Has HRC triangulated corruption and shadiness?

[AZ Progressive]

It seems to me more and more that HRC isn't that much different than Republicans on corruption and shadiness, including the way she conducts her campaign.

[Betty Karlson]

1. You are not alone in feeling that way. n/t

[Demeter]

2. I'd say "incorporated", frankly.

[NCTraveler]

3. One of the best headlines I have read here.

When Colbert puts forward a parody challenge duets really step up. Well done. Mocking the right through parody never gets old.

[Fuddnik]

4. Possibly. But, she sure as shit hasn't monopolized it.

[Skidmore]

5. Well, now that you've trotted out the vague right wing smear,

how about some specifics. Otherwise, this constitutes something straight from bowels of the rightwing smear machine for me. No different than someone making some amorphous noxious whisper about you and letting it drift unsubstantiated in the wind.

[TheFarseer]

11. start with the Clinton foundation

Donations can net you access to uranium, defense contracts, advanced fighter jets or support for a trade deal. Then look at how Bill and hill get paid $250,000 a pop for speeches to banks she says she wants to regulate.

[Thinkingabout]

6. Is this akin to the shady deal Sanders seems to pull with his ties

To defense contractors welfare funding? Last week he was saying too much money is spent on defense and yet he lives to fund the F-35 program. He claims not to be hawkish but will use the drone program and continues to fund the drone program.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. ...

[LiberalArkie]

8. The results are:

On Fri Nov 27, 2015, 09:47 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Has HRC triangulated corruption and shadiness?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251853303

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is just flame bait, stated as fact without reason.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 27, 2015, 09:50 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: 'It seems to me' is not stating as fact, it is clearly opinion
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alerter does not appear to understand what a question mark signifies. The OP asked a question and followed it up with an opinion about how the HRC campaign appears. Given the false claim of the alerter, I vote leave.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: truth stings?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Comparing a Democratic candidate to Republicans is hide-worthy.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[JoePhilly]

9. Does Hillary kill puppies and kittens?

[reddread]

10. MOABs do

so I guess yes, yes she does.