Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:21 AM Dec 2015

So, why is O'Malley still in the race?

Last edited Tue Dec 8, 2015, 09:56 AM - Edit history (2)

The hope that he could be making a play for second place seems to be faint based on the latest round of polls, he's cut his staffing to the bone and he is receiving almost no air time at all. Why is he still in it?

Is it because:

He doesn't want a de facto nominee in case one of the other two has to drop out before the voting ends? Possible, I suppose. But the threat of Clinton being indicted looks to be nil at this point, and Bernie is showing no indication he's giving up the race.

He wants to keep a national platform for as long as possible to share his governing philosophy? MOM isn't exactly an outsider, and he really doesn't have much to separate himself from the other candidates.

He's trying to position himself for an administrative position with the eventual nominee? I think this is the most likely. I figure he is trying to show the other two he could be VP (Highly doubtful to no chance with Clinton) or, at least, an effective cabinet member..

Something else?

On edit: this is not an attack, it really isn't. Some of my favorite people in GDP are MOM supporters. I am curious as to the motivations for a candidate who is clearly well outside the two frontrunners heading into the primaries and had very little shot to head off their momentum.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, why is O'Malley still in the race? (Original Post) Godhumor Dec 2015 OP
"Bernie is showing indication he's giving up the race. " <-- Is this a typo? 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #1
Yup typo. Forgotten "No", rather Godhumor Dec 2015 #2
Perhaps because he thinks he would be a good President. lovemydog Dec 2015 #3
Good answers, IMO. eom BlueMTexpat Dec 2015 #13
...says the guy who pointed out 60+ percent don't decide until closer to caucus day. jeff47 Dec 2015 #4
A couple days ago Godhumor Dec 2015 #6
He wasn't even the second choice among enough to be viable MaggieD Dec 2015 #7
Because a second place in an early primary state could throw some serious wind in his sails Scootaloo Dec 2015 #5
Good point. He might be throwing everything into the momentum gambit Godhumor Dec 2015 #9
He is different enough that I have a preference to Bernie. Kalidurga Dec 2015 #8
Who is he? This Dem Primary is one of the worst, many people slipslidingaway Dec 2015 #10
I'm glad he's there. senz Dec 2015 #11
I did laugh quite hysterically Kentonio Dec 2015 #15
THIS, SUBSTANCE, Acts, NOT TALK. elleng Dec 2015 #12
he hoping for an upset in Iowa bigtree Dec 2015 #14
Iowa is all about ground game, and having strong precinct captains. Agschmid Dec 2015 #16
O'Malley's gotten a lot of key endorsements in Iowa from county chairs and state legislators askew Dec 2015 #18
Really, askew, another Youth Caucus that he WON???!!! elleng Dec 2015 #20
Yep. His team is leaving no stone unturned in Iowa. askew Dec 2015 #27
Interesting, you got some links about this? joshcryer Dec 2015 #23
No problem. askew Dec 2015 #26
Thanks for the list JustAnotherGen Dec 2015 #30
I think so too. askew Dec 2015 #32
Oh man, Iowa is about to get interesting as hell. joshcryer Dec 2015 #34
Yeah, I had no idea until I went down to Iowa and saw the chaos of the Dean organization. askew Dec 2015 #35
Because he is the best candidate in the race on policy after policy. askew Dec 2015 #17
GREAT analysis, askew! elleng Dec 2015 #21
Thanks! askew Dec 2015 #24
Excellent askew JustAnotherGen Dec 2015 #29
He is hoping for a spark... DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2015 #19
He's a really good candidate firebrand80 Dec 2015 #22
I find him refreshing in the debates and I'm glad he's still in the race. EndElectoral Dec 2015 #25
Why not? The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2015 #28
Building name recognition and forming national identity in debates for another run. aikoaiko Dec 2015 #31
There is also the ongoing issue of Hillary's email server with open investigations in the Senate, askew Dec 2015 #33
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. "Bernie is showing indication he's giving up the race. " <-- Is this a typo?
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:37 AM
Dec 2015


I have seen NO indication whatsoever that "Bernie is giving up"

Do you have a link, showing how Bernie is "giving up"? or
is this some kind of brain-fart?

Bernie "giving up" would be news to me. Far from it.

Bernie is in this to stay, all the way.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
3. Perhaps because he thinks he would be a good President.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:47 AM
Dec 2015

Perhaps to help position himself for a presidential run in four or eight years.

Perhaps to strengthen his voice as a liberal policy leader and coalition builder in his home State and on the national scene.

Perhaps he wants a better present and future for his family and constituency.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. ...says the guy who pointed out 60+ percent don't decide until closer to caucus day.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:01 AM
Dec 2015

Was it yesterday you pointed that out, or the day before?

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
6. A couple days ago
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:22 AM
Dec 2015

Glad you remembered! And I'm not attacking O'Malley, it is a real question of curiosity. Because, frankly, his expected chance at being the nominee is hovering around 1%.

And the likely voter polls, which are predictive as I mentioned in the post you're citing, have shown him with very little support. So, he isn't winning. He knows he isn't winning, of that I'm certain. So what is his drive at this point... Platform, a job or to play backup if someone drops out?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
5. Because a second place in an early primary state could throw some serious wind in his sails
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:14 AM
Dec 2015

If he can't catch that by Nevada, he'll probably drop out.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
9. Good point. He might be throwing everything into the momentum gambit
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:26 AM
Dec 2015

But, yeah, I agree that he is penalty an early casualty when voting starts.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
8. He is different enough that I have a preference to Bernie.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:26 AM
Dec 2015

He is polished, well spoken, probably has more ideas on how to combat climate change, not quite as good ideas as Bernie on how to make the economy work for most people, he can play the guitar and sing, and I suspect he doesn't have a mean bone in his body.

Bernie is not polished, he speaks well enough but there is more fire than panache, he understands the implications of global warming very well but I haven't heard his ideas on what to do about it, he knows what needs to be done with the economy better than all the candidates combined, he has a good rhythmic voice but I won't run out to buy the album, I think he might have one mean bone in his body.

I want him to stay in the race as long as possible. I think it is good to have a couple people running to compare and contrast.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
10. Who is he? This Dem Primary is one of the worst, many people
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 AM
Dec 2015

who not engaged in politics only know the Clinton name.

Some may have heard of Sanders, but O'Malley, who is he.

What a joke, love how we want to spread democracy to other nations by overthrowing their leaders, while the rich by a seat in our government.








 

senz

(11,945 posts)
11. I'm glad he's there.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 03:08 AM
Dec 2015

A couple of years ago when talk of 2016 was getting started, I was hoping Elizabeth Warren would run or some new Democrats would gain prominence to challenge Hillary (who had been laser beam focused on the presidency since shortly after she and Bill left the WH). O'Malley occasionally showed up on the Sunday political shows sounding progressive and articulate and I hoped back then that he would run.

Then Bernie, whom I had been listening to every week on Thom Hartmann, started talking about running, and I knew I'd back him. He is who he is, clear-eyed and real, and I believe he's very much up to the job.

But I never lost my liking for O'Malley. I doubt he is as clear and focused as Bernie on what needs to change in this country, but he seems reasonably aware, certainly far more aware than Hillary. If anything were to happen to Bernie, I could vote with a clean conscience for O'Malley. So I hope he stays in. Yes, as a backup.

Someone upthread said they thought he hasn't a mean bone in his body but that Bernie may have one. I think I'd reverse that.

It would make me puke if the Hillary campaign wanted to weed out all of her competitors.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
15. I did laugh quite hysterically
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 07:59 AM
Dec 2015

When I saw a Hillary supporter try and claim a few days ago that Hillary had had to be talked into running this time.

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
14. he hoping for an upset in Iowa
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 07:37 AM
Dec 2015

...or a finish which beats expectations in order to attract more support and momentum for later contests.

O'Malley's more of an 'outsider' than the other two who have been D.C. political fixtures for decades. He 'separates' himself from the other two with actual accomplishments on the progressive issues he's campaigning on to buttress his words. More than just talk, he brings a record of action to this race which the other two can't match.

Again, it's amazing to me that a lifetime legislator in Congress can be claimed by his supporters to be an 'outsider.'

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
16. Iowa is all about ground game, and having strong precinct captains.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 10:26 AM
Dec 2015

I don't see him pulling off second but I could be wrong.

askew

(1,464 posts)
18. O'Malley's gotten a lot of key endorsements in Iowa from county chairs and state legislators
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:13 PM
Dec 2015

who do a lot of the GOTV operations. They will be key in deciding the caucus. Hillary has the top elected officials but they didn't help her in 2008 and I don't think they will be able to deliver a huge win for her in 2016.

Interestingly enough, there was another youth caucus contest in the past week and O'Malley won it. His team is smaller, but after seeing them up close at multiple Iowa events with Bernie and Hillary's team, I think O'Malley is going to finish much better than expected.

He's also done 3x as many events in Iowa than Hillary. He's visiting a lot of the counties that don't get a lot of attention. That is what Santorum did in 2012 and Edwards did in 2004 and 2008. I expect that to pay off for him.

askew

(1,464 posts)
27. Yep. His team is leaving no stone unturned in Iowa.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:17 PM
Dec 2015

A couple of the Iowa bloggers who follow all the Dem candidates keep saying how impressed they are with his team and how hard they are working. O'Malley is also drawing bigger crowds at his retail events which is good news.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
23. Interesting, you got some links about this?
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:42 PM
Dec 2015

I'm not doubting you, I want to read about these county chair and state legislator endorsements.

If there's anything us Deaniacs don't underestimate it's the ground game.

Not been paying that much attention to MOM, will have to delve further.

askew

(1,464 posts)
26. No problem.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:15 PM
Dec 2015

Here is the link - https://martinomalley.com/iowa/28-new-endorsements-and-locks-polk-county-democratic-chair/

NOV 17 | IOWA
28 NEW ENDORSEMENTS AND LOCKS POLK COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CHAIR
Des Moines – Today, following a breakout performance by Governor O’Malley at the Iowa Democratic Debate, O’Malley for Iowa announced 28 new endorsements, earning the support of five more county chairs including Polk County Democratic Party Chair Tom Henderson.

Today’s announcement includes five more elected officials, and four more college Democratic club leaders, and rounds out O’Malley’s backing from the majority of Democratic leaders in Polk County. With Henderson’s endorsement, O’Malley has now received banking for the heads of the Polk County Democratic Party, the South Side Des Moines Democrats, the East Side Des Moines Democrats, the Central Iowa Democrats, and Ankeny Area Democrats.

In the last four months, O’Malley has won the endorsement of over 81 public officials, community leaders and Democratic activists who support his record of actions not words, and laud O’Malley’s leadership based on principles, not polls.

Today, these Iowa leaders officially endorsed Martin O’Malley for President of the United States:

Tom Henderson, Polk County Chair
Gary Gelner, Hancock County Chair
Brian Gerjets, Cherokee County Chair
Julie Geopfert, Webster County Chair
Beth Vogt, Crawford County Chair
Kathy Kerns, Cass County Vice Chair
Kathy Geronzin, Jackson County Vice Chair
Nevon Conrad, Fort Dodge City Council Member
Pat Gill, Woodbury County Auditor
Perla Alarcón-Flory, Sioux City School Board Member
Tina Patterson, Vice President of Lin-Mar Board of Education
Matthew Goodman, Ames City Councilman
John Klaus, Former Ames City Attorney
Bob Leonard, President, Wartburg College Democrats
Lexi Fairbanks, President Young Democrats Morningside College
James Farnan, Vice President Young Dems Morningside College
Donald Weatherwax III, Linn County Central Committee Member
Clark Reike, Linn County Central Committee Member
Drew Kloetzer, Former Hardin County Chair
Patricia Malinee, Recording Secretary, Scott County Democrats
Highland Nichols, Former Clinton County Chair
Karen Havlicek, Woodbury County Dems
Steve Gorman, candidate for State Representative
Alba Perez, Latino community activist
Cheri Doane, Marion County activist
Marilee Monroe, Former Floyd County Recorder and Former President of Iowa State Association of Counties
Tracy Hatfield, Muscatine County Activist
Don Smith, Former Poweshiek County Chair


Polk County is where Des Moines is located so getting the chair's endorsement is a big deal.

More Iowa endorsements:
Kevin Kinney, State Senator
Bruce Bearinger, State Representative
Bruce Hunter, State Representative
Peggy Sherrets, Mayor of Oelwein
Dan Howard, Mayor of Maynard
Sharon Acuff, Pilot Mound City Councilwoman
Rick Howard, Maynard City Council Member
Art Behn, Dallas County Chair
Nancy Bobo, Polk County Activist
Ken Kahl, Crawford County Vice Chair
Sara Riley, Linn County Activist
Nancy Riley, Linn County Activist
Peter Riley, Linn County Activist
Larry Peterson, Former Crawford County Chair
Morgan Brittain, Former President of the College and Young Democrats of Iowa
Bob Beisch, Former Wapello County Chair
Jan Evans, Marion County Central Committee Member
Gregory Guelcher, Woodbury County Vice Chair
Cheryl Scherr, Marion County Vice Chair
Tom Corrieri, Story County Central Committee Treasurer
Richard Machacek, DNC superdelegate for Obama in ’08; Fmr Buchanan County Dems Chair
Kevin Powell, Starmont Community School District Board Member
Larry Stewart, Former President Charles City Chamber of Commerce
Karl Knock, Union County Activist
Sharon Holle, Scott County Activist
Rob Hubler, Former Iowa Congressional Candidate and Fairfield County Activist


He also has 41 more endorsements and picked up a couple more in the past few days. O'Malley has a lot of goodwill in Iowa due to his working his ass off doing events all over the state to try to help Dems up and down the ticket in 2014. He also is doing significantly more events in Iowa than Hillary and Bernie which is earning goodwill as well. All of this should payoff in the caucus, I hope.


I was a Deaniac who went to Iowa to do GOTV and I have to say that O'Malley's team is much more organized. I could tell Dean was going to lose after doing work with them in Iowa.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
34. Oh man, Iowa is about to get interesting as hell.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:15 PM
Dec 2015

Thanks for posting the link.

I was in the bubble with Dean and was completely taken aback (as were a lot of us, of course). Ever since then I never underestimated the ground game (it's one reason I pegged Obama as winning in 2008 fairly early, he simply had the better ground game).

askew

(1,464 posts)
35. Yeah, I had no idea until I went down to Iowa and saw the chaos of the Dean organization.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 03:56 PM
Dec 2015

Part of the problem was so many people from out of state volunteering for him. It just isn't as effective as having Iowans doing the GOTV efforts. O'Malley has excelled with getting locals involved in this campaign. I'd be curious what is happening with the other candidates. My uncle in Iowa has gotten a couple of calls from Hillary's team asking what his first, second and third choices were for the caucus and weren't happy to find out Hillary was #3. I haven't heard anything about the Bernie organization on the ground, but I am not local.

askew

(1,464 posts)
17. Because he is the best candidate in the race on policy after policy.
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:09 PM
Dec 2015

He's putting out more detailed policy platforms than Hillary and Bernie combined. His progressive stand on gun control, refugee issues and immigration issues has already moved Bernie to the left on all 3 issues. Bernie put out an immigration platform recently that cribs about 80% from O'Malley's platform. O'Malley's platform was called the most progressive ever released by a presidential candidate as was his criminal justice reform platform.

His climate change platform remains the gold standard. He pushed hard enough for Hillary to actually be forced to release 1/3 of a plan and that is more than she has done on most issues. By putting out such aggressive, detailed and progressive platforms, he is moving the entire conversation to the left.

Even polling in single digits, he is moving the candidates and the issues that the media is talking about. Immigration and refugee issues would never have gotten this much play in the primary if it wasn't for O'Malley relentlessly pushing on these efforts.

And if it wasn't for O'Malley, there would be very little retail politics in Iowa on the Dem side and the Republicans would be dominating that state's news. And that would not be good for us come November 2016.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
19. He is hoping for a spark...
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:18 PM
Dec 2015

I look at elections as proxies for efficient markets. The elections will determine who goes on and who doesn't and that refers to all candidates.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
22. He's a really good candidate
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:36 PM
Dec 2015

He's probably suffering from bad luck with timing more than anything.

No real reason to get out now, as long as he isn't going over budget.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,875 posts)
28. Why not?
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:19 PM
Dec 2015

Granted, his chances of suddenly surging to the top are pretty small, but he's a good, smart guy with useful things to say and I'm glad he's saying them. And it's also good that there are at least a couple of candidates who aren't willing to just stand down and anoint Hillary.

askew

(1,464 posts)
33. There is also the ongoing issue of Hillary's email server with open investigations in the Senate,
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:54 PM
Dec 2015

IG and FBI. Now, it is unlikely anything comes of it, but you never know and it is good to have a back-up just in case.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So, why is O'Malley still...