2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBe Very Careful Hillary Supporters
When you start to raise health and age issues about a candidate, you are really showing the most disgusting side of politics and something that should not be tolerated here. Agism is discrimination and it is illegal for employers to commit it. By saying Sanders is too old you make implications that he cannot do something because of his age. That is a disgusting generalization.
And it's obvious when Hillary supporters raise this because when strong objection smacks them in the face, they hide behind health issues. Well, let's be clear. Medical is also not a valid, nor legal, discrimination. Sanders is quite physically and mentally capable of moving from being a U.S. Senator to being the President. I don't even think RWers would question this, and yet, here we are having to explain why this tac is so very unacceptable here.
Is this really the Hillary campaign floating a balloon? If so, they better take caution, for if they go down this road, there will a backlash cometh.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)And now we know Ronald Reagan was unfit later on in his Presidency.
Health is a legitimate topic of discussion IMO.
That's why all candidates should release their medical records. Hillary has already done so and Bernie should do the same.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)alone if they have a clue
As an old lady, I think I can speak to this issue and frankly, I am sick of AGEISM! McCain had genuine health issues. Unless someone can point to one here, then let it go.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bernie has not.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)FOR her instead?
George II
(67,782 posts)Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)release your medical records?
Financial I understand releasing your records, but that would be ridiculous if it was required.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)Turned out that Eagleton had spent several weeks in a mental hospital for depression ... a major taboo back then ... and hadn't disclosed it to McGovern. He was forced to quit the ticket. It was played as an example of bad decision making by McGovern.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)when they ran. Also, Reagan's "unfitness" was Alzheimer's, which tends to strike older people and which medical records from a routine physical tend not to show anyway.
Smells more like ageism than health--and both Hillary and Bernie are up there in years, only 6 years apart.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Just sayin.
azmom
(5,208 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Maybe the ignore button really is my friend!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)What I see is that the Wheel of Outrage is spinning off its axis for some DU's Bernie supporters.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That is a real issue and the FBI is investigating that one, not some monkey-appointed Congressional committee.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)The ages are what they are and I do not feel that is a pressing difference in the candidates. But, I do like a posters point about.... "Be very careful Sanders supporters, Rw talking points show the most disgusting side of politics."
Beacool
(30,250 posts)She was born in 1947 and Sanders was born in 1941.
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Sanders runs several times a week for his health, while Hillary only runs to Wall Street and the bank...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Literally.
He actually goes running.
Null points that round.
840high
(17,196 posts)better exercises.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)(But quite funny)
Renew Deal
(81,863 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)lacking one must resort to smears..... Just Sayin"
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)have been attacked by both the left and the right!!! Thanks for the reply.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that is why I support Bernie!!!
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)The guy is having surgery, should concern not be had?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Ben Carson isn't operating on him
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)My husband, in his 30s had critical hernia surgery on his left side. His recovery was painful and took about 2 weeks before he felt comfortable for work.
Shortly afterwards, he got a new doctor and when the doctor noticed his surgery, he decided to explore the right side which proved to be weak and would likely result in similar surgery down the road. Recommendation? Do a simple outpatient cut and stitch to strengthen the abdominal muscles. He was back to work in two days.
Two decades later? No problem.
Lots of people have outpatient ELECTIVE surgery that is no big deal.
Hell. My own mastectomy was no big deal. In by 1 out by 6. Back to work in 3 days.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But like many of the conversations, the primaries take this off the plate. If one makes it through the primary process healthy and victorious, they are best suited to move on. Goes for all three of our candidates.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Their comparative health is pretty much equal.
I think they are both too old, and their health represents a risk of throwing American politics and policy into turmoil. yet they are the front runners and have the best chances at this point. O'Malley looks like a kid compared to them, so I guess we are wanting some sort of wise old person, the Yoda or Galadriel trope of U.S. politics.
I'll be amazed if either of them lives out two terms. I'd be unsurprised if the next President is a one-termer, even resigning for health reasons.
The VP is going to be an important choice.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Before you offer up advice.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)He should release his.
It is in no way, shape, or form ageism.
Clinton released hers. Sanders should release his.
http://www.p2016.org/clinton/clinton073115pr.html
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-31/hillary-clinton-s-doctor-describes-her-as-fit-to-serve-as-president-
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/07/31/us/politics/hillary-clinton-doctor-letter.html?_r=0
HDSam
(251 posts)Let's pull out all the stops and have them submit their DNA for testing. Surely we wouldn't want to elect a president that might be predisposed to prostate cancer, high cholesterol, heart disease, breast cancer or who-knows-what!
The fate of the free world depends on us knowing if our choice for the highest office in the land could keel over at any moment from a previously undiagnosed aneurysm!
/Sarcasm off/
But seriously, we've had some presidents that had very significant health issues, such as FDR, that nonetheless were great leaders.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)No hyperbole, just release his healthcare records.
Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)On DU, just give us a link to your whole health history.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Are you afraid that Sanders has something to hide?
Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)I was really concerned about his mental health. Get that for us and we'll talk
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Except for Kerry, and that turned into a huge issue. He lost.
Does Sanders has something to hide?
Or is he just not serious as a candidate.
Pharaoh
(8,209 posts)have a good night
HDSam
(251 posts)If you feel the health of the potential future President is truly a legitimate and valid concern, why not get the complete picture? Why stop at half-measures?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)dodged the question.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)And they are expected.
In 2004, where Kerry did not release his complete records it became an issue in the campaign. I am sure you noticed that Kerry did not win.
In modern times, there are some things that are expected. He should release his medical records. There should be nothing to hide.
HDSam
(251 posts)should follow McCain's example that you yourself referenced down thread and release her actual medical records, not a two page summary. He released 1500 pages and by my count, Clinton has 1498 to go.
There should be nothing to hide, right?
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He had to approve that or it would have violated HIPAA.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It has been common practice for over a decade.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)when are they releasing their birth certificates!
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....being told to be "careful" or having a pre-emptive "insult" thrown at a group of members here.
George II
(67,782 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)"Be vewy vewy quite, I'm hunting political positions."
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)As usual they just fling shit without any idea of how it can blow right back on them.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Apples to oranges.
This is the primary.
I'm sure he will release it in due time.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Romney and Ryan released them in 2012.
It is part of running for President.
When Kerry did not release his records in 2004, it became an issue in the campaign.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though I doubt O'Malley's campaign will do that on its own.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)I stand by that assertion. I have also said that Hillary is pushing it too, but at least there's precedence in her case because she would be the same age Reagan was when he was elected.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Here's the political truth: age and health issues favor Martin O'Malley and supporters of Clinton or Sanders are nuts to drag that subject to the table. Nuts.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)I have no idea why there are all of a sudden so many posts about both their ages.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Several weeks ago, anti Hillary DU'er brought up Hillary's health.
Opening the door to nasty politiking and then wanting to slam that same door shut when it's applied to Bernie?
Yup, pretty digusting, huh?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251818546
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251818546#post7
So how do you want to explain all of this just on 11/30/15...a noble, proud or petty response? Where does it end?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251860867
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251860837
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251861027
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, in any case, health isn't the same as age.
You could be 74 and healthy as a horse or 35 and sick. Age isn't the matter.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Renew Deal
(81,863 posts)He would be the oldest president ever elected to a first term. And Obama showed that the presidency takes energy.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)That statement was lame. It hardly won a thread.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Definitely thread win.
Response to berni_mccoy (Original post)
rbrnmw This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)What will you do, suck both thumbs in frustration instead of the usual one?