Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

panader0

(25,816 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:35 AM Dec 2015

I don't understand what motivation the Sanders campaign would have in accessing

Clinton's data. Outreach to HRC voters? I doubt that. Clinton's voter base is as loyal to her as Bernie's are
to him. So why would there be some evil motive? It doesn't make sense or smell right.

64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't understand what motivation the Sanders campaign would have in accessing (Original Post) panader0 Dec 2015 OP
They are losing and losing badly. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #1
Yes she is. panader0 Dec 2015 #3
You may want to get out of that Egyptian river. eom MohRokTah Dec 2015 #8
hahahaha no she isn't VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #27
LOL! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #62
none. It was a mistake by a staffer who abused a glitch. He was fired. Warren Stupidity Dec 2015 #2
Insight into her campaign strategy hack89 Dec 2015 #4
It was a phone list, not a campaign strategy. Thanks for playing. Scuba Dec 2015 #9
According to the Sanders campaign they downloaded Clinton voter models hack89 Dec 2015 #12
can you explain what you mean by voter models? n/t questionseverything Dec 2015 #15
Campaigns mine voter databases for all sorts of information hack89 Dec 2015 #18
Voter models... TeeYiYi Dec 2015 #49
Source please. Scuba Dec 2015 #16
tagging here to see reply. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #19
"one of our staffers accessed some modeling data from another campaign." hack89 Dec 2015 #21
"Modeling data" is not a campaign strategy. Scuba Dec 2015 #25
What do you think significantly shapes campaign strategy? hack89 Dec 2015 #26
Mining a data base is a tactic. Gathering such data is a tactic. Neither is a strategy. Scuba Dec 2015 #28
But the collected data provides insight of strategic value hack89 Dec 2015 #32
Looking at what data they've collected might help one make an educated GUESS about a strategy. Scuba Dec 2015 #35
Ok. Got it. The data was of no value whatsoever. hack89 Dec 2015 #36
No one said that. All I said was that the data isn't a strategy, which is what you claimed. Scuba Dec 2015 #37
Can we agree that it is more significant than a "phone list" as you claimed hack89 Dec 2015 #38
Please explain how Bernie's campaign, having very short access to Hillary's phone list ... Scuba Dec 2015 #39
So Bernie has to cheat to level the playing field? hack89 Dec 2015 #40
Bernie didn't cheat. Nice try though. Scuba Dec 2015 #41
So his campaign had the legal right to access Clinton's data? Really. nt hack89 Dec 2015 #42
Not seeing any claims that they "downloaded" any data. frylock Dec 2015 #54
Using four accounts they downloaded and saved 25 files in 40 minutes. Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #56
Who made that claim? frylock Dec 2015 #59
Have you considered reading any of the multiple threads on that very matter? hack89 Dec 2015 #60
The claim comes from DWS.. frylock Dec 2015 #61
Ok. Nt hack89 Dec 2015 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author frylock Dec 2015 #53
+1 fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #64
This is DWS in a desperate move, overplaying her heinous hand Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #5
Read this article interviewing the fired staffer over on CNN peacebird Dec 2015 #6
So Josh Uretsky was basically trying to protect Bernie's data. panader0 Dec 2015 #10
Yes, by trying to see what other campaignscould see. He had reported the bugs back in October peacebird Dec 2015 #14
He downloaded Clinton voter modeling data hack89 Dec 2015 #22
Possible honey pot scenario.. frylock Dec 2015 #55
I'm sure it wasn't a coordinated thing just some nosy staffer. book_worm Dec 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author peacebird Dec 2015 #13
there were 4....directed by the guy that got fired. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #29
According to the NYT comradebillyboy Dec 2015 #33
If it were the Clinton campaign that was caught. Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #11
Here's the thing: if you have a longstanding reputation for campaigning cleanly, you're more likely winter is coming Dec 2015 #20
Care to enlighten me as to how Hillary has a long reputation of campaigning dirty? Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #44
I remember the 2008 campaign. Apparently, you don't. n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #45
You casually throw mud and then can't back it up. Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #50
They are losing badly workinclasszero Dec 2015 #17
proles enid602 Dec 2015 #23
It's like a neighbor who left their door open. demmiblue Dec 2015 #24
Yeah it happened EXACTLY like that... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #30
Based on voter demographics and personal information, they could try to influence them. MoonRiver Dec 2015 #31
Well it definitely was trying to figure out what color pant suit she will wear tomorrow.... Historic NY Dec 2015 #34
Why is the data secret in the first place? Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #43
This is one of the best questions about this baloney. panader0 Dec 2015 #52
Listening to MSNBC: Hepburn Dec 2015 #46
Here is the reason... workinclasszero Dec 2015 #47
It easy to understand... Agschmid Dec 2015 #48
Josh Uretsky is the typical professional leftist Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #51
Easy answer: learning about your opponent brooklynite Dec 2015 #57
Access to the undecideds or soft supporters. Campaigns report all of those contacts too. Starry Messenger Dec 2015 #58

hack89

(39,171 posts)
18. Campaigns mine voter databases for all sorts of information
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:56 AM
Dec 2015

which they then used to decide where to allocate money and resources. The models are the software used to find and organize that information. If Sanders had access to Clinton's models or the results of those models then they would gain a significant insight to what she plans to do.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
21. "one of our staffers accessed some modeling data from another campaign."
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:58 AM
Dec 2015
"Unfortunately, yesterday, the vendor once again dropped the firewall between the campaigns for some data. After discussion with the DNC it became clear that one of our staffers accessed some modeling data from another campaign."


http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-dnc-suspension/

hack89

(39,171 posts)
26. What do you think significantly shapes campaign strategy?
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:25 PM
Dec 2015

campaigns mine these databases to determine the most efficient means to allocate resources and funding.

Come on - you are much smarter than this. You understand how political campaigns work.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
28. Mining a data base is a tactic. Gathering such data is a tactic. Neither is a strategy.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:27 PM
Dec 2015

Deciding what data to gather and how to use it would be a strategy. The data itself is not.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
32. But the collected data provides insight of strategic value
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:31 PM
Dec 2015

Why did they run that model? What groups are they focusing on? What groups are they ignoring? Where is their support strong? Where is their support weak?

If you want to play a semantics game, knock yourself out. I am not playing.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
35. Looking at what data they've collected might help one make an educated GUESS about a strategy.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:37 PM
Dec 2015

That's all.

Here, this may help you ...

http://www.diffen.com/difference/Strategy_vs_Tactic

hack89

(39,171 posts)
36. Ok. Got it. The data was of no value whatsoever.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:39 PM
Dec 2015

and therefore Bernie is being unfairly treated.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
37. No one said that. All I said was that the data isn't a strategy, which is what you claimed.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:43 PM
Dec 2015

hack89

(39,171 posts)
38. Can we agree that it is more significant than a "phone list" as you claimed
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:47 PM
Dec 2015

and that in fact it could give him an unfair advantage?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
39. Please explain how Bernie's campaign, having very short access to Hillary's phone list ...
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:50 PM
Dec 2015

... provides him an advantage greater than the advantage Hillary receives from having her 2008 campaign chair head the DNC and another of her former campaign leaders owning and running the company where all the candidate's phone files are maintained.


Thanks in advance; I'm sure you'll be right on it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
40. So Bernie has to cheat to level the playing field?
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:53 PM
Dec 2015

makes sense - he is a career politician after all.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
60. Have you considered reading any of the multiple threads on that very matter?
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:21 PM
Dec 2015

I am not in a spoon feeding mood at the moment.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
61. The claim comes from DWS..
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:36 PM
Dec 2015

you'll have to forgive me if I don't believe a fucking word out of her mouth. I've read the software vendor claims that no files were downloaded, and that information was only accessed.

Response to hack89 (Reply #12)

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
5. This is DWS in a desperate move, overplaying her heinous hand
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:39 AM
Dec 2015

Last edited Fri Dec 18, 2015, 01:06 PM - Edit history (1)

with a dirty trick of hitherto unprecented evil.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
6. Read this article interviewing the fired staffer over on CNN
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:39 AM
Dec 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/sanders-dnc-data-breach-josh-uretsky/index.html

(CNN)The Bernie Sanders campaign staffer who was fired for accessing data unique to the Hillary Clinton campaign's vote file, told CNN on Friday that he was only trying to "understand how badly the Sanders campaign's data was exposed" and not attempting to take data from the Clinton campaign.

"We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," said Josh Uretsky, reached by phone on Friday morning, a day after the campaign let him go.

He added, "To the best of my knowledge, nobody took anything that would have given the (Sanders) campaign any benefit."

panader0

(25,816 posts)
10. So Josh Uretsky was basically trying to protect Bernie's data.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:44 AM
Dec 2015

I think the "glitch" was intentional.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
14. Yes, by trying to see what other campaignscould see. He had reported the bugs back in October
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:48 AM
Dec 2015

And later.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
22. He downloaded Clinton voter modeling data
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:01 PM
Dec 2015

what does that have to do with protecting Bernie's data?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
55. Possible honey pot scenario..
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:13 PM
Dec 2015

seems plausible knowing that the Sanders campaign reported the security issues a couple months ago.

Response to book_worm (Reply #7)

comradebillyboy

(10,175 posts)
33. According to the NYT
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:31 PM
Dec 2015

However, the New York Times reported that four user accounts associated with the Sanders campaign conducted searches in the system while Clinton's information was available. and
'Sources close to the breach, first reported by the Washington Post, say a few other employees also accessed the Clinton data, but did so under the direction of the fired worker, who helped lead the campaign's digital efforts.'

Tommy2Tone

(1,307 posts)
11. If it were the Clinton campaign that was caught.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:45 AM
Dec 2015

It would have been just more proof that Hillary has no morals and is hated by everyone. But since it was Bernie's campaign, who is pure and clean, we should shrug and say no big deal.

Got it.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
20. Here's the thing: if you have a longstanding reputation for campaigning cleanly, you're more likely
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:58 AM
Dec 2015

to get the benefit of a doubt. If you don't, you don't.

Tommy2Tone

(1,307 posts)
44. Care to enlighten me as to how Hillary has a long reputation of campaigning dirty?
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 01:34 PM
Dec 2015

Or do you just get your information from Facebook, Twitter, Drudge Report, Red State or any of the usual suspects?

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
17. They are losing badly
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:51 AM
Dec 2015

and Bernie's ground game is second rate to Hillary's undoubtedly.

Maybe the person(s)? that performed the data breach were fishing for info they could never get on their own.

Names and addresses of potential democratic donors that might be persuaded to send money and/or vote for Sanders?

enid602

(8,652 posts)
23. proles
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:02 PM
Dec 2015

Same reason that Jane Sanders comitted a felony by grossly overstatiing Burlington Cilleges books on a loan application. Sometimes you have to break a few rules in the name of the Proletariate.

demmiblue

(36,893 posts)
24. It's like a neighbor who left their door open.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:08 PM
Dec 2015

Your neighbor has early stage Alzheimer's disease and has left her door open in the past. You know that that she usually keeps her door shut and locked tight. On those occasions, you helped her out by calling her and letting her know that she has been leaving her door open. She has always thanked you profusely, because she feels much, much safer with her door locked due to a rash of break-ins and burglaries in the neighborhood.

One cold December day, you see that her car is in the driveway and that her door is swinging wide open. This time, however, you think to yourself, "hmmm... something seems really off here." Sensing that something is wrong, you enter your neighbor's house to see if she has had an accident or is experiencing a medical emergency. Once inside, you discover that she fell and couldn't get up. You immediately call 911 for assistance.


MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
31. Based on voter demographics and personal information, they could try to influence them.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:29 PM
Dec 2015

None of us are immune to persuasion. Except me, of course!

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
34. Well it definitely was trying to figure out what color pant suit she will wear tomorrow....
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:34 PM
Dec 2015

they exploited the breach and went hunting.

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)
46. Listening to MSNBC:
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:17 PM
Dec 2015

Sanders spokesperson: Not only did the DNC and DWS shut out Sanders, they shut him out to his own data.

Fuck that shit!

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
47. Here is the reason...
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:20 PM
Dec 2015

Sanders Accounts Saved Clinton Data During Breach, Audit Says

Sanders’s campaign has sought to downplay the severity of the incident, initially saying that only a single “low-level” staffer accessed the Clinton data and that none of it was saved. But the audit of the database's logs created by the vendor that manages the data, NGP VAN, show that four accounts associated with the Sanders team took advantage of the Wednesday morning breach.

Staffers conducted searches that would be especially advantageous to the campaign, including lists of its likeliest supporters in 10 early voting states, including Iowa and New Hampshire.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-18/sanders-campaign-fires-data-director-after-breach-of-clinton-files

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
48. It easy to understand...
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:21 PM
Dec 2015

Let's say I canvass for Hillary, I knock on a door and the person is a strong Sanders supporter. I mark that on the sheet.

That data gets entered into VAN.

Let's say the Sanders campaign hasn't yet knocked on that door, but all the sudden they have access to my walk list. The list where I inidcated that the door is a strong Sanders supporter... Now the Sanders campaign knows...

- The door is a supporter.
- The door could be a volunteer.
- The door could make donations.

That's why they would want that information.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
51. Josh Uretsky is the typical professional leftist
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:51 PM
Dec 2015

who only gets involved when that special pony arises. They will break all of the rules to win.
The Josh Uretsky's of the world are the same ones who let Russ Feingold lose, and Scott Walker win.

brooklynite

(94,729 posts)
57. Easy answer: learning about your opponent
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:17 PM
Dec 2015

Where are their supporters? What groups are giving money or volunteering? How has support changed in the last 1-3-6 months?

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
58. Access to the undecideds or soft supporters. Campaigns report all of those contacts too.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:18 PM
Dec 2015

Create walklists and targeted phone-banking to those who could be shifted. Just one motivation.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't understand what m...