2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI thought for sure with the Bernie revolution and all that.....
that the Debate last Saturday would have had record numbers watching due to many Bernie political revolutionists viewing.
Wonder why the numbers were so low? With such an inspiring political campaign you would think they would have given up a Saturday evening for the cause to see their candidate debate in one of six debates to be held.
liberal N proud
(60,336 posts)What it had going for it was there are no block buster TV series on Saturday night unless you count the college football games that are taking place.
Oh yeah, college football games, that and just being on Saturday night probably had a lot to do with it. Only political junkies like us tend to go out of our ways to watch these things.
Economy good, people go out on Saturday night, drive past all the restaurants and bars in our area and they have waiting lines.
Between Evening Out and Football, the audience was reduced. Top that off with the bitter political climate in this country thanks to the republicans and people just didn't care to turn it on.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)national interest on. Let's face it-these primary debates are only interesting to political junkies who have already made up their minds- for the most part they are boring.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I thought they were ready for the revolution, and most certainly would give up Saturday night partying for it.
The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)Normal people watch things on the internet whenever they want.
treestar
(82,383 posts)which is why the whole complaint of the Saturday night airing doesn't really make sense, but Bernie supporters continue with it anyway.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Barriers to that are not a healthy thing for democracy.
Yes a lot of people do all that time-shiftung, streaming on dem,and stuff. But a lot of people don't.
It amazes me that people who are Democrats take the Republican line that democracy is supposed to be limited with as many barriers to participation as possible being a good thing.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Stay home Saturday and watch the debate. With the value of Democracy, who would quibble over that? It's not a work/school night, so you can stay up and watch it all and discuss it after to your heart's content. I don't see the Saturday airing as a "barrier."
Armstead
(47,803 posts)the debates against the GOP should be held on a Saturday night?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)rather than, missing the 1st 45 minutes of it (which I had to catch on the internet, later), as a dashed home from work. Had it not been for the debate, I probably would have stayed at work another hour or 2.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I'm not sure it bothers me when they air or not.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)weekday debates or just no do-able for her. She cannot carve 2 hours of her weekday study time.
we watched in together on Saturday and discussed.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I keep hearing about social media; yet, it is cable TV that, now, seems all important.
treestar
(82,383 posts)the people online, with cell phones. Now suddenly we're all about the old fogies that have to be home at the time something is aired in order to see it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Might want to check the OP's avatars.
But go ahead and take your cheap shot then whine when a Sanders supporter takes theirs.
treestar
(82,383 posts)how Hillary and DWS are plotting to keep Bernie out of the public eye and how they chose Sat. night so fewer people would get to see Bernie.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Please, show me.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Listen to you.
The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)I'm pretty damn old myself...
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Sorry. I should know better than to participate in flamebait OP's.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
The_Commonist
(2,518 posts)But I did back in the 90's.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)by at least some posters. And I have previously argued with them that people DVR or tape.
Not all Bernie people do it, but some have floated the concept that the debate is Saturday night as a way of making sure fewer people see Bernie. Goes along with the whole thing about how the debates are fewer in number for the same reason.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)that Bernie won and forgot to actually watch the debate.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It amazes me that people who are Democrats take the Republican line that democracy is supposed to be limited and placing barriers to participation is a good thing.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Question: Do you think if Clinton gets the nomination the debates against the GOP candidate should also be held on Saturday nights?
Would you defend the limited viewing time then?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)and I recorded the debate. It just a gripe point. In fact the less people who watched the debates would have been better for Sanders, the debate revealed a candidate in need for foreign affairs experience, if it was not viewed this could be a fact he hid.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)cringe-worthy opening statement.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)You'd think.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)He won the debate with gracious ease, at the same time regaling us with his plan to save us from ourselves--as well as Hillary-did he not?
Who wouldn't want to watch such a bear once in a lifetime performance? Not that Sanders won't replicate it next debate
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)whether or not one takes the time and effort to view the debate. They could hold the debates at the same time the super bowl is held, I would still record the debate.
tanyev
(42,568 posts)On Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I thought for sure with the Bernie revolution and all that.....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251823880
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Shit-stirring flamie-bait for the chuckles. There have been multiple threads on this, question asked and answered many times, BB was in them. Disruptive.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:33 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: STOP ALERT STALKING ON CLINTON SUPPORTERS WITHOUT CAUSE. IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT THEY SAY, MUSTER UP THE COURAGE AND CHALLENGE THEM!!! LEAVE IT ALONE!!!
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Don't see how this violates the TOS. If it bothers you, use the ignore feature or hide the thread.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Opinions are not shit-stirring, except with those who cannot accept differing opinions.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Meaning the alert, not the results.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)So joyful at the thought of a young movement snuffed out in its infancy. I think I will never understand your kind.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)fact her issues are directed at youth.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)lesser known and less popular players. It's not really possible to look at a 3 person event and claim that one of the 3 is responsible for low numbers. That's sad and absurd.
So you are left with a problematic argument, in that to ding Bernie for this means dinging Hillary for it as well and proportionately more as she's supposed to be the awesome popular. Where were HER viewers?
The real question for a real Democrat should be this: where were our viewers?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Bernie supporters are out enjoying their weekend and not inside yelling "nurse".
Nitram
(22,822 posts)I've been refraining about making adult diaper jokes about Bernie.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I do however demographics take a BIG seat in that.
People are out and about Saturday nights. The only ones who sit home and watch debates are political junkies.
But the "Nurse" joke was totally gratuitous. And unpleasant to people like me who have a parent dying in assisted living.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)eom
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Nitram
(22,822 posts)She has incredible depth in her knowledge of foreign and domestic policy, as well as the legislative process. She is a progressive among progressives.
Response to Nitram (Reply #60)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...first DWS comes up with only 6 debates. Then they are scheduled at very, very non-optimum times, a fact that has been called out repeatedly here at DU and elsewhere, BEFORE any of the debates were held -- IOW, this is not hindsight.
So now, with the numbers in, we have a DWS / Clinton supporter crowing that the audience was small, and somehow... wait for it... it's the fault of Sanders and his supporters, who aren't enthusiastic enough apparently. No mention, though, of the army of Clinton supporters, who also apparently aren't all that enthusiastic either?
Enough to make one go "Hmmm..."
djean111
(14,255 posts)They know what Bernie stands for. They are not going to be swayed by a debate - they look things up for themselves.
I have discussed "campaign blather", focus groups, and polls with my grandson.
With all of the much-bragged-about lead that Hillary is supposed to have, I would ask the same question of Hillary's supprters - where were they?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)about the timing of the debates?
They're the ones complaining that the debates are being held on the weekends.
If Bernie supporters don't watch TV and already know what Bernie stands for, then why should it even matter when the debates are held?
djean111
(14,255 posts)I don't listen to speeches anymore, either. Records and deeds, all that matter to me.
The Bernie supporters I know do not think any of the other candidates can utter anything that would erase the differences between themselves and Bernie, or make those differences irrelevant. I don't speak for any other supporters.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Thanks for the flame lame bait.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts). I find the excuses weak sauce, but it's what has been touted here for over a week now.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)to watch debates. Everyone knows that.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)and they can't even bother to record it to watch it later, or look it up online...
Is that what Sanders supporters call PASSION? A REVOLUTION?
Well, to me it feels like they aren't feeling the Bern...
polly7
(20,582 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The billions of H> supporters are so bored that they did not bother to tune in and watch her bloviate?