanders had some influence on the process.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary won the debate.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Age 2012 2016 Debate
18-45 51% 19%
45-64 35% 47%
65+ 14% 34%
under 45, where Sanders does better is very under represented.
Doesn't explain all of the discrepancy with the online polls but I would say on that basis alone, the poll significantly overstates Clinton's debate performance.