2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm 23 years old, and practically no liberal I know my age is supporting HRC. They are Bernie fans
From my experience, the overwhelming majority of millennial liberals are pro-Bernie Sanders, and have lukewarm support for Hillary Clinton.
Our demographic doesn't view "democratic socialism" as a dirty term, and we associate the term with Scandinavian social democracy rather than central planning in the U.S.S.R.
We're also very anti-drug war, pro-marijuana legalization, sick of war, support single-payer healthcare, support making colleges tuition and debt free, support dramatically reducing student debt, are pro-labor unions, pro-worker cooperatives, and pro-racial, LGBT, and gender justice. We're critical of Wall Street, and generally anti-establishment as a voting bloc.
Not surprising that we're picking the progressive in this race, Bernie Sanders, over the establishment candidate.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Bernie will be the easiest vote I've ever cast.
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I'm a hermit.
Good one me to
840high
(17,196 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)that you don't vote, your friends don't vote, you don't matter. And get off their lawn.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)nice call!!!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I nearly blew Perrier out of my nose!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)To those who refuse to believe it.
I, on the other hand, don't usually visit the DU because of the people who spend all their time in the "Democrats are fascist corporatist" echo chamber. No need to tell you who is really popular. The polls will do so soon enough.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)posted by the main progressive posters. It's the best place to try to high-jack a thread.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)hay rick
(7,640 posts)In my area 70-yr-olds voted at a 77% rate in 2014 and 20-yr-olds voted at a 22% rate. Counting on major presidential year improvement is magical thinking. If it's going to happen a lot of people are going to have to do a whole lot of work. The millennials are currently failing American democracy 101 and pretending otherwise or finding excuses for their non-participation makes us enablers. Now, about my lawn...
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Obama lost voters 65 and older, 44-56.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)If Sanders loses, it will be because his supporters ran off every possible persuadable voter with their nasty.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)That is some serious bullshit; sexist, ageist and just plain mean. I don't know what a "hillarian" is, only that Sanders supporters think it is ok to post slurs.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Read the thread first, 'k?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)I certainly didn't.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Not that all women are school marms. I know the distinction is slight... but it's there.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Like Bernie?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)That's just silly stupid. You guys are always grasping at straws. If the youth vote was trending toward Hillary you would be on here telling us how little a bunch of kids know about anything.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Please try to follow. It is tiresome walking you though all of this.
Hillary's supports don't because the youth vote is not with them. They feel the need to denigrate youth.
Kokonoe
(2,485 posts)AND There are greater things in life than a big old pile of cash.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)They may be useful for something, someday....
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Just sick of people who go on and on about how they are soooooo progressive posting racial and sexist slurs and innuendos. Stop doing that and/or stop defending people who do and we are good.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)as to allow you to be righteously indignant for your own gratification.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/spycatcher/201304/wound-collectors
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)You are diagnosing me with a mental disorder on an anonymous message board, and you think *I* have a problem? WTF. Grow some damn skin yourself.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)i.e. imagining a slight so as to use it for your own purposes. Seems pretty spot on.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)And it is long past the time where "just plain mean" has the faintest currency. Their behaviour on this website has been blatantly hypocritical and manipulative from the beginning of Primary season. I have no sympathy for them whatsoever.
Response to wildeyed (Reply #147)
Jester Messiah This message was self-deleted by its author.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Brilliant analysis.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Sanders sure as shit won't win if all us old ass school marms go to Hillary since we are the ones who do all campaign work.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)old ass school marms do most of the volunteer campaign work for Democratic campaign. Men are often paid organizers and candidates, but middle aged women do 2/3rds of the volunteer work. Have you had different experiences? Perhaps it varies by region. Do tell.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Some studies indicate slightly more male involvement, others slightly more female involvement.
But, generally, they tend to stay fairly even. Here's one such study which shows slightly more female involvement.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiSqLrTrrzJAhUQRogKHXAvAXUQFgg0MAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcawp.rutgers.edu%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fresources%2Fgendercivicengagmnt.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGCAQFvQGD0Nf8vWvh_XY0Gx2wsOA&bvm=bv.108538919,d.cGU
You'll note, even were we to presume this study to be gospel, as the saying goes, it's miles away from the 2/3rds female involvement you experienced.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)We are talking about old ass women and their volunteer involvement with the Democratic Party. This has nothing to do with what we are discussing. And anyway, it says "Working for a party or candidate" 4 females and 2 males, or 2/3rds, exactly what I said, even among the youngs. We are not talking about "general civic engagement", whatever the fuck that means.
And besides, I asked about your personal experiences. What is the male/female ratio and general ages of the volunteers on all the other campaigns you have worked on? I suspect that you and yours have not actually done any campaign work. So stop being a total dick to people who have just because they are saying something you don't like.
The original poster is CERTAIN that the youth vote will be there for Sanders because all the young people he knows like him. Many of us old ass females who have worked a bazillion hours of GOTV for Democratic candidates are skeptical because OUR personal experience says otherwise. Turning out the youth vote is like hearing cats. Not saying it can't happen, but it is not as easy as you might think. I recommend doing blanket registration pushes on college campuses, then knock and drag on election day. Regular GOTV strategy has never worked for me in this demographic. Don't even know how to do it in a caucus state. Do you have to get your friends to go to the caucus with you and stand around? Have fun with that. Pro-tip: Don't call the other caucus goers 'old ass'. It will not endear your candidate to them.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Anecdotal vs. anecdotal won't mean much... but yes, I have done a fair bit of campaigning over the last 20 years, and my experience is that the men to women ratio tends to be pretty close to even.
Personal experience aside, BLS shows volunteer rates for both men and women to be 22.0 percent and 28.3 percent, respectively... with the 35 to 44 year-olds segment being most likely to volunteer (Not really your "old ass women" group). Again, this doesn't reflect your 2/3rds claim.
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/volun.pdf
Yes, it's general civic engagement, but its a fair depiction of involvement at the political level as well... particularly since it reflects typical involvement. But of course, YMMV.
"So stop being a total dick to people who have just because they are saying something you don't like." - I'd say you need to address your own level civility before attacking mine. I never called anyone 'old ass'. Lastly, your allegiance is clear... so I'm not quite concerned about endearing you to my candidate. You're certainly not endearing me to yours.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)other than partisan attack. That is always the lazy default answer. And I will go to mine. I like both candidates. I will happily support whoever wins the primary. My personal preferences is for Hillary Clinton this cycle. Last cycle I supported Obama, and really early, waaaay before he won Iowa. But I liked both candidates then too and would have gladly supported Hillary if she won. Because I am actually a Democrat and also, I have seen up close and personal the HUUUUUGE difference between one of those and the current breed of Republican Tea Crazies. Try living in NC if you ever wondered.... Also, I remember Bush vs. Gore and the Naderites with their "Gore and Bush are the same BS". Nope. Wrong.
These stats you are posting, they don't mean anything. The question is what are the volunteer characteristics of DEMOCRATIC PARTY volunteers. Not civic engagement of 25 and under or general volunteer patterns. And yes, I understand that my experience is anecdotal. I am open to being wrong on this. So far you have not given compelling evidence that I am. The original thread is anecdotal too. It's all suspect due to confirmation bias, etc. Whatever. It is just interesting to think about and discuss.
I am not trying to convert you to Hillary. You are not a persuadable voter. You have decided. I respect your decision. You didn't post the original slur, but you jumped right in to defend it. That I don't respect.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Sorry, I'm just not going to accept your opinion as a valid form of proof. I've provided a statistic that can be used to extrapolate political activity... particularly since political involvement is a component of these stats... something you should agree with, were you being less disingenuous. But, you've countered with... more opinion. I'm gonna stick with these BLS.gov statistics over your opinion. You're welcome to counter with stats of your own, but until then, I think I'm done talking with you.
Have a good one.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Then that leaves out Hillary so I guess you're hoping O'malley's people measure up?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It's one of their memes, that O'Malley supporters are all sweetness and light, while Bernie supporters are all meanies.
Reality is, there are only a few O'Malley supporters around, so the fact that they're 'sweetness and light' is statistically unimpressive. If Bernie and O'Malley both had lots of supporters, I can guarantee you that O'Malley would have asses among his base too.
Heck, given the mendacious nature of some of O'Malley's attacks on Bernie, if the supporters were a reflection of the candidate, O'Malley would have more asses among his supporters in that case.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)What the fuck does anything I say have to do with Sanders' campaign?
In what reality to I or my comments have any influence on endorsements? That is just absurd.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)You share your opinion, I get to share mine. Enjoy your loss.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)with presidential endorsements?
Seriously.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Still, it is not an "opinion" that my posts influence endorsements. Because that is silly.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)I'm sure that certain groups will become even more hateful as the time passes
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I usually ignore such comments, but "old ass school marms" are the backbone of the Democratic Party. Such dismissive ageist sexism may indeed become common currency in here, which is sad. I don't know who they think that helps.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)but people are either too stupid to know that or just don't care
they want to see the opposing candidate go down no matter what
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)no,not opposing candidate,opposing candidate supporters.**they appear to be privileged assholes.**no offense.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)no idea what you just posted
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)I turned off sigs, but you probably have a bunch of campaign mess there too. It reflects badly, very badly, on your candidate when you say such horrible, sexist crap. This is a public forum. Most people read but never post. Most people are only just now tuning into the campaign. Old ass school marm is surfing about the dem primary, ends up here, sees your post, thinks Ouch! I like Hillary anyway, don't need to learn any more about this Sanders guy! And they are out..... Congrats! You just cancelled your own vote! Plus it is just a shitty thing to say. As a human being, you could be doing better.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Second, I am in no way affiliated with the Sanders campaign. I'm going to vote for him, that's it. I'm not here to reflect anything for anyone.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)it is however ageist, nasty and rude.
If someone popped off with I'm not voting for any old ass yelling dude, when speaking about Senator Sanders, y'all would lose your shit. Rightfully so.
The school marm part--meh, adding the old ass to it makes it an nasty ageist comment--directed at fellow DU'ers.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)consideration. I don't see young voters dismissing young voters. It is the old folks who dish this out every fucking time. That's ageist. It's old voters who think their views are worth more, are more valid because they can dump on "the youth vote."
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Why do you think it is okay to say something like that in the first place?
It's hard to take someone seriously when they obviously set out to be as offensive as possible and then throw a fit when someone tells them they've succeeded.
What else could you have been expecting?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)One thing I didn't expect was to be elevated to the position of influencing presidential endorsements! That feels pretty amazing. Trying to decide who to influence next!
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Maybe you didn't think it was okay but did it anyway? I'm very curious why anyone on DU would think it's okay to post what you did. Without resorting to more nonsense do you think you could explain that please?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)It is routine and predictable. Every time a post is made which eludes to youth interest, someone will inevitably post that the youth vote is unreliable, they don't vote, etc.
Poo poo-ing on youth voting is school marmy and get off my lawn-like distractions.
Response to morningfog (Reply #285)
Post removed
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)The membership is generally evenly split. That she won over the board is meaningless compared to where the membership will vote.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-teachers-union-214190
the reaction is following a pattern that has played out in many major unions that have gone through the endorsement process this year -- anger and opposition from rank-and-file members who support Sanders and want their unions to hold off on any endorsement in the primary. Many teachers protested vigorously after the American Federation of Teachers endorsed Clinton in July.
Some NEA members supporting Sanders said they simply do not trust Clinton to fight for their interests -- and plan to fight back against any union endorsement. Even if she says things that today sound supportive, shes not going to be a steadfast friend of organized labor, said Jamie Rinaldi, a teacher from Newton, Mass., and a union activist. We dont know shes going to be the ally thats going to stand with our legislative agenda.
That's not a win for hillary. At best, it's a break even.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I'm a member of AFT and the process was very open. Some complainers are not 50% of the union.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)They're getting reports that the membership polling was limited and targeted. That's far from a fair representation.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)It was a huge process that involved many thousands of members. It's the same process used for years.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I'm sure it's just them, in spite of being union stewards and long-time members of good standing who're very active in the union. I'm sure it's all just them.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Opinions aside, calling supporters "old ass school marms" is hardly going to win any undecideds, if that is actually a goal for some.
And yes, the process was just the same as previous endorsements. If people don't like the process, they should get in there and work to change it.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)The membership here found out the board voted after it happened. And it turns out, they were far from the only ones. There are reports of numerous other localities outside my state that were literally left out of the process. As I understand it, legal consultation is being sought right now to see if there is any recourse for the memberships at these schools.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)From there, the candidate questionnaire was developed. After I took the survey, I received emails about the process as it went on. Member town-halls were also held on the phone. Good luck with the lawyers, just seems like a waste of dues money, but whatever floats their boat.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)At the risk of stating the obvious, It's their choice what they do... but from what I've heard, they think they may have legal standing.
In any case, time will reveal all.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)That the endorsement polling was sent out when Hillary was the only Democratic candidate that was running. She's running a john-ellis-bush-bush campaign: no voter input needed in the primary just the acknowledgement that you can't vote for anyone else.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Sanders Supporters ... take it for what its worth ...
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)All of them are upset at how their schools have been left out of the process.
I'll be sure to post any updates I get from them.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)More than 30,000 NEA members have shown support for Sen. Bernie Sanders to be our next president through his campaign website or various social media sites,
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)30K members out of 3 million would be 1% of the membership?
so 1% of the membership is publicly support Sanders; doesn't sound like that big of a deal to me
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)You're right...the executive board's not a big deal... Except that they can arbitrarily choose to cast their lot in with hillary.
In the end it won't matter, the votes will come, all this squabbling will be done, and we'll be able to move on... one way or another.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)then the members have a responsibility to vote them out
however, it doesn't sound like the vast majority has any issue with the endorsement; maybe we'll hear from them later if they did
75% of the executive board voted to endorse Hillary
the NEA has a 175 member exec board
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Plus, AFT has 1.3 million members, so if the 30k includes members from each union, that percentage is even smaller. People are entitled to their choices and feelings, of course. But I wouldn't call it a mass movement.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)I'm VP of an educator chapter in Florida and on a state wide political committee.
Our state wide polls of teachers, university professors, and related unions (grad students, etc.) are overwhelmingly for Hillary. In fact, our analysis of candidate questionnaires, policies, and chapter meetings are consistent.
Hillary calls for preschool education, she has worked for children and immigrants for decades, and she has a better policy for higher education.
Bernie would be third or forth in most cases (behind Biden and O'Malley). His FTT on public retirement funds, lack of early policies for citizenship, Vermont's lack of tuition equity (which they have in NY and Maryland for example), and many other planks make Bernie a poor choice.
Union officers (like me) are members who are elected by members. We are not paid. Members can elect someone else from their ranks.
A small subset always disagree with endorsements - and there is also a subset who vote republican. The small subset cannot change the facts. Most educators prefer Hillary.
mdbl
(4,973 posts)by never putting on his comfortable shoes.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)great record of using his executive powers to greatly aid the NLRB to expand union rights, just to pick one example from many.
Meaningless and symbolic gestures aren't the same thing to us.
Lilith Rising
(184 posts)"old ass schoolmarms"?
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Says the guy voting for 73 year old geezer.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)It's one 23 year old and from there the post went to "old ass school marms."
morningfog
(18,115 posts)which came.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)A shame really, but it's true.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Voters their age elected Obama both times.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Voter_demographics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008#Voter_demographics
Obama lost among older voters in 2012. He lost or tied among older voters in 2008. It was "voters their age" who actually provided Obama's victories.
I think this is the third or fourth time I've show you the exact same demographics. How long are you planning to ignore them?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Guess who women are going to vote for in the Primary and in the General Election.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)Come from a Democratic upbringing in a red state -- but I can drive over to Iowa to volunteer for Sanders -- and can fill up my van with other female Bernie enthusiasts to volunteer across the border as well.
So tired of Hillary and supporters pulling the gender thing as an asset or reason to support her. I feel no sisterhood with anyone that is hawkish and a corporatist.
Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)people
(628 posts)Bernie Sanders all the way! Still idealistic - still p.o.'d. about injustice, dishonesty, hypocrisy and sold-outedness.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And I ain't no millennial.
.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example, in 2012 he lost men by about the amount he won women.
Also, the margin among women shot way up among millennial women. He lost women over 50. Or do millennial women not count?
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)dflprincess
(28,082 posts)as does their aunt.
sleepyvoter
(42 posts)Fact.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)nor a lot of fellow members of the LWV including several trailblazer feminists I know. Maybe it has something to do with their advocacy for a department of peace?
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Thanks!
A pivotal topic not mentioned enough.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)and I shudder to think of what things would be like if she had been president during the uprisings in the ME.
Her hawkishness honestly frightens me.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)hueymahl
(2,510 posts)My wife can't stand Hillary.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Because he's the best candidate running. Hands down, the best.
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)I'm seeing. I've already posted about the 3 in my family. I'm CONSTANTLY reminding them it takes so much more than talk. I hear many say, "we have time" and I keep telling them... It's NEVER TOO EARLY!
Hulk
(6,699 posts)While it tells me what percent voted for Obsma/Romney, where does it say what percent voted at all? That's the data I'd like to see.
If you have 90% voting for Sanders, if it's only 10% that bother to vote, it's meaningless.
The younger generation need to get off their lazy asses and smother the geezer vote. We are out there in high percentages, making our votes count. We'll be dead and gone in 20 years. The future is in their hands too!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)If this claim was correct, Romney would have won. After all, he won the geezer vote.
So since they already smothered the geezer vote in the last two presidential elections, you got any other complaints?
Hulk
(6,699 posts)They need to show up. Obama had the minority voters out the last two elections, and if that meant the younger voters as well...well, that's good. I don't trust the repuKKKes for one minute, and until we SOUNDLY beat their asses in national and regional elections, we are going to continue sliding backward while the rest of the industrialized world speeds past us.
The repub's will take the geezer vote, for a number of reasons not worth going into here. If the young voters showed up in percentages like the geezers do, we could do something positive with this country in the next decade. Without that, we'll continue to struggle along with a most probable Democratic President battling every inch of the way with a Congress that is poisoned with teabagger/fundie and "conservative" representation.
It just seems a shame that the younger generation have the most to gain, with their life expectancy and all, yet they blow it off in large percentage points. That's my complaint, I suppose. I'm aware of some very strong, involved younger voters. It's the large numbers that don't vote and don't want to get involved with even paying attention that is "my complaint". It's disheartening.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)"Not white" was 30-someodd percent of the vote. Under 40 was 30-someodd percent of the vote. (Going from memory, didn't bother looking it up again to get exact numbers)
Well then, perhaps we should give them a reason to show up, instead of repeating the mistakes we made with GenX. That might start with not insulting them as lazy and stupid.
Not going to be fixed until at least 2022. The Republicans did an excellent job of gerrymandering, and we did an excellent job of running abysmal campaigns.
Seriously, who the fuck thought running against the ACA in 2010 was a good idea?
Well, step 1: Stop insulting them.
Step 2: Start listening to them instead of lecturing them. They have issues. Don't blow off those issues like you blew off GenX's issues in the 90s.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)You're wasting it with me. I couldn't care less what you want to read into a post. Get a life.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)There aren't enough Boomers left to beat the Republicans, and GenX has been driven off into massive apathy.
You need "the kids" to win. Treating them like this is not going to get them.
Make a choice:
1) Your self-importance
2) Winning
In the 90's, you picked #1. Which one you want to do this time?
Frankly, I don't care. We have a massive pile of shit to clean up, and its going to take several generations to do it. Choosing #1 again just means we'll start the cleaning a little later.
beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)It's beyond me why the party establishment believes that Boomers are the future of the party. It's like they're doing the same thing as the Republicans, only not as loudly (and of course, minus the open racism).
This should be a t-shirt:
Well, step 1: Stop insulting them.
Step 2: Start listening to them instead of lecturing them. They have issues. Don't blow off those issues like you blew off GenX's issues in the 90s.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)They showed up in droves to vote for Obama. Young people DO vote, when there is a worthy politician on the ballot; one who represents their interests.
Young people need a reason to vote. They need an honest politician who will enact meaningful change.
Young people are excited about Sanders. They were toddlers when Bill Clinton was President.
The Clintons represent the history of our Democratic Party. Sanders represents the future.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Meanwhile, those "reliable" older voters voted for Romney.
Let's rely on Romney voters in the general election!!
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)We'd show up for midterms too, if the party would stop its insistence that we run shitty republicans against shittier republicans.
mythology
(9,527 posts)That makes it really hard to make the case for your argument given that it's not based in factual reality.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)They're polarized over social issues, mostly. "Well, our party also thinks you vile peasants should live in poverty and worship whatever master lets you lick the crumbs from his floor, too, but some of us think gay people should be able to get married!" probably isn't going to win many people over.
Don't get me wrong, social issues are as important as economic ones, otherwise I wouldn't be here at all, but when you combine support for social issues only when left with no choice with what's often only a marginal difference on economic issues, you're not going to whip up much enthusiasm. Especially when what you're competing against are a bunch of religious nuts that think even the most lukewarm support for social issues is somehow going to bring the moon crashing from the sky.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LonePirate
(13,431 posts)RichVRichV
(885 posts)And the under 50 crowd had 56% of the vote. That just further confirms to me the current polls are under-sampling the youth vote.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)They are not interested in politics as usual, but you throw a Bernie in the pot and just wait and see.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Complacency will be Hillary's downfall..
Oh but please continue NOT WORRYING for Hillary. She's got it all locked up remember?!
green917
(442 posts)Secretary clinton had it "all locked up" (the nomination at least) at this point in 2007 also. Look at how that worked out for her. Hillary (like her husband, al from, and the other founders of the dlc Before her ) has fallen into the same trap that has plagued the party since they (the 3rd way/dlc/neo-liberals) came on the scene. They believe that triangulation to appear more conservative to independent voters is what wins elections (even though it never has) but, as kinky friedman so eloquently put it, "the only thing you find in the middle of the road are yellow lines and dead armadillos! ". This will be a transformative election because the American people have shown that they are willing, no matter their political stripe, to support anyone who is outside the status quo of dc politics. This is the reason that the Donald, Ben carson, carly fiorina, and, to an extent, senator bernie sanders are doing so well.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)People really need to get their head out of the sand and put their finger in the wind.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)She could run the agency!
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)About armadillos. Otherwise, excellent post
green917
(442 posts)You are absolutely correct! thanks!
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)whom they know cares not even a little bit about them
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)BradBo
(531 posts)I don't comment much but I am down heartened when I read a comment from a millennium about supporting Bernie. They need to drop the Xbox controller and get out and vote. They have been way to comfortable for to long with parental support and don't know what real threats to their comfortable life style that are staring them right in the face. Vote, vote, vote!!!!!
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)very proud that your generation is cutting through the propaganda and seeing the light Now get off my lawn yer snot nosed whippersnappers
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Because nothing shows what a generation wants like throwing out half of them from your poll.
Meanwhile, keep your head up and keep fighting. We all will get this done.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Those pals include male, female, Republicans, Independents, Democrats, the young, the old and the middle aged!
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...who is supporting Sanders. Everyone in my book club is supporting Sanders. Not one Hillary supporter.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)The only people I know supporting Hillary are a few 55+yo women. Everyone else is for Bernie. Even people who were never interested in politics are taking an interest in Bernie.
I myself, never voted for other than a Democrat my entire life*. I even ran for Congress in 2004. I managed a couple of campaigns since then. Almost everyone I've been associated politically for the last 15 years is supporting Bernie.
* I must in all honesty admit that I voted against a "Democrat" in 2008, for a County Clerk office. The "Democrat" ran in 2004, with our financial and sweat support in 2004. The day after he lost, he showed up at a Repuke press conference, crying how the Party had abandoned his values, and he was switching over to Republican. He knew the incumbent Repuke he ran against was retiring after that term, and he tried to position himself for the next race. Behold! He filed as a Republican for the 2008 election. But the Republican Party had a better candidate in mind, and threw their support behind her. So, now this piece of shit opportunist switches back to Democrat, and file to run. And the assholes running the county and state parties backed this loser AGAIN!
Fuck him. It's te only time I ever voted for a Republican. And the "Democrat" lost in a landslide. He's now retired to the dustbin of Florida politics.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)For example, I voted against Feinstein twice. (Then I moved out of CA)
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)but it's NOW our duty to push and prod those who have followed in our footsteps. So very many of my group are BOOMERS, but as I stated here twice, 3 millennials are part of my family and I'm right behind them PUSHING!
Oh, also their boyfriends and girlfriends too!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Obama lost among voters over 40 in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012#Voter_demographics
"The kids" are doing just fine.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)...but do not need much push to get support for Bernie. He appears to be universally liked -- well, except for those who think the next Dem POTUS should be corporate owned.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)You are NOT crazy nor do you live in some weird unique place. Just telling you that before Camp Weathervane comes along and tries to gaslight you into believing otherwise.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...trying to pour cold water on any spark of enthusiasm for Bernie, aren't they?
No doubt, they seem collectively concerned and on a mission to keep throwing that cold water.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)IMO this is more important to these kids then it is to most of us older folks. Yet some try to discourage their will to better their lives and belittle their effort SMH!!!
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)beerandjesus
(1,301 posts)I seriously think you might have just hit on the best Hillary metaphor I've seen, haha!
PatrickforO
(14,588 posts)DrBulldog
(841 posts)Can you be like Bernie who walks the walk as well as talks the talk?
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)and their percentage is growing. So millennials will vote, it's generation X that is disengaged and doesn't show up. We need them too.
Main point of this article is a study showing that WITHOUT the youth vote in 2012, Romney would have sailed into the WH {shudders}
http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/study-youth-vote-was-decisive-083510
jeff47
(26,549 posts)First, the older half tend to be teabaggers.
Second, Democrats could make a winning coalition without us in the 90s, and we wanted different things than the Boomers and WWII generation in that coalition. Our small size made it not worth it to address that divide.
Which caused a lot of long-term apathy that will be very hard to overcome. Especially since GenX priorities were bargained away in compromises by Third-Way Democrats.
Since we're in our 40s now, it will be very difficult to get some sort of "GenX attracting" message to overcome all that. Our student loans are paid off. Those of us who will ever be able to buy a house have bought one. Those of us who never will be able to buy one have accepted their screwing. And we're too young to be seriously swayed by Medicare and Social Security - we still expect them to be bargained away before we get there (Hey, let's talk about raising the retirement age for everyone after Boomers again!)
And we're still a small block of voters.
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)I agree with everything you've said. Although I'm on the younger end of the Gen X spectrum, I'm 37, I vividly remember the generational struggles of the 90's and how our generation was treated by the powers that be. Many of my fellow classmates from high school are very much in the libertarian or tea party camps now because of these issues. The DNC has all but ignored our contingent and admittedly folks have checked out, but it isn't because we're apathetic or not involved. It's because we've been rarely given a reason to become involved. Most of us are working our jobs and balancing families and dealing with struggles to an extent that our parents didn't face.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Not enough power.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Due to life circumstances and a dash of ignorance/naivete, mine grew and grew while on deferments for years... Now they're huge. I'm on the income-based repayment plan now, at least, but the huge debt is itself an unwieldy burden.
=============
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)We're a bit spoiled here with vote-by-mail (GO WASHINGTON, OREGON AND COLORADO!) but I'll admit to never having caucused before for various reasons. Living in a semi-late caucusing state doesn't help. Most of the nomination legwork has already been done by the time the vote gets out here. I'll say for a fact that I am FIRED up to caucus this go-round, even if my preferred candidate has been all-but-eliminated. The enthusiasm is real and enthusiasm is invaluable come voting time.
So.... will millennials caucus? I can't speak for the rest of them, but at least one will.
(I disagree with describing millennials in broad strokes as lazy.)
Everybody needs to vote.
Peace
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)could have written your post. Well said.
central scrutinizer
(11,662 posts)Haven't had a real Democratic president since Carter. Time to end the trickle down bullshit
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(Sigh.)
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Voted for Jimmy Carter in 1980.
How did that election go? I forget.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)inflation is better now than then ... and that we don't have an ongoing hostage crisis. Times change ...
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)amirite?
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)I cried because I worked my ass off I took it hard
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Makes you "angry".......hello ignore list...
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... that's fine.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... but, I wonder when people talk about the hostage crisis and how "inflation" is better since then.
Just where were you living all these years, anyway?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)pacalo
(24,721 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Jesus Christmas already.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I guess that's the "beauty" of being idealistic. Those who are, are blissfully unaware of how their purity and unwillingness to compromise will result in more failure than success. And I suppose that's a valid reason why so many of the pure liberals are so angry, frustrated and aggressive.
It often appears that the purest of pure liberals would rather have NO loaf than compromise for half a loaf... you know... because compromising their values would be "wrong" and they'd rather starve (or lose an election) than to give a single inch.
Amazingly, this appears to be a point of pride with many. "We may have lost, but at least we didn't accept any of that dirty money." Or ... worse yet ... to be selfish enough to sabotage and undermine the party's nominee. It often seems that rather than blaming themselves and accepting their own flaws and weaknesses, they'd prefer to blame the pollsters, or invent conspiracy theories to explain-away their own failings. Worse yet, some appear to want to go BACKWARD in some selfish and misguided effort to claim the all-important all-powerful "I-told-you-so" rights.
So, yes... I too was "young" and idealistic. Some folks never "grow up" (so to speak, it's not entirely age-related) to become more realistic and pragmatic. Others do. I did.
Take it or leave it.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Thanks.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)It's your future, and I sincerely want it to be a better one then we have found.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I'm undecided, but of my left side of the aisle friends everyone except one supports Hillary.
intersectionality
(106 posts)Where do you live if you don't mind me asking? I'm in NYC and I get quite a lot of diversity of answers from my friend group and even my parents and their friend group in the Dallas tx area.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I have friends in various parts of the US.
6chars
(3,967 posts)https://www.facebook.com/yalestudentsforhillary/?_fb_noscript=1
http://www.browndailyherald.com/2015/09/13/brown-students-for-hillary-heres-why-you-should-vote-for-hillary/
https://callink.berkeley.edu/organization/RFH
https://maizepages.umich.edu/organization/studentsforhillary
http://bcgavel.com/2015/11/01/bc-students-for-hillary-kicks-off-campus-campaign/
http://wellesleyforhillary.com/
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)A recent article on Wellesley For Hillary included numerous quotes where they were partly backing her to increase the value of their degrees. So, yeah, not the least self-serving of votes...
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Everyone I know that has talked about presidential politics is a Sanders supporter. Of course, I live in a very liberal community, so that doesn't surprise me. But I'm seeing very little actual support for Senator Clinton.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)It is anybody that has a liberal bone in their body. I live in an extremely conservative state, but mention Bernie Sanders, and there is at least respect in the eyes of the people you are talking to.
Mention Hillary? Good luck with that!
Those are my observations.
BernTheRich
(29 posts)I'm supporting/voting for Bernie for the same reasons - and I'm 52!
I'm glad that you and the other intelligent people your age have a candidate whom you can believe in. I know that if it weren't for Bernie, I would have much less hope for all of us.
MsLeopard
(1,265 posts)I think you'll like it here; check out the Bernie group if you get a chance.
I'm 65 and "corner the vote" for Bernie each Sunday in my town. The number of people who show up with signs and banners grows every week and the feedback from drivers is mostly positive. Go Bernie!
BernTheRich
(29 posts)Your welcome and what you wrote put a smile on my face - and that's very unlike me lol!
And thank you for your support of Bernie. What you wrote only confirms that there is a real groundswell for Bernie that we're not really seeing in the media. I really believe that he has scared the "powers that be" - including (especially) certain Democrats.
I also believe that the issue of income inequality would hardly be raised, if at all, if it weren't for Bernie. The other candidates are just jumping on his bandwagon, and they wouldn't be doing that if they didn't think it would benefit them in a big way. Bernie is the real deal. And I never thought I'd be able to say that about any politician.
Thank You again!
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)and I totally agree with this 23 year-old...
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)feels like.
George McGovern won 16 or 17 electoral votes (can't remember exactly) in the general election after winning the primary where 18-21 year olds could vote for the first time.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Different persons - Different times - Different issues - Different consequences at stake.
I expected you to show disdain for liberals ... I am not in the least surprised ...
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)between this election and his poor polling numbers and the 2008 election when Obama overtook Hillary and won? Is that a false equivalency? Or is it like everything else seems to be with Bernie Sanders supporters and depends on whether or not it benefits Saint Bernie? Polls don't matter unless they show Bernie ahead either I noticed.
"Borrack is clearly unelectable in the GE"- moobu2, Mon Mar-24-08 08:27 AM
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)Okay, possibly one of those numbers is a tiny fib LOL.
I like Hillary, but I am for Bernie!
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)always lie about their age don't they?
Turn CO Blue
(4,221 posts)PennsylvaniaMatt
(966 posts)A lot of fellow young Democrats that I talk to support Bernie Sanders, myself included.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)what ALL of you so desperately need to do. I have 3 millennials in my family who ALSO support Bernie, but I'm CONSTANTLY reminding them that they MUST mobilize and GET OUT AND VOTE!!!
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)I encourage you to stay involved, but don't let your personal life suffer from it. Good luck gobears.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)If people who had hopes for a better future get crushed by TPTB, will they show up after feeling beaten down ???
Time will tell.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Especially by the rather nebulous TPTB?
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Just sayin'.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... worked the entire time ... and had about 100k in loans when I was done.
Never felt "beaten down".
WillyT
(72,631 posts)When I went to Jr. College it was free... except for books and lab fees.
When I went to state... tuition was $85 to $95 during the time I was there.
I don't know your personal situation (it's none of my business), and I know we don't agree on most things.
BUT...
There is all sorts of data out there that says that parents of children are now worried that their kids will not have a better life than they had... hell the data says the parents are worried it will be worse.
And other data has it that even people that have recently graduated college, are holding off on marraige, having kids, and buying a house.
THAT... was a major part of the American Dream.
They've held off because they have calculated how long to get out of debt, compared to their child-bearing years. And they lose...
There are a number of people here who seem to ask, "Why's everybody angry?"
I suggest that the above situation is why... if you ain't angry, you ain't paying attention.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And I'm in my 50s.
My son is 23.
My parents were afraid that I would not do as well as they did ... its something all parents worry about.
As for my level of anger ... I guess that where we differ is that I target my anger at the GOP ... you, and some others around here, don't seem to have their anger targeted in that direction.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)By I have anger for more that just the GOP.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)But to me personally, it's a greater crime to get stabbed in the back by a supposed friend.
I hate the GOP universally, but I will always have my eye out for our own trying to sell us down the river. Been burned before...
In it's own strange way, I can forgive Republicans for being universally global assholes...
Certain Dems... Not so much.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That's not so helpful- but catapult the propaganda, dude.
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)...the oldest being 14, I can assure you that your assessment is correct. We worry about paying for college for our kids, and it's coming sooner than we'd like. Hell, we're still paying student loan debt and paying for food on the table and a house over our heads. We're lucky, my profession has blessed me with an exceptional salary, but many of our friends aren't as lucky. Many of them are working their asses off just to make ends meet and feel like the entire political process means less than nothing in their lives. I know you're a Sanders supporter, as am I, and I hope you can see where I and others of my generation are coming from and why we support sanders. Interesting aside, we have an annual family reunion at Thanksgiving every year. Politics always seems to come up and myself and the cousins my age were discussing the current candidates, both GOP and Dem, bear in mind these are not political fiends and come from conservative and liberal points of view. Of the ten people discussing the primary, the only candidate that every single person agreed on was Bernie Sanders. Why? Because we each appreciated his honesty and believed he would work for the things he was running on. I'm sure someone will come along to pooh-pooh my anecdotal story but I've seen it elsewhere as well. We are at a crossroads in this country...whether we wish to admit it or not...
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thank you for that... truly.
And yeah... there is a whole lot of denial this time around.
Blessings to you and yours.
Docreed2003
(16,875 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Glad ta have ya aboard !!!
And thanks once again.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)The older half of us tend to be teabaggers though, so watch out for spittle if you do ask.
The younger half was not required to form a winning coalition in the 90s, and we had different priorities from the Boomers and WWII generation in that coalition. The party didn't bother juggling that divide because we were a small generation, and "who else you gonna vote for?"
Then when it came time to enact various bargains to show just how bipartisan Democrats were, GenX priorities were the ones bargained away. We weren't part of the coalition the party was supporting.
This has resulted in very long term political apathy, since both parties really did not give a damn about what we cared about. But hey, let's talk about raising the retirement age for everyone after Boomers again. I'm sure that'll fix it!
Anyway, younger GenX is what the party gets when they ignore "the kids". There are now more millennials than boomers, and that's only going to get worse as boomers leave the voting poll (except in Chicago). Disrespect them at your own peril.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)I'm a Boomer... yet still a Liberal.
I will have your back.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)dflprincess
(28,082 posts)not to sell their futures to Wall Street.
I doubt that dire predictions about the Supreme Court will be enough to scare them into voting.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Whatever Trump, Cruz, or Rubio and the GOP decides that should be.
dflprincess
(28,082 posts)and just saying "Trust me." probably won't cut it.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)They won't be motivated if the candidate doesn't excite them. Negative motivation, or "look what happens if we lose" doesn't have sufficient impact. They tend to need to "fall in love".
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And then maybe they'll learn that sometimes, Love hurts.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Just, you know... thinking out loud here...
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The reality is that they should turn out in the primaries for whichever candidate they prefer, and then, they should turn out again in the General, whether their candidate wins the primary or not.
That's what the rest of us grown-ups are going to do.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)And I think your concept of reality is bullshit. I'm not claiming to "know" they'll only turn out for Bernie, it just seems like that's the safe bet. There is certainly a percentage of them for whom that is true; and not only of them I might add. Also, there's no need to even take the risk, except for the dogged insistence by your faction that Hillary must be the nominee come hell or high water. You would expose all of us to needless risk for your damned stupid pride.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Time will tell soon.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and in fact I did. I was young and foolish. People like me, by voting for Anderson as a liberal Republican running as a third party liberal, splitting the vote of liberals for Carter, helped elect Ronald Reagan. I recognize that as a mistake and will not repeat it. I will vote for the party nominee, be it Sen. Sanders or Sen. Clinton. I will do so enthusiastically with the hope of victory. I will not vote third party and split the liberal vote ever again.
gordyfl
(598 posts)I had voted for John Anderson, as well.
I voted for Ted Kennedy in the Democratic Primary. I was against Carter because of the way he played politics with the hostages. The way he refused to debate Kennedy. Hiding in the Rose Garden.
I wasn't going to vote Reagan because I didn't trust him.
Thank goodness there was a third option.
Since then, I've grown to like Jimmy Carter. I admire the things he did since leaving the White House. And Reagan did some good things in office that surprised me. So you never know.
However, John Anderson had no bearing on the final election count. At least I voted my conscience.
Electoral Votes:
Reagan: 489
Carter: 49
Anderson: 0
Percent:
Reagan: 51%
Carter: 41%
Anderson: 6%
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)did, but the principle is there.
I didn't care for Kennedy as a candidate, and I wasn't upset with Carter for refusing to debate him. He had no business challenging the incumbent in his party. Nor did I fault him for the hostages. I was just young and didn't like him. Probably bought into the propaganda that I would now dismiss as bullshit. Overall, I know think Carter is one of the finest human beings he could possibly be and was a good President.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)deadly ignorance and bigotry, sounding the alarm Reagan ignored. For 7 years that piece of right wing shit refused to so much as acknowledge the AIDS crisis, his Press Sec joked about it once or twice and they all laughed but Ronnie said nothing and no action was taken until over 30,000 Americans had died. This month, December 2015, well over 100,000 people will die from AIDS, mostly in Africa at this point but far too many all over the world.
Good things? Not really. Union busting, drug warring, AIDS denying racist.
I voted for Jimmy Carter. Then I protested Reagan with all my might.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Yea, you're right. Reagan was not good for the working class. He surrounded himself with Wall Street advisors. He lead the way in union busting. (Wasn't he a union rep in Hollywood?) He ignored the AIDS crisis.
Although I disagreed with most of his decisions, Reagan did pull our troops out of Beirut, even though it was the unpopular thing to do at the time.
Heck, I consider Bush the worst president of my lifetime, but he did remove our military bases out of Saudi Arabia (to a neighboring country), which I thought was a wise thing to do. Sadly, he did this after he began war with Iraq.
PoliticalMalcontent
(449 posts)Always nice to see people so excited about politics. Spread that enthusiasm and remember to caucus! Hell, bring your friends if you can.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)When word on the street says someone is ahead in the hearts and minds of the people that person usually wins, even if the polls say otherwise.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)I keep running into this again and again in people under 30.
I support Bernie too, but please knowyou have to vote for any Democrat over any Republican for President.
The last Republican didn't protect us from 9/11, lied us into a deadly war, left us with a destroyed economy, and a conservative court that's against workers and for the oligarchs.
Please register and vote and make sure all your friends do too. If for no other reason than that we cannot bear 4 to 8 years of a Republican climate science denier.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)27 here.
I've never EVER spoken to a pro Hillary person outside of DU, nor have I seen any pro Hillary paraphernalia in my area. All Bernie.
The media is lying.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Besides Bernie stuff, all I've seen around here is for Trump or Carson. On edit, racking my brains, I think I might have seen one Hillary sticker somewhere.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Hillary's campaign is all about manufacturing the perception of strength through repeated assertion in the media.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)45
but you know i know mostly bernie fans in my age group and social crowd (both working poor and tech workers)
here is a question though to you gobears10
how many of your buddies /generation have land lines, cause that's where the main polls are done?
i know in my generation and social group not many have a land line
we have cells and internet
nice to see next gen kicking ass!
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)And the Bears don't play till Sunday.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Unless you're spamming, trolling, or doing a Will Pitt.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It is not at all uncommon for an OP to not respond to replies.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)At least, not the Jeff47 I used to read.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Or is it because it fits a preconceived notion that Sanders supporter = Male ? Really, I'm interested in knowing how you deduced that.
At best this is circular reasoning.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)And Bernie's strongest support comes from young males.
So, yes, it's a preconceived notion, but not an illogical one. And hasn't been disputed by the OP.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)many are women you'll still conclude that all these women are males to fit the narrative. Not saying it may not be generally true, but in this case there is some reason to suspect the OP is a woman (the rose).
FWIW, I know no women who support Hillary. Yes, I am young.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)Oh -- you said signature. I don't see signatures anymore because I couldn't stand seeing those crawling bugs everywhere. So I blocked all of them.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)They say that Bernie just reminds them of an angry old man. "Why does he always yell and look so angry."
I don't agree with them about Bernie, but that's what they said while watching the debates with us.
Duppers
(28,127 posts)They need to understand the issues above appearances. But I like O'Malley a lot too.
Make sure they vote.
gordyfl
(598 posts)In my neck of the woods women for Bernie seem to have a slight edge. Women following Hillary are usually around 60 and over and are content following headline news. Bernie supporters are all ages and follow politics more closely. Issues are more important to Benie supporters. "Looking presidential" is very important to the Hillary supporters. The Hillary supporters I know are actually conservative Democrats, although they won't admit to it.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)and Latinos, who don't consider themselves to be conservative anythings.
But I guess they don't count -- at least not from your point of view.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I still can't believe Nixon won!
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)and don't ever settle. It's going to be your future and your world. Do it the way you want, if the party doesn't like it they can lead, follow or get the fuck out of your way.
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)They plan to vote for him but few expect him to get the nomination.
expectations are based on experience and traditionally the most liberal candidates don't get nominated.
But the Republican side may break all expectations and nominate a flashy incompetent so expectations on our side might break into new territory too. We'll just have to wait and see.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)and be sure to ignore the midterms as you always do. Grrrrrrrrr.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)my son's friends are encouraged by Sanders.
Will they get out there to vote for Hillary? I know the answer to one candidate, not so sure about the other candidate as they are not inspired for a variety of reasons.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)which we desperately needed. There is a huge disconnect about the work involved, I know it;s not as sexy as the presidential, but they get you know where if you don't stay involved.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... and a lot better handle of the world, due to it.
I believe you and yours will prove that people no longer are growing up in a bubble.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)The old work hard and you will get ahead isn't working for a lot of people.
I am 69 and have been homeless and am doing ok now.
One thing I could offer is that you have to keep trying things. Don't give up.
I get called a conservative for saying things like that but actions do have consequences. Sometimes they are good consequences.
But inaction has consequences too.
Vote for Bernie if you believe in him but don't rely only on that to make life better.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)The millennials are coming out in droves to support him and are really excited about him. Go millennials and go Bernie!
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)They must just not care.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)I'm not surprised either.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Unfortunately for Bernie she's a UK citizen and can't vote for him.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I guess too busy with social media. I know, take your iphones with you to the voting precinct.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)My kids and their friends love Bernie and can barely stand Hillary.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)I have a very LONG memory.. Some of Reagan mostly Bush Sr on forward. Most voters have a very SHORT memory. I think Hillary counts on this especially with that supporter of hers coming to our door today. Good God she just totally ignored me. Never seen a supporter so cold before. SMH get the feeling alot of doors were shut on her face today... if I actually owned the house I probably would have done something a bit nicer but get cold as ice , I give cold water back.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Bernie Sanders rally, Seattle
Beacool
(30,251 posts)I will vote for mine.
Let the chips fall where they may.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Beacool
(30,251 posts)I come here once in a while. I read nonsense about Hillary on other sites, I don't need to read it here. Some are just RW talking points.
Why waste my time arguing with these folks?
vadermike
(1,416 posts)If our Dems dont all come out and vote for the nominee if it is gonna be Hillary . then we will have a R president , simple as that.. can u imagine an all R congress supreme court etc for a generation? UGH.. i just hope that we Dems can unite by election time , regardless of our nominee.. otherwise the results will be horrendous and cant really be reversed ugh
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)but I have no problems voting for either HC or BS in the GE. While I have had some differences with HC in the past and with BS more recently regarding the TPP and his campaign approach, I still am OK with them overall. The way I see it, they all have their own tactics of how they intend to set forth an overall progressive agenda, and I'd rather get some of what I want than nothing at all with the GOP. BS is more of an economics guy and has arguably the most progressive economic platform, while HC seems more balanced between economics, social issues, and foreign policy. There's something to like about both. The catch is that they need people around our age to vote more often in off-year elections instead of just every 4 years. It's on us to do our homework on the issues and the candidates and pay attention to what's going on, and not fall for cynicism and hopelessness. We've seen what happened with Obama when turnout was low in 2010. A president Bernie can't deliver on Medicare for all with a Republican-led Congress, and a president Hillary can't deliver on gun control under the same circumstances.
flamingdem
(39,321 posts)regardless of who gets the nom.
If not then I am notching my opinion of millenials down some more. It's one thing to be idealistic, which I applaud, it's another thing to act entitled and oblivious. Not that we didn't see this kind of thing before but I'm concerned. I did gotv at the community college and people had very little interest in elections. That's how Republicans win.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)but one that is not their first choice. For decades we have been singing the same song while ignoring the people, it is all about who the party puts forward and who the media covers.
It is plain as day, Obama was criticized by the corporate media, BUT they kept his name front and center all the time. They had a nice little show in the debates between Clinton and Obama and Edwards, see you had a choice of candidates that were willing to play along ... now select one.
We are now witnessing a distaste for establishment candidates, especially on the Repub side. But the DNC did not hold the first debate until after voters in NY state had to register to vote in the primary, very Democratic of them to introduce the other candidates after it was too late for millions of voters.
Sorry the millennials are making choices based on issues, they are excited for a candidate that speaks to what is important to them, but they are much less enthused when told to vote for a candidate they distrust. That is not acting entitled, many are smart and know the difference.
I am happy to have two children who do not always conform to the establishment rules, if we want their votes then we need to give them a reason to vote for a candidate, so far they like Sanders and they are much less aligned to a team.
I will not fault them for not complying and voting for the Dem nominee, they might or they might not for the nominee, that is their choice. As a parent my job is to instill curiosity and not wave a flag for one party or the other, we can discuss the pros and cons, but it is their decision.
What the Democratic Party should be doing is offering choices and discussing issues, instead they have silenced debate.
senz
(11,945 posts)Stay strong, stay good.
I wonder what the 24-year old Bernie Sanders would have thought if anyone could have told him that he would be an inspiration to 20-somethings fifty years in the future.
What an amazing destiny.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Clinton enthousiasm is for the above 40 and above 250.000 a year crowds. Anti-establishment sentiment is boiling - and it looks for a way to express itself.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Duppers
(28,127 posts)All the way, as are most of his friends.
themonster
(137 posts)I'm glad there are young people like yourself who believe in the things that you mentioned. It makes me hopeful for the future. I like Bernie but if Hillary ends up winning the nomination, I hope you won't stay at home and let the Republicans win the Presidency. The Republicans are against what you believe in. Hillary is FOR the things that you mentioned.
djean111
(14,255 posts)And that is the opinion of my 20 YO grandson and his friends. They scour the internet, they do not listen to campaign stuff.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)No she's not
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Reach out to as may as you can. We needs 90% participation in your age group to turn this thing around. It is up to us to help spread the word.
treestar
(82,383 posts)what does age matter? Older people vote.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p20-573.pdf
http://www.nonprofitvote.org/documents/2013/09/america-goes-to-the-polls-2012-voter-participation-gaps-in-the-2012-presidential-election.pdf
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/05/08/six-take-aways-from-the-census-bureaus-voting-report/
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But its BS's last hope that the mythical 18 to 24 year olds who hardly ever vote in any elections much less primaries, will descend en masse to the local voting precinct and save him.
Dreams die hard I guess.
2016 Iowa Presidential Caucuses are in 61 days.......
Sancho
(9,070 posts)I was on a college campus trying recently. Many don't have documents (birth certificates, etc.), can't vote except at their home precinct instead of their college campus, etc., etc.
Regular folks have trouble getting to vote now. The young just give up even if they try.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)It is a hassle and republicans with a big assist from SCOTUS are going to make it even harder in the general.
Its way way harder than clicking an online poll that's for damn sure LOL
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)As I've observed this too often mean-spirited fight in the primary, the same dozen or so HRC supporters drag out the same tired tactics, crash around a thread in the same ineffectual manner, and never engage in any true debate. They don't defend their candidate's behavior, votes, financial sources or mealy-mouthed "promises".
Sanders, however, gains new voices every day. Not just newbies either. They point to his independence, his ethical leadership and numerous votes to support progressive commonsense policy. I see people who have stayed out of the GD-P until now breaking towards Sanders and voicing it with enthusiasm and optimism.
If Bernie wins the primary, we see a landslide and real change in a Democratic USA. If Clinton continues to force herself down the throats of the Democratic Party, we might have her as Chief Executive, but nothing else changes and we have 4-8 years of Benghazi/email/whatever bullshit maintaining Republican hatred and paralyzing us in a time when we must be taking action to address countless looming disasters.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)pengu
(462 posts)5 younger voters. All 5 supported Bernie in the primary. Only one was willing to vote for Clinton in the general. Her only argument was the supreme court. She was willing to hold her nose. That's it. One will hold their nose. The other 4 were all "Hell no. Never."
Nominate Clinton and we're going to lose.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Just so you know, if I were a bagger troll, I would probably be tacking the same way. I do not believe that they want Hillary to be nominated because she will dominate those misogynist pigs on their side. So, they would try to defeat her in the primary. I am not saying that you are one of them so relax. Why don't you just promote your guy?
pengu
(462 posts)Welcome to ignore.
LexVegas
(6,094 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)yellowwoodII
(616 posts)I don't know whom those poll-takers ask, but almost all of the Democratic school marms I know Like Bernie Sanders. You know we're mothers and grandmothers, too, and we remember that Hillary voted for the Iraq War and Bernie didn't. If she didn't know better, it says something about her judgment. If she did know better, it was immoral.
But yes, we vote. If Hillary is the candidate, I'll probably have to vote for her because the Republican candidate will be so much worse, but I will hate to vote for her.
As far as voting for her "because she is a woman candidate," I could not care less. Silly.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)But then I got older and realized it wasn't. Still don't think I ever could have been persuaded to vote for a one note Charlie with an abysmal record of never getting things done. Never would have voted for a pro gunner either.
My son is 23 and very politically aware (probably because he grew up with an activist Mom - I used to take him to political meetings where he'd do his homework while we planned and strategized). He'd be happy with any of the Dems running.
His friends don't seem to care. To them politics in uncool. Which basically mirrors my peers when I was his age.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I think you need to go and find out something about socialism.
I find your post totally unconvincing, incidentally. The idea of an activist abandoning socialism as a concept is nonsensical.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)You're not required to be a socialist to engage in activism. In fact the vast, vast majority of liberal political activists are not socialists. That's just something you have constructed in your head. It's far from reality.
But I do get a kick out of DU for that reason. People here seem to think posting here makes them "activists" but it doesn't. Being a keyboard warrior doesn't count. To be an actual activist you have to actually act.
harun
(11,348 posts)How about Hillary's constituency having a say in her pro war vote and Iraq policy?
Think about that.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Were overwhelmingly in favor of the Iraq war. So if that is Bernie's excuse for being pro gun I suppose it works the same for Clinton. Right?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)Where young people going to go, Ted Cruz?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)NYCButterfinger
(755 posts)If they don't want war. It should be for people over the age of 40. Millennials need to get the hell out of the Armed Forces. They don't belong there.
Gothmog
(145,558 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)I know many Millennials. Not one supports Hillary Clinton
book_worm
(15,951 posts)that while Bernie does best among young voters that Hillary actually leads among them.
RandySF
(59,225 posts)People are typically drawn to the like-minded.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Voting for Bernie. Millennials WILL (bless your hearts) be the ones to get Bernie elected. Though, the 3 baby boomers and 1 Greatest Generation in this house are all voting for Bernie. I have yet to see anyone/hear of anyone that supports Clinton. I have had people approach me and compliment me on my Bernie buttons and have seen numerous Bernie bumper stickers - zero Clinton stickers. Bernie's support runs deep across generations! THREE generations in my family alone.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts). . . are gonna crush you millennials like a bug at the polls!!!
mdbl
(4,973 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,809 posts)What will you and your friends do IF it becomes clear by July 2016 that Bernie Sanders will not win the nomination and HRC will?
1) Pissing and moaning is not an option.
2) Staying home and not voting in the general election is not an option.
3) Writing in candidates or voting for 3rd-party or "vanity" candidates in the general election
is NOT. AN. OPTION.
Bernie Sanders himself has said that should he not win the nomination, he will whole-heartedly support whoever IS the Democratic nominee. Even if it is Hillary Clinton.
Will you and your friends do the same?
The stakes are way too high in 2016 to do otherwise.
DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Truprogressive85
(900 posts)I find it laughable that there are people in here saying the youth dont show to polls ?
So in 08 the youth did not show up ?
Are some of you saying Obama's victory both in the primaries and general the youth did not make histroy?
The youth dont show up to mid term elections because DNC runs shitty candidates that are play centrist bull!
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)the election?
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)we all agree that if it is Hillary we will vote for her. But in the meantime,we are working overtime for Bernie. We will do the same for Hillary if need be.
malthaussen
(17,216 posts)Voter apathy is the major problem with getting things done in this country. When Congress has 90% disapproval, yet over 90% are re-elected because no one shows up, that is a problem. Of course, it would also be nice if the voters were offered a real choice...
(Not you, personally, of course, but the demo to which you belong is not exactly politically active)
-- Mal
crim son
(27,464 posts)We old farts can be critical of today's young people but I find myself impressed by those I encounter. Smart people, you millennial liberals, with a healthy distrust for the Establishment.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)everyone doesn't recoil from in disgust next time
azmom
(5,208 posts)Are big Bernie supporters. My relatives who consist of Latinos and African-Americans are all in for Bernie also, except for one.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)That would be a useful piece of data.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And everyone I know is supporting Bernie too.
Jeb Bartlet
(141 posts)show up to vote so your concerns are dismissed. The only time 18-25 year olds show up is in a Presidential election and even then they only account for a few percentage points.
"Not surprising that we're picking the progressive in this race, Bernie Sanders, over the establishment candidate. "
Not surprising that it won't matter one bit.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)I do hope that you'll vote for the Democratic nominee if it isn't Bernie Sanders, however.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and we'll see how many of these snowflake millennials will be bothered to get their asses to the polls on election day... It's not like a whole lot of you showed up in '14...
FWIW, it's pretty dangerous to speak for the politics of even a small demographic, much less an entire generation...